From dhc@dcrocker.net Sun Feb 5 11:10:48 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DA8221F84D9 for ; Sun, 5 Feb 2012 11:10:48 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.6 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v5ymTEH63g+Y for ; Sun, 5 Feb 2012 11:10:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C830121F8557 for ; Sun, 5 Feb 2012 11:10:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (adsl-67-124-148-117.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [67.124.148.117]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q15JAONY025946 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 5 Feb 2012 11:10:29 -0800 Message-ID: <4F2ED420.9030208@dcrocker.net> Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2012 11:10:24 -0800 From: Dave CROCKER Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120129 Thunderbird/10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tobias Gondrom References: <6.2.5.6.2.20120110135951.0cb505f0@elandnews.com> <4F0CEF1E.1080303@gondrom.org> <4F0DB93B.8030806@dcrocker.net> <4F0E40B3.9090408@gondrom.org> <6.2.5.6.2.20120111222251.0782c998@elandnews.com> <4F0E92F9.30402@gondrom.org> In-Reply-To: <4F0E92F9.30402@gondrom.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Sun, 05 Feb 2012 11:10:30 -0800 (PST) Cc: appsdir@ietf.org, sm+ietf@elandsys.com Subject: Re: [appsdir] Request for reviews X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2012 19:10:48 -0000 On 1/11/2012 11:59 PM, Tobias Gondrom wrote: > But, if I may say so: actually I don't like the idea that you as the coordinator > need to send a reminder if you don't get an ACK from the reviewer. That creates > a lot of extra work on your end. > The best default should be that the assigned review will be done until the > deadline (of course as long as that deadline is something reasonable >72hours) > unless the reviewer sends a deny (of course within lets say 72hours). Good thing we are all in the communication protocol business and, therefore, all know the fundamental weakness in an open-loop control mechanisms. Positive acks and retries are your friend. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net From dhc@dcrocker.net Sun Feb 5 11:41:44 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9436021F854F for ; Sun, 5 Feb 2012 11:41:44 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.6 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aa2XQYCwLFS1 for ; Sun, 5 Feb 2012 11:41:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D071921F8548 for ; Sun, 5 Feb 2012 11:41:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (adsl-67-124-148-117.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [67.124.148.117]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q15JfZlj026478 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 5 Feb 2012 11:41:41 -0800 Message-ID: <4F2EDB6F.6070004@dcrocker.net> Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2012 11:41:35 -0800 From: Dave CROCKER Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120129 Thunderbird/10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tobias Gondrom References: <6.2.5.6.2.20120110135951.0cb505f0@elandnews.com> <4F0CEF1E.1080303@gondrom.org> <4F0DB93B.8030806@dcrocker.net> <4F0E40B3.9090408@gondrom.org> In-Reply-To: <4F0E40B3.9090408@gondrom.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Sun, 05 Feb 2012 11:41:41 -0800 (PST) Cc: appsdir@ietf.org Subject: Re: [appsdir] Request for reviews X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2012 19:41:44 -0000 On 1/11/2012 6:08 PM, Tobias Gondrom wrote: > On 12/01/12 00:30, Dave CROCKER wrote: > Maybe before I start, let me re-iterate, I have no strong preferences, only > thought the sec-dir approach might be beneficial for the team. So on my account > we can also keep things as they are. > In the end it boils down to your work style: some prefer to read one email with > a list which contains your name and assignment or scan a list of emails for some > that may be relevant for you. Personally I prefer the first, but can equally see > why others may prefer the latter. The one-email approach imposes extra load on the administrator, to aggregate things. It also means that the recipient does not have a transactional unit equal to a single review. Whereas having notices be per-review still allows the recipient to do aggregation (automatically with a filter) into a separate folder. At the meta-level, advocacy for an approach should consider downsides, or at least ask about them. I believe the claimed downside for the one message per review model is that it has more pieces and is therefore harder to manage? My suggestion about filtering into a separate folder is meant to attend to that. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net From barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com Mon Feb 13 15:48:21 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C26021F853B for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:48:21 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.957 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.957 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.019, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F7pGeIPAi5QA for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:48:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-gy0-f172.google.com (mail-gy0-f172.google.com [209.85.160.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B52621F8508 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:48:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by ghbg16 with SMTP id g16so3126338ghb.31 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:48:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=uBTzpM3GNmwIvcl9gC1/ERrDKztmTEzUvXXjKQ54Uyc=; b=UMgNjKLI6rL4ZAWMBawH4yO1CN4pwMg/Wmd0wLplSOgFMr1T9SyPaBmB+Brn6U2+/A lF25jqhjqZL+wmILxFkb3xl/j9PeGJ7tDkLR8r/J7NwcRRQpiGZPYynCWuLij0jXKqq8 TLkpB945pF8RnxJCKcGIrk8o7pJsp8IQ6o1Ac= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.133.210 with SMTP id q58mr24100332yhi.6.1329176900016; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:48:20 -0800 (PST) Sender: barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com Received: by 10.146.136.20 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:48:19 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:48:19 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: qO6YuSZfvu0ladxeYKz_9EEjr60 Message-ID: From: Barry Leiba To: appsdir@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf30363723f819dc04b8e11ce9 Subject: [appsdir] AppsDir reviews, and where to send them X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:48:21 -0000 --20cf30363723f819dc04b8e11ce9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 When SM sends out review requests, he includes this in the instructions: > The review should be sent to apps-discuss, the authors, the WG Chairs and > document shepherd, if applicable. ... > If your review recommends significant changes to a working-group document, > you should also consider copying the working group's mailing list. Please understand: I don't mean to pick on Henry at all... but his AppsDir review of draft-ietf-oauth-v2 is a perfect example of when sending a copy to the WG list would have been appropriate, and it wasn't sent there. Here's a good hint of that, from the review: there are four items labelled as "major issues", including a concern about not requiring TLS (a major security issue) and a concern that documentation of one aspect appears insufficient, requiring an Intenet search to augment the documentation. The doc editor responded to the review by forwarding it to the WG list. That was a good thing, but one result is that replies to the AppsDir review don't go to the OAuth list, and replies on the OAuth list don't go to apps-review or to the reviewer. So any discussion becomes fragmented. Again: I am NOT picking on any particular reviewer, but just using an example. I ask the reviewers to consider whether the WG should be seeing your review. In most cases where you're not just making editorial notes, or just talking about very minor things, the answer is probably "Yes." Barry --20cf30363723f819dc04b8e11ce9 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable When SM sends out review requests, he includes this in the instructions:
> The review should be sent to apps-discuss, the authors, the WG Ch= airs and
> document shepherd, if applicable.
...
> If your r= eview recommends significant changes to a working-group document,
> you should also consider copying the working group's mailing list.=

Please understand: I don't mean to pick on Henry at all... but = his AppsDir review of draft-ietf-oauth-v2 is a perfect example of when send= ing a copy to the WG list would have been appropriate, and it wasn't se= nt there. =A0Here's a good hint of that, from the review: there are fou= r items labelled as "major issues", including a concern about not= requiring TLS (a major security issue) and a concern that documentation of= one aspect appears insufficient, requiring an Intenet search to augment th= e documentation.

The doc editor responded to the review by forwarding it to the WG list.= =A0That was a good thing, but one result is that replies to the AppsDir re= view don't go to the OAuth list, and replies on the OAuth list don'= t go to apps-review or to the reviewer. =A0So any discussion becomes fragme= nted.

Again: I am NOT picking on any particular reviewer, but just using an e= xample. =A0I ask the reviewers to consider whether the WG should be seeing = your review. =A0In most cases where you're not just making editorial no= tes, or just talking about very minor things, the answer is probably "= Yes."

Barry
--20cf30363723f819dc04b8e11ce9-- From ht@inf.ed.ac.uk Mon Feb 13 16:20:26 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F44621E802D for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:20:26 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0LwWs8J9FdBU for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:20:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from treacle.ucs.ed.ac.uk (treacle.ucs.ed.ac.uk [129.215.16.102]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 669C721E801A for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:20:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from nutty.inf.ed.ac.uk (nutty.inf.ed.ac.uk [129.215.33.33]) by treacle.ucs.ed.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id q1E0Jxvt004635; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:20:04 GMT Received: from calexico.inf.ed.ac.uk (calexico.inf.ed.ac.uk [129.215.24.15]) by nutty.inf.ed.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q1E0JxBj030400; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:19:59 GMT Received: from calexico.inf.ed.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by calexico.inf.ed.ac.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q1E0JxLa006894; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:19:59 GMT Received: (from ht@localhost) by calexico.inf.ed.ac.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id q1E0Jv2p006890; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:19:57 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: calexico.inf.ed.ac.uk: ht set sender to ht@inf.ed.ac.uk using -f To: Barry Leiba References: From: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:19:56 +0000 In-Reply-To: (Barry Leiba's message of "Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:48:19 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) XEmacs/21.4.21 (linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Edinburgh-Scanned: at treacle.ucs.ed.ac.uk with MIMEDefang 2.60, Sophie, Sophos Anti-Virus, Clam AntiVirus X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.60 on 129.215.16.102 Cc: appsdir@ietf.org Subject: Re: [appsdir] AppsDir reviews, and where to send them X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:20:26 -0000 Barry Leiba writes: > When SM sends out review requests, he includes this in the instructions: >> ... >> If your review recommends significant changes to a working-group document, >> you should also consider copying the working group's mailing list. Hmm, not in the email I got. . . But I do remember seeing that somewhere in the past. In this case I followed the pro-forma on the appsdir page [1], which doesn't mention the WG :-( Sorry about that! I will try to have a look at the WG list tomorrow, but it may not be until Wednesday. . . ht [1] -- Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh 10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam] From sm@elandsys.com Mon Feb 13 16:36:58 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C42A21E8035 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:36:58 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.596 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.596 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.003, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NVqjBe7cJZhd for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:36:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79D0B21E8010 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:36:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([41.136.238.167]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1E0ahDZ022565 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:36:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1329179816; i=@elandsys.com; bh=uT9hxJJMbpgcS91XEtRNSbJX/6A2ienTq1lss1ZABvg=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=2JBSQQ3eb6J0mj3SbIabGSafOVzmWe/JHCqP6mY72ajLApRxkdKNCI4gphtKeQH6r XBRkXHaZGeMTPI8Lk4InLzwymQ2j3ArmNbdZ3aPhGf2Y8955sXrQZ6CQTqVgHPdXCg kUXEVgessk1T4DC8ZxB5jh9vpP2vmBva/+y4dwVI= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1329179816; i=@elandsys.com; bh=uT9hxJJMbpgcS91XEtRNSbJX/6A2ienTq1lss1ZABvg=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=lKTcNdCzcEex4rvhcr9sbM5ynxZcJSCyhk8Ubs0fqmFoPij10/yazrHQc4kne8/E8 fdyzGj4rbc3v7SR/T8KAZyWgS0cmank0oLFZCS7pxpAS+OwOVw9NEuoSFt44dY9GOZ ZlKqnhxeV9A4kbMcscukCDRcKyFMhJE5El09YQw8= Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20120213162513.0aab2880@elandnews.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6 Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:35:44 -0800 To: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) From: SM In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: appsdir@ietf.org Subject: Re: [appsdir] AppsDir reviews, and where to send them X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:36:58 -0000 Hi Henry, At 16:19 13-02-2012, Henry S. Thompson wrote: >Hmm, not in the email I got. . . I apologize for missing that. As a reminder, I posted some notes about AppsDir reviews at http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/AppsDirReview If any information is missing, ambiguous, etc., please let me know. Best regards, -sm From barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com Mon Feb 13 18:53:00 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 744F221E8030 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:53:00 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.957 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.957 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.019, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qTPuPX4NCroV for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:53:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-gx0-f172.google.com (mail-gx0-f172.google.com [209.85.161.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFFA521E8021 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:52:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by ggnq2 with SMTP id q2so3169312ggn.31 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:52:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=+QS6O5tTRHaZob3XceXJlNjkG7OeDnzqchGGjcUQuDA=; b=nVQFTZ3uaCdbcYrb1YTHBcdxEuFguJZgIbznlXUkS0TKwXUlOJ5HRqeS5KWELNDHk5 RzXoejuhz1W7j70QbBUptYCIKtCvoftns+oo4+AX4qjqSF1/XCYe0831IUEE4ErSixsp Oid2Qhs1f30XieWxNoIiufUcdzmb4cmj39EN4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.124.66 with SMTP id w42mr24059694yhh.23.1329187979582; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:52:59 -0800 (PST) Sender: barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com Received: by 10.146.136.20 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:52:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:52:59 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: UliFMpn0oca07VCub5se3vWw4EU Message-ID: From: Barry Leiba To: "Henry S. Thompson" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf300e56255cdbfd04b8e3b14f Cc: "appsdir@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [appsdir] AppsDir reviews, and where to send them X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 02:53:00 -0000 --20cf300e56255cdbfd04b8e3b14f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > :-( Sorry about that! Again, stressing: I REALLY didn't mean to complain at anyone in particular, and we REALLY appreciate the reviews! Just happened to be a good sample related to a WG that I'm involved with. Barry --20cf300e56255cdbfd04b8e3b14f Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > =A0:-( Sorry about that!

Again, stressing: I REALLY didn't = mean to complain at anyone in particular, and we REALLY appreciate the revi= ews! =A0Just happened to be a good sample related to a WG that I'm invo= lved with.

Barry --20cf300e56255cdbfd04b8e3b14f-- From tbray@textuality.com Mon Feb 13 18:54:21 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9FFD21E8030 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:54:21 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.977 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EvKyCE0B7nUJ for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:54:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-tul01m020-f172.google.com (mail-tul01m020-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2546021E8021 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:54:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by obbwd15 with SMTP id wd15so8863690obb.31 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:54:20 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.121.101 with SMTP id lj5mr14119361obb.39.1329188060742; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:54:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.79.66 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:54:20 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [24.84.235.32] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:54:20 -0800 Message-ID: From: Tim Bray To: Barry Leiba Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkwIEH9yG1gsAdDyRNwf4dPqObPqj5t+acXKrZdPw0S/gcYfqTpgIB2ddVzPgmnMIq6ZyDV Cc: "appsdir@ietf.org" , "Henry S. Thompson" Subject: Re: [appsdir] AppsDir reviews, and where to send them X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 02:54:21 -0000 I've done two Apps Dir reviews, and managed to screw up the recipient list both times :) -T On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 6:52 PM, Barry Leiba wrot= e: >> =A0:-( Sorry about that! > > Again, stressing: I REALLY didn't mean to complain at anyone in particula= r, > and we REALLY appreciate the reviews! =A0Just happened to be a good sampl= e > related to a WG that I'm involved with. > > Barry > _______________________________________________ > appsdir mailing list > appsdir@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/appsdir > From barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com Mon Feb 13 19:04:13 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8DB921F85DD for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:04:12 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.957 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.957 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.019, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kXyZ8mLxwJqy for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:04:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-gx0-f172.google.com (mail-gx0-f172.google.com [209.85.161.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A66021F8747 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:04:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by ggnq2 with SMTP id q2so3171338ggn.31 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:04:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=GzaKJwtyjI/jUscs5YcyGUjfUQyB+AyrKAD33UvZ+zw=; b=mwoSDQ06mIPurGHiDChsC++TL9cRgu0b8dI+zrOq1pThs50vnPujve6TYoYGt7TqMA cxiu7GGZkPjc1Awb8V/+PT8Znm8CcHJw/O69F3gMolpMxCVmCmVP9cqgsVy2vssPEJDl DpQ59BobUbjzgX3++SHanqsPqU2FnDhAg3hc4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.133.8 with SMTP id k8mr3316944ann.18.1329188651696; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:04:11 -0800 (PST) Sender: barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com Received: by 10.146.136.20 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:04:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:04:11 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: pb7eAjrnKz7iRARniZZfHW19NBE Message-ID: From: Barry Leiba To: Tim Bray Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d267746c81c604b8e3d9ba Cc: "appsdir@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [appsdir] AppsDir reviews, and where to send them X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 03:04:13 -0000 --0016e6d267746c81c604b8e3d9ba Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > I've done two Apps Dir reviews, and managed to screw up the recipient > list both times :) -T He-he-he....... --0016e6d267746c81c604b8e3d9ba Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > I've done two Apps Dir reviews, and managed to screw up the recipi= ent
> list both times :) =A0-T

He-he-he....... --0016e6d267746c81c604b8e3d9ba-- From sm@elandsys.com Mon Feb 13 19:50:08 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2271421E8021 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:50:08 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.596 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.596 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.003, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dxr0AgeI4d8m for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:50:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A3AA21E8043 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:50:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([41.136.238.167]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1E3nomi002126 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:50:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1329191404; i=@elandsys.com; bh=hg9/3XoCogmhDvYv4HG5nT5+WuL9IMUWCxllX3MmVZI=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=G1CY8a+7iaecZPLeeD5DSRpapNM6bpPFh+0KpLAwt/+MQdxKydS/LqPGBczC/9N04 udcBGsevfmIYVIRIJW/gkS1wmvjwr4wepDXE0+2NRbFE4I6ES93c7DYkyUUGMymjm2 AB7bTD2+T6NSvl3WKPPbm9ll6kQptOKK585mfXJg= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1329191404; i=@elandsys.com; bh=hg9/3XoCogmhDvYv4HG5nT5+WuL9IMUWCxllX3MmVZI=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=YBN75/p/2sAz2CjAbl2rN14cViYcb4CD3hPqK6Do/Wyx10cFhqxdWclOkaPQ/agxR IIxJal27S6dZ/iHl2pHBfMBsqyJxQa1kumz87qWxHcjKhpY64YmDFOXg4gue2zNeWX Kus2ElwvJHwdFVxmR11pqQ8+SrFfFHv1b3Fey/UU= Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20120213193455.0b019130@elandnews.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6 Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:48:55 -0800 To: appsdir@ietf.org From: SM In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20120119130848.0a459418@elandnews.com> References: <6.2.5.6.2.20120119130848.0a459418@elandnews.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: Re: [appsdir] Joint Review Experiment X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 03:50:08 -0000 Hello, Enrico Marocco, Alexey Melnikov performed a joint review. The other joint review from Dave Cridland and Julian Reschke should be in soon. Could everyone who had the option of a joint review assignment send me your comments off-list? I would like to know the difficulties you encountered, why you opted for doing or not doing the joint review, etc. I'll summarize the information without attribution for this mailing list. Best regards, -sm From sm@elandsys.com Wed Feb 15 15:23:37 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 225F121F850F for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:23:37 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.596 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.596 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.003, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xV-3qGda-tiE for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:23:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB68521F84FC for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:23:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([41.136.232.67]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1FNNCpv011892 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:23:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1329348205; i=@elandsys.com; bh=iW6gj0f96P/J0qLFtDQpx1qCptTpCXWzEOFKl7qp5nQ=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=c9kRSFLH6YqnZekL8Hg2IVwJfpA+B2Hip6iBJYPBIkXna6QzPUzdzSJQgPqmk/4Fr qEdH/yWMyksqB1XYUOAamD2wlmPJRBImIyczEd8F+2FOkVGrJybe2dpYn5DB7RVRhE 7FRlVcX3Ej3RAEnii4PdO84LP5qexAx2g1HsZ2xI= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1329348205; i=@elandsys.com; bh=iW6gj0f96P/J0qLFtDQpx1qCptTpCXWzEOFKl7qp5nQ=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=YeypK3InSFFXrLnPPThw1SXF33/JjWYz162oEUaoHmha45F/xrMJ5IaiN9b+E4scO XikS3LcVOLVCfYpOnoHhxwzVNzLUZUIbyzGz5majV+3J/px9o5m1bV0Fq2q0aS5jj+ wzODTdredof/fPdl95AX8j2poCBPtfeFD6bYFinU= Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20120215150908.0a637440@elandnews.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6 Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:12:18 -0800 To: Eliot Lear From: SM Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:59:59 -0800 Subject: [appsdir] Request for review: draft-desruisseaux-caldav-sched-10 X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 23:23:37 -0000 Hi Eliot, [Bcc to appsdir] Could you please review draft-desruisseaux-caldav-sched-10 before February 29? Please see http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/AppsDirReview for the administrative details. Best regards, -sm From sm@elandsys.com Wed Feb 15 15:23:50 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 210A421E80AD for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:23:50 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.596 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.596 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.003, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vZcRzf6mi-9y for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:23:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5976521E8086 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:23:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([41.136.232.67]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1FNNCpx011892 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:23:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1329348213; i=@elandsys.com; bh=VLZbilEj2BJ25MhCht7tVTcf+3FUECnRsZfw+TRgAjE=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=FjWqno3G2rH8ncCTqxK3MqI4+zpiG/KZU/OGVSUlwGCkLQEd+1SC64xgrEBmUw1rL 8gJqOaH1XL9zdVZMNdN/zKxd2OOjwJfSDKkmVUSXWIcNkyvTbEtxAjimL5byzZzLCX NokpNvuVn7c5vHyUMcIvuWCQ3vttFnFDw2EhvlW4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1329348213; i=@elandsys.com; bh=VLZbilEj2BJ25MhCht7tVTcf+3FUECnRsZfw+TRgAjE=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=a/6EhJx6JNizMXAlUTdgJJgxfVqicke62pfYgAPdfsAmxcwJebFmFygUI0EcasPHh roGvU3nPKlvu3tnJNQFSXdIscqRG6iciO7N12pJJdLgrZh9vyFyzEndqRdbIqY4tLp UT0OjN0py7U8QomQlJP2y/U22umDrLJ8uo48x1ME= Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20120215151219.0a6371b0@elandnews.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6 Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:14:23 -0800 To: Eran Hammer-Lahav From: SM Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 16:00:17 -0800 Subject: [appsdir] Request for review: draft-reschke-http-status-308-05 X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 23:23:50 -0000 Hi Eran [Bcc to appsdir] Could you please review draft-reschke-http-status-308-05 by February 29? Please see http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/AppsDirReview for the administrative details. Best regards, -sm From sm@elandsys.com Wed Feb 15 15:25:27 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 280CE21E8085 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:25:27 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.596 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.596 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.003, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r1nKoAbEp69u for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:25:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAF7621E8084 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:25:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([41.136.232.67]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1FNNCq1011892 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:23:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1329348222; i=@elandsys.com; bh=//xWG4PoXPiueSL48dA+udPQszjqWNR9VFszsZb3SPQ=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=Rz9OC+lkbGDXFhvtaALYsG53Ig/oAbRd+j0zY2lOZYKkpBrFCtW/lARg+N+mHN4O1 jD0MHjxZJRsJppyaWRpPhCE0ea7F8chnVTpqxMOFUhX6UvTz26pj90zXPEmSMx0hRu 6qXq32pVEnmMaEUTt3dRxJMPNTYmAsb0cENBHaDE= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1329348222; i=@elandsys.com; bh=//xWG4PoXPiueSL48dA+udPQszjqWNR9VFszsZb3SPQ=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=GSS9+XuxNcemQqk6T/25PiM8+re8ETCSgnXlwbhh3/uh8Z+3kFZ3eU5BtLG8ZvaHZ Kly97xwSFujmm9t/QeQmBT/J2HZNdG/uS/LNOcra410LQAbifDndSPjtJJuctTO72Y UQlnJ/3OGn4hPQ6adCIYeqEZPf8O3W/RRxRx+JqA= Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20120215151424.0a6376d0@elandnews.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6 Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:18:35 -0800 To: Claudio Allocchio From: SM Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 16:00:17 -0800 Subject: [appsdir] Request for review: draft-ietf-behave-64-analysis-05 X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 23:25:27 -0000 Hi Claudio, [Bcc to appsdir] Could you please review draft-ietf-behave-64-analysis-05 before February 27? The IESG evaluation is on March 1. Please see http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/AppsDirReview for the administrative details. BTW, if you identify any issue, please consider copying the review to the WG mailing list. Barry posted some comments about that at http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/appsdir/current/msg00772.html Best regards, -sm From sm@elandsys.com Thu Feb 16 09:44:14 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5716F21F8715 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 09:44:14 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.596 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.596 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.003, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vhWsd-zwZfiP for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 09:44:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A33DF11E8074 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 09:44:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([41.136.236.65]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1GHhld2010193 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 09:43:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1329414239; i=@elandsys.com; bh=16Z+2IPh28uXIpXiS0/2HZ34NqH6akHXze5qOQfSvgY=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=zbRauInz9Y4mhgBSE8xsKy6yEg0fgAD5sB9I+n8aUcTb5UiCb7t+GVjlye/ks4Db/ PJgFVIMqG9IyanDMEbELz/F4GNbfI75beJd0HgH6BcRWEO9h0b/SysmgK0WMlsXBvh SxWbbx4dEeyLgvU7p46KJCYoPhQ36wYVbiJov4u0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1329414239; i=@elandsys.com; bh=16Z+2IPh28uXIpXiS0/2HZ34NqH6akHXze5qOQfSvgY=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=eJKRpvNazqpQP5LSP+YeFw1t779kVVopx1pzI1zKuvsx18w6SzyJsK5X/9lSiXnqt paVSNGYbnGl0gLyCLGgUk0FDacXCdVuJU5XWhjofK9xq2RnS+5o5Q1RUbJjH4H7VbM 6k9vE4AXMOA1SWYVnVr4fNrTrqmfCK8CKbo/ZKSg= Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20120216094159.088abd38@elandnews.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6 Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 09:43:34 -0800 To: appsdir@ietf.org From: SM In-Reply-To: References: <6.2.5.6.2.20120215151424.0a6376d0@elandnews.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: Re: [appsdir] Request for review: draft-ietf-behave-64-analysis-05 X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 17:44:14 -0000 Hello, I'll review draft-ietf-behave-64-analysis-05 as Claudio is on vacation. Regards, -sm From Claudio.Allocchio@garr.it Thu Feb 16 13:06:35 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC00D21E8043 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 13:06:35 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.369 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.369 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.230, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FY0INe7vKW5Q for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 13:06:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from cyrus.dir.garr.it (cyrus.dir.garr.it [IPv6:2001:760:0:158::29]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A430C21E8064 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 13:06:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from mac-allocchio3.garrtest.units.it (mac-allocchio3.garrtest.units.it [140.105.201.3]) (authenticated bits=0) by cyrus.dir.garr.it (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1GL64Ui005423 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 16 Feb 2012 22:06:06 +0100 (CET) X-DomainKeys: Sendmail DomainKeys Filter v1.0.2 cyrus.dir.garr.it q1GL64Ui005423 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=mail; d=garr.it; c=simple; q=dns; b=PGdtWdY8vZlSzxn4x6zKq2vsaU3bPmPyJF9SPzsSq5iB2tlqb6IfVYZoijlAa7ems yC8D66OFs8qUzEgImeveY6XDcCDN7ieh33p969vRe9yc8ep4KNXHw7PLna2toONVNdd 1xlsYDjFUS+5AC/ljVDdYZaVB3oreifEf8A4nOE= Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 22:06:04 +0100 (CET) From: Claudio Allocchio X-X-Sender: claudio@mac-allocchio3.garrtest.units.it To: SM In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20120216094159.088abd38@elandnews.com> Message-ID: References: <6.2.5.6.2.20120215151424.0a6376d0@elandnews.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20120216094159.088abd38@elandnews.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (OSX 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: appsdir@ietf.org Subject: Re: [appsdir] Request for review: draft-ietf-behave-64-analysis-05 X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 21:06:36 -0000 On Thu, 16 Feb 2012, SM wrote: > Hello, > > I'll review draft-ietf-behave-64-analysis-05 as Claudio is on vacation. thanks S. ! > > Regards, > -sm > > _______________________________________________ > appsdir mailing list > appsdir@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/appsdir > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Claudio Allocchio G A R R Claudio.Allocchio@garr.it Senior Technical Officer tel: +39 040 3758523 Italian Academic and G=Claudio; S=Allocchio; fax: +39 040 3758565 Research Network P=garr; A=garr; C=it; PGP Key: http://www.cert.garr.it/PGP/keys.php3#ca From sm@elandsys.com Thu Feb 16 14:14:59 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2026121F8817 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 14:14:59 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.596 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.596 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.003, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NFjNnyX6cPev for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 14:14:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4646021F8690 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 14:14:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([41.136.236.65]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1GMEWhB004558 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 14:14:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1329430484; i=@elandsys.com; bh=VCceeIMhK5EkVtapHvyCj7niDlKubHK25q/eVor8nCw=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=EO+ZawqMcwJtDT0JacLL+R9Depf4+T8p9GZxJDdwRwl2796JGuCYuU1L826mFPfpa ojhYcZi+jgNiZjzgQcpaIc9oQ/rbYVe/zDSICcT/8EoOG7AAyGMJo2u2bJXrU3cJbO /J5fdqmq2Zt/9hEkLWzR/0LGFVBWlBNXcQk1AWYk= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1329430484; i=@elandsys.com; bh=VCceeIMhK5EkVtapHvyCj7niDlKubHK25q/eVor8nCw=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=LxwJPFMtyNjCPlNRbFI1ykKFvVsNjZAS3DONJN6oe+u069e+KwDr9I/YcFlcvb2aS T7GVtJ70cp5hVzSbr9paAvAsTgfRbI/2gfsXv6lyLBa/cy7IFv72Erk5O7J06EyrT9 YVlHOuH9qrP9xtK8ZmE2GXMuch4JEa/0ciIP2FCU= Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20120216131806.09b22378@elandnews.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6 Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 13:53:37 -0800 To: appsdir@ietf.org From: SM In-Reply-To: References: <6.2.5.6.2.20120119130848.0a459418@elandnews.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20120213193455.0b019130@elandnews.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: Re: [appsdir] Joint Review Experiment X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 22:14:59 -0000 Hello, First of all I would like to thank the persons who provided feedback on the Joint Review Experiment. There were two reviews assigned as joint reviews. One of them went smoothly and the other didn't. Some reviewers did not choose the option. I did not ask why. One of the main points was that it increases the workload by 30%. As one of the unlisted objectives of AppsDir is not to make matters easier for the reviewers, I prefer not to pursue the experiment. As usual, you can override me by commenting on this. It was pointed out that it is to early to tell whether doing joint reviews will improve the quality of the reviews. Another point was that it will help spread knowledge. As much as I believe that it is a good thing, I am not comfortable asking anyone to do so. Best regards, -sm From sm@elandsys.com Sat Feb 18 20:57:12 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 568D011E808C for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 20:57:12 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.595 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.595 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.004, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vQwFS-FUwHBC for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 20:57:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD4E511E8075 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 20:57:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([41.136.232.92]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1J4uqoW024217 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 18 Feb 2012 20:57:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1329627424; i=@elandsys.com; bh=fYI1w/xd65Uavlx0hGuHz4TTrUsLXnO4a4UixMv65OU=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=qtKrME3DPn6AJymzkqYNaGmq4iKWEMuvn3A0L8dAY1Jh5l6/vSRJqmGeQX1F4UqE+ Zju4iBmPGVITpp2Ee1HupMhC7yx27f4RHYgpgReNDsOIHdjQ1KhsaRGWztXSXH7EUg OqGfWMAaXjsoDSGjP32E2wsGCdZpFJ/0GobJYvSM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1329627424; i=@elandsys.com; bh=fYI1w/xd65Uavlx0hGuHz4TTrUsLXnO4a4UixMv65OU=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=wlMNMsrzAlmYuNmynwL6m/KTRqv4hTIDUZDRCLPNN5671Ft3Gag6ZOXDkrx38j2e+ YvDI1lx1dtu2Y55ZODjRZWpPDSYxtrJ5CKuODpGCuO1csqLH+3Ui77wmuhsVgZyOug b5Nqk+uzpPDbJTpqnLtOoX4x2TzLy12YfbW8X2D0= Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20120218204306.0a2a16a8@elandnews.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6 Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 20:46:00 -0800 To: Carsten Bormann From: SM Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 21:09:29 -0800 Subject: [appsdir] Request for review: draft-garcia-shim6-applicability-03 X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 04:57:12 -0000 Hi Carsten, {Bcc to appsdir] Could you review draft-garcia-shim6-applicability-03 by February 29? Please see http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/AppsDirReview for the administrative details. Thanks, -sm From sm@elandsys.com Sat Feb 18 20:57:21 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A032A11E808E for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 20:57:21 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.595 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.595 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.004, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sqO5ayIWcvmA for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 20:57:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3736C11E808F for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 20:57:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([41.136.232.92]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1J4uqoY024217 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 18 Feb 2012 20:57:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1329627433; i=@elandsys.com; bh=ZyjL64q/ygPf9Ps6GZDxlUEVrISDxSMAvrh213Vk3a8=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=IyyPBRtqGb/TqlRFH3/VIYM3yrWpAiJ6xS4baeXmve8r11Qw+r6OQXenO+6q3VK9E sy881E2C7wX5OxxdnUqhAGAsVyDGCmpJV1GqCzAnE8Tmfkv0wy378fWO9dWAbNd//I a1tey90bY2vk8Syb1WebgA1ec2FOKAT9/9ATY8bA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1329627433; i=@elandsys.com; bh=ZyjL64q/ygPf9Ps6GZDxlUEVrISDxSMAvrh213Vk3a8=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=AMDz1lNLxF+cLuM7/wWxuDe14xKkf/D2nRloMcsEqFYpWAtDmYPk9Us2/uqmtwF6r Ge4HRoHhIzirPIbKbdCXtzOIFstrbls3w/rfYruQZVTKmOlI0Yw6AxhrAPaVZNLIAB dJ1K5+nOdfm1ZkmHHIFmcCzLxlM1llrszzOnsAMc= Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20120218204602.0a2a1938@elandnews.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6 Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 20:49:40 -0800 To: Joseph Yee From: SM Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 21:09:29 -0800 Subject: [appsdir] Request for review: draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2671bis-edns0-08 X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 04:57:21 -0000 Hi Joseph, {Bcc to appsdir] Could you review draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2671bis-edns0-08 by February 29? As there will be a revised I-D, please work from it. I am sending the assignment early to take it off my list. Please see http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/AppsDirReview for the administrative details. Thanks, -sm From sm@elandsys.com Sat Feb 18 21:01:17 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06A6811E808E for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 21:01:17 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.595 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.595 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.004, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bcGHlF1P-7p3 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 21:01:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F214611E8075 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 21:01:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([41.136.232.92]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1J4uqoa024217 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 18 Feb 2012 20:57:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1329627440; i=@elandsys.com; bh=1XxslmvBmvM8DX8MUPwPXiphz1em1U6o76pxiIYeBFs=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=Jt1qXI02i+YBZZG2oetQckFCPKqxmdDAVaalOzg2Ee7VUzTjvhIvNJXjYq1SxeN/U RLNwnZ0MUQE1wzbgtpLi62g0AcwHCJ9QfQsP7BtTDz9dVjibQj+bGVMwX8GQOgF5R7 EOV+SMoRTSiLJSu9Ot+UpKgQw0XAIIIyvcRCUIbk= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1329627440; i=@elandsys.com; bh=1XxslmvBmvM8DX8MUPwPXiphz1em1U6o76pxiIYeBFs=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=Wg46kq0LdxgvjQNa1DkvnOkQ7+TTzRTqrquvuLVKi5Gtyzy20bHXAfKrBSRoKbhpl Ar2wnMNRVVdhsY9zUhzamgdOLgHnSSllQkqfgwFYDGGVJFdP1cj/v51E5fpuoSc/E2 HhZ72O6iL75CnpeMVUbEfUs/vA20BD8uDeQ6wzKQ= Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20120218204942.0a2a1bc8@elandnews.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6 Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 20:51:41 -0800 To: Mark Nottingham From: SM Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 21:09:29 -0800 Subject: [appsdir] Request for review: draft-ietf-pkix-cmp-transport-protocols-16 X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 05:01:17 -0000 Hi Mark, {Bcc to appsdir] Could you review draft-ietf-pkix-cmp-transport-protocols-16 by February 29? Please see http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/AppsDirReview for the administrative details. Thanks, -sm From sm@elandsys.com Sat Feb 18 21:01:17 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12DB811E8075 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 21:01:17 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.595 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.595 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.004, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7mgVFS5GJV+B for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 21:01:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AC4C11E808C for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 21:01:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([41.136.232.92]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1J4uqoc024217 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 18 Feb 2012 20:57:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1329627449; i=@elandsys.com; bh=TYlzcQhVqsjEgaD5tNAnGHU+TtHuZZ9A6hXkFt59Hf8=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=YbgT7P5aUKv4KziOlvdJX8l6i5WxgMaeK4/1WU+JaGHotXewALGcYMRbA5bT0NZwE BTd6J+ynN1y0oXCQy2DqEi2XHoN2YfKb21CLUUDp6gMibcnlVp8sH8Mx63SfMCL4c1 OU6e3wlFCxDWHrJvT6Qg7fsEb7zrISQokOhtGWjE= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1329627449; i=@elandsys.com; bh=TYlzcQhVqsjEgaD5tNAnGHU+TtHuZZ9A6hXkFt59Hf8=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=qGjsqYfO7yeczviX/msImy1kuPQZYy840ZvMKTdtPeQ4Dh1u+szMAHLnT6TQUrB6b dKpVDFI+Pv4lWVXcU31EphC8mmxojvennh2tbGYAsIK5VXDYioGXE8OD0EfZO5wQ1k Llxx+zDmWZgPLAVjVsCsC2S7VN3JU99S1PYEQtAo= Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20120218205143.0a2a1e58@elandnews.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6 Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 20:53:25 -0800 To: Salvatore Loreto From: SM Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 21:09:29 -0800 Subject: [appsdir] Request for review: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-reconfigure-rebind-09 X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 05:01:17 -0000 Hi Sal, {Bcc to appsdir] Could you review draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-reconfigure-rebind-09 by February 29? Please see http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/AppsDirReview for the administrative details. Thanks, -sm From sm@elandsys.com Sat Feb 18 22:31:18 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C948821F8596 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 22:31:18 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.595 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.595 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.004, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j7XIVDVX0Ed1 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 22:31:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 976D721F8594 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 22:31:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([41.136.232.92]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1J6HsAs020451 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 18 Feb 2012 22:18:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1329632286; i=@elandsys.com; bh=pNI1UNp6hSG0szkzPFwkpr1/up9BOIIZOQQIMybQ+vE=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=FukXNiazQ3VVImgB8Ey0dCZ5bM2cj/s9Kb2e2E+JAna+gQhPqAvcUTTQ6M8CQgbL4 L3SYLQW3JUQ11jZjLnIn7nwIvtasdJZZV5psO453kpaOXdwsQS+yI48C7GpBhEKLlA /jkouhPNl1a9r++nwVXMQ9U6Ko5Y1jPDQnd7IbFc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1329632286; i=@elandsys.com; bh=pNI1UNp6hSG0szkzPFwkpr1/up9BOIIZOQQIMybQ+vE=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=XFxO2S0dKDJynnnWmmMaHytQXceg0XA84yItbqtOM6iC7l6cu5R6VwSexvYD60vc2 FUdg/4f+RDQgMHLZm7aTiKHgYULH5SdNzSON9s7yrCNAqXKrUp+Dl0X3qx1mLLEKxW jHD5in9NekFblNkoQyeW9+I4c1tbp0FH2XWrwkbA= Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20120218221612.08c6f200@elandnews.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6 Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 22:17:24 -0800 To: Dave Cridland From: SM In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20120218205143.0a2a1e58@elandnews.com> References: <6.2.5.6.2.20120218205143.0a2a1e58@elandnews.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 22:36:16 -0800 Subject: Re: [appsdir] Request for review: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-reconfigure-rebind-09 X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 06:31:18 -0000 Hi Dave, [Bcc to appsdir] Can you do the review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-reconfigure-rebind-09 by February 29 as Sal is busy? Tahnks, -sm From sm@elandsys.com Sun Feb 19 08:38:47 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D00A721F8453 for ; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 08:38:47 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.595 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.595 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.004, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0u8ZFs+9S+QD for ; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 08:38:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD72221F8446 for ; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 08:38:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([41.136.236.75]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1JGcFMK021435 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 19 Feb 2012 08:38:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1329669515; i=@elandsys.com; bh=G0scuVPy+foa5D/KpbGC/9QZaON1Q1xDFsOndt2pEqw=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=g7xgIeYt1/Py8FYmJ0OlQAQEViHzPlNofs/FNPw2Be32twyXUcP4uoEamZxP8B2Ox C66amvkoiatV6o6R/e+5qYTlRStJmoTayXB14tiTJyMuSiLA18hV5dYUIdJDlURAlA u1zbP4wTYJCSFG7nENlEsK3u6f9pGSmxFvjPEPpI= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1329669515; i=@elandsys.com; bh=G0scuVPy+foa5D/KpbGC/9QZaON1Q1xDFsOndt2pEqw=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=TXkAP8n7UaCJE2/r3MNolG9vZ2VtY559HbBpbp/j+3LbTwxYRyGI7Wm1Dkz1Lu44o CzmC4zrMs0tUojMF8/32hev8XorbBFodFz8mKICE1nhXR5wnk+WeNWiky/+Gx4G2+P t9RZeQTvTRqKrZfKrvGJSRACmw0TVBd1IEkMVPRM= Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20120219083213.08484660@elandnews.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6 Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 08:35:41 -0800 To: Julian Reschke From: SM Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 08:42:47 -0800 Subject: [appsdir] Request for review: draft-ietf-core-link-format-11 X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 16:38:47 -0000 Hi Julian {Bcc to appsdir} Could you please review draft-ietf-core-link-format-11 by February 28? Please see http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/AppsDirReview for the administrative details. Thanks, -sm From sm@elandsys.com Sun Feb 19 08:38:53 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 299C121F84D8 for ; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 08:38:53 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.445 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.445 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.146, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aDkk7IGdQpek for ; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 08:38:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DE2D21F8446 for ; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 08:38:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([41.136.236.75]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1JGcFMM021435 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 19 Feb 2012 08:38:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1329669524; i=@elandsys.com; bh=Y0IT58UKKTzC+4fJhJynuLoGEpABHOMKe4MQIj4E/v8=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=CI2xo72slexbpyVFrcbKPG6ZGhcPn3U7PEVDje1uP6LXPSA1rytwGbrssu3GlQPyR wZb4+Ns9mxi5iqEgILtM9ssDtx6U+RkquQijjTs80blZIWKe+Ju209K8wuU4Pu9zeD yEA9S760Wz+KFso2ZsS0RakAQ9JGL6Xit3cLA09Y= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1329669524; i=@elandsys.com; bh=Y0IT58UKKTzC+4fJhJynuLoGEpABHOMKe4MQIj4E/v8=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=POd04ULHahuEXoRLTmtkr/48ntmdsxnV6a3w/66xGJFUIRqOqbyxK0NQImqitvVOp +MMvgn66X5RBgPMXGdJt2ff55vXIlL1bedcCN2EHJNPoGDaVyBZe5ggN4IgA4EzUoL MJn5JQDiA+R/RQ6/jbeLJlTcFfEG5l/rrtTdsMUA= Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20120219083553.083e46d8@elandnews.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6 Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 08:38:02 -0800 To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=22Martin_J=2E_D=FCrst=22?= From: SM Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 08:42:47 -0800 Subject: [appsdir] Request for review: draft-ietf-mile-template-02 X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 16:38:53 -0000 Hi Martin, {Bcc to appsdir} Could you please review draft-ietf-mile-template-02 by February 29? Please see http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/AppsDirReview for the administrative details. Thanks, -sm From sm@elandsys.com Mon Feb 20 12:12:27 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5C5E21F87F5 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 12:12:27 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.594 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.594 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.005, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BTbGxDb18hBG for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 12:12:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98E0E21F87EA for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 12:12:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([41.136.237.154]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1KKC2ZD009868 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 20 Feb 2012 12:12:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1329768734; i=@elandsys.com; bh=5kc1doLNGOCtOLDWifzw5I+36BaXcfJ7YASKjC91y3Q=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=i3nYRXbAyU3QPV2+bzZc3mcv3J8/+K+0MxzEPC0cQrXHbXFbuJXgtPqbSEw982AbH P2n3OFB+SODmaUmHbeJ8TkoJEYVj1Q6PoGhL3UOEXY2pZaCdsJxXU3m/qcNYYXho2B gQH79AbiUPZ1eBC6GSkBrhnAn/cjJyYpSHhLFEKs= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1329768734; i=@elandsys.com; bh=5kc1doLNGOCtOLDWifzw5I+36BaXcfJ7YASKjC91y3Q=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=zNtvnbyKnDakmBZX6D1u0Fqt0CvDxOwp9jDJNt7s36y0vhzoyeMtj3e8n+nbKPl0q c1vzV7U2KnAWRYoNLWGd6Vr9w/5hgH7GGHEh1cO7JJLnPhfBjckbWk7Tct6isyV+Qo a4PjQBTIVCNfhSsvbgapYvbXdPr9jnHFzhkV0Jhw= Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20120220115403.09836348@resistor.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6 Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 12:00:45 -0800 To: Julian Reschke From: SM In-Reply-To: <4F42A3E5.5030109@gmx.de> References: <20120211004840.7836.15484.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4F42A3E5.5030109@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: appsdir@ietf.org Subject: Re: [appsdir] Last Call: (FLUTE - File Delivery over Unidirectional Transport) to Proposed Standard X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 20:12:27 -0000 Hi Julian, At 11:49 20-02-2012, Julian Reschke wrote: >Here are a few comments, mainly of editorial nature: > >Below my review notes; just mechanical checks, and some checks on >the relation to HTTP header fields...: Thanks for posting the notes. For the record, this is related to the assignment posted at http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/appsdir/current/msg00757.html Best regards, -sm From haibin.song@huawei.com Mon Feb 20 18:24:08 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 444AE21F84A6 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 18:24:08 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.544 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.544 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.055, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kT8KXPtmMTVB for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 18:24:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com (szxga04-in.huawei.com [119.145.14.67]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A826821F84A1 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 18:24:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from huawei.com (szxga04-in [172.24.2.12]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LZQ00A101A7IC@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for appsdir@ietf.org; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:22:55 +0800 (CST) Received: from szxrg01-dlp.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LZQ009AL1A72O@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for appsdir@ietf.org; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:22:55 +0800 (CST) Received: from szxeml213-edg.china.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.1.9-GA) with ESMTP id AGY76591; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:22:53 +0800 Received: from SZXEML401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.31) by szxeml213-edg.china.huawei.com (172.24.2.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:22:36 +0800 Received: from SZXEML534-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.222]) by szxeml401-hub.china.huawei.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:22:48 +0800 Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 02:24:08 +0000 From: Songhaibin In-reply-to: <6.2.5.6.2.20120110211953.0e06fed0@elandnews.com> X-Originating-IP: [10.138.41.129] To: S Moonesamy , Richard Woundy Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-language: zh-CN Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Thread-topic: Apps review of DECADE drafts Thread-index: AQHM0CZMWA9Zl9q10Ee/N+h2ZReqG5ZG3oTA X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected References: <6.2.5.6.2.20120110211953.0e06fed0@elandnews.com> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 19:10:53 -0800 Cc: "appsdir@ietf.org" , David Harrington Subject: Re: [appsdir] Apps review of DECADE drafts X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 02:24:08 -0000 Hi S. Moonesamy, Just to let you know the updated DECADE problem statement draft is ready for your review. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-decade-problem-statement-05 BR, -Haibin > -----Original Message----- > From: S Moonesamy [mailto:sm+ietf@elandsys.com] > Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 1:37 PM > To: Richard Woundy; Songhaibin > Cc: appsdir@ietf.org; David Harrington > Subject: Apps review of DECADE drafts > > Dear DECADE WG Chairs, > > [Cc to Apps ADs and Responsible AD for their information] > > I assigned the review of draft-ietf-decade-reqs to one of the members > of the Applications Directorate and he pointed out that the document > is not ready for review given the AD review ( > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-decade-problem-statement/history/ > ). > > The Application Directorate would like to review > draft-ietf-decade-reqs and draft-ietf-decade-problem-statement > simultaneously. I would be grateful if you could contact me when > these two drafts are ready for publiation. > > Regards, > S. Moonesamy From sm@elandsys.com Thu Feb 23 00:03:57 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C99A521F855B for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 00:03:56 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.594 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.594 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.005, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DVfs9+73O0+M for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 00:03:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97EC821F8559 for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 00:03:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([41.136.239.254]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1N83Tho007374 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 23 Feb 2012 00:03:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1329984222; i=@elandsys.com; bh=ir04nwPT0FeWaHE8+lMnDFawiuYn66thP453j5x5I+c=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=sYdRoDO7GUCNLNOf/tbvMjhsWtZ7lCwLE+1pgNJlmHoLhjYDvN09izGPnjQ4HT1rB PBgz5/Rvg22U2ltJSsMdF0BPjL7Y7FR0fNn7arCCcyJLgeo0QIKjdKMX+AxM5DUxW/ iwoDTIbt/cUeB85ma1217qf/t51mMqlEFDyHi5OQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1329984222; i=@elandsys.com; bh=ir04nwPT0FeWaHE8+lMnDFawiuYn66thP453j5x5I+c=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=r+0xOuN4/tXGYIAOLe19Zcnwk3N033RToO90cgofP7JGlMtCFzmoH6ZiPxTTkPXut /GC+1W3AEx4VCFs4kPjyxGDWjQDyIf0PUU8OiKu4NB7dmHOGjkAcTBIL/pwQhM1YOR YaO3JNPYWifcr/gcin7oOBQoYcW7lKtXah8jOw0Y= Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20120222235913.0a02abb0@elandnews.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6 Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 00:03:00 -0800 To: Tim Bray From: SM In-Reply-To: <4F412E76.6080408@lodderstedt.net> References: <6.2.5.6.2.20120123134319.0a76c338@resistor.net> <4F412E76.6080408@lodderstedt.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: appsdir@ietf.org Subject: Re: [appsdir] [OAUTH-WG] [apps-discuss] Apps Area review of draft-ietf-oauth-v2-threatmodel-01 X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 08:03:57 -0000 Hi Tim, At 09:16 19-02-2012, Torsten Lodderstedt wrote: >I just submitted the revised version of the OAuth 2.0 security >document >(http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-v2-threatmodel-02). >This revision should address the issues you raised in your AppsDir >review. We especially removed all normative language from the document. Does the revised version address the issues you raised in your review ( http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/current/msg04181.html )? Best regards, -sm From sm@elandsys.com Tue Feb 28 17:29:54 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 768D821F86B1 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:29:54 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9unaY0xmJiDn for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:29:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3457521F8670 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:29:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([41.136.234.154]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1T1TY81015329 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:29:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1330478987; i=@elandsys.com; bh=2QbccCaIXkdPG/iJFAAI1k1fjjV+B1Tt3MCqskzv3sM=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=bdjAa+DTOSsGVO3XOHK347BgAn/Ub5FoAqOFoDcQbh3++ptA0S99viDpytuaKWk4M 1FDkGm7iPFjCVWIXRLzBaRekSx42sMcY+YWuumeeR0WKqsi1mX0CKtVKMt5NINhmGY bbWf0OU4pEN+EShuyTZjxQOvgANlr+mnMEl/tpxs= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1330478987; i=@elandsys.com; bh=2QbccCaIXkdPG/iJFAAI1k1fjjV+B1Tt3MCqskzv3sM=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=AjQsFVQ/mjAkB+v4SEZWRg5jNNDxwUxXl0YhI2iWyrGMcnW9LXmiMKowY0EgRGL+Q /+XHScAIYhKRzm61r9Th+AYceTJK3qPEblC5IW6Ui6eaUDLXETbpRPgzknZK5WM3+V kNZuc0yGjauIUziXwsVDVRlx+H4Lnm+Se43ZOKsU= Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20120228172127.0b200958@resistor.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6 Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:28:01 -0800 To: Carsten Bormann , Julian Reschke From: SM In-Reply-To: <1154EF26-CC2F-49DC-87F0-04AD88F1C7FD@tzi.org> References: <4F4D2FCB.8030805@gmx.de> <1154EF26-CC2F-49DC-87F0-04AD88F1C7FD@tzi.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: appsdir@ietf.org Subject: Re: [appsdir] [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-core-link-format-11 X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 01:29:54 -0000 Hi Carsten, Julian, At 12:13 28-02-2012, Carsten Bormann wrote: >On Feb 28, 2012, at 20:49, Julian Reschke wrote: A really good, >comprehensive review. > >Let me grab my implementer hat and pick three of the items. The quality of the review and the friendly exchange exceeds AppsDir expectations. :-) Thank you, -sm