<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>
<!DOCTYPE rfc [
<!ENTITY RFC0768 SYSTEM "https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.0768.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC0791 SYSTEM "https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.0791.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC0793 SYSTEM "https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.0793.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC1034 SYSTEM "https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.1034.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC1035 SYSTEM "https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.1035.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC1122 SYSTEM "https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.1122.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC2104 SYSTEM "https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2104.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC2119 SYSTEM "https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2119.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC2526 SYSTEM "https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2526.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC2663 SYSTEM "https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2663.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC3022 SYSTEM "https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.3022.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC3124 SYSTEM "https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.3124.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC3168 SYSTEM "https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.3168.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC3596 SYSTEM "https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.3596.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC3629 SYSTEM "https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.3629.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC3971 SYSTEM "https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.3971.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC4086 SYSTEM "https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4086.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC4106 SYSTEM "https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4106.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC4291 SYSTEM "https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4291.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC4555 SYSTEM "https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4555.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC4861 SYSTEM "https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4861.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC4862 SYSTEM "https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4862.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC5056 SYSTEM "https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5056.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC5869 SYSTEM "https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5869.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC5942 SYSTEM "https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5942.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC6177 SYSTEM "https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.6177.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC6298 SYSTEM "https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.6298.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC6887 SYSTEM "https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.6887.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC7050 SYSTEM "https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.7050.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC7721 SYSTEM "https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.7721.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC8085 SYSTEM "https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8085.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC8200 SYSTEM "https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8200.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC8273 SYSTEM "https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8273.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC8415 SYSTEM "https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8415.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC8504 SYSTEM "https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8504.xml">
]>
<rfc category="exp" docName="draft-gao-flexible-session-protocol-12"
     ipr="trust200902" submissionType="independent" tocDepth="2">
  <front>
    <title>Flexible Session Protocol</title>
    <author fullname="Jun-an Gao" initials="J." surname="Gao">
      <organization abbrev="Individual">Beijing Capital Highway Development
      Group Co.,Ltd.</organization>

      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>Shoufa Plaza-A, Liuliqiao South, Fengtai</street>

          <street>Beijing</street>

          <street>People's Republic of China</street>
        </postal>

        <email>jagao@outlook.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>

    <date day="18" month="April" year="2024"/>

    <abstract>
      <t>FSP is a connection-oriented transport layer protocol that provides
      mobility and multihoming support by introducing the concept of 'upper
      layer thread ID', which is associated with some shared secret that is
      applied with some authenticated encryption algorithm to protect
      authenticity of the origin of the FSP packets. It is able to provide
      following services to the upper layer application:</t>

      <t><ul>
          <li>Stream-oriented send-receive with native message boundary</li>

          <li>Flexibility to exploit authenticated encryption</li>

          <li>On-the-wire compression</li>

          <li>Light-weight session management</li>
        </ul></t>
    </abstract>
  </front>

  <middle>
    <section anchor="sect-1">
      <name slugifiedName="n-introduction">Introduction</name>
      <t>The dominating transport layer protocols, TCP and UDP that take use
      of the IP address to identifying the end node, introduce the
      controversial role of IP address both as the identifier and as the
      routing locater.</t>

      <t>Flexible Session Protocol, introduces the concept of 'upper layer
      thread ID' (ULTID), which was firstly suggested in <xref
      target="Gao2002"/>. The ULTID is unique in the local context of the FSP
      node. Its significance may be compared with the Security Parameter Index
      (SPI) in MOBIKE <xref target="RFC4555"/>.</t>

      <t>An integrity check code (ICC) field is designed in the FSP packet
      header to protect authenticity and optionally privacy of the FSP packet.
      The ICC field is designed to be associated with some shared secret
      indexed by the source or destination ULTID in the local context of the
      source or destination node, respectively. An FSP packet is assumed to
      originate from the same source if the ICC value associated the ULTID
      passes validation, regardless of the full source or destination address.
      In such a way FSP provides provides mobility, multi-homing and
      multi-path support.</t>

      <t>ICC is either calculated by <xref target="CRC64"/> which protects FSP
      against unintended modification, or cryptographically calculated with
      some Authenticated Encryption with Additional Data <xref target="R01"/>
      algorithm, each of which requires a shared secret key.</t>

      <t>In the former case a weak key meant to obfuscate the CRC64 checksum
      is agreed by the FSP participants. In the latter two cases, the shared
      secret key is assumed to be installed by the upper layer application
      (ULA).</t>

      <t>Either the weak key or the shared secret key is indexed by the source
      or destination ULTID in the local context of the sender or the receiver,
      respectively.</t>

      <t>FSP facilitates secret key installation by introducing the concept of
      transmit transaction. Mechanism of transmit transaction also provides
      the session-connection synchronization service to the upper layer.</t>

      <t>FSP is a transport layer protocol as specified in <xref
      target="RFC1122"/>, provides services alike TCP <xref target="STD5"/> to
      ULA, with session layer features as suggested in <xref
      target="OSI_RM"/>, most noticeably session-connection synchronization by
      introducing the concept of transmit transaction.</t>

      <section anchor="sect-1.1">
        <name slugifiedName="n-features">Features</name>
        <section anchor="sect-1.1.1" title="Transport Layer Mobility Support">
          <t>FSP is meant to be transport layer protocol that keeps the IP
          address as the routing locater but keeps it from being the key
          constituent of the end point identifier of FSP or any upper layer
          protocol built upon FSP.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="sect-1.1.2"
                 title="Flexibility to exploit Authenticated Encryption">
          <t>By optionally applying authenticated encryption with additional
          data on each FSP packet, FSP provides both authentication of message
          origin and privacy protection service to the upper layer
          application.</t>

          <t>The shared key required by the authenticated encryption algorithm
          is supposed to be established and installed onto the FSP layer by
          the upper layer application (ULA), and by introducing the concept of
          transmit tranaction FSP provides mechanism for the connected ULAs to
          synchronize installation of the shared key. Thus FSP makes it
          flexible to test, try or apply new key establish algorithms.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="sect-1.1.3" title="Transmit Transaction">
          <t>FSP introduces the concept of transmit transaction, which makes
          it able to mark end of message inherently at the transport layer,
          effectively eliminate the requirement of message delimiters at the
          application layer. Besides, it still provides byte-stream-oriented
          transfer service to its upper layer application which is familiar
          and friendly to application developers.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="sect-1.1.4" title="Light-weight session management">
          <t>In addition to transmit transaction mechanism, which is arguably
          a feature of session-connection synchronization, the FSP upper layer
          application is able to fork branch connections of an established
          connection in zero round-trip mode without compromising security. In
          this way FSP provides light-weight session management service to
          ULA.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="sect-1.1.5" title="On-the-wire Compression">
          <t>FSP provides on-the-wire compression service through the
          on-the-wire compression and fragmentation function module.</t>
        </section>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-1.2">
        <name slugifiedName="n-requirements-language">Requirements Language</name>
        <t>The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
        "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
        document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 <xref
        target="RFC2119"/>.</t>

        <t>In this document, these words will appear with that interpretation
        only when in ALL CAPS. Lower case uses of these words are not to be
        interpreted as carrying significance described in RFC 2119.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-1.3">
        <name slugifiedName="n-conventions">Conventions</name>
        <t>Conventions in describing the finite state machine (FSM) of FSP
        are:</t>

        <figure>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
		
ESTABLISHED           The string of alphabetic characters designates
                      the name of the           state
[API: Reset]          Upper Layer Application Programming Interface
                      Call
{Notify}              Call back/notify the upper layer application
{new context}         Additional action before or after state
                      transition
[Send                 Send some FSP packet
OPCODE_OF_FSP_PACKET]
[Retransmit           Retransmit some FSP packet
OPCODE_OF_FSP_PACKET]
{On transient state   Timed-out event
Timeout}
{&& additional        Together with some additional condition
condition}
-->                   state transition
|--                   branch

	]]></artwork>
        </figure>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section anchor="sect-2">
      <name slugifiedName="n-abbreviations-and-idioms">Abbreviations and Idioms</name>
      <t><dl>
          <dt>Connection</dt>
          <dd>An FSP connection is the binding of two network nodes
          established through some end-to-end negotiation process. It is
          identified by the ULTID in the local context of each network node,
          respectively.</dd>

          <dt>EoT</dt>
          <dd>End of Transaction. A transmit transaction is said to reach
          EoT if the EoT flag is set in a legitimate ACK_CONNECT_REQ,
          PURE_DATA, PERSIST or MULTIPLY packet. We said that the packet
          terminates the transmit transaction if the EoT flag is set. An FSP
          end node SHALL NOT send further data if it has initiated EoT of its
          transmit direction unless the packet with EoT flag set, together
          with all of the packets before this particular packet have all been
          acknowledged. EoT, i.e. termination of transmit transaction is
          unilateral.</dd>

          <dt>FREWS</dt>
          <dd>Flags and advertised REceive Window Size. It is the 32-bit
          combined word next to the ICC field in the normal FSP fixed
          header.</dd>

          <dt>ICC</dt>
          <dd>Identity Check Code. It is a 64-bit value that depends on
          both the session key and all of the headers of the FSP packet to
          include the ICC, calculated with the same algorithm in the context
          of each FSP participant. Only a packet with correct ICC can be
          accepted by any FSP participant as soon as the connection has been
          established. Initially CRC64 is exploited to make a checksum that
          weekly protects the FSP packet against unintentional modification.
          The checksum is obfuscated with the initial session key to get the
          ICC. After the ULA installed the long-term session key some
          Authenticated Encryption with Additional Data algorithm shall be
          applied to obtain or check the ICC.</dd>

          <dt>Session</dt>
          <dd>An FSP session is the transport-layer association of two
          network nodes. A full FSP session consists of one connection that
          was established from scratch and all of its branches. However for
          this version of FSP specification the idioms session and connection
          are interchangeable if not explicitly specified.</dd>

          <dt>Session Key</dt>
          <dd>The session key is a bit string of at least 128 bits
          that means to resist against masquerade attack. It is either
          initiated during the end-to-end negotiation phase or installed by
          the ULA after the FSP connection is established. The session key
          installed by the ULA is called the long-term session key. Here
          long-term means that the key could be used until the packet sequence
          space is exhausted. The packet sequence space is exhausted if the
          number of packets that use the same key reaches or exceeds
          2,147,483,647(2^31-1).</dd>

          <dt>SN</dt>
          <dd>Sequence Number. It is the unsigned 32-bit integer number
          assigned to every FSP packet except the preliminary packets.
          Difference of two sequence number is represented by a 32-bit signed
          integer. If the result of SN B subtracting SN A is greater than
          zero, we say that B is greater than A and the packet of the sequence
          number B is later than the packet of the sequence number A, although
          the unsigned integer representation of B may be far less that A.
          Consequently, as the result of A subtracting B is less than zero, we
          say that A is less than B and the packet of the sequence number A is
          earlier than the packet of the sequence number A.</dd>

          <dt>Transmit Transaction</dt>
          <dd>A transmit transaction in FSP is a sequence
          of FSP packets that were sent and marked by the ULA as one
          continuous stream where all packets in the stream must be
          acknowledged before any further packet is allowed to be sent. A
          ACK_CONNECT_REQ, PERSIST or MULTIPLY packet always starts a new
          transmit transaction. Any packet with EoT flag set, including the
          PERSIST packet that is exploited to acknowledge the ACK_CONNECT_REQ
          or MULTIPLY packet, terminates the transmit transaction. .</dd>

          <dt>ULA</dt>
          <dd>Upper Layer Application</dd>

          <dt>ULTID</dt>
          <dd>The Upper Layer Thread Identifier (ULTID) is a 32-bit
          word that was allocated by particular network end node of an FSP
          connection and is unique in the local context of the network end
          node. Theoretically all of the ULAs of a network end node MAY
          establish up to 2^31-1 FSP connections totally. Each connection MUST
          have a unique thread identifier (ULTID) assigned in the local
          context of the network end node. A session or connection in FSP does
          not require a global ID.</dd>
        </dl></t>
    </section>

    <section anchor="sect-3">
      <name slugifiedName="n-key-mechanisms">Key Mechanisms</name>
      <section anchor="sect-3.1" title="Underlying Layer Services Required">
        <t>FSP requires that the underlying layer provides packet delivery
        service. In addition FSP supposes that the underlying layer has
        following features:</t>

        <section anchor="sect-3.1.1" title="Handling of High Mobility">
          <t>Here high mobility refers to scenarios such as high-speed train
          or airplane.</t>

          <t>FSP solves somewhat coarse-grain or low-speed mobility problem.
          Fine-grain or high-speed mobility is left to the underlying physical
          network. To make mobility support work effectively it is assumed
          that one end-node MUST keep its lower layer address reasonably
          stable while the other end-node SHOULD NOT change its lower layer
          address too frequently.</t>

          <t>Here the meaning of physical network conforms to what was
          depicted in <xref target="RFC1122"/>.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="sect-3.1.2"
                 title="Network Address Change Notification">
          <t>Network address change notification is mandatory only in the IPv6
          network.</t>

          <t>We split the IPv6 address of the IPv6 packet underlying FSP into
          three parts. The leftmost 64-bit long word is the network prefix,
          which SHOULD be the unique IPv6 prefix assigned to the host <xref
          target="RFC8273"/>. The centermost 32-bit word is called the
          aggregation host ID, and the rightmost 32-bit word is the ULTID.
          While the ULTID MUST be kept stable even during the life of an FSP
          session, the network prefix part MAY change when an endpoint is
          roaming. The aggregation host ID may change as well. The network
          prefix part together with the aggregation host ID part act as the
          traditional routing locator at the network layer.</t>

          <t>The aggragation host ID SHOULD NOT be 0, nor hexadecimal value
          FDFFFFFFF, nor hexadecimal value FFFFFFFFF so that the final IPv6
          address assigned can not be an IPv6 subnet anycast address<xref
          target="RFC2526"/>.</t>

          <t>It is supposed that the network layer immediately notifies the
          FSP layer if the network prefix or aggregation host ID changes.</t>

          <t>An participant of an FSP connection SHALL immediately notify its
          peer whenever its underlying IPv6 address is changed with a
          KEEP_ALIVE packet. The peer shall send packet to the participant
          that has notified the address change with the new address.</t>

          <t>It is supposed that the packet to inform the remote end to update
          the lower layer address association could reach its destination in a
          satisfying success rate.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="sect-3.1.3" title="Network Congestion Control">
          <t>Network layer congestion control is mandatory only in future IPv6
          network.</t>

          <t>It is supposed that end-to-end congestion control is provided at
          some sub-layer of the network layer. Implementation of FSP MUST
          include a congestion manager <xref target="RFC3124"/> if such
          sub-layer service of the network layer is not provided.</t>
        </section>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-3.2" title="Identifying Connection by Local ULTID">
        <t>Each FSP connection prepares a pair of ULTIDs. An ULTID uniquely
        indexes a connection in the local context of an FSP end node. An FSP
        end node relies neither source IP address nor destination IP address,
        except the ULTID part of the near end's IPv6 address to identify an
        FSP connection.</t>

        <t>Each ULTID is allocated in the local context of the two FSP
        participant respectively. The source ULTID and the destination ULTID
        of an FSP packet usually differ in their values. However, the secret
        keys indexed in the local contexts of the two end-points must have the
        same value.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-3.3"
               title="Defending Against Connection Hijacking with ICC">
        <t>An integrity check code (ICC) field associated with the ULTID is
        designed in the FSP header to protect authenticity and optionally
        privacy of the FSP packet. An FSP packet is assumed to originate from
        the same source if the ICC value associated with certain destination
        ULTID passes validation, regardless of the source or destination
        address in the underlying layer.</t>

        <t>On initiating FSP takes use of <xref target="CRC64"/> to make
        checksum of the FSP packet to protect it against unintentional
        modification. The checksum is taken as the ICC.</t>

        <t>After the ULA has installed a shared secret key, value of ICC is
        calculated by firstly getting the secret key associated indexed by the
        local ULTID, then calculating the tag value with the AES-GCM <xref
        target="GCM"/> authenticated encryption with additional data
        algorithm.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-3.4"
               title="Synchronizing Key Installation with Transmit Transaction">
        <t>It is proposed that it is the ULA to do key establishment and/or
        end- point user-agent authentication while the FSP layer provides
        authenticated, optionally encrypted data transfer service.</t>

        <t>A dedicate application program interface (API) is designed for the
        ULA to install the secret key established by the ULA participants.</t>

        <t>FSP facilitates shared secret key installation by introducing the
        concept of transmit transaction.</t>

        <t>A transmit transaction of FSP is a sequence of FSP packets that
        were sent and requested by ULA as one continuous stream where all
        packets in the stream MUST be acknowledged before any further packet
        is allowed to be sent.</t>

        <t>A flag called 'End of Transaction' (EoT) is designed in the FSP
        header. When it is set, it marks that the transmit transaction in the
        direction from the source of the FSP packet towards the destination of
        the FSP packet is 'committed'.</t>

        <t>As the FSP node knows when a transmit transaction at FSP layer is
        terminated there is no ambiguity which packet is to be applied with
        the new session key when the key is installed by ULA through the
        dedicated API.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-3.5"
               title="0-RTT Connection Multiplication with OOB Packet">
        <t>An FSP connection MAY be multiplied to get a branch or branches of
        the connection. Multiplication of a connection is protected by
        deriving new session key from the original security context of the
        connection.</t>

        <t>The packet that carries the command to multiply an established FSP
        connection MUST be sent from a new allocated local ULTID towards the
        destination ULTID of the original connection. It is an out-of-band
        (OOB) packet in the context of the original connection and it MUST be
        cryptographically protected by the secret key of the original
        connection. The packet MAY carry payload.</t>

        <t>The receiver of the packet MUST allocate a new local ULTID, accept
        the optional payload in the new context associated with the new ULTID,
        derive a new secret key from the secret key of the original
        connection, and responds from the new context. The response MAY carry
        payload.</t>

        <t>The very first response packet MUST be protected by the new secret
        key. The sender of the multiply command packet MUST automatically
        inaugurate the same secret key, derived from the secret key of the
        same original connection. And it MUST treat the response packet as
        though a transmit transaction had been committed by the responder,
        i.e. authenticity of the response packet is verified with the new
        secret key.</t>

        <t>Thus the branch connection of a new pair of ULTIDs is established
        with zero round-trip overhead. This mechanism may be exploited to
        provide expedited data transfer or parallel data transfer service.</t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section anchor="sect-4">
      <name slugifiedName="n-packet-structure">Packet Structure</name>
      <section anchor="sect-4.1" title="FSP over UDP/IPv4">
        <t>In this version of FSP, when FSP is implemented in the IPv4
        network, every FSP packet MUST be encapsulated in a UDP <xref
        target="STD6"/> datagram. The UDP datagram encapsulated the FSP packet
        SHALL have the checksum disabled (i.e. set its value to 0) <xref
        target="RFC8085"/>. The Source and the destination ULTIDs are put at
        the leading position of the UDP payload. FSP fixed header, optional
        extension headers and FSP payload follow the ULTIDs:</t>

        <figure>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
		
 0                            15 16                           31
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|         Source Port           |        Destination Port       |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|            Length             |             0                 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                 Source Upper Layer Thread ID                  |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|               Destination Upper Layer Thread ID               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                                                               |
~                          FSP Fix Header                       ~
|                                                               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
~                Optional FSP Extension Headers                 ~
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
~                                                               ~
~                  FSP payload (may be empty)                   ~
~                                                               ~
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

	]]></artwork>
        </figure>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-4.2" title="FSP over IPv6">
        <t>When FSP is implemented over IPv6 <xref target="RFC8200"/>, the
        ULTID part is embedded in the IPv6 address. FSP fixed header follows
        the IPv6 headers:</t>

        <figure>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
			
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~                          IPv6 Header:                         ~
 0                            15 16                           31
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|Version| Traffic Class |           Flow Label                  |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|         Payload Length        |  Next Header  |   Hop Limit   |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                                                               |
+                                        Source Network Prefix  +
|                                                               |
+                 Source Address    ----------------------------+
|                                   Source Aggregation Host ID  |
+                                   ----------------------------+
|                                 Source Upper Layer Thread ID  |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                                                               |
+                                   Destination Network Prefix  +
|                                                               |
+        Destination Address   ---------------------------------+
|                              Destination Aggregation Host ID  |
+                              ---------------------------------+
|                            Destination Upper Layer Thread ID  |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
~                                                               ~
~                    Optional IPv6 Headers                      ~
~                                                               ~
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                                                               |
~                          FSP Fix Header                       ~
|                                                               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
~                Optional FSP Extension Headers                 ~
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
~                                                               ~
~                  FSP payload (may be empty)                   ~
~                                                               ~
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

		]]></artwork>
        </figure>

        <dl>
            <dt>Network Prefix</dt><dd>The leftmost 64-bit of the IPv6 address which
            MAY and usually do have different value at the difference
            interface of an IPv6 end- node.</dd>

            <dt>Aggregation Host ID</dt>
            <dd>The left 32-bit part of the rightmost 64-bit long word of the IPv6 address.
            For this version of FSP, all of the aggregation host ID parts of an IPv6 end- node's IPv6 addresses MUST have the same
            value and the value SHOULD avoid the value FDFF:FFFF (hexadecimal), which may cause confliction with some IPv6 anycast address.</dd>
        </dl>

        <t>Network prefix and aggregation host ID make the IPv6 prefix part of
        the IPv6 address under the context of FSP. It is assumed that there is
        a unique IPv6 prefix per host <xref target="RFC8273"/>.
        </t>

        <t>RFCs related to IPv6 address configuration such as ND for IPv6
        <xref target="RFC4861"/>, SLAAC <xref target="RFC4862"/>, 'IPv6 Subnet
        Model' <xref target="RFC5942"/>, 'IPv6 Address Assignment to End
        Sites' <xref target="RFC6177"/>, 'Discovery of the IPv6 Prefix Used
        for IPv6 Address Synthesis' <xref target="RFC7050"/>, DHCP <xref
        target="RFC8415"/> and 'IPv6 Node Requirements' <xref
        target="RFC8504"/> would be reviewed in separate documents.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-4.3" title="Generic FSP Header">
        <t>FSP headers include the fixed header and the extension headers. A
        general fixed header consists of a 32-bit FSP Header Signature and
        20-byte operation-code specific fields. An extension header consists
        of a 32-bit Code-Mark-Length Prefix and the operation-code specific
        content. The length of the extension header content may be variable,
        provided that the tail of the full extension header align on 64-bit
        boundary.</t>

        <t>Integers in the FSP fix header are transmitted in network byte
        order. Integers in the FSP extension headers are of little-endian.</t>

        <figure>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
			
  0                                                            31
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                       Header Signature                        |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
~                                                               ~
~              Operation Code Specific Fields                   ~
~                                                               ~
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

	]]></artwork>
        </figure>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-4.4"
               title="FSP Header Signature and Code-Mark-Length Prefix">
        <figure>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
			
 0             7 8            15 16                           31
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Operation Code|     Major     |              Offset           |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

 0             7 8            15 16                           31
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Operation Code|     Mark      |              Length           |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

		]]></artwork>
        </figure>

        <section anchor="sect-4.4.1" title="Operation Code">
          <t>The operation code is an octet that stores the code of the
          command which indicates the function of the FSP packet, or specifies
          the type of some extension header.</t>

          <texttable style="full">
            <ttcol>Synonym</ttcol>

            <ttcol>Code</ttcol>

            <ttcol>Meaning</ttcol>

            <c>INIT_CONNECT</c>

            <c>1</c>

            <c>Initialize Connection</c>

            <c>ACK_INIT_CONNECT</c>

            <c>2</c>

            <c>Acknowledge Initialization of Connection</c>

            <c>CONNECT_REQUEST</c>

            <c>3</c>

            <c>Formally Request to Connect</c>

            <c>ACK_CONNECT_REQ</c>

            <c>4</c>

            <c>Acknowledge the Connection Request</c>

            <c>RESET</c>

            <c>5</c>

            <c>Reset a connection. Abort the connection, or refuse to
            establish the connection at the very beginning.</c>

            <c>KEEP_ALIVE</c>

            <c>7</c>

            <c>Keep the peer alive. It is an out-of-band control packet acting
            as the heart-beating signal. An out-of-band control packet does
            not consume send sequence space itself. FSP takes use of the
            KEEP_ALIVE packet to inform the peer about the change of the
            source IP addresses. Besides, when the MIND flag is set, the
            KEEP_ALIVE packet is meant to tell the peer which packets should
            be retransmitted.</c>

            <c>PERSIST</c>

            <c>8</c>

            <c>Make a connection persistent. It is meant to start a new
            transmit transaction after a connection migrated to CLOSABLE
            state. It can also acknowledge ACK_CONNECT_REQ or MULTIPLY. It
            MUST carry payload. It always consumes a slot of the send sequence
            space.</c>

            <c>PURE_DATA</c>

            <c>9</c>

            <c>Pure Data. It does not carry any optional header.</c>

            <c>RELEASE</c>

            <c>11</c>

            <c>Release the connection. RELEASE packet does not carry payload,
            but it always consumes a slot of the send sequence space.</c>

            <c>MULTIPLY</c>

            <c>12</c>

            <c>Multiply the connection. It is sent in the context of the
            original connection and may carry payload and/or optional headers
            as an out-of-band packet.</c>

            <c>PEER_SUBNETS</c>

            <c>17</c>

            <c>Tell the remote end how to address the sender of the packet in
            the reverse direction. It is the code of the Sink Parameter
            extension header.</c>

            <c>SELECTIVE_NACK</c>

            <c>18</c>

            <c>Tell the remote end to retransmit the packets that were
            negatively acknowledged. It is the code of the Selective Negative
            Acknowledgment extension header.</c>
          </texttable>
        </section>

        <section anchor="sect-4.4.2" title="Major">
          <t>It is an octet that states current FSP major version. For this
          FSP version it MUST be 0.</t>

          <t>It is not mandatory for different major versions of FSP to be
          compatible.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="sect-4.4.3" title="Mark">
          <t>It is an octet that marks current minor version of the extension
          header, under the major FSP version specified in the fixed header,
          and/or serves as the flag, depending on the type of the extension
          header.</t>

          <t>It is mandatory for implementations to be compatible with
          different minor versions of FSP extension header under the same
          major FSP version.</t>

          <t>It is not mandatory for minor versions of FSP extension header
          under the different major FSP version to be compatible, even if the
          minor versions happen to be the same.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="sect-4.4.4" title="Offset">
          <t>The offset field is a 16-bit unsigned integer that specifies the
          offset of the first octet of the payload, starting from the begin of
          the FSP fixed header. If its value equals the size of the fixed
          header the packet has no extension.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="sect-4.4.5" title="Length">
          <t>The length field is a 16-bit unsigned integer that specifies the
          length, including the Type-Version-Length Header and the size of the
          the operation code specific content of the extension header.</t>
        </section>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-4.5" title="Preliminary FSP Packets">
        <t>Preliminary FSP packets are the packets exchanged during the
        end-to- end negotiation phase of FSP connection establishment when it
        is impossible to calculate ICC normally.</t>

        <section anchor="sect-4.5.1" title="Connect Initialization">
          <figure>
            <artwork><![CDATA[

 0                                                            31
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                       Header Signature                        |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                              Salt                             |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                                                               |
+                       Init-Check-Code                         +
|                                                               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                                                               |
 +                         Timestamp                            +
|                                                               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
~                                                               ~
~           Host Name of the Responder (optional)               ~
~                                                               ~
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

  Operation Code of this type of packet is INIT_CONNECT.

		]]></artwork>
          </figure>

          <dl>
              <dt>Salt</dt><dd>It a 32-bit random bit string that may be exploited to
              make secret key agreement.</dd>

              <dt>Timestamp</dt><dd>It is a 64-bit unsigned integer that represents
              number of microseconds elapsed since 00:00, Jan.1, 1970,
              Coordinated Universal Time. It may be exploited to synchronize
              the clocks of the participants and/or estimate delay during data
              transmission in the network.</dd>

              <dt>Init-Check-Code</dt><dd>It is a 64-bit random <xref
              target="RFC4086"/> bit string that means to uniquely associated
              with the connection initiated.</dd>

              <dt>Host Name of the Responder</dt><dd>The optional payload of the
              Connect Initialization packet is the host name of the responder.
              It MUST be encoded in UTF-8 <xref target="RFC3629"/> and SHOULD
              be resolvable in DNS,</dd>
          </dl>
        </section>

        <section anchor="sect-4.5.2"
                 title="Acknowledgment to Connect Initialization">
          <figure>
            <artwork><![CDATA[
			
 0                                                            31
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                       Header Signature                        |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                           Time Delta                          |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                                                               |
+                            Cookie                             +
|                                                               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                                                               |
+                       Init-Check-Code                         +
|                                                               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
~                                                               ~
~                         Sink Parameter                        ~
~                                                               ~
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

  Operation Code of this type of packet is ACK_INIT_CONNECT.

		]]></artwork>
          </figure>

          <dl>
              <dt>Time Delta</dt><dd>It is a 32-bit signed integer which is the
              difference between the near-end's time and the timestamp value
              sent in the Connection Initialization packet. The units and the
              epoch of the near-end's time value and the timestamp value MUST
              be the same. However, the precision or resolution of the time
              delta value is chosen arbitrarily by the responder.</dd>

              <dt>Cookie</dt><dd>It is a 64-bit bit string cryptographically generated
              by the responder in a represent-transfer state manner. More
              specifically when the same timestamp, time delta,
              Init-Check-Code, salt, source and destination ULTIDs are sent to
              the responder, the responder MUST be able to generate the
              identical cookie value.</dd>

              <dt>Init-Check-Code</dt><dd>It MUST be identical to the corresponding
              field in the Connect Initialization packet acknowledged.</dd>
          </dl>
          <figure>
            <artwork><![CDATA[  o Sink Parameter It is an extension header specified in 4.7.  ]]></artwork>
          </figure>
        </section>

        <section anchor="sect-4.5.3" title="Connect Request">
          <figure>
            <artwork><![CDATA[

 0                                                            31
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                       Header Signature                        |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                              Salt                             |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                                                               |
+                       Init-Check-Code                         +
|                                                               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                                                               |
+                         Time Stamp                            +
|                                                               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
~                                                               ~
~                         Sink Parameter                        ~
~                                                               ~
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                    Initial Sequence Number                    |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                           Time Delta                          |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                                                               |
+                            Cookie                             +
|                                                               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
~                                                               ~
~           Host Name of the Initiator (optional)               ~
~                                                               ~
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

  Operation Code of this type of packet is CONNECT_REQUEST.

		]]></artwork>
          </figure>

          <t>The value of each field that has the identical name with the one
          in the associated Connect Initialization and Acknowledgment to
          Connect Initialization packet MUST be assigned the same value as in
          these two packets, except header signature in the packet.</t>

          <t>Note that the initiator SHALL fill in the time delta field as it
          is and SHALL NOT assume endian-ness of the time delta field.</t>

          <dl>
              <dt>Sink Parameter</dt><dd>It is an extension header specified in
              4.7.</dd>

              <dt>Host Name of the Initiator</dt><dd>The optional payload of the
              Connect Request packet is the host name, which is encoded in
              UTF-8 and SHOULD be resolvable in DNS, of the initiator. It
              could be exploited by the responder to look up the address of
              the initiator that may receive packets in the reverse
              direction.</dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-4.6" title="Normal Fixed Header">
        <figure>
          <artwork><![CDATA[

 0                            15 16                           31
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                       Header Signature                        |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|      Flags    |         Advertised Receive Window Size        |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                                                               |
+                     Integrity Check Code                      +
|                                                               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                       Sequence Number                         |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|    Expected Sequence Number/Out-of-Band Serial Number         |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

		]]></artwork>
        </figure>

        <t>Operation Code of a normal fixed header may be ACK_CONNECT_REQ, PURE_DATA, PERSIST, KEEP_ALIVE, RELEASE or MULTIPLY.</t>

        <dl>
            <dt>Flags</dt>
            <dd>It is bit-field of width 8. From left to right: 
              <ul empty="true">
                <li>End of Transaction (EoT): If the EoT flag of a packet is
                set, it is the last packet of a transmit transaction. A packet
                with the EoT flag set MAY be the start and the single packet
                of the transmit transaction as well.</li>

                <li>Minimal-Delay (MIND): If the MIND flag of the Connect
                Request or Acknowledgment to Connect Request packet is set,
                the ULA prefers minimal delay and is willing to tolerate
                packet loss. FSP SHALL drop the packet received earliest when
                there is no enough receive buffer so that the latest packet
                received can be saved and the delay to deliver data to ULA is
                minimized. If the MIND flag has been set the EoT flag of any
                following packet is simply ignored. The MIND flag of an FSP
                packet may be set only if the packet does not belong to a
                compressed transmit transaction. Payload of each FSP packet is
                delivered to the ULA as an independent message if the MIND
                flag has been set.</li>

                <li>Compressed (CPR): If the CPR flag of the first packet of a
                transmit transaction is set, compression is applied on the
                octet stream of the payloads of the continuous packets that
                constitute the transmit transaction, or to put it simply, the
                payload octet stream of the transaction transaction. Such
                transmit transaction is called a compressed transmit
                transaction. When the CPR flag of a packet is set, CPR flag of
                each following packet is ignored until reaching termination of
                the transmit transaction. If the payload octet stream of the
                transmit transaction is compressed the Minimal-Delay flag of
                any packet in the transmit transaction MUST be cleared.</li>
              
                <li>ECN-Echo (ECE): The Explicit Congestion Notification Echo flag
                of a packet is set if the sender of the packet has received an
                underlying IPv6 packet with Congestion Experienced code point set
                for its peer as stated in "The Addition of Explicit Congestion
                Notification (ECN) to IP" <xref target="RFC3168"/>.</li>

                <li>Send Rate Reduced (SRR): The SRR flag of each packet SHALL be
                set as soon as the sender has received a legitimate packet with
                ECE flag set and has informed the congestion manager to reduce the
                send rate, until a sent packet with SRR flag set is
                acknowledged.</li>

                <li>The remaining 3 bits are reserved.</li>
            </ul>
        </dd>
        <dt>Advertised Receive Window Size</dt><dd>It is a 20-bit unsigned integer that
        stores number of the free blocks in the receive buffer of the sender
        of the packet that contains the receive window size field. It is count
        from the slot meant to accept the packet with the expected sequence
        number. The sender must ensure that the difference between the latest
        sequence number sent out and the largest expected sequence number
        received does not exceed the value of the latest advertised receive
        window size received.</dd>

        <dt>Sequence Number</dt><dd>Each in-band FSP packet is assigned a 32-bit
        unsigned integer as the sequence number. The sequence number assigned
        for in-band FSP packets MUST be in strict order. An out-of-band packet
        that has the operation code of KEEP_ALIVE or MULTIPLY MUST be assigned
        a sequence number that falls in the receive window.</dd>

        <dt>Expected Sequence Number</dt><dd>The 'expected sequence number/out-of-band
        serial number' field stores the earliest sequence number of the
        packets that were not yet received in the receive window of the sender
        for in-band packet. It is an accumulative acknowledgment. Any packet
        with the sequence number before the received Expected Sequence Number
        is supposed to have been received by the remote end.</dd>

        <dt>Out-of-band Serial Number</dt><dd>The 'expected sequence number/out-of-band
        serial number' field stores a 32-bit unsigned integer that numbers the
        out-of-band FSP packet separately from the sequence space of the
        in-band packets. Each time an out-of-band packet is sent the
        out-of-band serial number SHALL increase by one. It is assumed that in
        the life of the session no two packets have the same sequence number
        and the same out-of-band serial number simultaneously.</dd>

        <dt>Integrity Check Code</dt><dd>The ICC of the packet.</dd>

        </dl>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-4.7" title="Sink Parameter">
        <figure>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
			
 0                                                            31
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                    Code-Mark-Length Prefix                    |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                     Listener ID/Host ID                       |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
~                                                               ~
~               Addressable Network Prefixes                    ~
~                                                               ~
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

		]]></artwork>
        </figure>

        <t>Operation Code in the Header Signature of this extension header is
        PEER_SUBNETS.</t>

        <dl>
            <dt>Listener ID</dt><dd>It is the ULTID of the responder that is in
            LISTENING state.</dd>

            <dt>Host ID</dt><dd>It is the aggregation host id of the sender. It SHALL
            be 0 if it is in the IPv4 network.</dd>

            <dt>Addressable Network Prefixes</dt><dd>These are up to 4 64-bit words
            that specify the network prefixes of the lower layer interfaces
            that are addressable by the receiver in the reverse direction. In
            this version of the FSP 'Addressable Network Prefixes' field is of
            fixed length. The last network prefix which is non-zero is the
            last resort one. There MUST be at least one non-zero network
            prefix. If there are more than one non-zero network prefixes those
            other than the last resort are load-balanced preferred. In an IPv6
            network, the addressable network prefix is the leftmost 64 bits of
            the IPv6 address. The receiver of the Addressable Network Prefixes
            SHALL send packet in the reverse direction, i.e. to the sender of
            the field with the destination IPv6 address generated by combining
            a preferred network prefix with the aggregation host id and the
            ULTID part of the source address in the IPv6 header of the
            received packet that eventually carries the Addressable Network
            Prefixes. Such feature MAY be exploited to handle links with
            unidirectional connectivity, but it is NOT RECOMMENTED. In an IPv4
            network for compatibility with the IPv6 addressed ULA the 64-bit
            word of the addressable network prefix specified is composed as
            following Figure:</dd>
        </dl>

        <figure>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
			
 0                            15 16                           31
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|  0x2002 (IPv6 6to4 prefix)    |IPv4 address (leftmost 16 bits)|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|IPv4 address(rightmost 16 bits)|   UDP port number (16 bits)   |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

		]]></artwork>
        </figure>

        <t>Sender of the Sink Parameter packet SHOULD be NAT-aware in the
            IPv4 network. If it is able to obtain the from the NAT box (as
            defined in "Traditional IP Network Address Translator (Traditional
            NAT)" <xref target="RFC3022"/>) through Port Control Protocol
            (PCP) <xref target="RFC6887"/> SHOULD fill in the IPv4 address and
            UDP port number fields with the public IP value that were
            obtained. If it does not have such capability, it SHALL fill in
            the addressable network prefix with all binary zeroes.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-4.8" title="Selective Negative Acknowledgment">
        <figure>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
			
 0                                                            31
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                    Code-Mark-Length Prefix                    |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                   Expected Sequence Number                    |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                Delay Sample Sequence Number                   |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                   Acknowledgement Delay                       |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                            Gap Width                          |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                           Data Length                         |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
~                                                               ~
~          Further pairs of  (Gap Width, Data Length)           ~
~                                                               ~
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

		]]></artwork>
        </figure>

        <t>The operation code of this type of extension header is
        SELECTIVE_NACK</t>

        <t><dl>
            <dt>Expected Sequence Number</dt><dd>It stores the earliest sequence number
            of the packets that were not yet received in the receive window of
            the sender. It is an accumulative acknowledgment. Any packet with
            the sequence number before the received Expected Sequence Number
            is supposed to have been received by the remote end. The expected
            sequence number is represented in little endian.</dd>

            <dt>Delay Sample Sequence Number</dt><dd>It stores the sequence number of
            the packet that the acknowledgement delay was calculated on. The
            delay sample sequence number is represented in little endian.</dd>

            <dt>Acknowledgement Delay</dt><dd>A 32-bit unsigned integer specifies the
            delay in microseconds between sending the packet containing the
            SNACK extension header and accepting the last packet that is
            accumulatively acknowledged by the SNACK extension header. The
            acknowledgement delay is represented in little endian.</dd>

            <dt>Gap Width and Data Length</dt><dd>The SNACK header contains the
            descriptor of the receive window gaps. The descriptor itself is a
            list of entries. The length of the list can be zero which means
            that there is no gap in the receive window. If the list is not
            empty, each entry contains the width of one gap (Gap Width) in the
            receive window and the length of the continuously received data
            following the gap (Data Length), respectively. The unit of
            aforementioned length of gaps or number of packets is buffer block
            which size is agreed upon connection establishment. Gap width and
            data length MUST be transmitted in little endian.</dd>
          </dl></t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-4.9" title="RESET">
        <t>The 'RESET' packet is a special command packet meant to interrupt
        connection setup process or disconnect abruptly. Operation Code of the
        packet is RESET.</t>

        <t>Structure of a RESET packet in C code snippet with unnamed union
        applied:</t>

        <t><![CDATA[
	    struct FSP$HeaderSignature
      {
          octet opCode;
          octet major;
          uint16_t offset;
      };
      
      struct FSP_RejectConnect
      {
          FSP$HeaderSignature hs;
          /* bit field to describe reasons for reset: */
          uint32_t       reasons;
          /* effective sequence number: */
          union
          {
              timestamp_t timeStamp;
              struct
              {
                  uint32_t initial;
                  uint32_t expected;
              } sn;
          };
          /* proof of uniqueness: */
          union
          {
              uint64_t integrityCode;
              uint64_t cookie;
              uint64_t initCheckCode;
          };
      };
]]></t>

        <t>When the RESET packet is the response to a Connect Initialization
        packet both the timeStamp and the initCheckCode fields of the RESET
        packet MUST be set to the same values of Time Stamp and Init-Check-
        Code in the Connect Initialization packet, respectively.</t>

        <t>When the RESET packet is the response to a Connect Request packet
        both the timeStamp and the cookie fields of the RESET packet MUST be
        set to the same value of Time Stamp and Cookie in the Connect Request
        packet, respectively.</t>

        <t>When the RESET packet is the response to a packet with a normal
        fixed header, the sn.initial, the sn.expected and the integrityCode of
        the RESET packet MUST be set as to specification of normal fixed
        header field Sequence Number, Expected Sequence Number and Integrity
        Check Code, respectively.</t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section anchor="sect-5">
      <name slugifiedName="n-the-finite-state-machine">The Finite State Machine</name>
      <section anchor="sect-5.1" title="NON_EXISTENT">
        <figure>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
   ---[API: Listen]-->LISTENING
   |--[API: Connect]-->CONNECT_BOOTSTRAP-->[Send INIT_CONNECT]
   |--[API: Multiply]-->CLONING-->[Send MULTIPLY]
		]]></artwork>
        </figure>

        <t>NON_EXISTENT is a pseudo-state before a connection is created by
        the ULA calling API Listen, Connect or Multiply (or after a connection
        is reset).</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-5.2" title="LISTENING">
        <figure>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
   ---[API: Reset]-->NON_EXISTENT
   |<-->[Rcv.INIT_CONNECT]{&& accepted}[Send ACK_INIT_CONNECT]
   |<-->[Rcv.CONNECT_REQUEST]
       |--{&& duplication detected}--[Retransmit ACK_CONNECT_REQ]
       |--{&& no duplication}-->{Notify}
         |-->[API: Accept]
             -->{new context}CHALLENGING-->[Send ACK_CONNECT_REQ]
         |-->[API: Reject]-->[Send RESET]{abort new context, if any}
		]]></artwork>
        </figure>

        <t>LISTENING is a state entered by the ULA calling API Listen.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-5.3" title="CONNECT_BOOTSTRAP">
        <figure>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
   ---[API: Reset]-->NON_EXISTENT-->[Send RESET]
   |-->[Rcv.ACK_INIT_CONNECT]-->CONNECT_AFFIRMING
       -->[Send CONNECT_REQUEST]
   |--{On transient state Timeout}-->NON_EXISTENT-->[Notify]
		]]></artwork>
        </figure>

        <t>CONNECT_BOOTSTRAP is a state entered by the ULA calling API
        Connect, before receiving the acknowledgement of the remote end to the
        connection initialization packet.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-5.4" title="CONNECT_AFFIRMING">
        <figure>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
   ---[API: Reset]-->NON_EXISTENT-->[Send RESET]
   |--[Rcv.ACK_CONNECT_REQ]-->[Notify]
      |-->{Callback return to accept}
         |-->{EoT}
            |-->{ULA-flushing}-->COMMITTING2
                -->[Send PERSIST with EoT]
            |-->{Not ULA-flushing}-->PEER_COMMIT
                -->[Send PERSIST with EoT]
         |-->{Not EoT}
            |-->{ULA-flushing}-->COMMITTING
                -->[Send PERSIST without EoT]
            |-->{Not ULA-flushing}-->ESTABLISHED
                -->[Send PERSIST without EoT]
      |-->{Callback return to reject]-->NON_EXISTENT-->[Send RESET]
   |--[Rcv.RESET]-->NON_EXISTENT-->[Notify]
   |--{On transient state Timeout}-->NON_EXISTENT-->[Notify]
		]]></artwork>
        </figure>

        <t>CONNECT_AFFIRMING is a state entered by the ULA affirming to send
        connect request after receiving the acknowledgement to the connection
        initialization packet.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-5.5" title="CHALLENGING">
        <figure>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
   ---[API: Reset]-->NON_EXISTENT-->[Send RESET]
   |<-->[API: Send{new data}]{just pre-buffer}
   |--[Rcv.PERSIST]
      |-->{EoT}
         |-->{ULA-flushing}-->CLOSABLE-->[Notify]
             -->[Send SNACK]
         |-->{Not ULA-flushing}-->PEER_COMMIT-->[Notify]
             -->[Send SNACK]
      |-->{Not EoT}
         |-->{ULA-flushing}-->COMMITTED-->[Notify]
             -->[Send delay SNACK]
         |-->{Not ULA-flushing}-->ESTABLISHED-->[Notify]
             -->[Send delay SNACK]
   |--[Rcv.RESET]-->NON_EXISTENT-->[Notify]
   |--{On transient state Timeout}-->NON_EXISTENT-->[Notify]
		]]></artwork>
        </figure>

        <t>CHALLENGING is a state entered by the ULA accepting the connection
        request after a new connection context has been incarnated. The new
        connection is incarnated by the FSP context of the near end in the
        LISTENING state as a legitimate CONNECT_REQUEST packet is
        received.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-5.6" title="ACTIVE">
        <figure>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
   ---[API: Reset]-->NON_EXISTENT-->[Send RESET]
   |--[API: Send{flush}]-->COMMITTING{Urge to commit}
   |<-->[API: Send{more data}][Send PURE_DATA]
   |<-->[Rcv.PERSIST][Send KEEP_ALIVE]
   |--[Rcv.PURE_DATA]
       |--{EoT}-->PEER_COMMIT
          |-->[Send SNACK]-->[Notify]
       |--{Not EoT}-->[Send SNACK]-->[Notify]
   |--[Rcv.MULTIPLY]{passive multiplication}
   |--[Rcv.RESET]-->NON_EXISTENT-->[Notify]
   |--{On Idle Timeout}-->NON_EXISTENT-->[Notify]
		]]></artwork>
        </figure>

        <t>ACTIVE, also known as ESTABLISHED, is a state that the FSP
        participant has finished end-to-end negotiation but has not committed
        current transmit transaction nor fully received the latest transmit
        transaction of the remote end.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-5.7" title="COMMITTING">
        <figure>
          <artwork><![CDATA[			
   ---[API: Reset]-->NON_EXISTENT-->[Send RESET]
   |--[Rcv.SNACK]{Acknowledge-All}-->COMMITTED-->[Notify]
   |--[Rcv.PURE_DATA]
       |--{EoT}-->COMMITTING2-->[Send SNACK]-->[Notify]
       |--{Not EoT}-->[Send SNACK]-->[Notify]
   |--[Rcv.MULTIPLY]{passive multiplication}
   |--[Rcv.RELEASE]
       |--{All-Acknowledged}-->SHUT_REQUESTED
          |-->[Send SNACK]-->[Notify]
   |--[Rcv.RESET]-->NON_EXISTENT-->[Notify]
   |--{On Idle Timeout}-->NON_EXISTENT-->[Notify]
		]]></artwork>
        </figure>

        <t>COMMITTING is a state that the FSP participant has committed the
        transmit transaction but has not fully received the latest transmit
        transaction of the remote end, nor the acknowledgement to the transmit
        transaction commitment has been received.</t>

        <t>The participant in COMMITTING state SHALL NOT transmit further data
        until current transmit transaction commitment is acknowledged.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-5.8" title="COMMITTED">
        <figure>
          <artwork><![CDATA[			
   ---[API: Reset]-->NON_EXISTENT-->[Send RESET]
   |--[API: Send{more data}]-->ACTIVE-->[Send PERSIST]
   |--[API: Send{flush}]-->COMMITTING-->{Flush the send queue}
   |<-->[Rcv.PERSIST][Send KEEP_ALIVE]
   |--[Rcv.PURE_DATA]
       |-->{EoT}-->CLOSABLE
           -->[Send SNACK]-->[Notify]
       |-->{Not EoT}-->[Send SNACK]-->[Notify]
   |--[Rcv.MULTIPLY]{passive multiplication}
   |--[Rcv.RELEASE]-->SHUT_REQUESTED
          -->[Send SNACK]-->[Notify]
   |--[Rcv.RESET]-->NON_EXISTENT-->[Notify]
   |--{On Idle Timeout}-->NON_EXISTENT-->[Notify]
		]]></artwork>
        </figure>

        <t>COMMITTED is a state that the FSP participant has committed current
        transmit transaction and has received the acknowledgement to the
        transmit transaction commitment, but has not fully received the latest
        transmit transaction of the remote end.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-5.9" title="PEER_COMMIT">
        <figure>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
   ---[API: Reset]-->NON_EXISTENT-->[Send RESET]
   |--[API: Send{flush}]
       -->{Mark EoT or append payload-less PURE_DATA with EoT set}
       -->COMMITTING2-->{Do Send}
   |--[API: Shutdown]-->PRE_CLOSED-->{Append RELEASE}
       -->{Do Send}
   |<-->[API: Send{more data}][Send PURE_DATA]
   |<-->[Rcv.PURE_DATA]{just prebuffer}
   |--[Rcv.PERSIST]
       |<-->{EoT}-->[Send SNACK]
           --{&& is new transaction}-->[Notify]
       |-->{Not EoT}-->ACTIVE-->[Send SNACK]
   |--[Rcv.MULTIPLY]{passive multiplication}
   |--[Rcv.RESET]-->NON_EXISTENT-->[Notify]
   |--{On Idle Timeout}-->NON_EXISTENT-->[Notify]
		]]></artwork>
        </figure>

        <t>PEER_COMMIT is a state that the FSP participant has not committed
        current transmit transaction but has fully received the latest
        transmit transaction of the remote end, and the acknowledgement to the
        transmit transaction commitment has not been received yet.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-5.10" title="COMMITTING2">
        <figure>
          <artwork><![CDATA[			
   ---[API: Reset]-->NON_EXISTENT-->[Send RESET]
   |--[API: Send{flush}]
       -->{Mark EoT or append payload-less PURE_DATA with EoT set}
       -->COMMITTING2-->{Do Send}
   |--[API: Shutdown]-->PRE_CLOSED-->{Append RELEASE}
       -->{Do Send}
   |<-->[API: Send{more data}][Send PURE_DATA]
   |<-->[Rcv.PURE_DATA]{just prebuffer}
   |--[Rcv.PERSIST]
       |<-->{EoT}-->[Send SNACK]
           --{&& is new transaction}-->[Notify]
       |-->{Not EoT}-->COMMITTING-->[Send SNACK]
   |--[Rcv.MULTIPLY]{passive multiplication}
   |--[Rcv.RELEASE]
       |--{All-Acknowledged}-->SHUT_REQUESTED
          |-->[Send SNACK]-->[Notify]
   |--[Rcv.RESET]-->NON_EXISTENT-->[Notify]
   |--{On Idle Timeout}-->NON_EXISTENT-->[Notify]
		]]></artwork>
        </figure>

        <t>COMMITTING2 is a state that the FSP participant has committed
        current transmit transaction and has fully received the latest
        transmit transaction of the remote end, but the acknowledgement to the
        transmit transaction commitment has not been received yet.</t>

        <t>The participant in COMMITTING2 state SHALL NOT transmit further
        data until current transmit transaction commitment is
        acknowledged.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-5.11" title="CLOSABLE">
        <figure>
          <artwork><![CDATA[			
   ---[API: Reset]-->NON_EXISTENT-->[Send RESET]
   |--[API: Shutdown]-->PRE_CLOSED-->{Append RELEASE}-->{Do Send}
   |<-->[Rcv.PURE_DATA]{just prebuffer}
   |--[Rcv.SNACK]{Acknowledge All}-->CLOSABLE-->[Notify]
   |--[Rcv.PERSIST]
       |--{EoT}--{but a new transaction}
           -->[Send SNACK]-->[Notify]
       |--{Not EOT}-->COMMITTING-->[Send SNACK]
   |--[Rcv.MULTIPLY]{passive multiplication}
   |--[Rcv.RELEASE]-->SHUT_REQUESTED
       -->[Send SNACK]-->[Notify]
   |--[Rcv.RESET]-->NON_EXISTENT-->[Notify]
   |--{On Idle Timeout}-->NON_EXISTENT-->[Notify]
		]]></artwork>
        </figure>

        <t>CLOSABLE is a state that the FSP participant has committed current
        transmit transaction and has received the acknowledgement to the
        transmit transaction commitment, and has fully received the latest
        transmit transaction of the remote end.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-5.12" title="SHUT_REQUESTED">
        <figure>
          <artwork><![CDATA[			
   ---[API: Reset]-->NON_EXISTENT-->[Send RESET]
   |--[API: Shutdown]-->CLOSED-->[Notify]
   |<-->[Rcv.RELEASE]-->[Send SNACK]
   |--[Rcv.RESET]-->NON_EXISTENT-->[Notify]
		]]></artwork>
        </figure>

        <t>SHUT_REQUESTED is a state entered when a legitimate RELEASE packet
        was received in COMMITTED or CLOSABLE state. It may be entered as well
        if the RELEASE packet was received in COMMITTING or COMMITTING2 state
        and all packets in flight were accumulatively acknowledged.</t>

        <t>A connection context MAY persist in SHUT_REQUESTED state until the
        session key runs out of life, or the host system needs to recycle the
        resource allocated. A connection in SHUT_REQUESTED state MAY be
        resurrected.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-5.13" title="PRE_CLOSED">
        <figure>
          <artwork><![CDATA[			
   ---[API: Reset]-->NON_EXISTENT-->[Send RESET]
   |--[Rcv.SNACK]{Acknowledge All}-->CLOSED-->[Notify]
   |--[Rcv.RELEASE]-->[Notify]-->CLOSED
   |--[Rcv.RESET]-->NON_EXISTENT-->[Notify]
   |--{On transient state Timeout}-->CLOSED-->[Notify]
		]]></artwork>
        </figure>

        <t>PRE_CLOSED is a state entered on the ULA calling the API Shutdown
        in PEER_COMMIT or CLOSABLE state.</t>

        <t>Note that the ULA may call the API Shutdown in COMMITTING2 state as
        well, where it SHALL wait the FSP layer to get the accumulative
        acknowledgement to all packets in flight before sending the RELEASE
        packet.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-5.14" title="CLOSED">
        <t><t>|--{On Recycling Needed}--&gt;NON_EXISTENT</t></t>

        <t>CLOSED is a state migrated from PRE_CLOSED state on receiving a
        legitimate KEEP_ALIVE packet which acknowledges all packet in flight
        from the remote end, or from SHUT_REQUESTED state on the ULA calling
        the API Shutdown.</t>

        <t>Unlike TCP <xref target="STD7"/>, CLOSED state in FSP is not
        fictional. Instead a connection context MAY persist in CLOSED state
        until the session key runs out of life, or the host system needs to
        recycle the resource allocated to the CLOSED session. A connection in
        CLOSED state MAY be resurrected.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-5.15" title="CLONING">
        <figure>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
   ---[API: Reset]-->NON_EXISTENT
   |<-->[API: Send{new data}]{just prebuffer}
   |<-->[Rcv.PURE_DATA]{just prebuffer}
   |--[Rcv.PERSIST]
       |-->{Not EoT}
           |--{&& Not ULA-flushing}-->ACTIVE
              -->[Send SNACK]-->[Notify]
           |--{&& ULA-flushing}-->COMMITTED
              -->[Send SNACK]-->[Notify]
       |-->{EoT}
           |--{&& Not ULA-flushing}-->PEER_COMMIT
              -->[Send SNACK]-->[Notify]
           |--{&& ULA-flushing}-->CLOSABLE
              -->[Send SNACK]-->[Notify]
   |--[Rcv.RESET]-->NON_EXISTENT-->[Notify]
   |--{On transient state Timeout}-->NON_EXISTENT-->[Notify]
		]]></artwork>
        </figure>

        <t>CLONING is a state entered by ULA calling the API Multiply from any
        state that may accepting an out-of-band packet.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-5.16" title="Passive Multiplication">
        <figure>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
			
  {ACTIVE, COMMITTING, COMMITTED, PEER_COMMIT, COMMITTING2, CLOSABLE}
    |-->/MULTIPLY/-->[API{Callback}]-->{new context}
       |-->[{Return Accept}]
          |-->{Send packet(s) starting with PERSIST}
       |-->[{Return Reject}]-->{abort creating new context}
           -->[Send RESET]

		]]></artwork>
        </figure>

        <t>In the ACTIVE, COMMITTING, COMMITTED, PEER_COMMIT, COMMITTING2 or
        CLOSABLE state an FSP end node MAY accept its peer's connection
        multiplication request and transit to the unnamed, temporary passive
        multiplication state.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-5.17" title="Typical State Transitions">
        <t>This section is informative.</t>

        <section anchor="sect-5.17.1" title="Typical Main Connection">
          <figure>
            <artwork><![CDATA[
			
  ***                      Bootstrapping                 ***
  CONNECT_BOOTSTRAP  ------ INIT_CONNECT ------->  LISTENING
      |              <---- ACK_CONNECT_INIT -----
  CONNECT_AFFIRMING  ------ CONNECT_REQUEST ---->      |

  *** Connection affirmation, carrying welcome messages ***
                                                       |
                                                   {Accept}
     {and send a single packet welcome message immediately}
                                                       |
      |            <- ACK_CONNECT_REQ c/w EoT -  CHALLENGING
  PEER_COMMITTED
      |
  {Callback, to send ticket immediately}
  {(a fictional identification token of a single packet)}
      |
  COMMITTING2        ----- PERSIST c/w EoT ----->      |
                                                   CLOSABLE
      |              <---- KEEP_ALIVE(SNACK) ----      |
  CLOSABLE
                                                       |
                                    {Send Server's Challenge}
                                                       |
      |           <----- PERSIST w/o EoT -----  PEER_COMMITED
  COMMITTED          ---- KEEP_ALIVE(SNACK) ---->
                               .
                               .

                               .                       |
                                                   {Flush}
                                                       |
      |            <---- PURE_DATA c/w EoT ----  COMMITTING2
  CLOSABLE
                     ---- KEEP_ALIVE(SNACK) ---->      |
                                                   CLOSABLE
      |
  {Send Client's Response}
      |
  PEER_COMMITTED     ----- PERSIST w/o EoT ----->      |
                                                   COMMITTED
      |              <--- KEEP_ALIVE(SNACK) -----      |
                               .
      |              ---- PURE_DATA w/o EoT ---->  COMMITTED
  PEER_COMMITTED     <--- KEEP_ALIVE(SNACK) ----       |
                               .
                               .

      |                        .
  {Flush}
      |
  COMMITTING2        ---- PURE_DATA c/w EoT ---->      |
                                                   CLOSABLE
      |              <---- KEEP_ALIVE(SNACK) ----
  CLOSABLE

** Typical C/S request-response exchange on application layer **
      |
  {Send Request}
      |
  PEER_COMMITTED     ----- PERSIST w/o EoT ----->      |
                                                   COMMITTED
      |              <--- KEEP_ALIVE(SNACK) -----      |
                               .
      |              ---- PURE_DATA w/o EoT ---->  COMMITTED
  PEER_COMMITTED     <--- KEEP_ALIVE(SNACK) -----      |
                               .
                               .
      |                        .
  {Flush}
      |
  COMMITTING2        ---- PURE_DATA c/w EoT ---->      |
                                                   CLOSABLE
      |              <---- KEEP_ALIVE(SNACK) ----
  CLOSALBE
                                                 {Send Response}
                                                       |
      |              <----- PERSIST w/o EoT -----  PEER_COMMITED
  COMMITTED
                     ---- KEEP_ALIVE(SNACK) ---->      |
                               .
      |              <---- PURE_DATA w/o EoT ----  PEER_COMMITED
  COMMITTED          ---- KEEP_ALIVE(SNACK) ---->      |
                               .
                               .
                               .
                                                   {Flush}
                                                       |
      |              <---- PURE_DATA c/w EoT ----  COMMITTING2
  CLOSABLE
                     ---- KEEP_ALIVE(SNACK) ---->      |
                                                   CLOSALBE
                               .
                               .
                               .
   *** Following request-responses, e.g. HTTP pipelining ***
                               .
                               .
                               .

  CLOSABLE                                         CLOSALBE
                               .
                               .
   *** End of connection, in a typical C/S application ***
                                                       |
                                                   {Shutdown}
                                                       |
     |               <---------- RELEASE --------  PRE_CLOSED
  SHUT_REQUESTED
                     ---- KEEP_ALIVE(SNACK) ---->      |
     |                                               CLOSED
  {Shutdown}
     |
   CLOSED

		]]></artwork>
          </figure>
        </section>

        <section anchor="sect-5.17.2"
                 title="Typical Clone Connection for Get Resource">
          <figure>
            <artwork><![CDATA[
			
   Client                                                Server
   *** Suppose that the browser forks a new connection to   ***
   *** request some resource and the URI is short enough    ***
   ***  to be encapsulated in a single packet               ***
  {MultiplyAndWrite}
      |                                      {In Clonable State}
  CLONING            ---- MULTIPLY c/w EoT ---->       *
                                         {Make Clone Connection}
                          {and return resource data immediately}
                                                       |
      |              <---- PERSIST w/o EoT ------  PEER_COMMITTED
  COMMITTED          ---- KEEP_ALIVE(SNACK) ---->

                     <---- PUER_DATA w/o EoT ----  PEER_COMMITTED
  COMMITTED          ---- KEEP_ALIVE(SNACK) ---->
                               .
                               .
                               .                       |
                                                   {Flush}
                                                       |
      |              <--- PURE_DATA c/w EoT -----  COMMITTING2
  CLOSABLE
                     ---- KEEP_ALIVE(SNACK) ---->      |
                                                   CLOSABLE
                               .
                               .
                  *** End of Connection ***

		]]></artwork>
          </figure>
        </section>

        <section anchor="sect-5.17.3"
                 title="Typical Clone Connection for Push Message">
          <figure>
            <artwork><![CDATA[
			
Initiator of Multiplication              Responder of Multiplication
  (Used to be the server)                  (Used to be the client)
***Suppose that the server forks a new connection to push message***
      |
  {MultiplyAndWrite}
      |                                         {In Clonable State}
  CLONING            ---- MULTIPLY w/o EoT ---->       *
                                         {Make Clone Connection}
*** Suppose that there is no immediately available response data ***
                                                       |
                                                   COMMITTING
      |               <--- PERIST(c/w EoT) ----        |
  PEER_COMMITTED
      |              ---- KEEP_ALIVE(SNACK) ---->  COMMITTED
                               .
      |              ---- PURE_DATA w/o EoT ---->  COMMITTED
  PEER_COMMITTED     <--- KEEP_ALIVE(SNACK) ----       |
                               .
                               .
      |                        .
  {Flush}
      |

  COMMITTING2        ---- PURE_DATA c/w EoT ---->      |
                                                   CLOSABLE
      |              <---- KEEP_ALIVE(SNACK) ----
  CLOSABLE
                               .
                               .
                  *** End of Connection ***

		]]></artwork>
          </figure>
        </section>

        <section anchor="sect-5.17.4" title="Simultaneous Shutdown">
          <figure>
            <artwork><![CDATA[
			
CLOSABLE                                         CLOSABLE
   |                                                 |
{Shutdown}                                       {Shutdown}
   |                                                 |
PRE_CLOSED                                       PRE_CLOSED
   |  \                                          /   |
   |   \                                        /    |
   |    \                                      /     |
   |     \------------- RELEASE --------------/----->+
   +<------------------- RELEASE ------------/       |
   |                                               CLOSED
CLOSED

		]]></artwork>
          </figure>
        </section>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section anchor="sect-6">
      <name slugifiedName="n-end-to-end-negotiation">End-to-End Negotiation</name>
      <t>End-to-end negotiation of FSP session occurs in the connection
      establishment phase. Connection establishment process of FSP consists of
      two and a half pairs of packet exchanges for connection initialization,
      connection incarnation and the last confirmation. During the process
      various optional header or payload MAY be carried in the FSP preliminary
      packets to negotiate end-to-end session parameters.</t>

      <section anchor="sect-6.1" title="Connect Initialization">
        <t>The initiator sends the INIT_CONNECT packet to the responder:
        (INIT_CONNECT, Salt, Timestamp, Init-Check-Code [, Responder's Host
        Name])</t>

        <t>The initiator initates the connection with a locally unqiue ULTID
        which SHOULD be generated securely randomly. The ULDID with value in range 0..65535 SHOULD be reserved.</t>

        <t>Connection initialization MAY be syndicated with optional address
        resolution at the gateway in the IPv6 network by carrying the
        responder's host name in the INIT_CONNECT packet.</t>

        <t>If it does carry the responder's host name it MUST take the link-
        local interface address <xref target="RFC4291"/> as the source IPv6
        address and the default link-local gateway address, FE80::1, as the
        destination IPv6 address no matter whether the global unicast IP
        address of the default gateway is configured.</t>

        <t>If the gateway that relays the INIT_CONNECT packet finds that the
        responder is on the same link-local network with the initiator it
        SHALL change the source and the destination IP addresses of the
        INIT_CONNECT packet to the link-local IP addresses of the initiator
        and the responder respectively, and relay the packet onto the same
        link-local network.</t>

        <t>On receiving the INIT_CONNECT packet that carries the responder's
        host name the link-local gateway MUST resolute the responder's global
        unicast IPv6 address and map the initiator's global unicast IPv6
        address, and replace the destination and source address of the
        INIT_CONNECT packet respectively, unless it finds that the initiator
        and the responder are on the same link-local network, where the
        gateway SHALL process the packet as stated in the previous
        statement.</t>

        <t>The gateway SHALL silently ignore the INIT_CONNECT packet if it is
        unable to resolve the IP address of the responder.</t>

        <t>If the destination address is the default link-local gateway
        address while the INIT_CONNECT does not carry the responder's host
        name payload, it is supposed that the gateway is the intent
        destination of the connection to initialize.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-6.2" title="Response to Connect Initialization">
        <t>The responder sends acknowledgment to the initiator:</t>

        <t>(ACK_INIT_CONNECT, Time-delta, Cookie, Init-Check-Code Reflected,
        Responder's Sink Parameter)</t>

        <t>If the responder is ready to accept the connection, it SHALL
        generate a cookie which is meant to be reflected by the initiator. The
        responder MUST send the ACK_INIT_CONNECT packet with the new allocated
        local ULTID instead of the original listening ULTID. The initiator
        should be able to find out the original listening ULTID by searching
        its own connection context.</t>

        <t>In the Responder's Sink Parameter the original listener ULTID MUST
        be set to the right value.</t>

        <t>The destination address of the packet sent back MUST be set to the
        source address of the corresponding Connect Initialization packet
        whose source and destination address MAY be updated by some
        intermediary such as the link-local gateway of the initiator.</t>

        <t>The responder SHALL NOT make state transition on receiving
        INIT_CONNECT packet.</t>

        <t>If the responder refuses to accept the connection, it SHALL
        silently discard the INIT_CONNECT packet.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-6.3" title="Connection Incarnation Request">
        <t>(CONNECT_REQUEST, Salt, Timestamp, Init-Check-Code, Initial SN,
        Time- delta Reflected, Cookie Reflected, Initiator's Sink Parameter [,
        Initiator's Host Name])</t>

        <t>The initiator accepts the Response to Connect Initialization packet
        if and only if both the destination ULTID of the response packet
        matches the source ULTID of the connect initialization packet and the
        Init-Check-Code reflected in the response packet matches the Init-
        Check-Code in the connect initialization packet.</t>

        <t>If the response packet is accepted the initiator formally requests
        to establish the connection by sending the CONECT_REQUEST packet.</t>

        <t>In the CONNECT_REQUEST packet the value of the Timestamp, the Init-
        Check-Code and the Salt field MUST be the same as in the INIT_CONNECT
        packet while the value of the Cookie Reflected field and the Time-
        delta Reflected field MUST be the same as in the ACK_INIT_ CONNECT
        packet, respectively.</t>

        <t>The initiator MUST send the packet towards the remote ULTID that
        the responder has preserved and sent with the ACK_INIT_CONNECT packet.
        It MUST fill the original listener ID field in the Initiator's Sink
        Parameter with the right value.</t>

        <t>The source address of the CONNECT_REQUEST packet MUST be set to the
        destination address of the received ACK_INIT_CONNECT packet, while the
        network prefix and host-id part of the destination address MUST be set
        to the source address of the received ACK_INIT_CONNECT packet in the
        IPv6 network.</t>

        <t>The initiator SHALL save the cookie value that the responder has
        given to make up the weak session key.</t>

        <t>The initiator MUST fill the Initial SN field with the sequence
        number of the packet that will follow CONNECT_REQUEST. The
        CONNECT_REQUEST packet is payload free and does not consume the
        sequence space.</t>

        <t>The optional fields Initiator's Host Name is put as the payload of
        the CONNECT_REQUEST packet. If presented it MAY be exploited by the
        responder as the last resort to resolute the most recent IP address of
        the initiator in some extraordinary scenarios such as the initiator
        has hibernated for a considerably long time.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-6.4" title="Connection Incarnation Response">
        <t>Case 1: (ACK_CONNECT_REQ, FREWS, Initial SN, Expected SN, ICC[,
        Payload])</t>

        <t>Case 2: (RESET, Reason of Failure, Timestamp Reflected, Copy of
        Cookie Reflected)</t>

        <t>The responder responds as in case 1 if the reflected cookie was
        validated, resources were successfully allocated and the initial
        context of the connection was setup. Otherwise it SHOULD respond as in
        case 2.</t>

        <t>However, if the cookie is invalid, the responder SHALL silently
        discard the CONNECT_REQUEST packet.</t>

        <t>The Initial SN in case 1 is the initial sequence number of the
        responder. The responder should fill in the field with a random 32-
        bit unsigned integer. As the ACK_CONNECT_REQ packet may carry payload
        the sequence number of the responder starts from the ACK_CONNECT_REQ
        packet.</t>

        <t>The Expected SN MUST equal to the Initial SN specified in the
        corresponding CONNECT_ REQUEST packet.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-6.5" title="The Last Confirmation">
        <t>Case 1: (PERSIST, FREWS, Initial SN, Expected SN, ICC, payload)</t>

        <t>Case 2: (RESET, Reason of Failure, Initial SN, Expected SN,
        ICC)</t>

        <t>The initiator of the connection MUST eventually confirm to the
        responder that the connection is established by sending a PERSIST
        packet (case 1).</t>

        <t>Of course the initiator MAY quit to establish the connection by
        sending a legitimate RESET packet (case 2).</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-6.6" title="Retransmission">
        <t>The initiator SHALL retransmit the INIT_CONNECT packet if the
        corresponding ACK_INIT_CONNECT packet is not received in some limit
        time (by default 15 seconds).</t>

        <t>The initiator SHALL retransmit the CONNECT_CONNECT packet if the
        corresponding ACK_CONNECT_REQ packet is not received in some limit
        time (by default 15 seconds).</t>

        <t>The responder SHALL NOT retransmit ACK_INIT_CONNECT or
        ACK_CONNECT_REQ packet.</t>

        <t>The initiator SHOULD retransmit the right INIT_CONNECT packet or
        CONNECT_CONNECT packet until the legitimate ACK_CONNECT_REQ packet is
        eventually received.</t>

        <t>It SHALL give up if the time starting from the very first
        INIT_CONNECT packet was sent has exceed a longer timed-out value (by
        default 60 seconds) before the legitimate ACK_CONNECT_REQ packet is
        received.</t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section anchor="sect-7">
      <name slugifiedName="n-quad-party-session-key-installation">Quad-party Session Key Installation</name>
      <t>It is assumed that in the scenarios applying FSP it is the ULA to do
      key establishment and/or end-point authentication while the FSP layer
      provides authenticated, optionally encrypted data transfer service. The
      ULA installs the established shared secret key as the new session key of
      the FSP layer. Together they establish a secure channel between two
      application end-points.</t>

      <t>In a typical scenario the ULA endpoints first setup the FSP
      connection where resistance against connection redirection is weakly
      enforced by CRC64. After the pair of ULA endpoints have established a
      shared secret key, they install the secret key. Authenticity of the FSP
      packets sent later is cryptographically protected by the new secret key
      and resistance against various attacks is secured.</t>

      <t>Although transmit transaction is actually uni-directional the secret
      key is shared bi-directionally in this version of FSP.</t>

      <t>Protocol for installation of the shared secret key is quad-party in
      the sense that both the upper layer application and the FSP layer of
      both the participant nodes MUST agree on the moment of certain state to
      install the shared secret key.</t>

      <t>It is arguably much more flexible for the application layer protocols
      to adopt new key establishment algorithm while offloading routine
      authentication and optionally encryption of the data to the underlying
      layers where it may be much easier to exploit hardware-
      acceleration.</t>

      <section anchor="sect-7.1" title="API for Session Key Installation">
        <t>A dedicate application program interface (API) is designed for the
        ULA to install the secret key established by the ULA participants. The
        API SHOULD take four parameters:</t>
        <ul>
            <li>A 'handle' to state the connection context for installing the
            session key</li>

            <li>A octet string of initial key materials (IKM)</li>

            <li>An integer to state the length of IKM. The unit is octet.</li>

            <li>An integer to state the desired length of the effective session
            key if AEAD is applied. The unit is bit. For this version of FSP
            desired length of the effective session key is either 128 or
            256.</li>
        </ul>
        <t>The peer MUST have commit a transmit transaction and it SHALL
        install the same secret key on receiving the FSP packet with the EoT
        flag set.</t>

        <t>The ULA SHOULD have installed the new shared secret key, or install
        it instantly after accepting the packet with the EoT flag set. If the
        new secret key has ever been installed the packet received after the
        one with the EoT flag set MUST adopt the new secret key.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-7.2"
               title="Time to Call API for Session Key Installation">
        <t>A participant MAY install new session key if and only if the packet
        with the latest sequence number it has received has EoT flag
        marked.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-7.3"
               title="Time to Take New Session Key into Effect">
        <t>By committing a transmit transaction a ULA participant clearly
        tells the underlying FSP layer that the next packet sent MAY adopt a
        new secret key. On receiving a packet with the EoT flag set the ULA is
        informed that the next packet received MAY adopt a new shared secret
        key.</t>

        <t>After the ULA of a network node installed a new session key, every
        packet to send with sequence number later than the one with the EoT
        flag set just before the API to install session key was called MUST
        adopt the new session key in the FSP layer of the network node.</t>

        <t>Every packet received with the sequence number later than the one
        with EoT flag set when the ULA called the API to install session key
        MUST be validated with the new session key. If the new secret key has
        ever been installed the packet received after the one with the EoT
        flag set MUST adopt the new secret key.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-7.4" title="Generating the Initial Session Key">
        <t>When the ULA install the secret key, it is required to provide the
        initial key material which might have unbalanced bit randomness, not
        the session key itself. HMAC-based Extract-and-Expand Key Derivation
        Function (HKDF) <xref target="RFC5869"/> is applied to generate the
        initial session key.</t>

        <t>Given raw key material ikm, length of the ikm nB in octets,
        intended master key length lenb in bits, || is octet string
        concatenation,</t>

        <t>If AEAD is designated, the initial session key, or the first secret
        key for packet authentication and payload encryption is obtained as
        specified in <xref target="RFC5869"/>:</t>

        <dl>
            <dt>Key Extract phase</dt>
            <dd><t>Let Km = HMAC-SM3k512(zeros,
            ikm), where:</t>
              <ul empty="true">
              <li>zeros is 64 octets of zeroes</li>

              <li>ikm is the input initial key material</li>

              <li>HMAC-SM3k512 is applied. HMAC-SM3k512 is the HMAC algorithm
              <xref target="RFC2104"/> that exploits SM3 secure hash algorithm
              <xref target="ISO-SM3"/> with a slight modification that exploits
              initial key with length of 512 bits instead of 256 bits.</li>

              <li>Km is the result master key.</li>
              </ul>        
            </dd>
           <dt>Key Expand phase:</dt>
           <dd><t>Let Ks = HMAC-SM3k512(Km, info), where:</t>
             <ul empty="true">
             <li>Km is the master key generated in previous phase, padded to 512
            bits with zeroes at right.
            </li>
            <li>info is concatenation of the arbitrary ASCII string
            "Establishes an FSP session", which is 26-octet long, 3 octets of
            integer 0, and 1 octet of integer 1.</li>
            <li>HMAC-SM3k512 algorithm is applied.</li>
            <li>Ks is the result of 256 bits in length. If the requested key
            length is 128-bit or 192-bit, Ks is the final result. If the
            requested key length is 256-bit, the second iteration of HKDF MUST
            be applied to get the final result of 512 bits in lenth.</li>
            </ul>
          </dd>
        </dl>
        <t>For this version of FSP the final result is split into three
          parts, the initial session key of requested key length, the 32-bit
          salt, and the remain bits that are simply discarded. The salt is
          to be applied to compose the initialization vector(IV), which
          would be passed to AES-GCM, together with the sequence number and
          expected sequence number fields in the normal FSP fixed
          header:</t>
        <figure>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
 0                                                            31
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                             Salt                              |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                        Sequence Number                        |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|     Expected Sequence Number/Out-of-band Serial Number        |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
		]]></artwork>
        </figure>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-7.5" title="Internal Rekeying">
        <t>Let Ks' = HMAC-SM3k512(Km, H || info') , where:
         <dl>
            <dt>Km</dt><dd>is the master key generated as in section 7.4, padded to 512
            bits with zeros at right.</dd>

            <dt>H</dt><dd>is the 16-octet internal hash sub-key of AES-GCM of previous
            session key</dd>

            <dt>info' </dt><dd>is concatenation of the arbitrary ASCII string "Sustains
            an FSP connection", which is 26-octet long and the 4 octets in
            network order of the 32-bit unsigned integer that specifies the
            batch index of the session key.</dd>

            <dt>HMAC-SM3k512</dt><dd>is applied.</dd>

            <dt>Ks'</dt><dd>is the result of 256 bits in length.</dd>
          </dl></t>

        <t>For this version of FSP, if the session key length is 128-bit or
        192-bit, the leftmost bits in key length of the result Ks' is taken as
        the new session key, the following 32 bits is taken as the new salt
        that is to be applied to compose the IV as the input to AES-GCM. If
        the key length is 256-bit, the result is taken as the new session key
        and the salt SHALL NOT be changed.</t>

        <t>The batch index of the initial session key is 1, and it is
        increased by 1 every time before it is to re-key.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-7.6"
               title="Sample Sequence of Installing Session Key">
        <t>This section is informative.</t>

        <figure>
          <artwork><![CDATA[			
      Node A                                          Node B
ULA-A        FSP-A                              FSP-B        ULA-B
{Send Km-A}
               ->[seq_a2b_0]                  ->
                                                       {Send Km-B}
               <-                  [seq_b2a_0]<-
                             .
                             .
                             .
{Commit}
               ->[seq_a2b_m c/w EoT]          ->
                                                     {Install Key}
                             .
{Wait}                       .
                             .
                                                          {Commit}
               <-          [seq_b2a_n c/w EoT]<-
{Install Key}
                             .
                             .                      {Send Further}
               <-                [seq_b2a_n+1]<-
                             .
{Send Further}               .
               ->[seq_a2b_m+1]                ->
		]]></artwork>
        </figure>

        <t><dl>
            <dt>Send Km-A, Send Km-B</dt>
            <dd>ULA of node A and node B send  there key material for key establishment, respectively.</dd>
		        <dt>Commit</dt>
            <dd>ULA of node A or node B informs the FSP layer to set the
                End of Transaction flag of the last packet to send and flush
                the send buffer.				
			      </dd>
		        <dt>Install Key</dt>
            <dd>ULA of node A or node B informs the FSP layer to install
                new session key, giving key materials for deriving the session
                key. A node may call Install Key if and only if its peer has
                just committed a transmit transaction.
			      </dd>
		        <dt>Wait</dt>
            <dd>The ULA MUST wait until it has received some packet with EoT
            set from its peer before it may install new session key. There is
            no mandatory calling order of Commit and Install Key. However, if
            a node Commit before Install Key and it wants to apply new session
            key for the transmit transaction next to the one it has just
            committed, it SHALL NOT send further data until Install Key has
            returned successfully. In the above example, for node A packet
            with sequence number [seq_a2b_m+1] will be sent by applying the
            new session key, for node B packet with sequence number
            [seq_b2a_n+1] will be sent by applying the new session key.
            </dd>
		        <dt>Send Further</dt>
            <dd>ULA of node A or node B sends further data in the new transmit
            transaction, respectively. There is no mandatory order on which node
            should start new transmit transaction firstly.
            </dd>
		  </dl></t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section anchor="sect-8">
      <name slugifiedName="n-send-and-receive">Send and Receive</name>
      <section anchor="sect-8.1" title="Packet Integrity Protection">
        <section anchor="sect-8.1.1" title="Application of CRC64">
          <t>Starting from ACK_CONNECT_REQUEST, until the ULAs have installed
          the shared secret CRC64 is applied to calculate the value of the ICC
          field. The algorithm:</t>

          <t><ol>
              <li>Take pair of the ULDs as the initial value of accumulative
              CRC64</li>

              <li>Accumulate the value of the Init-Check-Code field</li>

              <li>Accumulate the value of the Cookie field successively</li>

              <li>Accumulate the combined value of the salt and the timeDelta
              field where the former is the leftmost 32 bits and the latter is
              the rightmost 32 bits</li>

              <li>Accumulate the value of the Time Stamp field</li>

              <li>Save the accumulated CRC64 value as the pre-computed CRC64
              value</li>
            </ol></t>

          <t>The pair of the ULDs is composed of the near end's ULTID and the
          remote end's ULTID, where the former is the leftmost 32 bits and the
          latter is the rightmost 32 bits of initial value for the send
          direction, and the order is reversed for the receive direction.</t>

          <t>When calculate the value ICC of a particular FSP packet, firstly
          set ICC to the pre-computed CRC64 value, then calculate the CRC64
          checksum of the whole FSP packet, while ULTIDs are NOT included if
          the FSP packet is encapsulated in UDP. The result is set as the
          final value of the ICC field.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="sect-8.1.2"
                 title="Authenticated Encryption with Additional Data">
          <t>FSP provides per-packet authenticated encryption service. Only
          one authenticated encryption algorithm is allowed for a determined
          version of FSP. For this FSP version, the authenticated encryption
          algorithm selected is GCM-AES <xref target="GCM"/><xref
          target="AES"/>, it is applied to protect integrity of the full FSP
          packets, and privacy of the payload together with the extension
          headers, if any. The four inputs to GCM- AES authenticated
          encryption are:</t>

          <t>K: the key derived by the master key installed by ULA. The length
          of the session key is determined by the ULA.</t>

          <t>IV: the initial vector, 96-bit string made by concatenating a
          32-bit salt, the 32-bit sequence number of the packet and the 32-bit
          expected sequence number field of the packet. The salt is derived by
          the master key installed by ULA.</t>

          <t>P: the plaintext are the bytes following the fixed header up to
          the end of the original payload.</t>

          <t>AAD: additional authenticated data, for this version of FSP it
          consists of first 128 bits of the fixed header of the FSP packet.
          The source ULTID MUST be stored in the leftmost 32-bit of the ICC
          field while the destination ULTID MUST be stored in the rightmost
          32-bit of the ICC field before the ICC value is calculated.</t>

          <t>The length of the authentication tag MUST be 64 bits for FSP
          version 0 and 1. The authentication tag is stored in the ICC
          finally.</t>

          <t>The inputs to GCM-AES decryption are:</t>

          <t>K: the key derived by the master key installed by ULA. The length
          of the session key is determined by the ULA.</t>

          <t>IV: the initial vector, 96-bit string made by concatenating
          consisted of the 32-bit salt, the 32-bit sequence number of the
          packet and the 32-bit expected sequence number field of the
          packet.</t>

          <t>C: the cipher-text are the bytes following the fixed header up to
          the end of the received payload.</t>

          <t>AAD: additional authenticated data, for this version of FSP it
          consists of the first 128 bits of the fixed header of the FSP
          packet. The sender's ULTID MUST be stored in the leftmost 32-bit of
          the ICC field while the receiver's ULTID MUST be stored in the
          rightmost 32-bit of the ICC field before the ICC value is
          calculated.</t>

          <t>T: The authentication tag, which is fetched from the ICC field
          received.</t>

          <t>Only when the outputs of GCM-AES decryption tell that the
          authentication tag passed verification may the receiver deliver the
          decrypted payload to the ULA.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="sect-8.1.3" title="ICC of the Out-of-Band Packet">
          <t>When calculating the ICC of an out-band packet (KEEP_ALIVE or
          MULTIPLY), the ExpectedSN field SHALL be filled with the out-of-
          band serial number. The first 32-bit word of the fixed header is
          taken as the second salt.</t>

          <t>To get or check the ICC of the out-of-band packet the original
          salt value that is set on deriving the session key and stored in the
          internal security context MUST be XORed with the second salt value
          before applying GCM-AES. The original salt value MUST be recovered
          instantly after GCM-AES is applied.</t>
        </section>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-8.2" title="Start a New Transmit Transaction">
        <t>The responder starts a transmit transaction by send the
        ACK_CONNECT_REQ packet which MAY terminate the transmit transaction at
        the same time.</t>

        <t>Any party MAY start a new transmit transaction by sending a PERSIST
        packet:</t>

        <t><t>(PERSIST, FREWS, SN, ExpectedSN, ICC, Payload)</t></t>

        <t>PERSIST packet sent by the initiator firstly acknowledges the
        ACK_CONNECT_REQ packet as well.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-8.3" title="Send a Pure Data Packet">
        <t><t>(PURE_DATA, FREWS, SN, ExpectedSN, ICC, Payload)</t></t>

        <t>After a new transmit transaction has been started further PURE_DATA
        packet MAY be sent until a packet with EoT flag set is sent.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-8.4" title="Commit a Transmit Transaction">
        <section anchor="sect-8.4.1"
                 title="Initiate Transmit Transaction Commitment">
          <t>A participant of an FSP connection MAY notify its peer that a
          transmit transaction shall be committed by setting the EoT flag of
          the last packet of the transmit transaction, be it PERSIST,
          PURE_DATA or MULTIPLY.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="sect-8.4.2"
                 title="Respond to Transmit Transaction Commitment">
          <t><t>(KEEP_ALIVE, FREWS, SN, ExpectedSN, ICC, Sink Parameter, SNACK)</t></t>

          <t>Whenever a legitimate packet falls in the receive window of the
          receiver, and the packet fills in the last gap of the sequence of
          current transmit transaction on receiving direction, or the packet
          with same sequence number has been accepted already, a responding
          KEEP_ALIVE packet that accumulatively acknowledges all the packets
          sent by the remote end SHALL be sent back immediately, and the FSP
          layer MUST immediately notify the ULA that a transmit transaction
          has been committed.</t>

          <t>The sequence number (SN) of the KEEP_ALIVE packet MUST equal the
          latest sequence number of the legitimate packets that have been
          sent.</t>

          <t>The out-of-band serial number SHALL increase by one whenever a
          new KEEP_ALIVE packet is sent.</t>

          <t>Here the KEEP_ALIVE packet SHALL contain a SNACK extension
          header, although number of gap descriptors in the SNACK header MUST
          be 0.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="sect-8.4.3"
                 title="Finalize Transmit Transaction Commitment">
          <t>After receiving the KEEP_ALIVE packet that accumulatively
          acknowledges all the packets sent the sender of the EoT flag
          migrates to the COMMITTED or CLOSABLE state from the COMMITTING or
          COMMITTING2 state, respectively.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="sect-8.4.4"
                 title="Time-out for Committing Transmit Transaction">
          <t>The ULA SHALL be timed-out if there is no packet was acknowledged
          in some hard-coded time-out. For this version of FSP the time-out is
          set to 30 seconds.</t>
        </section>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-8.5" title="Retransmission">
        <section anchor="sect-8.5.1" title="Calculation of RTT">
          <t>We borrows specifications for calculating RTT (and RTO)
          considerably from Computing TCP's Retransmission Timer <xref
          target="RFC6298"/> to calculate Retransmission Time Out (RTO).</t>

          <t>The sender maintains two state variables, SRTT (smoothed
          round-trip time) and RTTVAR (round-trip time variation). In
          addition, we assume a clock granularity of G seconds.</t>

          <t>Initial round trip time (RTT) for the Connection Initiator:
          Equals to the mean of the time elapsed when ACK_ INIT_CONNECT was
          received since INIT_CONNECT was sent, and the time elapsed till
          ACK_CONNECT_REQ was received since CONNECT_REQUEST was sent.</t>

          <t>Initial RTT for the Connection Responder: Equals to the time
          elapsed when the CONNECT_REQUEST packet was received since the
          ACK_INIT_CONNECT packet had been received.</t>

          <t>Initial RTT for the Initiator of Connection Multiplication:
          Equals to the most recent RTT of the multiplied connection.</t>

          <t>Initial RTT for the Responder of Connection Multiplication:
          Equals to the most recent RTT of the multiplied connection.</t>

          <t><t>When the Initial RTT measurement R is made, the host MUST set</t></t>

          <figure>
            <artwork><![CDATA[
   SRTT <- R
   RTTVAR <- R/2

]]></artwork>
          </figure>

          <t><t>When a subsequent RTT measurement R' is made, a host MUST set</t></t>

          <figure>
            <artwork><![CDATA[
   RTTVAR <- (1 - beta) * RTTVAR + beta * |SRTT - R'|
   SRTT <- (1 - alpha) * SRTT + alpha * R'

]]></artwork>
          </figure>

          <t>The value of SRTT used in the update to RTTVAR is its value
          before updating SRTT itself using the second assignment. That is,
          updating RTTVAR and SRTT MUST be computed in the above order.</t>

          <t>The above SHOULD be computed using alpha=1/8 and beta=1/4.</t>

          <t>R' SHOULD be measured whenever a packet with the SNACK extension
          header is received.</t>

          <t>Suppose the packet with the latest SN that is accumulatively
          acknowledged is P-latest, R' equals the time when the SNACK header
          is received, minus the time when P-latest was sent, minus the delay
          that the acknowledgment was made.</t>

          <t>The delay that the acknowledgment was made is stored in the
          "Acknowledgement Delay" field of the SNACK header. It equals the
          time difference between the time when the acknowledgement was sent
          and the time when P-latest was received.</t>

          <t>Note that the no packet with SN later than any gap described in
          the SNACK header is considered as the packet with the latest SN that
          is accumulatively acknowledged.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="sect-8.5.2"
                 title="Generation and transmission of SNACK">
          <t>Whenever the receiver receives a packet it SHALL shift the time
          to send next heartbeat signal earlier to the time of RTT since
          current time, if the time to send next heartbeat signal used to be
          later. If the time is already earlier than the time of RTT since
          current time, it needs not be shifted.</t>

          <t>On the time to send the heartbeat signal the FSP node generates
          the SNACK header, then generate and send a new KEEP_ALIVE packet to
          carry the SNACK header.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="sect-8.5.3"
                 title="Negative acknowledgment of Packets Sent">
          <t>KEEP_ALIVE packets in FSP carry the SNACK extension headers. We
          call them SNACK packets. A SNACK packet P1 is said to be later than
          P0, if and only if SN of P1 is later than SN of P0, or SN of P1
          equals SN of P0 while the out-of-band sequence number of P1 is later
          than that of P0.</t>

          <t>By convention when we specify the range, the left square bracket
          meant to be inclusive, while the right parenthesis meant to be
          exclusive, the packets with SN in the ranges:</t>

          <t>[expectedSN, expectedSN + 1st Gap Width),</t>

          <t>[expectedSN + 1st Gap Width + 1st Data Length, expectedSN + 1st
          Gap Width + 1st DataLength + 2nd Gap Width), ...</t>

          <t>[expectedSN + 1st Gap Width + 1st Data Length... + (n-1)th Gap
          Width + (n-1)th Data Length, expectedSN + 1st Gap Width + 1st
          DataLength... + n-th Gap Width)</t>

          <t>together with the packets with SN later than (expectedSN + 1st
          Gap Width + 1st DataLength + ... + n-th Gap Width), these packets
          are assumed to be negatively acknowledged.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="sect-8.5.4" title="Retransmission Interval">
          <t>Until RTT measurement has been made for a packet sent between the
          sender and receiver, the sender SHOULD set RTO &lt;- 1 second.</t>

          <t>After computing new SRTT, a host MUST updated RTO &lt;- SRTT +
          max (G, K*RTTVAR) where K = 4.</t>

          <t>Clock granularity SHOULD be finer than 100msec, that is, it
          SHOULD be that G &lt;= 0.1 second.</t>

          <t>Whenever RTO is computed, if it is less than 1 second, then the
          RTO SHOULD be rounded up to 1 second.</t>

          <t>An implementation MUST manage the retransmission timer(s) in such
          a way that A packet is never retransmitted less than one RTO after
          the previous transmission of that packet.</t>

          <t>Every time an in-band packet is sent (including a
          retransmission), if the timer is not running, start it running so
          that it will expire after RTO seconds (for the current value of
          RTO).</t>

          <t>When all outstanding data has been acknowledged, turn off the
          retransmission timer.</t>

          <t>When the retransmission timer expires, retransmit the packets
          that have not been acknowledged by the receiver, but limit by the
          rate throttling mechanism.</t>

          <t>Rate of retransmission MUST be throttled in a way that No more
          that M/2 packets may be retransmitted in a clock interval, suppose
          in each clock interval M packets were sent averagely.</t>

          <t>Packet retransmission SHALL be subjected to congestion control as
          well.</t>

          <t>However, at least one packet MAY be retransmitted in one clock
          interval, provide that the retransmission timer expires for the
          first packet that has not been acknowledged yet.</t>
        </section>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-8.6" title="Flow Control">
        <t>The participants of an FSP connection negotiate the initial receive
        window size with the FREWS field in the ACK_CONNECT_REQ packet, and
        the first PERSIST packet that acknowledges the ACK_CONNECT_REQ packet,
        respectively. The receive window size SHALL NOT be less than 4 and
        SHALL be less than 2^24.</t>

        <t>An FSP participant advertises current receive window size in the
        FREWS field.</t>

        <t>An FSP participant SHALL NOT send a packet whose sequence number is
        later than the value of the ExpectedSN field plus the advertised
        receive window size, where both value come from the very packet
        received with the latest sequence number.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-8.7" title="Congestion Control">
        <t>FSP supposes that end-to-end congestion control is provided by some
        shim layer, such as the congestion manager <xref target="RFC3124"/>
        between the "traditional" IP layer and the FSP transport layer. The
        shim layer is considered as a sub-layer of the network layer.
        Implementation of FSP MUST provide such shim layer if the network
        layer of the end node does not provide end-to-end congestion
        management service.</t>

        <t>FSP layer SHALL provide following information to the congestion
        manager as soon as the first packet on the fly was acknowledged by any
        mean, or a legitimate packet falling in the receive window with the
        ECE flag set is received:</t>
        <ul>
            <li>The local interface number that the packet carrying the ECE
            signal is accepted.</li>

            <li>The remote network prefix that the congestion information is
            meant to associate. Note that the aggregated host ID part is NOT
            included in the prefix.</li>

            <li>The traffic class. For FSP it is bisected: MIND flag set or
            not.</li>

            <li>Number of outstanding octets, including all of those in the
            payload AND the FSP headers.</li>

            <li>The effective round trip time calculated in the most recent
            period. Note that retransmitted packets MUST be excluded on
            calculating the effective RTT.</li>

            <li>Whether an ECN-Echo signal was received. The ECE flag of a
            legitimate packet falling in the receive window is the ECN-Echo
            signal.</li>

            <li>Whether a sent packet with SRR flag set is acknowledged.</li>
        </ul>
        <t>The congestion manager SHOULD reduce the send rate if the FSP
        sender informed it that an ECN-Echo signal was received.</t>

        <t>The sender SHALL NOT inform the congestion manager to reduce the
        send rate again even if further packet with ECE flag set is received,
        until at least one sent packet with SRR flag set is acknowledged.</t>

        <t>A packet with ECE flag set received after the packet with SRR flag
        set is acknowledged SHOULD make the congestion manager reduce the send
        rate again.</t>

        <t>Retransmitted packet SHALL be subjected to send rate control at the
        underlying congestion management service sub-layer as well.</t>

        <t>Quota or other means to enforce fairness among various FSP
        connections SHOULD be provided directly to the ULA by the congestion
        management service.</t>

        <t>Requirement of an FSP congestion manager would be detailed in a
        separate document.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-8.8" title="On-the-Wire Compression">
        <t>FSP exploits the lossless compression algorithm as per <xref
        target="LZ4"/>.</t>

        <t>If the CPR flag of the first packet of a transmit transaction is
        set, compression is applied on the payload octet stream of the
        transaction transaction.</t>

        <t>When applying compression FSP divides source stream into multiple
        blocks. For this version of FSP length of each block is 128KiB (131072
        octets), except the final block whose length may be less than or equal
        to 128KiB. The final block is the one that terminate the transmit
        transaction, i.e. which contains the last FSP packet of the transmit
        transaction. The last FSP packet of the transmit transaction has the
        EoT flag set. The "LZ4_compress_fast_continue" method SHALL be applied
        on each block. That is, data from previous compressed blocks are taken
        use for better compression ratio.</t>

        <t>When transferring the result data of compressing each block, the
        result data is prefixed with its length. The length is expressed by a
        4-octets little-endian integer.</t>

        <t>On-the-wire compression of each transmit transactions is
        independent. It is the upper layer application that SHALL make
        agreement on which transmit transaction utilizes on-the-wire
        compression.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-8.9"
               title="Milk Like Payload and Minimal Delay Service">
        <t>An ordinary data flow is wine-like in the sense that the older data
        are more valuable. If it has to, data packet sent latest are dropped
        first. In the contrary, milk-like payload is that the newer data are
        more precious and outdated data packet can be discarded.</t>

        <t>When ULA is willing to accept incomplete message the peer of the
        underling FSP node SHALL set the MIND flag of the first PERSIST packet
        that starts the first transmit transaction, and set the MIND flag of
        every following PURE_DATA packet, while set the Traffic Class of the
        underlying IPv6 packet to some registered value.</t>

        <t>In the transmission path, any relaying middle box, be it router or
        switch, should reserve a reasonably short queue for the packet flow of
        such flow to minimize delay.</t>

        <t>When the receive buffer overflows the receiver discards the
        undelivered packet received first to free buffer space for the latest
        packet received. However it keeps order on delivering the packets to
        he ULA. ULA may choose to discard packets received earlier than some
        threshold.</t>

        <t>The receiver SHOULD NOT make any acknowledgement to the packet
        received with the MIND flag set.</t>

        <t>Minimal delay service is asymmetric in the sense that one
        transmission direction the data flow may be milk-like while in the
        reverse direction the data flow may be wine-like.</t>

        <t>A minimal delay service data flow is terminated by ULA via some
        out- of-band control mechanism.</t>
      </section>
    </section>


    <section anchor="sect-9">
      <name slugifiedName="n-connection-multiplication">Connection Multiplication</name>
      <t>Connection multiplication is the process of incarnating a new
      connection context by re-using security context of an established
      connection.</t>

      <section anchor="sect-9.1" title="Request to Multiply Connection">
        <t><t>(MULTIPLY, FREWS, SN, Salt, ICC [, Sink Parameter] [, payload])</t></t>

        <t>The initiator's initial sequence number of the new connection is
        the sequence number of the packet that piggybacks the connection
        multiplication header. The ExpectedSN field of the normal packet store
        a Salt value instead.</t>

        <t>The FREWS field MUST be processed in the new connection context
        while the ICC MUST be calculated with the session key of the original
        connection.</t>

        <t>The new connection inherits the remaining key life. ULA SHOULD
        negotiate new session key and/or install new session key as soon as
        possible.</t>

        <t>The optional payload of the MULTIPLY packet MUST be processed in
        the new connection context.</t>

        <t>The MULTIPLY packet is an out-of-band command packet in the
        original connection context.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-9.2"
               title="Response to Connection Multiplication Request">
        <t><t>Case 1: (PERSIST, FREWS, SN, ExpectedSN, ICC, Payload)</t></t>

        <t><t>Case 2: (RESET, Reason of Failure, SN, ExpectedSN, ICC)</t></t>

        <t>In all of these cases the ULTID of the remote-end MUST be the value
        of the initiator's ULTID in the connection multiplication header.</t>

        <t>It is REQUIRED that only a connection in the ESTABLISHED,
        COMMITTING, COMMITTED, PEER_COMMIT, COMMITTING2 or CLOSABLE state may
        accept a connection multiplication request.</t>

        <t>In case 1 the responder admits the multiplication request AND
        commit the transmit transaction, the new connection enters into the
        PEER_COMMIT or CLOSABLE state immediately, on request of ULA.</t>

        <t>In case 2 the responder admits the multiplication request and the
        new connection enters into the ESTABLISHED, PEER_COMMIT, COMMITTING or
        CLOSABLE state immediately, depending whether the ULA of the
        multiplication initiator has requested to commit the transmit
        transaction immediately and whether the ULA of the multiplication
        responder has requested to commit the transmit transaction in the
        reverse direction immediately.</t>

        <t>In case 3 the responder rejects the multiplication request. To
        defend against spoofing attack ICC MUST be valid. The value of the SN
        field MUST equal the value of the 'Expected SN' field of the
        requesting MULTIPLY packet while the value of ExpectedSN field MUST
        equal the value of the 'Sequence No' field.</t>

        <t>The new connection MUST derive new session key from the session key
        of the original connection where the out-of-band requesting MULTIPLY
        packet is received immediately.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-9.3"
               title="Duplicate Detection of Connection Multiplication Request">
        <t>Every time the responder of connection multiplication receives a
        MULTIPLY packet it MUST check the suggested responder's ULTID and the
        initiator's ULTID.</t>

        <t>The responder MUST reject the multiplication request if the
        suggested responder's ULTID equals the near-end ULTID of some
        connection and the remote-end ULTID of that connection does not equal
        the initiator's ULTID.</t>

        <t>The responder MUST recognize the MULTIPLY packet as a duplicate
        connection request if some connection matches the request and SHOULD
        response by retransmitting the head packet of the send queue of the
        matching connection. A connection matches the MULTIPLY request if and
        only if the suggested responder's ULTID in the MULTIPLY packet equals
        the near-end ULTID of the connection and the initiator's ULTID equals
        the remote-end ULTID of the connection.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-9.4" title="Retransmission">
        <t>The initiating side SHALL retransmit the MULTIPLY packet if the
        corresponding PERSIST packet is not received in some limit time (by
        default 15 seconds).</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-9.5" title="Key Derivation for Branch Connection">
        <t>Let K_out = HMAC-SM3k512(Km, [d] || Label || 0x00 || Context || L),
        where:
         <ul empty="true">
            <li>Km is the master key, padded to 512 bits with zeros at
            right,</li>

            <li>[d] is one octet of integer Depth. For this version of FSP it
            is the fixed number 1 for the first iteration,</li>

            <li>Label is the fixed ASCII string "Multiply an FSP connection"
            which is 26-octet long for this version of FSP,</li>

            <li>Context is concatenation of two 32-bit words idB and idR idB is
            the ULTID allocated for the branch connection in the context of
            the multiplication initiator. idB is byte-order neutral. idR is
            the receiver side ULTID of the original connection that is to
            accept the connection multiplication request. idI or idR is
            byte-order neutral.</li>

            <li>L is a 32-bit network byte-order integer specifying the length
            in bits of the derived key K-out</li>

            <li><t>The result K_out is of 256 bits in length. If the requested key
            length is 128-bit or 192-bit, leftmost bits of the key requested
            length of K_out is taken as the session key of the new branch
            connection, the following 32 bits is taken as the salt to be
            applied to compose the IV for AES-GCM.</t>

            <t>If the requested key length is 256-bit, K_out is taken as the
            session key of the new branch connection while the salt to be
            applied to compose the IV for AES-GCM in the original connection
            is simply inheritted.</t>
            </li>
        </ul></t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section anchor="sect-10">
      <name slugifiedName="n-mobility-and-multihome-upport">Mobility and Multihome Support</name>
      <section anchor="sect-10.1" title="Heartbeat Signals">
        <t>FSP requires that the participants periodically send the heartbeat
        signals.</t>

        <t>The participant in the ACTIVE, COMMITTING, COMMITTED, PEER_COMMIT,
        COMMITING2 or CLOSABLE state MUST send the KEEP_ ALIVE packet as the
        heart-beat signal periodically to retain the connection in case that
        underlying IP address has changed.</t>

        <t>(KEEP_ALIVE, FREWS, SN, ExpectedSN, ICC, Sink Parameter, SNACK)</t>

        <t>Heartbeat signal packet is an out-of-band control packet. It does
        not carry payload. The sequence number of the packet SHALL be set to
        the latest sequence number of all of the packets that have been
        sent.</t>

        <t>Only the FSP node in the ACTIVE, COMMITTING, COMMITTED,
        PEER_COMMIT, COMMITING2 or CLOSABLE state MAY process the heartbeat
        signal.</t>

        <t>In this version of FSP the heartbeat period is arbitrarily set to
        600 seconds.</t>

        <t>The sequence number (SN) of the heartbeat signal packet MUST equal
        the latest sequence number of the legitimate packets that have been
        sent.</t>

        <t>The out-of-band serial number SHALL increase by one whenever a new
        hearbeat signal packet is sent.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-10.2" title="Active Address Change Signaling">
        <t>During communication process the FSP participant whose underlying
        IP address is changed SHOULD inform its peer such change by transmit a
        heartbeat signal packet so that the peer can retransmit the packets
        that were negatively acknowledged, if any.</t>

        <t>Such informing hearbeat signal packet SHALL be sent in the ACTIVE,
        COMMITTING, COMMITTED, PEER_COMMIT, COMMITING2 or CLOSABLE state.</t>

        <t>Informing heartbeat signal packet SHOULD be sent more frequently
        than a normal heartbeat signaling packet.</t>

        <t>For this version of FSP informing heartbeat signal packet SHALL be
        retransmitted every 4 RTT interval until the heuristic acknowledgement
        is received.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-10.3"
               title="Heuristic Remote Address Change Adaptation">
        <t>A participant of the FSP connection SHALL set the source address of
        the packet to be transmitted (or retransmitted) to the new IPv6
        address as soon as the near-end IPv6 address has changed. However, the
        ULTID field MUST remain the same.</t>

        <t>When a new packet with a later sequence number is received and the
        source IP address of the packet is found to be different with the
        preserved IP address of the remote end, the receiver SHOULD
        automatically update the preserved IP address of the remote end to the
        source IP address of the new packet, unless there is a Sink Parameter
        header in the packet.</t>

        <t>If the sequence number of the packet received is not the latest in
        the receive window the preserved IP address of the remote end SHALL
        NOT be updated even if the source address of the received packet has
        changed.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-10.4"
               title="Heuristic Address Change Acknowledgement">
        <t>The address change signaling heartbeat signal packet is supposed to
        be acknowledged if a packet targeted at the new IP address that the
        heartbeat signal packet has informed is received.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-10.5" title="NAT-traversal and Multihoming">
        <t>When FSP is implemented over UDP in the IPv4 network, each endpoint
        of the FSP connection is bound one and only one IPv4 address as soon
        as the connection is established. Each endpoint SHALL choose the
        source IPv4 address of the last packet received as the destination
        IPv4 address of the packet that it is to send later. By this mean FSP
        over UDP is NAT-friendly.</t>

        <t>When FSP is implemented over IPv6, as soon as the connection is
        established the IPv6 address may be changed dynamically, and one more
        alternate IP address may be added or removed dynamically for
        individual endpoint as well, provided that ULTIDs and host-IDs all
        IPv6 addresses of the endpoint keep the same value at any given
        moment.</t>

        <t>The sender may choose as the source IP address by selecting any
        network prefix that it has most-recently sent to its peer in the
        allowed address list field of the Sink Parameter header, joining with
        the host ID in the Sink Parameter header and the stable ULTID of the
        sender, and choose as the destination IP address by selecting any
        network prefix in the allowed address list field of the Sink Parameter
        header most-recently received from its peer, joining with the peer's
        host ID and the peer's ULTID. Thus multiple multi-homed paths MAY
        co-exist between the two FSP endpoints.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-10.6" title="Explicit Multi-home Informing">
        <t>If an FSP end node is configured with multiply global unicast IPv6
        address, it MAY advertise multiple underlying addresses to the remote
        end by put them in the addressable network prefix list of the Sink
        Parameter extension header. The Sink Parameter extension header may be
        carried in the CONNECT_REQUEST, ACK_CONNECT_REQ, PERSIST, MULTIPLY or
        KEEP_ALIVE packet.</t>

        <t>Any participant of the communication SHALL NOT make discrimination
        of the source or destination IP address of any packet provided that
        both the source ULTID and the destination ULTID keep unchanged and the
        ICC field passes verification.</t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section anchor="sect-11">
      <name slugifiedName="n-graceful-shutdown">Graceful Shutdown</name>
      <t>One participant of an FSP connection MAY initiate graceful shutdown
      of the connection if and only if its peer has committed the most recent
      transmit transaction.</t>

      <t>By initiating graceful shutdown the participant tells its peer that
      current transmit transaction is to be committed as well.</t>

      <section anchor="sect-11.1" title="Initiation of Graceful Shutdown">
        <t><t>(RELEASE, FREWS, SN, ExpectedSN, ICC)</t></t>

        <t>An FSP end node MAY initiate graceful shutdown if it is in the
        PEER_COMMIT, COMMITTING2 or CLOSABLE state. It SHALL NOT initiate
        graceful shutdown if its peer has not committed current transmit
        transaction.</t>

        <t>Graceful shutdown is signaled to the remote end by sending a
        RELEASE command packet. The FSP end node SHALL migrate to the
        PRE_CLOSED state just before sending the RELEASE packet.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-11.2" title="Acknowledgment of Graceful Shutdown">
        <t>The RELEASE packet may be accepted in the COMMITTING, COMMITTED,
        COMMITTING2, CLOSABLE or PRE_CLOSED state.</t>

        <t>If the legitimate RELEASE packet is received in the COMMITTING or
        COMMITTING2 state, the FSP end node SHALL buffer the RELEASE packet,
        wait each packet of the last transmit transaction of its peer has been
        received, deliver all the buffered payload and then migrate to the
        SHUT_REQUESTED state.</t>

        <t>If the legitimate RELEASE packet is received in the COMMITTED or
        CLOSABLE state, the FSP end node SHALL migrate to the SHUT_REQUESTED
        state immediately.</t>

        <t>In either of the two cases the receiver of the RELEASE packet SHALL
        acknowledge the sender of the RELEASE packet with a legitimate out-
        of-band KEEP_ALIVE packet.</t>

        <t>Note that out-of-order RELEASE packet MAY be discarded in the
        COMMITTED or CLOSABLE state.</t>

        <t>If the RELEASE packet is received in the PRE_CLOSED state, it is to
        finalize the graceful shutdown procedure.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-11.3" title="Finalization of Graceful Shutdown">
        <t>If either the legitimate RELEASE packet or the legitimate
        KEEP_ALIVE packet is received in the PRE_CLOSED state the grace
        shutdown request is supposed to be acknowledged and the shutdown
        procedure SHALL be finalized by that the FSP end node migrates to the
        CLOSED state immediately.</t>

        <t>In SHUT_REQUESTED state the FSP node SHALL migrate to CLOSED state
        immediately on the Shutdown API called by the ULA.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-11.4" title="Retransmission of RELEASE Packet">
        <t>The FSP end node in the PRE_CLOSED state SHALL retransmit the
        RELEASE packet until it migrates to CLOSED state or it is timed
        out.</t>

        <t>As RELEASE is the in-band packet retransmission of the RELEASE
        packet is subjected to the normal retransmission rule.</t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section anchor="sect-12">
      <name slugifiedName="n-timeouts-close">Timeouts and Abrupt Close</name>
      <section anchor="sect-12.1" title="Timeouts in End-to-End Negotiation">
        <t>Initially the initiator is in the CONNECT_BOOTSTRAP state. It
        migrates to the CONNECT_ AFFIRMING state after it received the
        legitimate ACK_INIT_CONNECT packet. Then it migrates to the
        PEER_COMMIT or CLOSABLE state after it received the legitimate
        ACK_CONNECT _REQ packet, depending on the hint of ULA.</t>

        <t>The responder incarnates a new connection context which is
        initially in the CHALLENGING state after accepting a legitimate
        Connect Request packet. Then it migrates to the COMMITTING or CLOSABLE
        state, depending on the packet received from its peer.</t>

        <t>If the initiator or the responder is unable to migrate to a new
        state in some limit time (by default 60 seconds, except in LISTENING
        state) it aborts the connection by recycling the connection
        context.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-12.2" title="Timeouts in Multiply">
        <t>Initially the initiating side of Connection Multiplication is in
        the CLONING state. It migrates to the ACTIVE, COMMITTED, PEER_COMMIT
        or CLOSABLE state after it received the legitimate PERSIST packet.
        Which state to migrated depends on the EoT flag of the initiating
        MULTIPLY packet and the responding PERSIST packet.</t>

        <t>If the initiating side is unable to migrate to a new state in some
        limit time (by default 60 seconds) it aborts multiplication by
        recycling the new connection context.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-12.3"
               title="Timeout of Transmit Transaction Commitment">
        <t>The FSP node MUST abort the connection if the time of no packet
        having arrived has exceed certain limit in the COMMITTING or
        COMMITTING2 state.</t>

        <t>In this FSP version, timeout of transmit transaction commitment is
        set to 5 minutes.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-12.4" title="Timeout of Graceful Shutdown">
        <t>It simply migrates to the NON_EXISTENT pseudo-state if timeout in
        the PRE_CLOSED state.</t>

        <t>In this FSP version, timeout of Graceful Shutdown is set to 1
        minute.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-12.5" title="Idle Timeout">
        <t>If one participant has not received any packet nor has it sent any
        packet in some limit time, it MUST be abruptly closed.</t>

        <t>In this FSP version the time limit, or the idle timeout, is set to
        4 hours.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-12.6" title="Session Key Timeout">
        <t>For this FSP version if a secret key is applied for more than 2^30
        times the FSP node MUST abruptly closed instantly.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-12.7" title="Abrupt Close">
        <t>An FSP node abruptly shutdown a session by sending a RESET packet
        and release all of the resource occupied by the the session
        immediately.</t>

        <t><t>(RESET, Reason of Failure, SN, ExpectedSN, ICC)</t></t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section anchor="sect-13" toc="include">
      <name slugifiedName="n-security-considerations">Security Considerations</name>
      <section anchor="sect-13.1" title="Deny of Service Attack">
        <t>FSP is designed to mitigate effect of DoS attack by exploiting
        Cookie.</t>

        <t>However, resistance against distributed DoS attack relies on
        external mechanism.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-13.2" title="Replay Attack">
        <t>In-band sequence number and out-of-band sequence number are
        exploited to resist against replay attack.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-13.3" title="Passive Attacks">
        <t>AEAD MAY be exploited by the ULA to protect it against passive
        attacks such as eavesdropping, gaining advantage by analyzing the data
        sent.</t>

        <t>MAC only service MAY also be utilized. Together with application
        layer stream-mode encryption it protects the ULA against passive
        attacks as well.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-13.4" title="Masquerade Attack">
        <t>Both AEAD and MAC only service may be exploited to protect the
        endpoints against masquerade attack.</t>

        <t>If proxy pattern for syndicated name resolution is exploited for
        FSP over IPv6, secure neighbor discovery <xref target="RFC3971"/>
        SHOULD be applied instead of common neighbor discovery whenever it is
        feasible.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-13.5" title="Active Man-In-The-Middle Attack">
        <t>The ULA SHALL take account to protect itself against MITM attack
        when making client authentication and key establishment.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="sect-13.6" title="Privacy Concerns">
        <t>It is beneficial for privacy protection that the ULTID of each
        endpoints of an FSP connection is generated randomly <xref
        target="RFC7721"/>.</t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section anchor="sect-14">
      <name slugifiedName="n-IANA-considerations">IANA Considerations</name>
      <t>It should be requested that the port number registered for UDP
      packets encapsulating FSP in the IPv4 network. The port number 18003 is
      exploited in the concept prototype implementation. The number is the
      decimal presentation of ASCII codes of the character 'F' ('x46') and 'S'
      ('x53') concatenated in network byte order.</t>

      <t>It should be requested that the 'Next Header'/protocol number is
      assigned for FSP over IPv6. Decimal number 144 is exploited in the
      concept prototype implementation.</t>
    </section>
  </middle>

  <back>
    <references title="Normative References">
      <reference anchor="AES">
        <front>
          <title>Advanced Encryption Standard (AES)</title>

          <author>
            <organization>NIST</organization>
          </author>

          <date month="November" year="2001"/>
        </front>
      </reference>

      <reference anchor="CRC64">
        <front>
          <title>Data Interchange on 12.7 mm 48-Track Magnetic Tape Cartridges
          - DLT1 Format Standard, Annex B</title>

          <author>
            <organization>ECMA</organization>
          </author>

          <date month="December" year="1992"/>
        </front>
      </reference>

      <reference anchor="GCM">
        <front>
          <title>Recommendation for Block Cipher Modes of Operation:
          Galois/Counter Mode (GCM) and GMAC</title>

          <author>
            <organization>NIST</organization>
          </author>

          <date month="November" year="2007"/>
        </front>
      </reference>

      <reference anchor="LZ4" target="https://lz4.github.io/lz4/">
        <front>
          <title>LZ4: Extremely Fast Compression algorithm</title>

          <author/>

          <date/>
        </front>
      </reference>

      <reference anchor="OSI_RM">
        <front>
          <title>Information technology-Open Systems Interconnection - Basic
          Reference Model: The Basic Model</title>

          <author>
            <organization>ISO and IEC</organization>
          </author>

          <date month="November" year="1994"/>
        </front>
      </reference>

      <reference anchor="R01">
        <front>
          <title>Authenticated encryption with Associated Data</title>

          <author fullname="P. Rogaway" initials="P." surname="Rogaway"/>

          <date year="2002"/>
        </front>
      </reference>

      &RFC1122;

      &RFC2104;

      &RFC2119;

      &RFC2526;

      &RFC2663;

      &RFC3124;

      &RFC3168;

      &RFC3629;

      &RFC4106;

      &RFC4291;

      &RFC5056;

      &RFC5869;

      &RFC6887;

      &RFC8085;

      &RFC8200;

      &RFC8273;

      <reference anchor="STD5">
        <front>
          <title>Internet Protocol</title>

          <author fullname="J. Postel" initials="J." surname="Postel"/>

          <date month="September" year="1981"/>
        </front>

        <seriesInfo name="STD" value="5"/>

        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="791"/>
      </reference>

      <reference anchor="STD6">
        <front>
          <title>User Datagram Protocol</title>

          <author fullname="J. Postel" initials="J." surname="Postel"/>

          <date month="August" year="1980"/>
        </front>

        <seriesInfo name="STD" value="6"/>

        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="768"/>
      </reference>

      <reference anchor="STD7">
        <front>
          <title>Transmission Control Protocol</title>

          <author fullname="J. Postel" initials="J." surname="Postel"/>

          <date month="September" year="1981"/>
        </front>

        <seriesInfo name="STD" value="7"/>

        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="793"/>
      </reference>
    </references>

    <references title="Informative References">
      <reference anchor="Gao2002"
                 target="https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/u-6i-6f-Etuvh80-SUuRbSCDTwg">
        <front>
          <title>Fuzzy-layering and its suggestion</title>

          <author fullname="J. Gao" initials="J." surname="Gao"/>

          <date month="September" year="2002"/>
        </front>

        <seriesInfo name="IETF" value="Mail Archive"/>
      </reference>

      <reference anchor="ISO-SM3"
                 target="https://www.iso.org/standard/67116.html">
        <front>
          <title>IT Security techniques -- Hash-functions -- Part 3: Dedicated
          hash-functions</title>

          <author fullname="International Organization for Standardization"/>

          <date month="October" year="2018"/>
        </front>

        <seriesInfo name="ISO/IEC" value="10118-3:2018"/>
      </reference>

      &RFC1034;

      &RFC1035;

      &RFC3022;

      &RFC3596;

      &RFC3971;

      &RFC4086;

      &RFC4555;

      &RFC4861;

      &RFC4862;

      &RFC5942;

      &RFC6177;

      &RFC6298;

      &RFC7050;

      &RFC7721;

      &RFC8415;

      &RFC8504;
    </references>

    <section pn="section-appendix.a" toc="include">
      <name slugifiedName="n-issues-for-further-study">Issues for Further Study</name>
      <section pn="section-appendix.a.1" title="Resolution of ULTID in DNS">
        <t>There are two patterns of IP address resolution in FSP: the DNS-
        compatible pattern and the proxy pattern. The former pattern relies on
        some name service to resolve the IP address of the responder for the
        initiator before they exchange end-to-end negotiation packets.</t>

        <t>In the DNS-compatible pattern, the responder side of the FSP
        participants registered its address identifier, such as 'domain name'
        in some name service such as DNS <xref target="RFC1034"/><xref
        target="RFC1035"/>, according to some pre-agreement at first. The
        initiator resolves the current IP address of the responder by
        consulting the name service, such as looking after the A or AAAA
        record <xref target="RFC3596"/> of the domain name in DNS.</t>

        <t>If UDP over IPv4 is exploited as the under layer data packet
        delivery service the port number of the responder is firstly resolved
        just alike normal network application such as HTTP. Then it is
        extended to 32-bit ULTID, and ULTIDs of FSP can be considered as the
        superset of TCP port numbers.</t>

        <t>If the string representation of IPv4/IPv6 address is applied
        directly as the peer's address identifier instead of the domain name
        there is no need for some real address resolution. But from the API
        caller's point of view it is a DNS-compatible mode address
        resolution.</t>
      </section>

      <section pn="section-appendix.a.2"
               title="Proxy Pattern for Syndicated Name Resolution">
        <t>The proxy pattern of IP address resolution in FSP is to embed the
        address resolution information in the connection initialization
        packets and is designed to work in FSP over IPv6 mode only.</t>

        <t>In IPv6 network the rightmost 32 bits of the IPv6 address directly
        maps to the ULTID so FSP does not need additional multiplexing
        mechanism such as port number. And it needs not consult SRV record or
        look for some entry in some 'services' file.</t>

        <t>If the INIT_CONNECT packet carries the responder's host name it
        MUST take the link-local interface address as the source IPv6 address
        and the default link-local gateway address, FE80::1, as the
        destination IPv6 address no matter whether the global unicast IP
        address of the default gateway is configured. In such scenario the
        link-local gateway MUST be able to resolute the responder's host name
        to its global unicast IPv6 address, and the gateway MUST be able to
        map the initiator's link local address to its global unicast IPv6
        address.</t>

        <t>If the gateway that relays the INIT_CONNECT packet finds that the
        responder is on the same link-local network with the initiator it
        SHALL change the source and the destination IP addresses of the
        INIT_CONNECT packet to the link-local IP addresses of the initiator
        and the responder respectively, and relay the packet onto the same
        link-local network.</t>

        <t>On receiving the INIT_CONNECT packet that carries the responder's
        host name the link-local gateway MUST resolute the responder's global
        unicast IPv6 address and map the initiator's global unicast IPv6
        address, and replace the destination and source address of the
        INIT_CONNECT packet respectively, unless it finds that the initiator
        and the responder are on the same link-local network, where the
        gateway SHALL process the packet as stated in the previous
        statement.</t>
      </section>

      <section pn="section-appendix.a.3" title="Asymmetric Transmission">
        <t>If there is one participant whose receive interface is not the same
        as the send interface the participant is called an asymmetric-
        transmission node.</t>

        <t>Asymmetric transmission itself is asymmetric in the sense that one
        participant may be asymmetric-transmission node while its peer is a
        normal node that the send interface is the same receive interface.</t>

        <t>An end node is asymmetric-transmission if it received an
        ACK_CONNECT_REQ packet or PERSIST packet whose source IP address that
        the network interface accepting the packets reported is not in the
        allowed IP address list in the Sink Parameter header of the
        packet.</t>

        <t>For an asymmetric-transmission remote end, the near end cannot rely
        on automatic IP address change detection. Instead IP address change
        notification mechanism shall be utilized.</t>

        <t>However for this version of FSP asymmetric transmission support is
        optional.</t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section pn="section-appendix.b" toc="include">
      <name slugifiedName="n-choices-of-design-goals">Choices of Design Goals</name>
      <section pn="section-appendix.b.1" title="Optimizing towards IPv6">
        <t>FSP intends to promote IPv6 for sake of transparent end-to-end connectivity.</t>
        <section pn="section-appendix.b.1.1" title="Goal: More Efficient Use of the IPv6 Address Space">
          <t>
            The length of an IPv6 address is 128 bits. Practices of IPv4 NAPT
            show that address space of 48 bits is sufficient. There could be
            optimization space for more efficient use of the IPv6 address space.
          </t>
          <t>It could be argued that every IPv6 network node is effectively a router.
            And it could be argued that this opinion is implicitly supported by
            "Unique IPv6 Prefix per Host" <xref target="RFC8273"/>.
          </t>
          <t>It could be argued that the upper layer application is the ultimate IPv6 end-point as well.</t>
        </section>
        <section pn="section-appendix.b.1.2" title="Goal: NAT friendliness in IPv4 network">
          <t>
            Network Address Translation and Port Translation (NAPT) <xref target="RFC2663"/>
            works well for conserving global addresses and addressing multihoming
            requirements because an IPv4 NAPT router implements three functions:
            source address selection, next-hop resolution, and (optionally) DNS
            resolution. It is mandatory for FSP to keep NAT-friendliness in the
            IPv4 internetwork because NAT middleboxes are ubiquitous.
          </t>
        </section>
        <section pn="section-appendix.b.1.3" title="Non-Goal: NAT friendliness in IPv6 network">
          <t>
            It is both feasible and preferable to avoid NAT in the IPv6
            internetwork for sake of transparent end-to-end connectivity.
          </t>
        </section>
      </section>
 
      <section pn="section-appendix.b.2" title="Hardware-Accelerated Cryptography">
      <t>
        Hardware implementation efficiency and popularity shall be the most
        important factors of selecting the data integrity and confidentiality
        protection algorithm.
      </t>
      <t>
        First version of FSP exploits AES-GCM<xref target="AES"/><xref target="GCM"/>, like in The Use
        of Galois/Counter Mode (GCM) in IPsec Encapsulating Security Payload
        (ESP) <xref target="RFC4106"/>.
      </t>
      <t>
        Here it is explicitly proposed that the upper layer application
        should take care of key establishment, and install the key
        established onto the FSP layer, alike to the Use of Channel Bindings
        to Secure Channels<xref target="RFC5056"/>. Reason behind the proposal is alike to
        channel binding as well: 'the main goal of channel binding is to be
        able to delegate cryptographic session protection to network layers
        below the application in hopes of being able to better leverage
        hardware implementations of cryptographic protocols'.
      </t>
      </section>

      <section pn="section-appendix.b.3" title="On-the-wire Compression">
        <t>
          Because lots of content is compressible and compression saves
          bandwidth, it is proposed that FSP shall support on-the-wire
          compression.
        </t>
        <t>
          LZ4 algorithm is chosen for it "features extremely fast decoder"
          [LZ4]. Few well-known loss-less compression algorithm has higher
          performance than LZ4 in terms of decompression speed.
        </t>
        <t>
          Besides, LZ4 offers a high compression derivative called LZ4_HC that
          shares the same "extremely fast decoder" with the default compressor.
          It is possible to pre-compress some content with LZ4_HC and serve it
          to mass client, while each client decodes and gets the original
          content with on-the-wire speed.
        </t>
        <section pn="section-appendix.b.3.1" title="Goal: Compatibility with Pre-compression">
          <t>
            From the sender side of view lots of content is pre-determined and
            pre-compressible. It would be welcomed if the on-the-wire compression
            algorithm chosen offers a high compression branch that share the same
            on-the-wire speed decoder with the on-the-wire encoder.
          </t>
        </section>
        <section pn="section-appendix.b.3.2" title="Goal: Goal: Decompression Speed">
          <t> The decoder should run as fast as possible.</t>
        </section>
        <section pn="section-appendix.b.3.3" title="Goal: System Robustness">
          <t>
            From the receiver point of view decompression may consume
            unpredictable amount of memory resource. On-the-wire compression
            service SHOULD be provided in the user space for sake of system
            robustness. And the decoder should consume memory resource less than
            the amount reasonably provided by a constrained node.
          </t>
        </section>
        <section pn="section-appendix.b.3.4" title="Non-Goal: Versatility of On-the-Wire Compression">
          <t>
            Speed and system robustness should take precedence over compression ratio on selecting the
            on-the-wire compression algorithm for FSP.
          </t>
        </section>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section title="Acknowledgements">
    </section>

  </back>
</rfc>
