From nobody Tue Apr 5 09:43:49 2022 Return-Path: X-Original-To: core-parameters@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: core-parameters@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B2863A0B25; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 09:43:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.637 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.637 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3Yd92aXFzPkp; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 09:43:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.lax.icann.org (smtp.lax.icann.org [192.0.33.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BE863A0C00; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 09:43:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from request4.lax.icann.org (request1.lax.icann.org [10.32.11.221]) by smtp.lax.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF5AEE32C6; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 16:43:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by request4.lax.icann.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 9FB2E206D1; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 16:43:15 +0000 (UTC) RT-Owner: sabrina.tanamal From: "Sabrina Tanamal via RT" Reply-To: drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: X-RT-Loop-Prevention: IANA X-RT-Ticket: IANA #1229125 X-Managed-BY: RT 4.4.3 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/) X-RT-Originator: sabrina.tanamal@icann.org CC: cabo@tzi.org, jaime.jimenez@ericsson.com, core-parameters@ietf.org, anima@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8 Precedence: bulk Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2022 16:43:15 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Archived-At: Subject: [core-parameters] [IANA #1229125] expert review for draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy (core-parameters) X-BeenThere: core-parameters@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 List-Id: "Expert review of CoAP parameters." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2022 16:43:21 -0000 Carsten and Jaime (cc: anima WG), As the designated experts for the Resource Type (rt=) Link Target Attribute Values registry, can you review the proposed registrations in draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy for us? Please see https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy/ If this is OK, when the IESG approves the document for publication, we'll make the registration at https://www.iana.org/assignments/core-parameters If you're the first expert to submit a review, please let us know whether you want us to wait for both reviewers to respond before we mark the document "IANA OK" (or send your comments to the authors, if the registrations aren't OK). The IESG has asked us to set a two-week deadline for registration reviews. The due date for this request is 19 April 2022. thanks, Sabrina Tanamal Lead IANA Services Specialist From nobody Tue Apr 5 13:29:58 2022 Return-Path: X-Original-To: core-parameters@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: core-parameters@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 012CD3A1151; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 13:29:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.909 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c8QK1Mmgz3ud; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 13:29:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:32::15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFEBD3A114C; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 13:29:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p5089ad4f.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.173.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4KXzlP5PWkzDCbt; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 22:29:37 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\)) From: Carsten Bormann In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 22:29:37 +0200 Cc: jaime.jimenez@ericsson.com, core-parameters@ietf.org, anima@ietf.org X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 670883377.195779-ee169724ab86cb7e6fd360ebc70e4134 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [core-parameters] [IANA #1229125] expert review for draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy (core-parameters) X-BeenThere: core-parameters@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Expert review of CoAP parameters." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2022 20:29:51 -0000 Hi Sabrina, I looked at the registration requests in the draft. They use somewhat unusual language about discovering ports - resource = discovery is understood to discover resources. For brski.jp, this = appears to be about discovering a CoAP or CoAPs entry point (without = describing how exactly that is then used, e.g., what happens if that has = a different IP address in the authority than the request address). For = brski.rjp, this appears to be about discovering an entry point for a = protocol that I don=E2=80=99t seem to fully understand the description = for. I didn=E2=80=99t try to obtain a deep understanding of the protocol = before writing this, but I would prefer if the language used for the = description were understandable for other registrants in this registry, = i.e., discussing resources, not ports (port numbers?). All the other criteria for a registration appear to be fulfilled. I don=E2=80=99t think we need to reach a consensus between the = designated experts before proceeding. Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe, Carsten > On 2022-04-05, at 18:43, Sabrina Tanamal via RT = wrote: >=20 > Carsten and Jaime (cc: anima WG),=20 >=20 > As the designated experts for the Resource Type (rt=3D) Link Target = Attribute Values registry, can you review the proposed registrations in = draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy for us? Please see >=20 > = https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy/ >=20 > If this is OK, when the IESG approves the document for publication, = we'll make the registration at >=20 > https://www.iana.org/assignments/core-parameters >=20 > If you're the first expert to submit a review, please let us know = whether you want us to wait for both reviewers to respond before we mark = the document "IANA OK" (or send your comments to the authors, if the = registrations aren't OK). >=20 > The IESG has asked us to set a two-week deadline for registration = reviews. The due date for this request is 19 April 2022.=20 >=20 > thanks, >=20 > Sabrina Tanamal > Lead IANA Services Specialist >=20