From presnick@qti.qualcomm.com Wed Sep 11 22:00:45 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9089911E8137 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 22:00:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xN4Ut+-UqF7K for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 22:00:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sabertooth01.qualcomm.com (sabertooth01.qualcomm.com [65.197.215.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAD9A21E8088 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 22:00:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qti.qualcomm.com; i=@qti.qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1378962038; x=1410498038; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject: content-transfer-encoding; bh=Lp4yEw6bLk35ASPxypR0z4B+V+p0CpuCe3oOxJ+13kI=; b=ZQteZQNkaE9yOtR369hN4d/J7USAZPBNOIbmV3xp6a4AjrFGvH+/NlKr 9PZc9zDcJW4Rvn0tZuf2Bai3qAP1s9G3YXeJxCh/n+F1GUfC/MW9Ccm/K snelmGTUE9NBo6oQtgJIvH4IVKAEqE5FJfpfFLOthEJ5P8RoWvKj79dyw 4=; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,7195"; a="51291690" Received: from ironmsg04-l.qualcomm.com ([172.30.48.19]) by sabertooth01.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 11 Sep 2013 22:00:38 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,7195"; a="510372004" Received: from nasanexhc04.na.qualcomm.com ([172.30.48.17]) by Ironmsg04-L.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 11 Sep 2013 22:00:25 -0700 Received: from resnick2.qualcomm.com (172.30.48.1) by qcmail1.qualcomm.com (172.30.48.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.146.2; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 22:00:25 -0700 Message-ID: <52314A68.5080001@qti.qualcomm.com> Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 00:00:24 -0500 From: Pete Resnick User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100630 Eudora/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [172.30.48.1] Subject: [appsdir] Request for review: draft-ietf-homenet-arch X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 05:00:45 -0000 Folks, I didn't notice https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-homenet-arch/ on the IESG agenda until just now. I think it's important enough for me to review that I've employed the seldomly-used IESG hammer of "The Defer", delaying consideration until the 26-September telechat. I would very much appreciate an AppsDir review of this document as well. Could someone be assigned quickly and get the review in time for the telechat? Thanks, pr -- Pete Resnick Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478 From Claudio.Allocchio@garr.it Wed Sep 11 23:58:24 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A191311E822D for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 23:58:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.719 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.719 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0ZxLrT-2+irJ for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 23:58:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cyrus.dir.garr.it (cyrus.dir.garr.it [193.206.158.29]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20EEE11E8175 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 23:58:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: internal info suppressed Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 08:57:37 +0200 (CEST) From: Claudio Allocchio X-X-Sender: claudio@vpnclnt01.dir.garr.it To: appsdir@ietf.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (OSX 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=garr.it; s=cyrus; t=1378969089; bh=AqbpV4tjynLk84SaPTxpSOTxKybLskDYuPYc8WzK8jw=; h=Date:From:To:Subject; b=ZSJbkxXNCk50ol1vyDvC3fA2qgo/sh/i+6GgAnXmvIuZBHOHIjL6o6LJhhkIE8IGu QOcJcgoRw20WDpePVqbdh5Q/qlBVGHFBzbXutYMTCkhv38w6owzn7FJCget0BaxU/F ClvGDmGDodCDd3SG89FIhPgT+1BMlFqHSMk0XiVU= Subject: [appsdir] draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-reqts-08.txt for review X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 06:58:24 -0000 Hello all, draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-reqts-08.txt is in LC and neds our attention. Abstract This document specifies the requirements for an end-to-end session identifier in IP-based multimedia communication networks. This identifier would enable endpoints, intermediate devices, and management and monitoring systems to identify a session end-to-end across multiple SIP devices, hops, and administrative domains. Now that we should all be back from vacations, let's see if there is a volunteer for this review ;-) The C ends on 2013-09-24 and that's also the review deadline. Please confirm on the list! many thanks! PS: there are also draft-ietf-repute-media-type-10 raft-ietf-repute-query-http-09 which were never picked up by assigned reviewer: anyone to help on these short one "now" ? Claudio From Claudio.Allocchio@garr.it Thu Sep 12 00:00:49 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3733211E822F for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 00:00:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.719 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.719 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O2dnGT5wLLyl for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 00:00:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cyrus.dir.garr.it (cyrus.dir.garr.it [193.206.158.29]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B51311E8175 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 00:00:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: internal info suppressed Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 09:00:04 +0200 (CEST) From: Claudio Allocchio X-X-Sender: claudio@vpnclnt01.dir.garr.it To: Pete Resnick In-Reply-To: <52314A68.5080001@qti.qualcomm.com> Message-ID: References: <52314A68.5080001@qti.qualcomm.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (OSX 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=garr.it; s=cyrus; t=1378969236; bh=LevW8MeBS9ghxFSVPKiTuUgkPqCO98/zOsb9cW7VXfI=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=rgBdeSyuwIzp81QGFtmLu9FIhuyPcAYnpgxr0o2ikf2xkFGJBgS4IFoj4eF5fwTMe YspNQiggjb8gWEsrJ3lpQvefWU8QpQxeY+/khwmvO64Hipr8UcdP3rFywfFPxKf05M WaXS/gVX+apMzsYQnWL6o2vuxIR23dFP0XBlSAuY= Cc: appsdir@ietf.org Subject: Re: [appsdir] Request for review: draft-ietf-homenet-arch X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 07:00:49 -0000 On Thu, 12 Sep 2013, Pete Resnick wrote: > Folks, > > I didn't notice https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-homenet-arch/ on > the IESG agenda until just now. I think it's important enough for me to > review that I've employed the seldomly-used IESG hammer of "The Defer", > delaying consideration until the 26-September telechat. I would very much > appreciate an AppsDir review of this document as well. Could someone be > assigned quickly and get the review in time for the telechat? yes! as for the others, any volunter before "my european evening" ? otherwise I'll go to the list! thanks again! > > Thanks, > > pr > > -- > Pete Resnick > Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478 > > _______________________________________________ > appsdir mailing list > appsdir@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/appsdir > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Claudio Allocchio G A R R Claudio.Allocchio@garr.it Senior Technical Officer tel: +39 040 3758523 Italian Academic and G=Claudio; S=Allocchio; fax: +39 040 3758565 Research Network P=garr; A=garr; C=it; PGP Key: http://www.cert.garr.it/PGP/keys.php3#ca From Claudio.Allocchio@garr.it Thu Sep 12 00:19:24 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CBE521F9EDD for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 00:19:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.026 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.026 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.744, BAYES_05=-1.11, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z+RYdMEySPVH for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 00:19:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cyrus.dir.garr.it (cyrus.dir.garr.it [193.206.158.29]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 024BA21F9EBE for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 00:19:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: internal info suppressed Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 09:18:47 +0200 (CEST) From: Claudio Allocchio X-X-Sender: claudio@vpnclnt01.dir.garr.it To: appsdir@ietf.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (OSX 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=garr.it; s=cyrus; t=1378970359; bh=JiIxIm0+ZeKr1M38Zz7HshP6KQU/yZKumex8C3OAg30=; h=Date:From:To:Subject; b=qKB8bbyh2qnE8yGCGaPCUqnL7zQmpuuIl/nbd9ZapJCxZZUg3dAvBAIk7L7prgP8q aVcpmuESEUMZ+gOptr2pvOD7CtxuOtuMYjIis3gLnjyxcv9MXvC0tZ6JJKA36MLKEb Jk5nkjn3eOeQGtfy7edCPG0B0Eoi97pXOC/TcHJY= Subject: [appsdir] [dir-coord] review request for draft-ietf-dime-app-design-guide-19 (fwd) X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 07:19:24 -0000 As we did also the other DIME WG docs, I suggest we add our review to the list, too. I guess Sep 30th may be a deadline for it, but I've asked the WG chair about it. Any voluneer for this early review? (by tonight)... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Claudio Allocchio G A R R Claudio.Allocchio@garr.it Senior Technical Officer tel: +39 040 3758523 Italian Academic and G=Claudio; S=Allocchio; fax: +39 040 3758565 Research Network P=garr; A=garr; C=it; PGP Key: http://www.cert.garr.it/PGP/keys.php3#ca ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 03:53:51 +0300 From: Jouni Korhonen To: "dir-coord@ietf.org" Subject: [dir-coord] review request for draft-ietf-dime-app-design-guide-19 Folks, draft-ietf-dime-app-design-guide-19 has ended WGLC a while ago. Before advancing it into IESG I would be happy to receive reviews at least from Gen-ART, AAA directorate, Sec-dir and Ops-dir. The focus should be on Sec-dir and AAA Directorate. There are no transport related discussion/recommendations in the draft. Thanks, Jouni (Dime co-chair) _______________________________________________ dir-coord mailing list dir-coord@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dir-coord From vkg@bell-labs.com Thu Sep 12 06:29:27 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F62E21E80D3 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 06:29:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -110.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1c0FUiTjiXRk for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 06:29:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ihemail1.lucent.com (ihemail1.lucent.com [135.245.0.33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F46121E80E3 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 06:28:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usnavsmail4.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (usnavsmail4.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com [135.3.39.12]) by ihemail1.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id r8CDSZVt015466 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 12 Sep 2013 08:28:36 -0500 (CDT) Received: from umail.lucent.com (umail.ndc.lucent.com [135.3.40.61]) by usnavsmail4.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/GMO) with ESMTP id r8CDSY4e008701 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 12 Sep 2013 08:28:35 -0500 Received: from shoonya.ih.lucent.com (shoonya.ih.lucent.com [135.185.237.229]) by umail.lucent.com (8.13.8/TPES) with ESMTP id r8CDSYLb023491; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 08:28:34 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <5231C2AA.7050602@bell-labs.com> Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 08:33:30 -0500 From: "Vijay K. Gurbani" Organization: Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130805 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Claudio Allocchio References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.33 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 135.3.39.12 Cc: appsdir@ietf.org Subject: Re: [appsdir] draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-reqts-08.txt for review X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 13:29:28 -0000 On 09/12/2013 01:57 AM, Claudio Allocchio wrote: > > Hello all, > > draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-reqts-08.txt is in LC and neds our attention. > > Abstract > > This document specifies the requirements for an end-to-end session > identifier in IP-based multimedia communication networks. This > identifier would enable endpoints, intermediate devices, and > management and monitoring systems to identify a session end-to-end > across multiple SIP devices, hops, and administrative domains. > > Now that we should all be back from vacations, let's see if there is a > volunteer for this review ;-) > > The C ends on 2013-09-24 and that's also the review deadline. Claudio: I can take this. Please confirm. Cheers, - vijay -- Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA) Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / vijay.gurbani@alcatel-lucent.com Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/ | Calendar: http://goo.gl/x3Ogq From Claudio.Allocchio@garr.it Thu Sep 12 06:49:38 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E294811E819D for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 06:49:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.57 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.57 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.149, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ChcWzbC+2o9M for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 06:49:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cyrus.dir.garr.it (cyrus.dir.garr.it [193.206.158.29]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D746C11E8185 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 06:49:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: internal info suppressed Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 15:48:35 +0200 (CEST) From: Claudio Allocchio X-X-Sender: claudio@vpnclnt01.dir.garr.it To: "Vijay K. Gurbani" In-Reply-To: <5231C2AA.7050602@bell-labs.com> Message-ID: References: <5231C2AA.7050602@bell-labs.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (OSX 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=garr.it; s=cyrus; t=1378993746; bh=fyl9mynr2KepLcd57ppnXba8QcweXgQ+bKYyZ6y6Er8=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=EtdHySlNSyvmMhnPUA1mfQS3b4BIB4A+BK4E36Huq8HoVLOYvv8SzOlvNEUUIR7Wu apjddZ/3W5rSRp2oAVY4jdWATTW5Sa9U2f/KxxHCVQCWJ5+YDjeyyAmk32Ka8N3Lxg yfGouahExFHwOrBIjgPhI9SNtWk+9b0XDD7PRhwM= Cc: appsdir@ietf.org, Claudio Allocchio Subject: Re: [appsdir] draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-reqts-08.txt for review X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 13:49:39 -0000 On Thu, 12 Sep 2013, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote: > On 09/12/2013 01:57 AM, Claudio Allocchio wrote: >> >> Hello all, >> >> draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-reqts-08.txt is in LC and neds our attention. >> >> Abstract >> >> This document specifies the requirements for an end-to-end session >> identifier in IP-based multimedia communication networks. This >> identifier would enable endpoints, intermediate devices, and >> management and monitoring systems to identify a session end-to-end >> across multiple SIP devices, hops, and administrative domains. >> >> Now that we should all be back from vacations, let's see if there is a >> volunteer for this review ;-) >> >> The C ends on 2013-09-24 and that's also the review deadline. > > Claudio: I can take this. > > Please confirm. ok, thanks Vijay! > > Cheers, > > - vijay > -- > Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent > 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA) > Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / vijay.gurbani@alcatel-lucent.com > Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/ | Calendar: http://goo.gl/x3Ogq > _______________________________________________ > appsdir mailing list > appsdir@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/appsdir > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Claudio Allocchio G A R R Claudio.Allocchio@garr.it Senior Technical Officer tel: +39 040 3758523 Italian Academic and G=Claudio; S=Allocchio; fax: +39 040 3758565 Research Network P=garr; A=garr; C=it; PGP Key: http://www.cert.garr.it/PGP/keys.php3#ca From Claudio.Allocchio@garr.it Thu Sep 12 23:57:30 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6FD221E809A for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 23:57:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.636 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.636 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.083, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6eA1OzqqXxJc for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 23:57:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cyrus.dir.garr.it (cyrus.dir.garr.it [193.206.158.29]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6DE321E8051 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 23:57:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: internal info suppressed Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 08:56:30 +0200 (CEST) From: Claudio Allocchio X-X-Sender: claudio@vpnclnt01.dir.garr.it To: SM Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (OSX 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=garr.it; s=cyrus; t=1379055423; bh=6KeUQdbYovjr6yuJK0Vig/JAohThAWm09nAFrxer3H0=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject; b=nD6NtqxXwROGYArOwu538O1EO0KciqNR/TWl5o6grAJet2cf6sKUfleD71lRZ+J+H 2kVa8VhkTQr5jtMHYsgTguobdEESgAszCuiFANY9kTRfDNjmp4MJR0EOlJKGw6NMaq R2A4c4AAxwFvfEuVuShmkqIo/xKIWtlpv72+tnzc= Cc: appsdir@ietf.org Subject: [appsdir] Request for review: draft-ietf-homenet-arch (fwd) X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 06:57:30 -0000 ok, as I had no volunteers for this... SM, could you please do this review of draft-ietf-homenet-arch ? deadline (as Pete says): ASAP ! please ACK! thank you! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Claudio Allocchio G A R R Claudio.Allocchio@garr.it Senior Technical Officer tel: +39 040 3758523 Italian Academic and G=Claudio; S=Allocchio; fax: +39 040 3758565 Research Network P=garr; A=garr; C=it; PGP Key: http://www.cert.garr.it/PGP/keys.php3#ca ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 00:00:24 -0500 From: Pete Resnick To: appsdir@ietf.org Subject: [appsdir] Request for review: draft-ietf-homenet-arch Folks, I didn't notice https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-homenet-arch/ on the IESG agenda until just now. I think it's important enough for me to review that I've employed the seldomly-used IESG hammer of "The Defer", delaying consideration until the 26-September telechat. I would very much appreciate an AppsDir review of this document as well. Could someone be assigned quickly and get the review in time for the telechat? Thanks, pr -- Pete Resnick Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478 _______________________________________________ appsdir mailing list appsdir@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/appsdir From Claudio.Allocchio@garr.it Fri Sep 13 00:05:41 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 345A221E8051 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 00:05:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.645 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.645 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.074, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3N7OJNk+X4nk for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 00:05:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cyrus.dir.garr.it (cyrus.dir.garr.it [193.206.158.29]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73D3F21E809F for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 00:05:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: internal info suppressed Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 09:04:49 +0200 (CEST) From: Claudio Allocchio X-X-Sender: claudio@vpnclnt01.dir.garr.it To: salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (OSX 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=garr.it; s=cyrus; t=1379055920; bh=aPz9EO4M4qlrO2XF+2er1Zw6AkBkqmIdNGJAY1IMUGE=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject; b=OHz4zbvaRyklOMnY56nJWHU+eiF4pUPFFAg/jLIYdH9EM5Y9y7AB639T+owzF/7j6 gE+eO/aw0NXRE4f6fjXooE9A+doojoCO0z9q7649grbt6ecJA0qnEvPvfzE7EnuhWN Kjwf4QdCWrWllLm//5JotiMrXUdiqjTk5ZugIStw= Cc: appsdir@ietf.org Subject: [appsdir] review request for draft-ietf-dime-app-design-guide-19 X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 07:05:41 -0000 Hello Salvatore, could you please do this early review of draft-ietf-dime-app-design-guide-19 by September 27th? Please ACK assignment, thanks! best! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Claudio Allocchio G A R R Claudio.Allocchio@garr.it Senior Technical Officer tel: +39 040 3758523 Italian Academic and G=Claudio; S=Allocchio; fax: +39 040 3758565 Research Network P=garr; A=garr; C=it; PGP Key: http://www.cert.garr.it/PGP/keys.php3#ca ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 09:18:47 +0200 (CEST) From: Claudio Allocchio To: appsdir@ietf.org Subject: [appsdir] [dir-coord] review request for draft-ietf-dime-app-design-guide-19 (fwd) As we did also the other DIME WG docs, I suggest we add our review to the list, too. I guess Sep 30th may be a deadline for it, but I've asked the WG chair about it. Any voluneer for this early review? (by tonight)... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Claudio Allocchio G A R R Claudio.Allocchio@garr.it Senior Technical Officer tel: +39 040 3758523 Italian Academic and G=Claudio; S=Allocchio; fax: +39 040 3758565 Research Network P=garr; A=garr; C=it; PGP Key: http://www.cert.garr.it/PGP/keys.php3#ca ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 03:53:51 +0300 From: Jouni Korhonen To: "dir-coord@ietf.org" Subject: [dir-coord] review request for draft-ietf-dime-app-design-guide-19 Folks, draft-ietf-dime-app-design-guide-19 has ended WGLC a while ago. Before advancing it into IESG I would be happy to receive reviews at least from Gen-ART, AAA directorate, Sec-dir and Ops-dir. The focus should be on Sec-dir and AAA Directorate. There are no transport related discussion/recommendations in the draft. Thanks, Jouni (Dime co-chair) _______________________________________________ dir-coord mailing list dir-coord@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dir-coord _______________________________________________ appsdir mailing list appsdir@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/appsdir From dave@cridland.net Fri Sep 13 02:25:42 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3379D11E817A for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 02:25:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.977 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D5FczOT9mihl for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 02:25:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-oa0-x233.google.com (mail-oa0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF94521F89A5 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 02:25:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id h1so925793oag.10 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 02:25:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cridland.net; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=xlq8t2dp0SrYlvdkCnvqy2qfE7V/ZrFhni2BtYHTfbo=; b=JpwNrnGVmpugm6Tn412nFFSwqcemTjZ2HUTPD5aToE6zcy7CrZ3FtNbp584lYZVZ3x Spr/+UhwEu+qskrdUsJd2Xz+YSS0B8veNvWh2WP4OYW1QN6+DnQcfOs484Pb/Qp7uslD 4p5aL8VFTLyMol/TAIbgqWHLkwJuDQglYu/yc= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=xlq8t2dp0SrYlvdkCnvqy2qfE7V/ZrFhni2BtYHTfbo=; b=b86jJNnOlZt76LtCwBiwRLf1EtJP44QpTBe2+/d1FY6ov1TTwZBhNdG/bWYmZ7GcXr Pcz0rfPeLQBULy3ssmTUNTnUWs6Yd529azseSE++MMnyVyV/x5ekJab4XYjrWnRNl75S 9OGN6Bl/Fio1VSEPoqm2kFVY534JUDsTUTuNccw6NO4BGjXPx2nGWPD+eSEp4/dIWzhS /cfI8Ex4A7A1xridmDYxkCK30MV1YWs98GyJLmLFP4L4YitUMN8ef1MIT5k2Pip3qhgK YM3Ca3KC/1Gju5mRt+gASIKChJixhnh4aW6RjEL+zs/aWZ0Eb/CYrXg0+IhmRwzA3OUL qOAA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm3gswd0YnPwguSvo9YGY90r3fbXR4ehuD/mHhVQbFKCuFbu2kjZru32GMXqknmcLa3HkpX MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.117.198 with SMTP id kg6mr82832oeb.80.1379064339384; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 02:25:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.60.121.97 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 02:25:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <52314A68.5080001@qti.qualcomm.com> Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 10:25:39 +0100 Message-ID: From: Dave Cridland To: Claudio Allocchio Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b3a99f81257ec04e64070f3 Cc: Pete Resnick , appsdir@ietf.org Subject: Re: [appsdir] Request for review: draft-ietf-homenet-arch X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 09:25:42 -0000 --047d7b3a99f81257ec04e64070f3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable An informal review, I just happened to find it interesting. Nothing leaps out at me suggesting it shouldn't be published. =A71 para 5: Apparently home networks are what they are. I admit to being easily baffled, but I cannot understand how they might not be what they are. Perhaps: "We assume that the IPv4 network architecture currently deployed in home networks can not be modified by new recommendations." In general, =A71 uses a lot of the terms of art from =A71.1, which I found quite hard to deal with - perhaps some of the paragraphs of =A71 could be moved below =A71.1, either as a =A71.2 or something else. =A71.1 "CER" I understand as "the router"; that is, it's the pre-existing DSL/Cable router that's in the majority of home networks now, right? The term used elsewhere in the document is "modern home router", which seems obvious enough, but isn't present in the definition. I've read through the rest of the document, it looks good to me (though some parts I've only skimmed). =A74 seems less of a conclusion and more of a summary; I'm not really sure what it's there for. What I was hoping to find here was a bullet point list of new work needed. Instead, potential new work items are scattered throughout the text, making them hard to locate and enumerate. Dave. --047d7b3a99f81257ec04e64070f3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
An informal review, I just happened to find it interesting= . Nothing leaps out at me suggesting it shouldn't be published.
=A71 para 5: Apparently home networks are what they are. I admi= t to being easily baffled, but I cannot understand how they might not be wh= at they are. Perhaps:

"We assume that the IPv4 network architecture currently= deployed in home networks can not be modified by new recommendations."= ;

In general, =A71 uses a lot of the terms of art = from =A71.1, which I found quite hard to deal with - perhaps some of the pa= ragraphs of =A71 could be moved below =A71.1, either as a =A71.2 or somethi= ng else.

=A71.1

"CER" I under= stand as "the router"; that is, it's the pre-existing DSL/Cab= le router that's in the majority of home networks now, right? The term = used elsewhere in the document is "modern home router", which see= ms obvious enough, but isn't present in the definition.

I've read through the rest of the document, it look= s good to me (though some parts I've only skimmed).

=A74 seems less of a conclusion and more of a summary; I'm not re= ally sure what it's there for. What I was hoping to find here was a bul= let point list of new work needed. Instead, potential new work items are sc= attered throughout the text, making them hard to locate and enumerate.

Dave.
--047d7b3a99f81257ec04e64070f3-- From Claudio.Allocchio@garr.it Fri Sep 13 02:49:07 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD41A21F9E96 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 02:49:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.093 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.093 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.677, BAYES_05=-1.11, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JccNZwrNL1Qd for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 02:49:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cyrus.dir.garr.it (cyrus.dir.garr.it [193.206.158.29]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF6BB21F9E9A for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 02:49:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: internal info suppressed Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 11:48:25 +0200 (CEST) From: Claudio Allocchio X-X-Sender: claudio@vpnclnt01.dir.garr.it To: Dave Cridland In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <52314A68.5080001@qti.qualcomm.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (OSX 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-1768052538-1379065736=:39235" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=garr.it; s=cyrus; t=1379065736; bh=OdllEoEzggQM2ToXxdEjNiwtFG1yXPBDTBDi/fuJFsM=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=KfQ6jGubWXEtxtM3KXddMv5IrYrmOxjNj2QiQ45uGQbMrNGNPAAxx0SwGWE05HjKQ uprFR93brLwR7LtvcyBlQDwWYRqcht5Yzwj0AsixDySVqhyJIGoePrJXYgyGf26ByI IiWF2+YBmGpOqmWzbI/IHi0mq8bMEkWV0LXrpicM= Cc: Pete Resnick , appsdir@ietf.org, Claudio Allocchio Subject: Re: [appsdir] Request for review: draft-ietf-homenet-arch X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 09:49:07 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --0-1768052538-1379065736=:39235 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Fri, 13 Sep 2013, Dave Cridland wrote: > An informal review, I just happened to find it interesting. Nothing leaps > out at me suggesting it shouldn't be published. I guess we can easily publish it... I asked SM to do the formal review, but he can include also your comments in the formal review itself, if yoiu both agree (I've nothing against it). thanks Dave! > > §1 para 5: Apparently home networks are what they are. I admit to being > easily baffled, but I cannot understand how they might not be what they > are. Perhaps: > > "We assume that the IPv4 network architecture currently deployed in home > networks can not be modified by new recommendations." > > In general, §1 uses a lot of the terms of art from §1.1, which I found > quite hard to deal with - perhaps some of the paragraphs of §1 could be > moved below §1.1, either as a §1.2 or something else. > > §1.1 > > "CER" I understand as "the router"; that is, it's the pre-existing > DSL/Cable router that's in the majority of home networks now, right? The > term used elsewhere in the document is "modern home router", which seems > obvious enough, but isn't present in the definition. > > I've read through the rest of the document, it looks good to me (though > some parts I've only skimmed). > > §4 seems less of a conclusion and more of a summary; I'm not really sure > what it's there for. What I was hoping to find here was a bullet point list > of new work needed. Instead, potential new work items are scattered > throughout the text, making them hard to locate and enumerate. > > Dave. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Claudio Allocchio G A R R Claudio.Allocchio@garr.it Senior Technical Officer tel: +39 040 3758523 Italian Academic and G=Claudio; S=Allocchio; fax: +39 040 3758565 Research Network P=garr; A=garr; C=it; PGP Key: http://www.cert.garr.it/PGP/keys.php3#ca --0-1768052538-1379065736=:39235-- From sm@elandsys.com Fri Sep 13 03:02:31 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6681921F9DDB for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 03:02:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.578 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.578 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.021, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dncxlR1rZ9-H for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 03:02:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D364C21F9CB6 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 03:02:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.224.139.127]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r8DA1p6X014230 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 13 Sep 2013 03:02:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1379066524; bh=S6PZ4jyCIOvFIdIngMBXjEwfo6x2vfwPyxxnnjiaHFQ=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=oDtdUwLReHbGlEignxewfSNLMdW3TnpQkFoMB3YrYyiVi0jJ2ycVNG3zDxmsnk96c 6Msog7yU3bgNxPrQyLDVpXmUq1W3URNJKO6srR+3vz0NcNuxmBiwhJHFjG4UpoOJes Dc25wltgh/8PSLBxRR9iZqmA9Y8acOPR7ma2dF7M= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1379066524; i=@elandsys.com; bh=S6PZ4jyCIOvFIdIngMBXjEwfo6x2vfwPyxxnnjiaHFQ=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=iOzUs28TgThyt2zIXD9fAslP8kjnRLy6D2P+KzXnscpJ286QWCIK8uCiNGsGgGsrh L9/wHCtu5F2Sfq9qUASUqzIKLASaDk9VGOJ9t6Cfgh3cjoBGm7R2eHSXmVPJGEHtVZ 7WoBPqG/H1a5xxJiohOFUc8iexHWKVlSu7ARWh3c= Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20130912235913.0bf565d8@elandnews.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6 Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 00:15:54 -0700 To: Claudio Allocchio From: SM In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: appsdir@ietf.org Subject: Re: [appsdir] Request for review: draft-ietf-homenet-arch (fwd) X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 10:02:31 -0000 Hi Claudio, At 23:56 12-09-2013, Claudio Allocchio wrote: >ok, as I had no volunteers for this... ... and you have to find one. :-) >SM, could you please do this review of draft-ietf-homenet-arch ? Ok. >deadline (as Pete says): ASAP ! Give me a few days as it's a long document. Best regards, -sm From Claudio.Allocchio@garr.it Fri Sep 13 03:14:48 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EB2711E8120 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 03:14:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.595 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.595 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.124, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n5LuCiUV-EHq for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 03:14:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cyrus.dir.garr.it (cyrus.dir.garr.it [193.206.158.29]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 851ED1F0D36 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 03:14:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: internal info suppressed Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 12:13:54 +0200 (CEST) From: Claudio Allocchio X-X-Sender: claudio@vpnclnt01.dir.garr.it To: SM In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20130912235913.0bf565d8@elandnews.com> Message-ID: References: <6.2.5.6.2.20130912235913.0bf565d8@elandnews.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (OSX 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=garr.it; s=cyrus; t=1379067265; bh=elJgZ53uVidmIPnpHDvvFquekZH/hCLBQdYr6iG93NI=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=iPiAlViSDOTU2KGfBRq7u4fZCVq2dUtqb/OAQkB1yBBmLEPkgclyKipr2ofB0Jx3W t/fRNL7R8nMnZsSz1IlCVVgJsmbTq5IuHeB4E4KWdTSFaW9dMm7LLW3yY/IsqHQ3WQ mbxCsJ+9el8d2VKxWoJQnAQlHmLlPWZ8iLyeTm0w= Cc: appsdir@ietf.org, Claudio Allocchio Subject: Re: [appsdir] Request for review: draft-ietf-homenet-arch (fwd) X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 10:14:48 -0000 > At 23:56 12-09-2013, Claudio Allocchio wrote: >> ok, as I had no volunteers for this... > > ... and you have to find one. :-) > >> SM, could you please do this review of draft-ietf-homenet-arch ? > > Ok. > >> deadline (as Pete says): ASAP ! > > Give me a few days as it's a long document. thanks indeed... and as I said in previos message, see also Dave Cridland's informal comments ;-) > > Best regards, > -sm > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Claudio Allocchio G A R R Claudio.Allocchio@garr.it Senior Technical Officer tel: +39 040 3758523 Italian Academic and G=Claudio; S=Allocchio; fax: +39 040 3758565 Research Network P=garr; A=garr; C=it; PGP Key: http://www.cert.garr.it/PGP/keys.php3#ca From salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com Fri Sep 13 04:09:40 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05AAE11E8213 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 04:09:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nRGxPE5thzj0 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 04:09:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sesbmg20.ericsson.net (sesbmg20.ericsson.net [193.180.251.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 877FE11E8189 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 04:09:34 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: c1b4fb38-b7fcf8e0000062b8-d0-5232f2677e4f Received: from ESESSHC004.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sesbmg20.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 8A.0E.25272.762F2325; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:09:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.lmf.ericsson.se (153.88.183.148) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.328.9; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:09:26 +0200 Received: from nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se [131.160.33.3]) by mail.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3EED11024B; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 14:09:26 +0300 (EEST) Received: from nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 182A355F7D; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 14:09:20 +0300 (EEST) Received: from n94.nomadiclab.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB16755E23; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 14:09:19 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <5232F266.2080502@ericsson.com> Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 14:09:26 +0300 From: Salvatore Loreto User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Claudio Allocchio References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrOLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+JvjW76J6Mgg7YnUhZTp+5jtVh4ZzO7 A5PH1nfvGD2WLPnJFMAUxWWTkpqTWZZapG+XwJVxfPcG1oJJohVzD2xiamBcJdDFyMkhIWAi 8fLnDCYIW0ziwr31bF2MXBxCAkcZJe60vmKBcDYwSqydeYkZpEpIYC+jxKQZJRD2OkaJn01Q HcsYJXZffgk2ildAW2JLO4TNIqAq0bhuHguIzSZgJvH84RawQaICyRJNl++zQNQLSpyc+QTM FhEwlDh7bTMbiM0MdNL9y0/A5ggL+Er8uzKFDWKxu8TF5ddYQWxOAQ+Jfc39TBD1thIX5lxn gbDlJba/ncMM8ZqaxNVzm6Ae0JLoPdvJNIFRdBaS1bOQtM9C0r6AkXkVI0dxanFSbrqRwSZG YOAf3PLbYgfj5b82hxilOViUxHm36J0JFBJITyxJzU5NLUgtii8qzUktPsTIxMEp1cC44d58 u5ZD5/hMOu8pqErOdVxsnny7z21uQdn5l87eEsZlKxcZsRntu2rs5ftN7qjaUiurA/tCrGy+ 5nre0gne+Mz+dUM9l9nX/1MPas/qzdnDs2T5+al2t+seeO/Z/nb1Sf8t3VkRiywe2/yREb9S s7WT9eFu5kIXvbcPAref3na++HeEiKWjEktxRqKhFnNRcSIAx58Jh0oCAAA= Cc: appsdir@ietf.org Subject: Re: [appsdir] review request for draft-ietf-dime-app-design-guide-19 X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 11:09:40 -0000 sure I can do it best regards Salvatore On 9/13/13 10:04 AM, Claudio Allocchio wrote: > > Hello Salvatore, > > could you please do this early review of > > draft-ietf-dime-app-design-guide-19 > > by September 27th? > > Please ACK assignment, thanks! > > best! > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Claudio Allocchio G A R R Claudio.Allocchio@garr.it > Senior Technical Officer > tel: +39 040 3758523 Italian Academic and G=Claudio; > S=Allocchio; > fax: +39 040 3758565 Research Network P=garr; A=garr; > C=it; > > PGP Key: http://www.cert.garr.it/PGP/keys.php3#ca > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 09:18:47 +0200 (CEST) > From: Claudio Allocchio > To: appsdir@ietf.org > Subject: [appsdir] [dir-coord] review request for > draft-ietf-dime-app-design-guide-19 (fwd) > > > As we did also the other DIME WG docs, I suggest we add our review to > the list, too. > > I guess Sep 30th may be a deadline for it, but I've asked the WG chair > about it. > > Any voluneer for this early review? (by tonight)... > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Claudio Allocchio G A R R Claudio.Allocchio@garr.it > Senior Technical Officer > tel: +39 040 3758523 Italian Academic and G=Claudio; > S=Allocchio; > fax: +39 040 3758565 Research Network P=garr; A=garr; > C=it; > > PGP Key: http://www.cert.garr.it/PGP/keys.php3#ca > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 03:53:51 +0300 > From: Jouni Korhonen > To: "dir-coord@ietf.org" > Subject: [dir-coord] review request for > draft-ietf-dime-app-design-guide-19 > > Folks, > > draft-ietf-dime-app-design-guide-19 has ended WGLC a while ago. Before > advancing it into IESG I would be happy to receive reviews at least > from Gen-ART, AAA directorate, Sec-dir and Ops-dir. The focus should > be on Sec-dir and AAA Directorate. There are no transport related > discussion/recommendations in the draft. > > Thanks, > Jouni (Dime co-chair) > _______________________________________________ > dir-coord mailing list > dir-coord@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dir-coord > _______________________________________________ > appsdir mailing list > appsdir@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/appsdir > > -- Salvatore Loreto, PhD www.sloreto.com From Claudio.Allocchio@garr.it Fri Sep 13 04:21:11 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D823021E8096 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 04:21:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.604 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.604 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.115, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YkP9JTYEDZ6O for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 04:21:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cyrus.dir.garr.it (cyrus.dir.garr.it [193.206.158.29]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39CE711E80F7 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 04:21:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: internal info suppressed Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:20:35 +0200 (CEST) From: Claudio Allocchio X-X-Sender: claudio@vpnclnt01.dir.garr.it To: appsdir@ietf.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (OSX 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=garr.it; s=cyrus; t=1379071266; bh=ULTmZZWedPkA+bkOtbJy2a20QLYn/uYNcds/Adk+POM=; h=Date:From:To:Subject; b=aPL71HVG7I8Xk+0q7k9mD+MAcc6beWWdbQ74AbSEc+ImQUC0zebfgPR4zJWGZqW+9 Fd/X8u+YsDhsteeGMB+zh/3nDnlov7mxAgVl6oatOO9Zv7f/nWc3hgQ11XjtSVBAbP v15NRx11i0ABLEY73UvOnU11cVDP6YjvMxuuPrqo= Subject: [appsdir] review of draft-ietf-clue-telepresence-use-cases-07.txt X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 11:21:12 -0000 Hi all, also draft-ietf-clue-telepresence-use-cases-07.txt has started its LC, and needs a review from us: Abstract Telepresence conferencing systems seek to create an environment that gives non co-located users or user groups a feeling of co-located presence through multimedia communication including at least audio and video signals of high fidelity. A number of techniques for handling audio and video streams are used to create this experience. When these techniques are not similar, interoperability between different systems is difficult at best, and often not possible. Conveying information about the relationships between multiple streams of media would allow senders and receivers to make choices to allow telepresence systems to interwork. This memo describes the most typical and important use cases for sending multiple streams in a telepresence conference. the due date is 2013-09-26. Any volunteer for it before tonight? thanks indeed Claudio From Claudio.Allocchio@garr.it Fri Sep 13 04:24:40 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94F3C21F9D7E for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 04:24:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.613 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.613 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.106, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6xeNNE10FnKk for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 04:24:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cyrus.dir.garr.it (cyrus.dir.garr.it [193.206.158.29]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77A1B21F9C8E for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 04:24:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: internal info suppressed Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:24:01 +0200 (CEST) From: Claudio Allocchio X-X-Sender: claudio@vpnclnt01.dir.garr.it To: Salvatore Loreto In-Reply-To: <5232F266.2080502@ericsson.com> Message-ID: References: <5232F266.2080502@ericsson.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (OSX 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=garr.it; s=cyrus; t=1379071472; bh=Betxc2IkHqkwDgT6N36/lHoBdodrZ4VghShLqDdzDK8=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=B7YoZc4Bd8kJhoV5+Pcz1fHYrnCqfl93WociW2L7cgMnICCHG6KWC54/NytKNi7Ny 9vj8knv/l+fZdmAqBmpY8kSvuDcVEGVnd0WN0Y+B6zqdinFa7d23KE4HemJb29Hd/M UPf0hAUL/S8SYJ/ljbQdExrupAnuoB+CdsuYqyxo= Cc: appsdir@ietf.org, Claudio Allocchio Subject: Re: [appsdir] review request for draft-ietf-dime-app-design-guide-19 X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 11:24:40 -0000 On Fri, 13 Sep 2013, Salvatore Loreto wrote: > sure I can do it thank you! > > best regards > Salvatore > > On 9/13/13 10:04 AM, Claudio Allocchio wrote: >> >> Hello Salvatore, >> >> could you please do this early review of >> >> draft-ietf-dime-app-design-guide-19 >> >> by September 27th? >> >> Please ACK assignment, thanks! >> >> best! >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Claudio Allocchio G A R R Claudio.Allocchio@garr.it >> Senior Technical Officer >> tel: +39 040 3758523 Italian Academic and G=Claudio; >> S=Allocchio; >> fax: +39 040 3758565 Research Network P=garr; A=garr; C=it; >> >> PGP Key: http://www.cert.garr.it/PGP/keys.php3#ca >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 09:18:47 +0200 (CEST) >> From: Claudio Allocchio >> To: appsdir@ietf.org >> Subject: [appsdir] [dir-coord] review request for >> draft-ietf-dime-app-design-guide-19 (fwd) >> >> >> As we did also the other DIME WG docs, I suggest we add our review to the >> list, too. >> >> I guess Sep 30th may be a deadline for it, but I've asked the WG chair >> about it. >> >> Any voluneer for this early review? (by tonight)... >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Claudio Allocchio G A R R Claudio.Allocchio@garr.it >> Senior Technical Officer >> tel: +39 040 3758523 Italian Academic and G=Claudio; >> S=Allocchio; >> fax: +39 040 3758565 Research Network P=garr; A=garr; C=it; >> >> PGP Key: http://www.cert.garr.it/PGP/keys.php3#ca >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 03:53:51 +0300 >> From: Jouni Korhonen >> To: "dir-coord@ietf.org" >> Subject: [dir-coord] review request for draft-ietf-dime-app-design-guide-19 >> >> Folks, >> >> draft-ietf-dime-app-design-guide-19 has ended WGLC a while ago. Before >> advancing it into IESG I would be happy to receive reviews at least from >> Gen-ART, AAA directorate, Sec-dir and Ops-dir. The focus should be on >> Sec-dir and AAA Directorate. There are no transport related >> discussion/recommendations in the draft. >> >> Thanks, >> Jouni (Dime co-chair) >> _______________________________________________ >> dir-coord mailing list >> dir-coord@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dir-coord >> _______________________________________________ >> appsdir mailing list >> appsdir@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/appsdir >> >> > > > -- > Salvatore Loreto, PhD > www.sloreto.com > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Claudio Allocchio G A R R Claudio.Allocchio@garr.it Senior Technical Officer tel: +39 040 3758523 Italian Academic and G=Claudio; S=Allocchio; fax: +39 040 3758565 Research Network P=garr; A=garr; C=it; PGP Key: http://www.cert.garr.it/PGP/keys.php3#ca From Claudio.Allocchio@garr.it Mon Sep 16 13:44:09 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42B8311E8324 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:44:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.125 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.125 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.645, BAYES_05=-1.11, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L7CiNVAlvBFV for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:44:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cyrus.dir.garr.it (cyrus.dir.garr.it [193.206.158.29]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E347D11E8313 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:44:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: internal info suppressed Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 22:44:00 +0200 (CEST) From: Claudio Allocchio X-X-Sender: claudio@mac-allocchio3.garrtest.units.it To: Eric Burger Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (OSX 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=garr.it; s=cyrus; t=1379364241; bh=RM78E2aH9kdObLXDzv8BgEB+rJ//6M2GMQpVYH4+0MA=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject; b=FsXsvuV9TeiRp+zWJrNYSM0XwuIGSoGau0Vk9VVFTtO6snurircGHTyX/IQZnsUIT ykxkGbyoErcOO0FLpBX+yi2fzlkb5zoCkNKApb3yFLXDJHAK8/8D4zU1rM/jcqW+kU Z9MYivHX1AWzEvtXcS8lFspe0fzp0Mua9n93pdEc= Cc: appsdir@ietf.org Subject: [appsdir] review of draft-ietf-clue-telepresence-use-cases-07.txt (fwd) X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 20:44:09 -0000 Eric, could you please perform the review of draft-ietf-clue-telepresence-use-cases-07 by Sept 26th ? Please let us know, thanks! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Claudio Allocchio G A R R Claudio.Allocchio@garr.it Senior Technical Officer tel: +39 040 3758523 Italian Academic and G=Claudio; S=Allocchio; fax: +39 040 3758565 Research Network P=garr; A=garr; C=it; PGP Key: http://www.cert.garr.it/PGP/keys.php3#ca ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:20:35 +0200 (CEST) From: Claudio Allocchio To: appsdir@ietf.org Subject: [appsdir] review of draft-ietf-clue-telepresence-use-cases-07.txt Hi all, also draft-ietf-clue-telepresence-use-cases-07.txt has started its LC, and needs a review from us: Abstract Telepresence conferencing systems seek to create an environment that gives non co-located users or user groups a feeling of co-located presence through multimedia communication including at least audio and video signals of high fidelity. A number of techniques for handling audio and video streams are used to create this experience. When these techniques are not similar, interoperability between different systems is difficult at best, and often not possible. Conveying information about the relationships between multiple streams of media would allow senders and receivers to make choices to allow telepresence systems to interwork. This memo describes the most typical and important use cases for sending multiple streams in a telepresence conference. the due date is 2013-09-26. Any volunteer for it before tonight? thanks indeed Claudio _______________________________________________ appsdir mailing list appsdir@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/appsdir From sm@elandsys.com Thu Sep 19 12:45:53 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA33521F935A for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 12:45:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.549 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.549 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lcNz64Mk-0fE for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 12:45:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3102A21F933B for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 12:45:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.224.144.105]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r8JJjGO0025192 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 19 Sep 2013 12:45:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1379619930; bh=AvTHwHML5yf6ZB89eOV5TKSXeI3TaDZ66kJnwh0lqUw=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=AQT11cNGOMbQe5CY8wJY8fVE02TwMKKIa/H5aJ97G+n8Yodu5IO5Mq3YzpsfMIf3L Z+aC5f7U1s5h5gP+ZdVVAZKjFQUVdtJ8vRkP1+yqVJOtsnifY3CGzU+tjYr2Z3QX1X nR76aek3nHt2tXX2/ii3LEySK6Vlgl+lU/idOido= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1379619930; i=@elandsys.com; bh=AvTHwHML5yf6ZB89eOV5TKSXeI3TaDZ66kJnwh0lqUw=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=YKfaINIpyHlty6R0PuSh35BEdJL6vQsBxiujNuAmDy7uFzzO3hwEKLCrULR9AgTg8 9rnAe1JDDK7Qq76stnh5UvD4lH7sQK+XDFJAmO+0/uf4IznM2Vc5Pw6Ti/1dEw6W7u y9Zpn3e7jBbDtdOF19jz68ZatxZMUNAPSVkh/auo= Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20130919123250.0e8ce9f0@elandnews.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6 Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 12:43:44 -0700 To: Ted Lemon , Pete Resnick , Barry Leiba , Dave Cridland From: S Moonesamy In-Reply-To: References: <6.2.5.6.2.20130914143222.0b9590f0@elandnews.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20130918225335.0d0e2478@elandnews.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: appsdir@ietf.org, Claudio Allocchio Subject: Re: [appsdir] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-homenet-arch-10 X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 19:45:54 -0000 Hi Ted, [Cc to appsdir@ which is publicly readable] Please see the message at http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/current/msg10454.html for context. I suggest talking to Barry and Pete as this is an unusual situation. I don't know how the working group read the review from Dave Cridland and my review. I prefer not to see a fight between Apps and another area as it does not help anyone. Barry, Pete, can you provide some guidance? Thanks, -sm From Ted.Lemon@nominum.com Thu Sep 19 14:30:49 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66ABD21F8417 for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 14:30:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.516 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.516 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.083, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZC2zxMKS1wUX for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 14:30:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from exprod7og129.obsmtp.com (exprod7og129.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.122]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC6E021F8416 for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 14:30:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob129.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUjttA1jRaXH37PTWAWVrRf3EHPpnJCMG@postini.com; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 14:30:43 PDT Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 715331B82C5 for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 14:30:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-02.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D6CF190068; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 14:30:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com) Received: from [10.0.10.40] (192.168.1.10) by CAS-02.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 14:30:41 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1811\)) From: Ted Lemon In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20130919123250.0e8ce9f0@elandnews.com> Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 17:30:38 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <1C0F7F8E-1BEF-4748-B23A-FF8F141A5F0E@nominum.com> References: <6.2.5.6.2.20130914143222.0b9590f0@elandnews.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20130918225335.0d0e2478@elandnews.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20130919123250.0e8ce9f0@elandnews.com> To: S Moonesamy X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1811) X-Originating-IP: [192.168.1.10] Cc: Pete Resnick , Barry Leiba , appsdir@ietf.org, Claudio Allocchio , Dave Cridland Subject: Re: [appsdir] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-homenet-arch-10 X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 21:30:49 -0000 On Sep 19, 2013, at 3:43 PM, S Moonesamy wrote: > I suggest talking to Barry and Pete as this is an unusual situation. = I don't know how the working group read the review from Dave Cridland = and my review. I prefer not to see a fight between Apps and another = area as it does not help anyone. There won't be a fight=97I'm just trying to figure out what the right = thing is to do. The situation is complicated by the fact that as Brian = said, the document really does focus on layer 3 and naming, and isn't = intended to go any wider than that. To us, that's what "IPv6" means, = but I think we failed to account for the possibility that other readers = might think it includes the application layer. =46rom my perspective, I think accounting for the application layer is a = good idea=97it's just not something that this document sets out to do, = and indeed I don't think this document by itself can do that, so that = needs to be excluded by what we mean by "IPv6 Home Network = Architecture." As Brian said, we really are talking about the bottom = of the stack here. I would actually encourage you to look at the MIF architecture document = (not yet adopted, but should be soon), which is still an intarea = document, but really addresses the apps layer problem more directly: = https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-anipko-mif-mpvd-arch/ I say this not only because I think it's a good and interesting = document, and not only because I would like your input, but also because = I believe it relates pretty closely to what's going on with the homenet = architecture document, and I'm realizing that by exposing you to partial = snapshots of the larger picture, we are making your work harder. From sm@elandsys.com Thu Sep 19 16:59:59 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F003D21F89FF for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 16:59:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.55 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.55 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.049, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FUtIVz8jhFYO for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 16:59:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34DAE21F85C9 for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 16:59:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.224.144.105]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r8JNxNN7018292 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 19 Sep 2013 16:59:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1379635178; bh=3MSOJjDeV2DV1OwvRW8u3wJRaGvW9ylEeuaiIC9zmyQ=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=gkMThQMoQIOAowHjpkZZgNl7GzdP9huBsXhJTZdjT1dRpC/EsgO/9QGy9r3ZwD57O xH1C2k2LCqM3mjl+fAJHXmBbVRo96pVANi+Klq4Knqyd2glWip5gcUsBcg8nhL1zo8 mVU/vvTBWKz+8L9gpXw3kjLSXdPgEK4PCyZ7gNdQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1379635178; i=@elandsys.com; bh=3MSOJjDeV2DV1OwvRW8u3wJRaGvW9ylEeuaiIC9zmyQ=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=1KCKFQfYchfOdXZqlxMXBfq3g15d0HqtNpqxjknl479Y0PU2qmc7lDLkwisfPHDKR NSoDlsVn++qMl17QZWV2p4nNfDE+pV5QoE8tqIYsvHEqQxppjZGthzBTg8p5IZIITp buAJdCDER0x2v3iOUFlajFJz8RFt1vCWPs4yBBvU= Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20130919155631.0d2bc4a0@elandnews.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6 Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 16:58:48 -0700 To: Ted Lemon From: SM In-Reply-To: <1C0F7F8E-1BEF-4748-B23A-FF8F141A5F0E@nominum.com> References: <6.2.5.6.2.20130914143222.0b9590f0@elandnews.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20130918225335.0d0e2478@elandnews.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20130919123250.0e8ce9f0@elandnews.com> <1C0F7F8E-1BEF-4748-B23A-FF8F141A5F0E@nominum.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Pete Resnick , Barry Leiba , appsdir@ietf.org, Claudio Allocchio , Dave Cridland Subject: Re: [appsdir] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-homenet-arch-10 X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 23:59:59 -0000 Hi Ted, At 14:30 19-09-2013, Ted Lemon wrote: >There won't be a fight=97I'm just trying to figure=20 >out what the right thing is to do. The=20 >situation is complicated by the fact that as=20 >Brian said, the document really does focus on=20 >layer 3 and naming, and isn't intended to go any=20 >wider than that. To us, that's what "IPv6"=20 >means, but I think we failed to account for the=20 >possibility that other readers might think it includes the application= layer. The document discusses about addressability. As=20 Pete pointed out there's an application=20 perspective to that. There are two alternatives=20 right now, i.e. what Dave Cridland suggested or=20 looking into the organization of the=20 document. There may be more alternatives if there is input from other= people. > From my perspective, I think accounting for the=20 > application layer is a good idea=97it's just not=20 > something that this document sets out to do,=20 > and indeed I don't think this document by=20 > itself can do that, so that needs to be=20 > excluded by what we mean by "IPv6 Home Network=20 > Architecture." As Brian said, we really are=20 > talking about the bottom of the stack here. The bottom of the stack approach is not that=20 practical when the parts have to be put=20 together. In my opinion it leads to complexity. >I would actually encourage you to look at the=20 >MIF architecture document (not yet adopted, but=20 >should be soon), which is still an intarea=20 >document, but really addresses the apps layer=20 >problem more directly:=20 >https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-anipko-mif-mpvd-arch/ > >I say this not only because I think it's a good=20 >and interesting document, and not only because I=20 >would like your input, but also because I=20 >believe it relates pretty closely to what's=20 >going on with the homenet architecture document,=20 >and I'm realizing that by exposing you to=20 >partial snapshots of the larger picture, we are making your work harder. I thought about MIF when I was reading the=20 draft. The home networking would likely be using=20 split views for DNS. I have to go through the=20 DHCPv6 specifications and some of the MIF work=20 before I can comment on the MIF architecture=20 document. The work is not that hard. I'll take=20 the liberty not to explain why or else I will be=20 volunteered for IETF work. :-) Best regards, -sm=20 From Ted.Lemon@nominum.com Thu Sep 19 18:01:39 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E49C21F8596 for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 18:01:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.517 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.517 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.082, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eIADQuRhMrqC for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 18:01:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from exprod7og116.obsmtp.com (exprod7og116.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.219]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8137821F85B8 for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 18:01:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob116.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUjueaDShvJX5mLIc2MyeT98SroT2hb2W@postini.com; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 18:01:32 PDT Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36A1A1B82C3 for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 18:01:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-02.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C3AC190068; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 18:01:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com) Received: from [10.0.10.40] (192.168.1.10) by CAS-02.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 18:01:26 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1811\)) From: Ted Lemon In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20130919155631.0d2bc4a0@elandnews.com> Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 21:01:24 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: References: <6.2.5.6.2.20130914143222.0b9590f0@elandnews.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20130918225335.0d0e2478@elandnews.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20130919123250.0e8ce9f0@elandnews.com> <1C0F7F8E-1BEF-4748-B23A-FF8F141A5F0E@nominum.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20130919155631.0d2bc4a0@elandnews.com> To: SM X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1811) X-Originating-IP: [192.168.1.10] Cc: Pete Resnick , Barry Leiba , appsdir@ietf.org, Claudio Allocchio , Dave Cridland Subject: Re: [appsdir] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-homenet-arch-10 X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 01:01:39 -0000 On Sep 19, 2013, at 7:58 PM, SM wrote: > The bottom of the stack approach is not that practical when the parts = have to be put together. In my opinion it leads to complexity. Are you proposing that we just give up on multihoming and large = prefixes, and settle for NPT66? From sm@elandsys.com Thu Sep 19 21:25:35 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 738A921F87BB for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 21:25:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.551 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.048, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UvGabUXrZYKf for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 21:25:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B642221F842A for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 21:25:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.224.144.105]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r8K4P4Oj009239 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 19 Sep 2013 21:25:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1379651119; bh=Shy3gHrqz/2WKwJ/YN1kq+OAcPoICpdqsMloRsFlSTw=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=LAWg/H+NCMfwZewu78+a0IiLX/rg0GQaiejRx0GBZtaN4h+ShjGlrkhAS/71MT4ms fTU91Pqwi+LnFVebeMsMQfzVOcgIfN/h/aCYAa/GX8TzDHAT/d/4XYlAhAx/MBh6iT l25/6uIq1zdOusg1/aMQ1FasHdute22+0lyjp2F8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1379651119; i=@elandsys.com; bh=Shy3gHrqz/2WKwJ/YN1kq+OAcPoICpdqsMloRsFlSTw=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=rcoh77QaBq1zNaBDF32Go5H9poMS/wugjEQpW0CMwWYuBXzhWWZjtYtdn9fahGse2 MIqxhINRFrod7U1q4hgzriAWOmkWCmPlyboe5GKCuMmwWkue9jJZkCyY8ObAtPdoRy hLI1TXHLMG3ks+xHSiWfiQ0b/G13QzDJ/GN/d8LY= Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20130919211535.0ce86620@elandnews.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6 Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 21:20:52 -0700 To: Ted Lemon From: SM In-Reply-To: References: <6.2.5.6.2.20130914143222.0b9590f0@elandnews.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20130918225335.0d0e2478@elandnews.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20130919123250.0e8ce9f0@elandnews.com> <1C0F7F8E-1BEF-4748-B23A-FF8F141A5F0E@nominum.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20130919155631.0d2bc4a0@elandnews.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Pete Resnick , Barry Leiba , appsdir@ietf.org, Claudio Allocchio , Dave Cridland Subject: Re: [appsdir] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-homenet-arch-10 X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 04:25:35 -0000 Hi Ted, At 18:01 19-09-2013, Ted Lemon wrote: >Are you proposing that we just give up on multihoming and large >prefixes, and settle for NPT66? No, as that would create complexity and cause addressability issues (see http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/behave/current/msg05046.html ). Best regards, -sm From Ted.Lemon@nominum.com Fri Sep 20 03:55:21 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFE6421F9371 for ; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 03:55:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.518 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.518 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.081, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gr+hAW1QDALR for ; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 03:55:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from exprod7og122.obsmtp.com (exprod7og122.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AE7321F92CD for ; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 03:55:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob122.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUjwpktlKJyJWizERmOYJLaQlhkb7fcS/@postini.com; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 03:55:15 PDT Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08D101B814B for ; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 03:55:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-02.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A72C4190071; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 03:55:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com) Received: from [10.0.10.40] (192.168.1.10) by CAS-02.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 03:55:12 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1811\)) From: Ted Lemon In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20130919211535.0ce86620@elandnews.com> Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 06:55:10 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: References: <6.2.5.6.2.20130914143222.0b9590f0@elandnews.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20130918225335.0d0e2478@elandnews.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20130919123250.0e8ce9f0@elandnews.com> <1C0F7F8E-1BEF-4748-B23A-FF8F141A5F0E@nominum.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20130919155631.0d2bc4a0@elandnews.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20130919211535.0ce86620@elandnews.com> To: SM X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1811) X-Originating-IP: [192.168.1.10] Cc: Pete Resnick , Barry Leiba , appsdir@ietf.org, Claudio Allocchio , Dave Cridland Subject: Re: [appsdir] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-homenet-arch-10 X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 10:55:21 -0000 On Sep 20, 2013, at 12:20 AM, SM wrote: >> Are you proposing that we just give up on multihoming and large = prefixes, and settle for NPT66? >=20 > No, as that would create complexity and cause addressability issues = (see http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/behave/current/msg05046.html = ). I didn't think so, but talking about simplicity at the application layer = tends to make my wind wander in that direction. I think we blew up = "simplicity" as soon as we decided to talk about multihoming. But I'd = be delighted to be proven wrong. From sm@elandsys.com Wed Sep 25 13:11:59 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A36C521E8056 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 13:11:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.562 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.562 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.037, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YvC-ABFHl1bF for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 13:11:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5352121E8086 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 13:11:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.224.132.253]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r8PKBEDV007104 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 25 Sep 2013 13:11:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1380139886; bh=KZzqyzDnoKNSWBJdG3fT2yDXc7p2dHhpunUQoQ+j/tM=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=jh4EW0Ksj9mPqFISw+NLjGTiKcu1CgSQoXTz0I3FXVIozhKI4YIkf3MBw+BbcX67e awl15QG7EdMT8FU0XP/c7vWuEH9iYCzD3pt48b3l81amOGWRbjbyLVapZkWBjIqEmm /eH9iUHtUiOOHvpnEXJjeqmNITK3Wv22dsyhqsS4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1380139886; i=@elandsys.com; bh=KZzqyzDnoKNSWBJdG3fT2yDXc7p2dHhpunUQoQ+j/tM=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=V6fnVhBDMSSShFLOhV+MDIZ3TwMdPE0PNACHAbbDfobbgHPDSdKaNqtmOLAm69GJR ukXJjJJVM6t+pkRbsyxOYqTJQa/i5U7Gy3dR0NnKQ2kzpLGPeNgcDaEY6781hqjs9O 2oUid4GOH8VPsWyfoKAHnI6/qE384WeGlEmWlUM0= Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20130925125903.0cdefd60@resistor.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6 Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 13:03:53 -0700 To: Claudio Allocchio From: SM In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: appsdir@ietf.org Subject: Re: [appsdir] [apps-discuss] Request for Apps Area review of LDAP Printer Schema (19 September 2013) X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 20:11:59 -0000 Hi Claudio, At 09:34 19-09-2013, Ira McDonald wrote: >The IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WG would like to request >IETF Apps Area review of our updated LDAP Printer Schema (updates >RFC 3712). > >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-mcdonald-ldap-printer-schema-05.txt I don't know whether there is anyone on AppsDir with LDAP expertise. Best regards, -sm From alexey.melnikov@isode.com Wed Sep 25 13:14:07 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2291C21F9F1B for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 13:14:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z5WMW6CCgqvj for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 13:14:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from statler.isode.com (statler.isode.com [62.3.217.254]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DC0521F85E0 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 13:14:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1380140041; d=isode.com; s=selector; i=@isode.com; bh=jYzjzrDSDWyZFJqTM2JgSGeXpYl/cYaKrfx3KSGeAYg=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=cjTu51KxJ4B3bIFcKYVtbC3+dVnWsa1l3EyFpjZNGa6jwCxMIVGhlPYn/V1DJI+FILUxKU 8jxBHMiVM7YnnZknnBt3FTSUgrnpE0jzwd9wm+YvE6VmGF+VwTFW+ufrFTW9j/EiydTeA8 1JZQoQN/Xi+3wfTk36+Rg/8Qbh8yIG0=; Received: from [192.168.0.4] (cpc5-nmal20-2-0-cust24.19-2.cable.virginmedia.com [92.234.84.25]) by statler.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPA id ; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 21:14:01 +0100 Message-ID: <5243440C.6080303@isode.com> Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 21:14:04 +0100 From: Alexey Melnikov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 To: SM References: <6.2.5.6.2.20130925125903.0cdefd60@resistor.net> In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20130925125903.0cdefd60@resistor.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: appsdir@ietf.org, Claudio Allocchio Subject: Re: [appsdir] [apps-discuss] Request for Apps Area review of LDAP Printer Schema (19 September 2013) X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 20:14:07 -0000 On 25/09/2013 21:03, SM wrote: > Hi Claudio, > At 09:34 19-09-2013, Ira McDonald wrote: >> The IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WG would like to request >> IETF Apps Area review of our updated LDAP Printer Schema (updates >> RFC 3712). >> >> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-mcdonald-ldap-printer-schema-05.txt >> > > I don't know whether there is anyone on AppsDir with LDAP expertise. I have some... From sm@elandsys.com Wed Sep 25 13:31:33 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A66421F9C7D for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 13:31:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.563 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.563 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.036, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vbR60PZ5GjOZ for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 13:31:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C92D21F960E for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 13:31:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.224.132.253]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r8PKV5IS017898 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 25 Sep 2013 13:31:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1380141084; bh=AEfBsVQvBfSkV/g9X3pvezBYQ25oex2rEOYZjLVN+1k=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=gY9BWtKXwr+4fz2elryhDAQZA884dlwZt8TpQ0ULI4ch/ULnkZS93nYIr6FaSPf8g xHOWxT0B8f0JMFPvVONwofZF7xMugVnC/p+nDYwEKfPDpIIL0RKxDID4zRdlgLrTEL X4AH1FyctQl/Bn5BP/loNXxqdw75cEeqsTAHtFbI= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1380141084; i=@elandsys.com; bh=AEfBsVQvBfSkV/g9X3pvezBYQ25oex2rEOYZjLVN+1k=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=bf/tr7lA+si7A55iyNo1gkzKR9+ug1D1C2KlP2ZWc+CHmazi4EXmQKYhVLmjHjUL2 saQKAhrKu4A5OYaZAiyDKDOk/2JMRVUhuTkl7eTg5Xblk2xj1in9D+9zr26+RVWFsR 2vI4KvrqCysCkXXwDGfZunSpNZMIyaeEoxfWSjLU= Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20130925132002.0ddf3898@elandnews.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6 Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 13:30:24 -0700 To: Alexey Melnikov From: SM In-Reply-To: <5243440C.6080303@isode.com> References: <6.2.5.6.2.20130925125903.0cdefd60@resistor.net> <5243440C.6080303@isode.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: appsdir@ietf.org, Claudio Allocchio Subject: Re: [appsdir] [apps-discuss] Request for Apps Area review of LDAP Printer Schema (19 September 2013) X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 20:31:33 -0000 Hi Alexey, At 13:14 25-09-2013, Alexey Melnikov wrote: >I have some... There is a request for review ( http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/current/msg10455.html ). Would you be able to perform the review? Best regards, -sm From superuser@gmail.com Wed Sep 25 14:25:32 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22F1D11E80E0 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 14:25:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.504 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.504 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.095, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0HnEx9wDIoFH for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 14:25:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wg0-x234.google.com (mail-wg0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::234]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C025211E80DF for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 14:25:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id m15so276443wgh.7 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 14:25:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=j1Wowq/+PVHGnu37sJ/bMUvyVugxmDta/SXAzEU5xig=; b=ifT2tpdCkINp5cYMagGhXBtoR4+xIxAzfzPincguOuSfcJunHg86iBSeXHkvCwpSR3 5Iu9J8iPUMNj2Yva+v5kLCT8jgH7nIFVX7E1i6p78HuEEkZBt3DZ2YeOJ+1QoSXdEp5O QcnR5M0xoop0TnzkXzzIQaEgf1R+cOnBkm11X97XA05xTu914ebPUbVHfWwBD17HparK b1shQ4F0CRXwDBgO/QV4rakgpxlIO+Y7QpPzkf1j5KtpMG+6D2Tjmez+L7QwMfRaXYuu j/k1X1VJ4X4zFIPbnfa1WXzDUzT84Ziaqw9QchMbbHnPJSU8GlXrmz1c3dAvtCtErpm2 inEA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.175.66 with SMTP id by2mr3278931wjc.59.1380144324732; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 14:25:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.18.202 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 14:25:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20130925125903.0cdefd60@resistor.net> References: <6.2.5.6.2.20130925125903.0cdefd60@resistor.net> Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 14:25:24 -0700 Message-ID: From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" To: SM Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013d19f836ee8504e73be412 Cc: appsdir@ietf.org, Claudio Allocchio , Philip Guenther Subject: Re: [appsdir] [apps-discuss] Request for Apps Area review of LDAP Printer Schema (19 September 2013) X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 21:25:32 -0000 --089e013d19f836ee8504e73be412 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 1:03 PM, SM wrote: > At 09:34 19-09-2013, Ira McDonald wrote: > >> The IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WG would like to request >> IETF Apps Area review of our updated LDAP Printer Schema (updates >> RFC 3712). >> >> > printer-schema-05.txt >> >http://**www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/**draft-mcdonald-ldap-printer-** >> schema-05.txt >> > > I don't know whether there is anyone on AppsDir with LDAP expertise. > Not that I want to volunteer him for work, but Philip Guenther < guenther@sendmail.com> comes to mind. Cc'd here in case he's ready, willing, able. -MSK --089e013d19f836ee8504e73be412 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 1:03 PM, SM <= sm+ietf@elandsys.= com> wrote:
At 09:34 19-09-2013, Ira McDonald wrote:
The IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WG would like to request
IETF Apps Area review of our updated LDAP Printer Schema (updates
RFC 3712).

<http://www.ietf.org/internet-dr= afts/draft-mcdonald-ldap-printer-schema-05.txt>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-= mcdonald-ldap-printer-schema-05.txt

I don't know whether there is anyone on AppsDir with LDAP expertise.

Not that I want to volunteer him for work= , but Philip Guenther <guenther= @sendmail.com> comes to mind.=A0 Cc'd here in case he's read= y, willing, able.

-MSK
--089e013d19f836ee8504e73be412-- From Claudio.Allocchio@garr.it Wed Sep 25 15:36:55 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D6C421F95D0 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 15:36:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.588 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.588 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.131, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sMe7pXIpm+25 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 15:36:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cyrus.dir.garr.it (cyrus.dir.garr.it [193.206.158.29]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F80621E8056 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 15:36:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: internal info suppressed Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 00:36:20 +0200 (CEST) From: Claudio Allocchio X-X-Sender: claudio@mac-allocchio3 To: SM In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20130925125903.0cdefd60@resistor.net> Message-ID: References: <6.2.5.6.2.20130925125903.0cdefd60@resistor.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (OSX 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=garr.it; s=cyrus; t=1380148589; bh=y2/pVH7jnxXM4UIGdAik8u7I23RVNgW6rshrP56QFRo=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=TTY7rUpeo8vQ3Wu05yTLeIiz2Pc2ywndPYa/FEILD+fxQAFBnHcWw3GE6AFKTRxcM FRrYtcQOBr9rgbLr5mrfPVI3jjy7nIM8lwKHqfphDpb/1JZCpWj+LRDU37dvP33DRk V66GmTlsFWNE39QDnpUv5Td55v24WkCALa2Lwf2I= Cc: appsdir@ietf.org, Claudio Allocchio Subject: Re: [appsdir] [apps-discuss] Request for Apps Area review of LDAP Printer Schema (19 September 2013) X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 22:36:55 -0000 On Wed, 25 Sep 2013, SM wrote: > Hi Claudio, > At 09:34 19-09-2013, Ira McDonald wrote: >> The IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WG would like to request >> IETF Apps Area review of our updated LDAP Printer Schema (updates >> RFC 3712). >> >> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-mcdonald-ldap-printer-schema-05.txt > > I don't know whether there is anyone on AppsDir with LDAP expertise. ....mmmh as far as I know... we lack somebody in this area! But... is ther anybody who feels he/she can do this? > > Best regards, > -sm > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Claudio Allocchio G A R R Claudio.Allocchio@garr.it Senior Technical Officer tel: +39 040 3758523 Italian Academic and G=Claudio; S=Allocchio; fax: +39 040 3758565 Research Network P=garr; A=garr; C=it; PGP Key: http://www.cert.garr.it/PGP/keys.php3#ca From Claudio.Allocchio@garr.it Thu Sep 26 01:04:26 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F6E811E8169 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 01:04:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.595 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.595 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.124, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id urv77oMaPXlU for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 01:04:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cyrus.dir.garr.it (cyrus.dir.garr.it [193.206.158.29]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9EE811E8127 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 01:04:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: internal info suppressed Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 10:03:49 +0200 (CEST) From: Claudio Allocchio X-X-Sender: claudio@vpnclnt04.dir.garr.it To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <6.2.5.6.2.20130925125903.0cdefd60@resistor.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (OSX 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=garr.it; s=cyrus; t=1380182635; bh=7aimIme9l/2OU+lC1wlQWLxWPaitTfoLrZUTbErw3M4=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=FnIxMRQ8kLsBylP7YpFd8gmKP7XX3bm960PAH8gDc6/En1cCEwUQ0r5WsPrywWBzn hwKf319YRDyWWXDPtuBKcalNMNyuQbdV+ZTyFzf1/b63gbH5wuqa8vvgHaelMBNpR1 iTtE5Kn0YGBy7Ajm2s4Tlx9049klzBjM8pnjjVAI= Cc: appsdir@ietf.org, SM , Philip Guenther , Claudio Allocchio Subject: Re: [appsdir] [apps-discuss] Request for Apps Area review of LDAP Printer Schema (19 September 2013) X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 08:04:26 -0000 OK, so let's see if we have Alexey or Philip. Do we know when they need te review? On Wed, 25 Sep 2013, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 1:03 PM, SM wrote: > >> At 09:34 19-09-2013, Ira McDonald wrote: >> >>> The IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WG would like to request >>> IETF Apps Area review of our updated LDAP Printer Schema (updates >>> RFC 3712). >>> >>> >> printer-schema-05.txt >>>> http://**www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/**draft-mcdonald-ldap-printer-** >>> schema-05.txt >>> >> >> I don't know whether there is anyone on AppsDir with LDAP expertise. >> > > Not that I want to volunteer him for work, but Philip Guenther < > guenther@sendmail.com> comes to mind. Cc'd here in case he's ready, > willing, able. > > -MSK > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Claudio Allocchio G A R R Claudio.Allocchio@garr.it Senior Technical Officer tel: +39 040 3758523 Italian Academic and G=Claudio; S=Allocchio; fax: +39 040 3758565 Research Network P=garr; A=garr; C=it; PGP Key: http://www.cert.garr.it/PGP/keys.php3#ca From Claudio.Allocchio@garr.it Thu Sep 26 09:03:21 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13A4F1F0D07 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 09:03:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.607 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.607 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.112, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AvhrEpJUpXuO for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 09:03:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cyrus.dir.garr.it (cyrus.dir.garr.it [193.206.158.29]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2FAF21F99B0 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 09:03:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: internal info suppressed Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 18:02:46 +0200 (CEST) From: Claudio Allocchio X-X-Sender: claudio@vpnclnt04.dir.garr.it To: Alexey Melnikov In-Reply-To: <5243440C.6080303@isode.com> Message-ID: References: <6.2.5.6.2.20130925125903.0cdefd60@resistor.net> <5243440C.6080303@isode.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (OSX 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=garr.it; s=cyrus; t=1380211371; bh=6IQVdsMfoG/JO7klGHxtQeEJEVG0tzG9d9J3EqoRK/k=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=KrFv9q+3P076w90PdCiHwbfOJKVYT/v5Vz728pgqd+fEJvMprLt3KHyzG/G5IoFGA xtKO9hG4L6anWathtG1+tC4DcQi3+a4bnvXrUdPV4jU7Q6A99gK5ic0U2ldkiPPwgq iF+nwdtAdokq89KxgjHruu7LygA6ZpUItyafk3VA= Cc: appsdir@ietf.org, SM , Claudio Allocchio Subject: Re: [appsdir] [apps-discuss] Request for Apps Area review of LDAP Printer Schema (19 September 2013) X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 16:03:21 -0000 Hi Alexey, given that Philip has not answered, yes... please proceed with the review (and see also the security considerations aready discussed on the apps-discuss list today). Many thanks! Claudio On Wed, 25 Sep 2013, Alexey Melnikov wrote: > On 25/09/2013 21:03, SM wrote: >> Hi Claudio, >> At 09:34 19-09-2013, Ira McDonald wrote: >>> The IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WG would like to request >>> IETF Apps Area review of our updated LDAP Printer Schema (updates >>> RFC 3712). >>> >>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-mcdonald-ldap-printer-schema-05.txt >> >> I don't know whether there is anyone on AppsDir with LDAP expertise. > > I have some... > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Claudio Allocchio G A R R Claudio.Allocchio@garr.it Senior Technical Officer tel: +39 040 3758523 Italian Academic and G=Claudio; S=Allocchio; fax: +39 040 3758565 Research Network P=garr; A=garr; C=it; PGP Key: http://www.cert.garr.it/PGP/keys.php3#ca From sm@elandsys.com Thu Sep 26 09:17:22 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87E2E11E8102 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 09:17:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.556 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.556 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.043, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J6-MRyjzCgik for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 09:17:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76BE011E8147 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 09:17:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.224.155.160]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r8QGGiaC007483 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 26 Sep 2013 09:16:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1380212217; bh=fzHV44OND3q++ulMHStRDYQr++XKdP5ltkip+UtuTCg=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=Udt2eifgoyGhSB4KiRb6u76P/pmkq7DFWSAn7AoBI0rAz5R59sUBwTcO5RIFTSAw0 uMi26o1IEw7ZsKPPBvq/fO+V+GJPUgHO7r/FUHxoWfUPQC6E0E4rmsdD3tyH2Rz39T A0vI8Qv4y6kwlF6tU+IFKQeq5/sRIW1VEcJRhWoQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1380212217; i=@elandsys.com; bh=fzHV44OND3q++ulMHStRDYQr++XKdP5ltkip+UtuTCg=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=zzjEDBh1L33yRzlIv2x3PKMfiizt7OXcQjzHyx1VcRmPjtBZAU13NWleYHOlb5vj5 hEXCRFCdnEom5teKWCB0qLWFfujzxiTuWcU9rYHsx31dmZMQXFBsCMy/uCp0CN0r4K y5GQ8cwcnZ9VTOKemrfsoJ0hjNWApysIVbKVSjbA= Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20130926091352.065ac5f0@elandnews.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6 Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 09:16:19 -0700 To: Claudio Allocchio From: SM In-Reply-To: References: <6.2.5.6.2.20130925125903.0cdefd60@resistor.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: appsdir@ietf.org Subject: Re: [appsdir] [apps-discuss] Request for Apps Area review of LDAP Printer Schema (19 September 2013) X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 16:17:22 -0000 Hi Claudio, At 01:03 26-09-2013, Claudio Allocchio wrote: >Do we know when they need te review? I suggest having a two-weeks deadline. Best regards, -sm From Claudio.Allocchio@garr.it Thu Sep 26 09:29:09 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EAA311E8116 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 09:29:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.696 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.696 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.185, BAYES_50=0.001, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Entnwn+qJcgn for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 09:29:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cyrus.dir.garr.it (cyrus.dir.garr.it [193.206.158.29]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54F4B21F8E51 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 09:28:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: internal info suppressed Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 18:27:34 +0200 (CEST) From: Claudio Allocchio X-X-Sender: claudio@vpnclnt04.dir.garr.it To: SM In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20130926091352.065ac5f0@elandnews.com> Message-ID: References: <6.2.5.6.2.20130925125903.0cdefd60@resistor.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20130926091352.065ac5f0@elandnews.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (OSX 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=garr.it; s=cyrus; t=1380212857; bh=UubmhSeHm0IaqdIqwjFiCselerdYkZykg+smzNJvlmw=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=I1iZu98KG/wkKg0RRiiqzRLlD8azTdVL9siDQrQxEH6GG4yW60SkZ8gpuyHW7C/KV +P2gItNRBpbx5uUhuBMNYsiGl7OLcDDNOd81htPFEvX8BUIT+okIcxGkgwk+mP71aU gR+1zPS0qecSjEtXhe6cxpPhJtufnt45y+/Lsrd4= Cc: appsdir@ietf.org, Claudio Allocchio Subject: Re: [appsdir] [apps-discuss] Request for Apps Area review of LDAP Printer Schema (19 September 2013) X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 16:29:09 -0000 On Thu, 26 Sep 2013, SM wrote: > Hi Claudio, > At 01:03 26-09-2013, Claudio Allocchio wrote: >> Do we know when they need te review? > > I suggest having a two-weeks deadline. see Ira's message (indeed she asked the review quite late given they start shippig priducts in October!)... but ... Let's see what we can do! > > Best regards, > -sm > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Claudio Allocchio G A R R Claudio.Allocchio@garr.it Senior Technical Officer tel: +39 040 3758523 Italian Academic and G=Claudio; S=Allocchio; fax: +39 040 3758565 Research Network P=garr; A=garr; C=it; PGP Key: http://www.cert.garr.it/PGP/keys.php3#ca