From nobody Tue Aug 2 03:15:46 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD9FC12D08C for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 03:15:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -15.808 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.808 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1baCb1u04rh7 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 03:15:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0426812B049 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 03:15:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=10139; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1470132943; x=1471342543; h=references:subject:to:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to; bh=c/UIWhsEHZ5UVcnzvmNICRhH6DvyeWeQtd8U2m6uHTg=; b=ZATeOxq8BRoizZVXAX6lF2Tin7Sp4B9dLOAvxy3bZBkXSl8cqj+t+/pL WTR32bii0Z9e82UOwyQeEMn6huWtVL35t6cFb/fXWxOwpkl0gnhFKkUwz LN/unC1UYVoaif/c3jyMpm7OiqFTHKa+bO5+IXutdKc6XKQSSQLIdYftU U=; X-Files: signature.asc : 481 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0CdCACJcaBX/xbLJq1chBsqUrslJoV3A?= =?us-ascii?q?oF/AQEBAQEBXhwLhF8GI0sbRgcCAkYHCgYKAwYCAQGILQ6xA5ADAQEBAQEBAQM?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQETCQWIIoJVh0GCWgWZM4M6gXBuiGeBa4Ragw4jhUmMMIN3VIJFgTc6M?= =?us-ascii?q?ogXAQEB?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,459,1464652800"; d="asc'?eml'208?scan'208,208";a="639048399" Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Aug 2016 10:15:41 +0000 Received: from [10.61.168.28] ([10.61.168.28]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u72AFerA025091 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 10:15:40 GMT References: <20160801144052.32557.44206.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> To: "appsdir@ietf.org" From: Eliot Lear X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <20160801144052.32557.44206.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Message-ID: <0aab7300-9c3a-97a0-99c6-b6e60847df63@cisco.com> Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 12:15:39 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160801144052.32557.44206.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9cwKUAtDbOb6MALH0RoKxJjgAcCd3CbCV" Archived-At: Subject: [appsdir] Fwd: Last Call: (I2RS Security Related Requirements) to Informational RFC X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 10:15:45 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --9cwKUAtDbOb6MALH0RoKxJjgAcCd3CbCV Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Ldp4o8TU9PJ3rwgP0T22I9maUIcmGVfFj" From: Eliot Lear To: "appsdir@ietf.org" Message-ID: <0aab7300-9c3a-97a0-99c6-b6e60847df63@cisco.com> Subject: Fwd: Last Call: (I2RS Security Related Requirements) to Informational RFC References: <20160801144052.32557.44206.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20160801144052.32557.44206.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> --Ldp4o8TU9PJ3rwgP0T22I9maUIcmGVfFj Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------B6B2C134891FFF0FDDCA5672" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------B6B2C134891FFF0FDDCA5672 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Would anyone care to review draft-ietf-i2rs-protocol-security-requirement= s? I think the key thing here is to confirm that none of the requirements are impracticable in an application context. This is a pretty short read= =2E Eliot --------------B6B2C134891FFF0FDDCA5672 Content-Type: message/rfc822; name="Last Call: (I2RS Security Related Requirements) to Informational RFC.eml" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename*0="Last Call: To: "IETF-Announce" Subject: Last Call: (I2RS Security Related Requirements) to Informational RFC X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.29.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20160801144052.32557.44206.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 07:40:52 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: i2rs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-i2rs-protocol-security-requirements@ietf.org, i2rs-chairs@ietf.org, akatlas@gmail.com X-BeenThere: ietf-announce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org List-Id: "IETF announcement list. No discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org Sender: IETF-Announce Return-Path: ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: XCH-RTP-008.cisco.com X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthMechanism: 10 X-MS-Exchange-Organization-Network-Message-Id: fe08c3c1-5929-4ffe-056a-08d3ba19f109 X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AVStamp-Enterprise: 1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 The IESG has received a request from the Interface to the Routing System WG (i2rs) to consider the following document: - 'I2RS Security Related Requirements' as Informational RFC The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2016-08-15. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract This presents security-related requirements for the I2RS protocol for mutual authentication, transport protocols, data transfer and transactions. The file can be obtained via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-protocol-security-requirements/ IESG discussion can be tracked via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-protocol-security-requirements/ballot/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. --------------B6B2C134891FFF0FDDCA5672-- --Ldp4o8TU9PJ3rwgP0T22I9maUIcmGVfFj-- --9cwKUAtDbOb6MALH0RoKxJjgAcCd3CbCV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXoHLMAAoJEIe2a0bZ0nozI2QIAIPHrit+HW8vebtWh0RXunBE zQAOwafZ7gkKK5KJT8s+vJPbcbcZlMjchdgk0pUjFddKxi1NUWZor6HZISPe49hg kffwIJUnLGg/fIDGndJmjRMFC+YjyqXK6xeZPpf+jA9chM+rldshzx9ti53teoNF oyOBihSdrmHr9twKuhj8L3JyzyaIC8ERTYqQ/TtfuxIOF70OuYJNaWz3EWeuAL8h ZeRPZ1Xe6B9fwiLMkJuYUdoLKHvWoCdwNRxiML68j4LzYsYePRrnMoBXZBCAVTkQ k6kAEsqt0LuuESFygeVBO0vR8ZDEVZ1ROaXx4mw56nv9C8xt9fEREpwCfMxbgWU= =MnUM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9cwKUAtDbOb6MALH0RoKxJjgAcCd3CbCV-- From nobody Thu Aug 4 15:12:47 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B618912DB31 for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 15:12:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.388 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.388 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=opendkim.org header.b=NrQdHXJK; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=elandsys.com header.b=JpsqEfY9 Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2BC8-7Cu707O for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 15:12:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74BFC12DB2E for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 15:12:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.226.54.237]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u74MCRa5023569 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 4 Aug 2016 15:12:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1470348759; x=1470435159; bh=fEcP4vhhPRCeKxSYQ7ebwIjFRUq+WbKRQ1ftcitG0NU=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=NrQdHXJKhsm2PidDSfTTcEcTdWCJEjsqn0F9ZpuEgE+75uyGNJtAz680cowmp+XpP jEVCZAbznCJRMVr/hGoE/K7nApiy52vDn4AErzKj2p5wDtePw3BHNkv+0TSeWv/Y8g a/RaJmgrDgFawVXt6v+c7e4HxuBART5PmlKeBvEY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1470348759; x=1470435159; i=@elandsys.com; bh=fEcP4vhhPRCeKxSYQ7ebwIjFRUq+WbKRQ1ftcitG0NU=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=JpsqEfY90i1+Frg7TaAsaQzjprSlncUFZ65COuo2fdNTPXx7XoYAQhxJLXlDab4m0 kiwEFxdLQQmAhDRlfEVvvkj+G3xkQlnWrksyQANSlYi6g/mDO3XYiX/J6znOhrBOUX +Ql3YmzZxYkQKlyJyVtjNnRdq0rmFrY2xetr8Y/M= Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20160804150939.0d758a90@elandnews.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6 Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2016 15:12:13 -0700 To: Eliot Lear From: SM In-Reply-To: <66c04911-7e20-3d21-5a38-d64d0365352a@cisco.com> References: <20160518001706.24865.86238.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <66c04911-7e20-3d21-5a38-d64d0365352a@cisco.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Archived-At: Cc: appsdir@ietf.org Subject: Re: [appsdir] Fwd: Last Call: (UDP Usage Guidelines) to Best Current Practice X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2016 22:12:45 -0000 Hi Eliot, At 03:53 18-05-2016, Eliot Lear wrote: >Seeking a reviewer for draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis-13? Any takers? I'll volunteer if you don't have anyone yet. Best regards, -sm From nobody Fri Aug 5 07:51:39 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF0DA12D8B2 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 07:51:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -15.809 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.809 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xqvyPlGNKMbE for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 07:51:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C6E412D89C for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 07:51:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=11686; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1470408695; x=1471618295; h=references:subject:to:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to; bh=nDDr7xjNOmc1LzPJdnXZisi990Zd1OpdDH51yaKnDbI=; b=YGN29OGaEkyL1rgli8D0JzURhYvf6a+kq2aobNv5MlNsLYLR6uzyS8Go i4i1rIr5xl8rzYasCqNYPhiBSwjSJYYA0sTgoOJhJRkkVCfDnBbEzO+vj HuMTSG3fMH6iCTq2ZTCXhPXtVXAXHPKqCEZooDNlPOMlt9FV7LNSse2qT E=; X-Files: signature.asc : 481 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0CCAgBFpKRX/xbLJq1chBsqUrcSgg+Bf?= =?us-ascii?q?SSFeQKBdxQBAQEBAQEBXRwLhF8GI0sbRgcCAkYHCgYNBgIBAYgtDq5QkAIBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQIBAQEBAQETCQWIIgiCTYdBgloFmTWDO4Fzb4hrgWuEW4MOhW6GZIVPg?= =?us-ascii?q?3ceNoJFgTc6ModlAQEB?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,474,1464652800"; d="asc'?eml'208?scan'208,208";a="638830748" Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Aug 2016 14:51:33 +0000 Received: from [10.61.89.30] (ams3-vpn-dhcp6431.cisco.com [10.61.89.30]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u75EpXE6015149 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 14:51:33 GMT References: <20160803180345.6185.91442.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> To: "appsdir@ietf.org" From: Eliot Lear X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <20160803180345.6185.91442.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Message-ID: Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 16:51:32 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160803180345.6185.91442.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0oPuiTXx6GiCkS81ABjFiJqL7LIX97lWr" Archived-At: Subject: [appsdir] Fwd: Last Call: (Data Types in the Remote Authentication Dial-In User Service Protocol (RADIUS)) to Proposed Standard X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2016 14:51:38 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --0oPuiTXx6GiCkS81ABjFiJqL7LIX97lWr Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="JfhjskvQQt9fnI6hiN6gRe60skMj7XN3A" From: Eliot Lear To: "appsdir@ietf.org" Message-ID: Subject: Fwd: Last Call: (Data Types in the Remote Authentication Dial-In User Service Protocol (RADIUS)) to Proposed Standard References: <20160803180345.6185.91442.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20160803180345.6185.91442.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> --JfhjskvQQt9fnI6hiN6gRe60skMj7XN3A Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------0A8BA7E5AA2F1888D754551A" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------0A8BA7E5AA2F1888D754551A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Names names and more names. Would anyone like to review this document in last call? For one thing, it may make sense, and I don't know if this is really an apps area thing, to see if we have other protocols that also declare data types, and how the two might map. That seems to me very appy, but I am also thinking in terms of YANG... Eliot --------------0A8BA7E5AA2F1888D754551A Content-Type: message/rfc822; name="Last Call: (Data Types in the Remote Authentication Dial-In User Service Protocol (RADIUS)) to Proposed Standard.eml" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename*0="Last Call: (Data Types "; filename*1="in the Remote Authentication Dial-In User Service Protocol ("; filename*2="RADIUS)) to Proposed Standard.eml" X-Mozilla-Keys: Received: from xch-rtp-004.cisco.com (64.101.220.144) by xch-aln-005.cisco.com (173.36.7.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3 via Mailbox Transport; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 13:04:37 -0500 Received: from xch-rtp-007.cisco.com (64.101.220.147) by XCH-RTP-004.cisco.com (64.101.220.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 14:04:35 -0400 Received: from xch-rtp-012.cisco.com (64.101.220.152) by XCH-RTP-007.cisco.com (64.101.220.147) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 14:04:35 -0400 Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (173.37.86.78) by mail.cisco.com (64.101.220.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 14:04:33 -0400 Received: from alln-core-9.cisco.com ([173.36.13.129]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 03 Aug 2016 18:04:31 +0000 Received: from alln-inbound-l.cisco.com (alln-inbound-l.cisco.com [173.37.147.242]) by alln-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u73I4Uce021322 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA bits=128 verify=OK); Wed, 3 Aug 2016 18:04:30 GMT Received-SPF: Pass (alln-inbound-l.cisco.com: domain of ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org designates 4.31.198.44 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=4.31.198.44; receiver=alln-inbound-l.cisco.com; envelope-from="ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org"; x-sender="ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org"; x-conformance=spf_only; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (alln-inbound-l.cisco.com: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail.ietf.org) identity=helo; client-ip=4.31.198.44; receiver=alln-inbound-l.cisco.com; envelope-from="ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org"; x-sender="postmaster@mail.ietf.org"; x-conformance=spf_only Authentication-Results: alln-inbound-l.cisco.com; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster@mail.ietf.org; dkim=pass (signature verified) header.i=@ietf.org X-from-outside-Cisco: 4.31.198.44 IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3A8fbLzBTYcv1oxGVZNRSXNkL3Odpsv+yvbD5Q0YIu?= =?us-ascii?q?jvd0So/mwa6+ZR2N2/xhgRfzUJnB7Loc0qyN4vimCTRLuM/f+Fk5M7V0Hycfjs?= =?us-ascii?q?sXmwFySOWkMmbcaMDQUiohAc5ZX0Vk9XzoeWJcGcL5ekGA6ibqtW1aJBzzOEJP?= =?us-ascii?q?K/jvHcaK1oLshrj0q8WYOlwWzBOGIppKZC2sqgvQssREyaBDEY0WjiXzn31TZu?= =?us-ascii?q?5NznlpL1/A1zz158O34YIxu38I46Fp34d6XK77Z6U1S6BDRHRjajhtpZ6jiB/Y?= =?us-ascii?q?UAHa5mcASn5E1V1XHBeD7RzmUNH2qCS9s+N83CyTO4rxVaw1XjK5qKZmVBGtgS?= =?us-ascii?q?EBMCM/+2yEt8prkagOpRugowB4kY/ZfI/QPfx4eb7bdt5fX2dYQ8tKSwRAD5+y?= =?us-ascii?q?KYwVAL0aIOxaooLh8kYItga0HgK2BenimQNP0zXX8JEUls0nFwbb2gctVZpasX?= =?us-ascii?q?nIopD8MqEVTOa+wYHJwCnNKfRM1mGu0oXQdgEdpqSNUK5+Wcvc1UdpEBnK3XuK?= =?us-ascii?q?romwAzOYnsUgiEfTu+ttTu3qkGMssQxtqyK+7sYhloePgZganAOXvR5lyZo4cI?= =?us-ascii?q?XrAHVwZsSpRd4J73mX?= X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0GgAADFMaJXhyzGHwRdHQGCeoEDbQ+NL?= =?us-ascii?q?KwFgXQiC4dHOBQBAQEBAQEBAQIPAQEBCA0JCRkvgjIEAQEDDwEIOTwBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?jAj4xBAI3BgEBBAoeCwECAwECBgJABQMIAwEbJxcTBYgtAgIJrjeFKgEBBYFcB?= =?us-ascii?q?olVAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBFAMFhg6PBI8RiigZhX+IXQqBa4RbiHq?= =?us-ascii?q?GZIVMhBWCO0CBVU6HRoEUAQEB?= X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0GgAADFMaJXhyzGHwRdHQGCeoEDbQ+NLKwFgXQiC4dHOBQ?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQEBAQIPAQEBCA0JCRkvgjIEAQEDDwEIOTwBAQEBAQEjAj4xBAI3BgEBB?= =?us-ascii?q?AoeCwECAwECBgJABQMIAwEbJxcTBYgtAgIJrjeFKgEBBYFcBolVAQEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBFAMFhg6PBI8RiigZhX+IXQqBa4RbiHqGZIVMhBWCO0CBV?= =?us-ascii?q?U6HRoEUAQEB?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,466,1464652800"; d="scan'208";a="227934093" X-IronPort-Outbreak-Status: No, level 0, Unknown - Unknown Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by alln-inbound-l.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Aug 2016 18:04:12 +0000 Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91D8C12D691; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 11:03:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1470247431; bh=RqlhUXoi7Pr6FOZd8kj6Iu0ifvqu84EmnEY817glXjU=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Cc:Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=VmCPBc6F639f1N1DCqg4Ka+avLWkjK9KcFoH4De9BQOGs5gw/fTjBs+lOubR6GFC0 L4p/2J8QzdX29Ys5MHJahPjf0bhuVF78qpLUNY8XsW3dP4BCyB5eFGkxcXW1vagrfE LT2dga5phESIMjDUX+6xOBQSgGJOp9QtoE2c3DbI= X-Original-To: ietf-announce@ietf.org Delivered-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16A9C12B01B; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 11:03:45 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: The IESG To: "IETF-Announce" Subject: Last Call: (Data Types in the Remote Authentication Dial-In User Service Protocol (RADIUS)) to Proposed Standard X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.29.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20160803180345.6185.91442.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 11:03:45 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: radext@ietf.org, Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com, draft-ietf-radext-datatypes@ietf.org, radext-chairs@ietf.org, Stefan Winter X-BeenThere: ietf-announce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org List-Id: "IETF announcement list. No discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org Sender: IETF-Announce Return-Path: ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthMechanism: 10 X-MS-Exchange-Organization-Network-Message-Id: 4dc40a1b-3726-4ea3-2d87-08d3bbc8a0d6 X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AVStamp-Enterprise: 1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 The IESG has received a request from the RADIUS EXTensions WG (radext) to consider the following document: - 'Data Types in the Remote Authentication Dial-In User Service Protocol (RADIUS)' as Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2016-08-17. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract RADIUS specifications have used data types for two decades without defining them as managed entities. During this time, RADIUS implementations have named the data types, and have used them in attribute definitions. This document updates the specifications to better follow established practice. We do this by naming the data types defined in RFC 6158, which have been used since at least RFC 2865. We provide an IANA registry for the data types, and update the RADIUS Attribute Type registry to include a "Data Type" field for each attribute. Finally, we recommend that authors of RADIUS specifications use these types in preference to existing practice. This document updates RFC 2865, 3162, 6158, and 6572. The file can be obtained via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-radext-datatypes/ IESG discussion can be tracked via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-radext-datatypes/ballot/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. The document contains these normative downward references. See RFC 3967 for additional information: rfc3576: Dynamic Authorization Extensions to Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS) (Informational - Independent Submission Editor stream) rfc5904: RADIUS Attributes for IEEE 802.16 Privacy Key Management Version 1 (PKMv1) Protocol Support (Informational - IETF stream) rfc2866: RADIUS Accounting (Informational - IETF stream) rfc2867: RADIUS Accounting Modifications for Tunnel Protocol Support (Informational - IETF stream) Note that some of these references may already be listed in the acceptable Downref Registry. --------------0A8BA7E5AA2F1888D754551A-- --JfhjskvQQt9fnI6hiN6gRe60skMj7XN3A-- --0oPuiTXx6GiCkS81ABjFiJqL7LIX97lWr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXpKf1AAoJEIe2a0bZ0nozVXMIAL8a46mmR9enTtHGmcMg7uR3 AI9JMDFJTbd0R9EiBWjJQhU1R1/ORXmoCpsZIUeKCORRVOzq1UeAtsBgS0Sds7GJ vFc9vEsscDbyZ/sY0x2MV/coHczefYVVomQcDDaw0G0obLJgCxZGjhT7UYxsEpjf lXTKP4VwbvmKLiamOAslgFX237iNQeiwwYmEv+W9xwlXF2KZewJoTw8G3njFNLLF 7nIdUXoDf4mDTzP8KCZPNXZ33d/6ao8aUjnkFfbl+oLG9GcEnHkV/WNYzPLmSpqM vUr1PNdRGQ5NooT3lq2xhjYDlwh0vJRVxLLSyzAt36fSmM4bAFimmy0PKReXNX4= =rxz4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0oPuiTXx6GiCkS81ABjFiJqL7LIX97lWr-- From nobody Tue Aug 9 10:57:46 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 164F512D8B0 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 10:57:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -15.769 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.769 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WKdOkk4LNwIm for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 10:57:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9667312D863 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 10:57:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=10813; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1470765435; x=1471975035; h=references:subject:to:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to; bh=Qnt2SGtfvcdIeQyuw/L2dhN2XhnCaJX9HTcA5ltIQuk=; b=k6a2CitUI2JrCbT0z2KDSMIXe1nfVyMWZPLhSESSfZ5vd9Yu0JcHx34f ZKrhPH16tyBkQ+E5zgIDdsI9uwIzzpFsnj41a5gzeKbGM8Ev23ecE7TjU YmFOseqlM5gyXAbrnCMPF+icKCufzAI8EH5V0x06O8pfSyfFKzJZEjs19 s=; X-Files: signature.asc : 481 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0BRAgAxGKpX/xbLJq1dhBsqUrkkgX0kh?= =?us-ascii?q?XkCggQUAQEBAQEBAV0cC4RfBiNLG0YHAgJGBwoGDQYCAQGILQ6xEZAWAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQECAQEBAQEBAQERCQWIIgiCTYdBgloFmTmDO4Fzb4htgWuEW4MPhW6GZIVQg?= =?us-ascii?q?3geNoJFgTc6MocsAQEB?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,495,1464652800"; d="asc'?eml'208?scan'208,208";a="639559686" Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Aug 2016 17:57:13 +0000 Received: from [10.61.228.123] ([10.61.228.123]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u79HvDsO017516 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 17:57:13 GMT References: <147075365319.30624.13089702576267937900.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> To: "appsdir@ietf.org" From: Eliot Lear X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <147075365319.30624.13089702576267937900.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 19:57:12 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <147075365319.30624.13089702576267937900.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6TPRXvEf24MeRoA892II6PQbQeiRwDdev" Archived-At: Subject: [appsdir] Fwd: Last Call: (Internet Printing Protocol/1.1: Model and Semantics) to Proposed Standard X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2016 17:57:45 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --6TPRXvEf24MeRoA892II6PQbQeiRwDdev Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="gal5douP7MXmHENPmj4pixa29Rgc0m1mT" From: Eliot Lear To: "appsdir@ietf.org" Message-ID: Subject: Fwd: Last Call: (Internet Printing Protocol/1.1: Model and Semantics) to Proposed Standard References: <147075365319.30624.13089702576267937900.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <147075365319.30624.13089702576267937900.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> --gal5douP7MXmHENPmj4pixa29Rgc0m1mT Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------C34525247334FA20AC626E2F" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------C34525247334FA20AC626E2F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Can I please have a volunteer for the IPP update? Eliot --------------C34525247334FA20AC626E2F Content-Type: message/rfc822; name="Last Call: (Internet Printing Protocol/1_1: Model and Semantics) to Proposed Standard.eml" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename*0="Last Call: (Internet Printin"; filename*1="g Protocol/1_1: Model and Semantics) to Proposed Standard.em"; filename*2="l" X-Mozilla-Keys: Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) by xch-aln-005.cisco.com (173.36.7.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3 via Mailbox Transport; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 09:41:23 -0500 Received: from xch-aln-011.cisco.com (173.36.7.21) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 09:41:22 -0500 Received: from xch-rcd-013.cisco.com (173.37.102.23) by XCH-ALN-011.cisco.com (173.36.7.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 09:41:21 -0500 Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (173.37.86.79) by mail.cisco.com (173.37.102.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 09:41:21 -0500 Received: from alln-core-2.cisco.com ([173.36.13.135]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 09 Aug 2016 14:41:21 +0000 Received: from alln-inbound-g.cisco.com (alln-inbound-g.cisco.com [173.37.147.237]) by alln-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u79EfFcA013956 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA bits=128 verify=OK); Tue, 9 Aug 2016 14:41:20 GMT Received-SPF: Pass (alln-inbound-g.cisco.com: domain of ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org designates 4.31.198.44 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=4.31.198.44; receiver=alln-inbound-g.cisco.com; envelope-from="ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org"; x-sender="ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org"; x-conformance=spf_only; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (alln-inbound-g.cisco.com: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail.ietf.org) identity=helo; client-ip=4.31.198.44; receiver=alln-inbound-g.cisco.com; envelope-from="ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org"; x-sender="postmaster@mail.ietf.org"; x-conformance=spf_only Authentication-Results: alln-inbound-g.cisco.com; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster@mail.ietf.org; dkim=pass (signature verified) header.i=@ietf.org X-from-outside-Cisco: 4.31.198.44 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0HFAAC66qlXfyzGHwRdHQGCeoEDbQ+NL?= =?us-ascii?q?ZdslAuBdCILhXQDAoFMOBQBAQEBAQEBAw8BAQsJCwkXMYJTOTwBAQEBAQEjAj4?= =?us-ascii?q?xBAI3BgEBBAoeCwECAwECBgJABQMIAwEbJxcTBYgtAgIJsF+FKwEBBYFciXwBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEUAwWGDoIchyaFQo8SiiwZhgSIbYFrhFuIfYw?= =?us-ascii?q?0hBaCO0CBVU6HTQEBAQ?= X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0HFAAC66qlXfyzGHwRdHQGCeoEDbQ+NLZdslAuBdCILhXQ?= =?us-ascii?q?DAoFMOBQBAQEBAQEBAw8BAQsJCwkXMYJTOTwBAQEBAQEjAj4xBAI3BgEBBAoeC?= =?us-ascii?q?wECAwECBgJABQMIAwEbJxcTBYgtAgIJsF+FKwEBBYFciXwBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQEBAQEUAwWGDoIchyaFQo8SiiwZhgSIbYFrhFuIfYw0hBaCO0CBVU6HT?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQ?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,495,1464652800"; d="scan'208";a="231596747" X-IronPort-Outbreak-Status: No, level 0, Unknown - Unknown Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by alln-inbound-g.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Aug 2016 14:41:17 +0000 Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B58C12D8A8; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 07:40:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1470753658; bh=5rTNlFUBvl4NW6F9WT2KvLl9zFQNCnmBw3IrBCjIg1E=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Cc:Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=u3BqecX7MYascAjq3lQcCfkih50Zt+Y4AcTlX6kdiqtdblCazY4mQEr9iaaPpJ6fT u2mIX70ACwdZMaYzrOYsD9cE5AY2UaPO2SgfP9zXG3LuytFtVe9RfFYCeAKRVrim6q zp0aLAZ6LOsZO25eu5k0QgjHF/6ezJtBiSPQRnSw= X-Original-To: ietf-announce@ietf.org Delivered-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FFF012D8A9; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 07:40:53 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: The IESG To: "IETF-Announce" Subject: Last Call: (Internet Printing Protocol/1.1: Model and Semantics) to Proposed Standard X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.29.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <147075365319.30624.13089702576267937900.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2016 07:40:53 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: alexey.melnikov@isode.com, barryleiba@computer.org, draft-sweet-rfc2911bis@ietf.org X-BeenThere: ietf-announce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org List-Id: "IETF announcement list. No discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org Sender: IETF-Announce Return-Path: ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: XCH-RCD-013.cisco.com X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthMechanism: 10 X-MS-Exchange-Organization-Network-Message-Id: 3e0beb8d-234c-41fb-a52f-08d3c0633b22 X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AVStamp-Enterprise: 1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider the following document: - 'Internet Printing Protocol/1.1: Model and Semantics' as Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2016-09-06. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. This is the Second IETF LC to explicitly call out DownRefs (see below). Abstract The Internet Printing Protocol (IPP) is an application level protocol for distributed printing using Internet tools and technologies. This document describes a simplified model consisting of abstract objects, attributes, and operations that is independent of encoding and transport. The model consists of several objects including Printers and Jobs. Jobs optionally support multiple Documents. IPP semantics allow End Users and Operators to query Printer capabilities, submit print Jobs, inquire about the status of print Jobs and Printers, and cancel, hold, and release print Jobs. IPP semantics also allow Operators to pause and resume Jobs and Printers. Security, internationalization, and directory issues are also addressed by the model and semantics. The IPP message encoding and transport are described in IPP/1.1: Encoding and Transport [RFC2910bis]. This document obsoletes RFCs 2911, 3381, and 3382. The file can be obtained via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sweet-rfc2911bis/ IESG discussion can be tracked via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sweet-rfc2911bis/ballot/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. The document contains these normative downward references. See RFC 3967 for additional information: rfc2818: HTTP Over TLS (Informational - IETF stream) rfc1977: PPP BSD Compression Protocol (Informational - IETF stream) rfc1952: GZIP file format specification version 4.3 (Informational - Legacy stream) rfc1951: DEFLATE Compressed Data Format Specification version 1.3 (Informational - Legacy stream) rfc3196: Internet Printing Protocol/1.1: Implementor's Guide (Informational) rfc7612: Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): Schema for Printer Services (Informational) rfc2565: Internet Printing Protocol/1.0: Encoding and Transport (Experimental) rfc2566: Internet Printing Protocol/1.0: Model and Semantics (Experimental) Note that some of these references may already be listed in the acceptable Downref Registry. --------------C34525247334FA20AC626E2F-- --gal5douP7MXmHENPmj4pixa29Rgc0m1mT-- --6TPRXvEf24MeRoA892II6PQbQeiRwDdev Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXqhl5AAoJEIe2a0bZ0nozCYkH/i21+nuU6Mr9IQAiNeCVUDJY USYodeaACOYwiZuefZA+4BT1kS9/iq+WXhUiucyjFs78KnYAuEn0v8Ah94OoiuSX 6fVA1OrQFXAdChaUYMyTbeyI27J772YS1Xky3SpgdGv+/YUCx412P9w7S6RC06iS T1WtRXmz0V0pX/pPCuPtP6WCOhcUjOZrxUL7VJaJbNtiW2DasmIu1vg4hzAZyUL9 ng+vHjmGm243QgFi58y6/FGwc3+NG6xfdSuWK5wNCY2Joz539ctMXv81Z4MPQ1e/ 6ZTnkjhvX8asPWxQiZJ9sbv0Qz9L0h27txxAsl0HDbNr7daMRP1Z+yQlrYycLDI= =x0VT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6TPRXvEf24MeRoA892II6PQbQeiRwDdev-- From nobody Wed Aug 10 02:35:18 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2A9512D0DC for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 02:35:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.248 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.248 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isode.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RSB-rNaI-Kzy for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 02:35:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from waldorf.isode.com (waldorf.isode.com [62.232.206.188]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B47E412B01F for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 02:35:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1470821715; d=isode.com; s=june2016; i=@isode.com; bh=mte6YkX5o3+x5M4ySQCzLEaa60B3qMn7iucORDZ1zbY=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=frj72dqObbcztK6e3lxBNoiIQz1L+ORu+eYnrTzAAcPUwegDOiGs6/zp/PDAL4UctyD9IW Q58U0+WlgldRY6iW6u/f0SqvIOyFdW8HgrV6vQ7TEZzcEbABXH8ufoQXbFYmTzxJkUs/vu EN+8vq3rvC6i/fA+nM2HC4QXu5V/8NU=; Received: from [172.20.1.215] (dhcp-215.isode.net [172.20.1.215]) by waldorf.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id ; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:35:15 +0100 To: Eliot Lear , "appsdir@ietf.org" References: <147075365319.30624.13089702576267937900.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> From: Alexey Melnikov Message-ID: <1c21876c-8a1e-ab87-9c30-b7e6624a6c91@isode.com> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:35:00 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Subject: Re: [appsdir] Fwd: Last Call: (Internet Printing Protocol/1.1: Model and Semantics) to Proposed Standard X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 09:35:18 -0000 Hi Eliot, On 09/08/2016 18:57, Eliot Lear wrote: > Can I please have a volunteer for the IPP update? As much as I would like to have a reviewer for this, this document is 200+ pages long, it is also tied to a companion document which is 50+ pages long. Both were already reviewed by IESG, so I suggest you skip this one. Best Regards, Alexey From nobody Mon Aug 15 01:18:43 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF90212D75E for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 01:18:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -15.768 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.768 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K3_-BEfu4g8y for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 01:18:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E42312D75A for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 01:18:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2712; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1471249121; x=1472458721; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:mime-version; bh=xsPa9BBjG47xP1Gmd4G9z/vYIyFHHGzvUqPy8ncYU3U=; b=UlZsaGDntIiMp/5lqfppK0MPSgeuIaUEfZy30AOzUz7IBgsC5g9X6Vn2 dTqsSk6cIwJfmU7oQn3ACzvIXCukCP3QONwOEd+eo1q5BzfGYdEHMYSTd u4JuTDXb/6Y1MPC9a1zY+VUx1uB96/LeM+V56dtVoRzIBzl14ta9qE5rt I=; X-Files: signature.asc : 481 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0BIEwDZebFX/xbLJq1ehBsqtQOFB4FMM?= =?us-ascii?q?YgSEgIBAQEBAQEBXhwLQQ6EBjNILAE+AlMMDQgBAYgtoXKPZZAYAQoBAQEVDog?= =?us-ascii?q?iglWHQYJaBZk+gzyBc4lniVWFbpAvJQcog3w6gWqFVwEBAQ?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,524,1464652800"; d="asc'?scan'208,217";a="643674455" Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Aug 2016 08:18:39 +0000 Received: from [10.61.77.244] (ams3-vpn-dhcp3572.cisco.com [10.61.77.244]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u7F8Idto017857 for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 08:18:39 GMT To: "appsdir@ietf.org" From: Eliot Lear Message-ID: Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 10:18:38 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9veBIsGO9qJhdFvcv8l9KlNbqp9CP8AAt" Archived-At: Subject: [appsdir] reviews needed X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 08:18:43 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --9veBIsGO9qJhdFvcv8l9KlNbqp9CP8AAt Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="W7x6mQUBCQtK5O8Ak47ViWwU4QpJ7FjgD" From: Eliot Lear To: "appsdir@ietf.org" Message-ID: Subject: reviews needed --W7x6mQUBCQtK5O8Ak47ViWwU4QpJ7FjgD Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------43785A76AC88091333595C1D" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------43785A76AC88091333595C1D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi everyone, I am seeking volunteers to review the following documents: * draft-ietf-mif-happy-eyeballs-extension-10.txt (informational) (12 pg= s) * draft-ietf-httpauth-extension-07.txt (experimental) (27 pgs, but really about 24) In particular for the httpauth extension it would be helpful to have=E2=80= =93 get this=E2=80=93 http experts review. Eliot --------------43785A76AC88091333595C1D Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi everyone,

I am seeking volunteers to review the following documents:

  • draft-ietf-mif-happy-eyeballs-extension-10.txt (informational) (12 pgs)
  • draft-ietf-httpauth-extension-07.txt (experimental) (27 pgs, but really about 24)

In particular for the httpauth extension it would be helpful to have=E2=80=93 get this=E2=80=93 http experts review.

Eliot



--------------43785A76AC88091333595C1D-- --W7x6mQUBCQtK5O8Ak47ViWwU4QpJ7FjgD-- --9veBIsGO9qJhdFvcv8l9KlNbqp9CP8AAt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXsXreAAoJEIe2a0bZ0nozNKIIAM622+L6KvN9nVM2iNIX3pmg MWPibK9OIUBYcG40k5Utb6Yr9iOzxeb1b9mdmmcBLEcWgrhFM+wEL2ElnSGyCPEQ IlR9HFwQ+hfXRG7ELV0VK2Kbj8AeGN+5Nf0pJvNib0IVcz7CH/k/fJveUUcvu4lT DQzE/yJFpg+dXuhPgQT557XuzsLKOmSE01Der1HZ4SDQVp39WErjTGZ4M7umTnnz kkueq6ORNApWXChov25cKDWNfTTUGbtq5AnxF+RtvGH7h3Y3vLYgXrOup8hOsXOe ptbPS4QiyiHyNKiwxuQ0yBWxSrZP1A/ETbAlhe7s8/sV5wDk7jUSvBK5L5DTo1U= =N0YA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9veBIsGO9qJhdFvcv8l9KlNbqp9CP8AAt-- From nobody Wed Aug 17 02:15:28 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC44112D0DA for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 02:15:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.246 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.246 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isode.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cW_tbYifEcC0 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 02:15:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from statler.isode.com (Statler.isode.com [62.232.206.189]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCAE912D08C for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 02:15:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1471425323; d=isode.com; s=june2016; i=@isode.com; bh=IYkYi/YAnnkjUMQtwi9m/fMrTEUquyyGBO+ZADw+LXA=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=USBnwqpfxf4mkOV/6HnFr1R5C3F68hb3bwsnYzUGGsPCTkAXgxig5I/us5fUdwgU3bY6IZ 1sSXdKJhAWVx8ji4uzleKFQ1SiX7XOytfOHD5hygys8KqxWIz3XYlZlxe9OnmS0tEXaG1u f1qU+3HYR5ny33lYReKfJrV9SXBKWP0=; Received: from [10.14.166.234] ((unknown) [85.255.234.25]) by statler.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id ; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 10:15:23 +0100 X-SMTP-Protocol-Errors: NORDNS PIPELINING From: Alexey Melnikov Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 10:26:51 +0100 References: <6480226A-3EDE-42F5-A705-9F4B85528DAC@mnot.net> To: appsdir@ietf.org Message-Id: X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13G35) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-CB6B6805-8F0C-4B73-83A6-AE59F70A5E84 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Subject: [appsdir] Fwd: Last Call: (Guidelines for HTTP-to-CoAP Mapping Implementations) to Informational RFC X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 09:15:27 -0000 --Apple-Mail-CB6B6805-8F0C-4B73-83A6-AE59F70A5E84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Can I ask somebody with HTTP background to review this? Begin forwarded message: > Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org > From: Mark Nottingham > Date: 17 August 2016 at 03:18:25 BST > To: HTTP Working Group > Subject: Fwd: Last Call: (Guidelines= for HTTP-to-CoAP Mapping Implementations) to Informational RFC >=20 > Has anyone had a look at this? >=20 >=20 >> Begin forwarded message: >>=20 >> From: The IESG >> Subject: Last Call: (Guidelines for= HTTP-to-CoAP Mapping Implementations) to Informational RFC >> Date: 8 August 2016 at 11:50:43 PM AEST >> To: "IETF-Announce" >> Cc: alexey.melnikov@isode.com, Jaime Jimenez = , core-chairs@ietf.org, core@ietf.org, draft-ietf-core-http-mapping@ietf.org= >> Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org >> Archived-At: >>=20 >>=20 >> The IESG has received a request from the Constrained RESTful Environments= >> WG (core) to consider the following document: >> - 'Guidelines for HTTP-to-CoAP Mapping Implementations' >> as Informational RFC >>=20 >> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits >> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the >> ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2016-08-22. Exceptionally, comments may be= >> sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the >> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. >>=20 >> Abstract >>=20 >>=20 >> This document provides reference information for implementing a >> cross-protocol network proxy that performs translation from the HTTP >> protocol to the CoAP protocol. This will enable a HTTP client to >> access resources on a CoAP server through the proxy. This document >> describes how a HTTP request is mapped to a CoAP request, and then >> how a CoAP response is mapped back to a HTTP response. This includes >> guidelines for URI mapping, media type mapping and additional proxy >> implementation issues. This document covers the Reverse, Forward and >> Interception cross-protocol proxy cases. >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> The file can be obtained via >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-core-http-mapping/ >>=20 >> IESG discussion can be tracked via >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-core-http-mapping/ballot/ >>=20 >>=20 >> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. >=20 > -- > Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 --Apple-Mail-CB6B6805-8F0C-4B73-83A6-AE59F70A5E84 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Can I ask somebody with HTTP backgroun= d to review this?

Begin forwarded message:

Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: 17 August 2016 a= t 03:18:25 BST
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Subject: Fwd: Last C= all: <draft-ietf-core-http-mapping-13.txt> (Guidelines for HTTP-to-CoA= P Mapping Implementations) to Informational RFC

Has anyone had a look at this?=


Begin f= orwarded message:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
Subject: Last Call: <dr= aft-ietf-core-http-mapping-13.txt> (Guidelines for HTTP-to-CoAP Mapping I= mplementations) to Informational RFC
Date: 8 August 2016 at 11:50:43 PM AEST
To: "IETF-Announce" <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Cc: alexey.melnikov@isode.com, Jaime Jimenez <jaime.jimenez@ericsson.com>, core-chairs@ietf.org, core@ietf.org, draft-ietf-core-http-mapping@ietf.org
<= blockquote type=3D"cite">Reply-To: ie= tf@ietf.org
Archi= ved-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-annou= nce/5cRBzBNOXq9rPdiFB0fNxZPD-ow>

<= /span>
The IESG has received= a request from the Constrained RESTful Environments
=
WG (core) to consider the following document= :
- 'Guidelines for H= TTP-to-CoAP Mapping Implementations'
<draft-ietf-core-http-mapping-13.txt> as Informationa= l RFC

The IESG plans to make a decision i= n the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments= to the
ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2016-08-22. Exception= ally, comments may be
sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In eith= er case, please retain the
= beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

Abstract

 This document provides= reference information for implementing a
 cross-protocol network proxy that performs trans= lation from the HTTP
=  protocol to the CoAP protocol.  This will enable a HTTP client t= o
 access resou= rces on a CoAP server through the proxy.  This document
 describes how a HTTP request i= s mapped to a CoAP request, and then
 how a CoAP response is mapped back to a HTTP response= .  This includes
 guidelines for URI mapping, media type mapping and additional proxy<= /span>
 implementation= issues.  This document covers the Reverse, Forward and
 Interception cross-protocol p= roxy cases.



The file can b= e obtained via
https:/= /datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-core-http-mapping/

IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draf= t-ietf-core-http-mapping/ballot/


No IPR declarations have= been submitted directly on this I-D.





--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

<= br>


= --Apple-Mail-CB6B6805-8F0C-4B73-83A6-AE59F70A5E84-- From nobody Wed Aug 17 03:05:29 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 583BA12D5B8 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 03:05:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.021 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.021 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=adobe.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P_1AHcpRMV4f for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 03:05:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from NAM02-CY1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-cys01nam02on0080.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.37.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 699CD12D597 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 03:05:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=adobe.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=Gta2bo9H0vsrzfX15OpHg8ayyGihgD3PaRvGMYB7iKw=; b=Zcq/b1y3EZI04n0rcpNAO9LTg66GN1HcmKa5rXm76gjm/GZPcVFeB6Fg7Jnlxp+LEiDp0FFSqXsNG+EpBsb/FJLodexZWMHpee5cqmEntRTwEmZzEikGOld6ZxbPFq/iFnhX1FuIk46V78A5umZvbjklfpyDEw9hfx1G/W93Lws= Received: from CY4PR02MB2566.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.173.41.13) by CY4PR02MB2566.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.173.41.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.549.15; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 10:05:21 +0000 Received: from CY4PR02MB2566.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([10.173.41.13]) by CY4PR02MB2566.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([10.173.41.13]) with mapi id 15.01.0549.027; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 10:05:21 +0000 From: Larry Masinter To: Alexey Melnikov Thread-Topic: [appsdir] Fwd: Last Call: (Guidelines for HTTP-to-CoAP Mapping Implementations) to Informational RFC Thread-Index: AQHR+Gfm3X83Vm0ILUaSxkELdzgDe6BM7OqJ Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 10:05:20 +0000 Message-ID: <94EA7645-2507-482B-B566-C937AA936D46@adobe.com> References: <6480226A-3EDE-42F5-A705-9F4B85528DAC@mnot.net>, In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=masinter@adobe.com; x-originating-ip: [50.184.24.49] x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 0a786e0b-6884-468a-f72b-08d3c685ffa6 x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; CY4PR02MB2566; 6:L2VnyAw1gdhxNvUlDMRgeM6bRCTKzy+jrKT9E1W89x1BJ3vd8+UqMFnVGNDp5Fb6tB+5yo7LeBZQK8J1ep/c2DnULB/8F8NOgjrk6WomKrRgD2iVbUBF9ZrsFQbZP06dM0NmxTf4rtD3AzFN3Su+GYjKe7cU2w/BM39VBCq3Q9DC6NNpwLWh57YSkgATcX13CTR1FBGvv5b/i1O/k+hlWhv1azv1xSWYX9OkVY0+EMeSodSVXSAJx1oo03EA9aYWh2FLzEQ8ld8Pazpv0GQLfGUzfK2pdba9S5ZsWANsuDv4nK7FHIY97Ms3LUcp/W7OBHUPLlTcK0R5kYe1XLYCGQ==; 5:rGEUubZrOfJmFzWVKE98eEvSW3bKO3jiayoh2tok9dKcXUPcMfVkyZZlzTwekU6/OcBc5fD0K9WGHrxSREvBuuahtEBT3Pk+4/e4JBUcg/sFjEXUtR3AdqBA9tLhDt2oZptwneP6JmEgkz+p4LvMlg==; 24:lxG1555Y+pbd6iQn5A8NWxP1+NoNVG/BzhgApaUTCLhjB9vLPKqk/GkPwFaXKgoej2cor1HGrFRtRr7fIMZxG5cKmnrMHsmWmMW1odDrvHM=; 7:wUemOBHfGxTevIwnG9c7QfNzzFbG3sQujRxwEYzryC/aOoDpE4/8WBKl66e0I2n4FpcgPim1p8y5+xp6TrSf28575ggpw21+6bmRw8oiDYxcRGSsZiUfq7otPA7C7ke1v8nQFRxFw3idnFMfBJ8NwR2MJbezw9bP8WRH+OvJwq5EY19Rtxj6trHlMZjaw2lJV0zEB7xTy0iI58vpBNjqkOdluRpEoJ7leGWPSkJIuted3JGux4ApMBq79FORxYuT x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:CY4PR02MB2566; x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(37575265505322)(158342451672863)(120809045254105); x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(61425038)(6040176)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(10201501046)(3002001)(6055026)(61426038)(61427038); SRVR:CY4PR02MB2566; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:CY4PR02MB2566; x-forefront-prvs: 0037FD6480 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(7916002)(377454003)(2473001)(189002)(199003)(24454002)(189998001)(7736002)(6116002)(19617315012)(586003)(7846002)(122556002)(102836003)(3846002)(16236675004)(16601075003)(82746002)(68736007)(92566002)(4326007)(5002640100001)(99286002)(8936002)(105586002)(230783001)(106356001)(2906002)(36756003)(19580405001)(19580395003)(50986999)(76176999)(7906003)(33656002)(66066001)(54356999)(3280700002)(10400500002)(10090500001)(8676002)(11100500001)(81156014)(77096005)(106116001)(575784001)(15975445007)(110136002)(81166006)(83716003)(87936001)(587094005)(101416001)(2900100001)(86362001)(97736004)(2950100001)(3660700001)(104396002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:CY4PR02MB2566; H:CY4PR02MB2566.namprd02.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: adobe.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_94EA76452507482BB566C937AA936D46adobecom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: adobe.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 17 Aug 2016 10:05:20.8161 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: fa7b1b5a-7b34-4387-94ae-d2c178decee1 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CY4PR02MB2566 Archived-At: Cc: "appsdir@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [appsdir] Fwd: Last Call: (Guidelines for HTTP-to-CoAP Mapping Implementations) to Informational RFC X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 10:05:27 -0000 --_000_94EA76452507482BB566C937AA936D46adobecom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I will review -- http://larry.masinter.net On Aug 17, 2016, at 2:15 AM, Alexey Melnikov > wrote: Can I ask somebody with HTTP background to review this? Begin forwarded message: Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org From: Mark Nottingham > Date: 17 August 2016 at 03:18:25 BST To: HTTP Working Group > Subject: Fwd: Last Call: (Guidelines = for HTTP-to-CoAP Mapping Implementations) to Informational RFC Has anyone had a look at this? Begin forwarded message: From: The IESG > Subject: Last Call: (Guidelines for H= TTP-to-CoAP Mapping Implementations) to Informational RFC Date: 8 August 2016 at 11:50:43 PM AEST To: "IETF-Announce" > Cc: alexey.melnikov@isode.com, Jaime Jime= nez >, core-c= hairs@ietf.org, core@ietf.org, draft-ietf-core-http-mapping@ietf.org Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org Archived-At: The IESG has received a request from the Constrained RESTful Environments WG (core) to consider the following document: - 'Guidelines for HTTP-to-CoAP Mapping Implementations' as Informational RFC The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2016-08-22. Exceptiona= lly, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please= retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract This document provides reference information for implementing a cross-protocol network proxy that performs translation from the HTTP protocol to the CoAP protocol. This will enable a HTTP client to access resources on a CoAP server through the proxy. This document describes how a HTTP request is mapped to a CoAP request, and then how a CoAP response is mapped back to a HTTP response. This includes guidelines for URI mapping, media type mapping and additional proxy implementation issues. This document covers the Reverse, Forward and Interception cross-protocol proxy cases. The file can be obtained via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-core-http-mapping/ IESG discussion can be tracked via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-core-http-mapping/ballot/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ _______________________________________________ appsdir mailing list appsdir@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/appsdir --_000_94EA76452507482BB566C937AA936D46adobecom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I will review

--

On Aug 17, 2016, at 2:15 AM, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> wrote:

Can I ask somebody with HTTP background to review this?

Begin forwarded message:

Resent-From: ietf-http-w= g@w3.org
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot= .net>
Date: 17 August 2016 at 03:18:25 BST
To: HTTP Working Group <ie= tf-http-wg@w3.org>
Subject: Fwd: Last Call: <draft-ietf-core-http-mapping-13.txt&= gt; (Guidelines for HTTP-to-CoAP Mapping Implementations) to Informational = RFC

Has anyone had a look at this?


Begin forwarded message:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
Subject: Last Call: <draft-ietf-core-htt= p-mapping-13.txt> (Guidelines for HTTP-to-CoAP Mapping Implementations) = to Informational RFC
Date: 8 August 2016 at 11:50:43 PM AEST
To: "IETF-Announce" <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Cc: alexey.melnikov@isode.com, Jaime Jimenez <jaime.jimenez@ericsson.com>, core-chairs@ietf.org, core@ietf.org, draft-ietf-core-http-mapping@ietf.org
Reply-To: = ietf@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://m= ailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/5cRBzBNOXq9rPdiFB0fNxZPD-ow&= gt;


The IESG has received a request from the Co= nstrained RESTful Environments
WG (core) to consider the following documen= t:
- 'Guidelines for HTTP-to-CoAP Mapping Impl= ementations'
<draft-ietf-core-http-mapping-13.txt>= as Informational RFC

The IESG plans to make a decision in the ne= xt few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send = substantive comments to the
ietf@ietf.= org mailing lists by 2016-08-22. Exceptionally, comments may be<= br>
sent to ie= sg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow auto= mated sorting.

Abstract


 This document provides reference info= rmation for implementing a
 cross-protocol network proxy that per= forms translation from the HTTP
 protocol to the CoAP protocol.  = This will enable a HTTP client to
 access resources on a CoAP server thr= ough the proxy.  This document
 describes how a HTTP request is mappe= d to a CoAP request, and then
 how a CoAP response is mapped back to= a HTTP response.  This includes
 guidelines for URI mapping, media typ= e mapping and additional proxy
 implementation issues.  This doc= ument covers the Reverse, Forward and
 Interception cross-protocol proxy cas= es.




The file can be obtained via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf= -core-http-mapping/

IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/dra= ft-ietf-core-http-mapping/ballot/


No IPR declarations have been submitted dir= ectly on this I-D.





--
Mark Nottingham   https:/= /www.mnot.net/





_______________________________________________
appsdir mailing list
appsdir@ietf.org
https://www= .ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/appsdir
--_000_94EA76452507482BB566C937AA936D46adobecom_-- From nobody Wed Aug 17 06:53:10 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF43812D9BE for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 06:53:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.248 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.248 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isode.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dHpodTVN0Wif for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 06:53:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from waldorf.isode.com (waldorf.isode.com [62.232.206.188]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4279A12D9BD for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 06:53:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1471441988; d=isode.com; s=june2016; i=@isode.com; bh=REx37FvN65ucv928/tuV0DUa7WgrrXzf/L1hQoBfu6Q=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=A8fXZOnLk+8udyw78dbPs0S4xKeaaL/iVxjMeyDFGfsMfB7R68ApR8YNl35ADmIh2xkKE7 MifZZsafRAs3gsC0kD1degqQtFwxPeFw1e8dJkqzZSsmY0QxdA4eqcxuYXF3y9gvet57ut Ip6WOBkD7AvrVcmT2UAUPdTBTSx5oZ0=; Received: from [172.22.50.30] ((unknown) [62.232.206.186]) by waldorf.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id ; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 14:53:08 +0100 X-SMTP-Protocol-Errors: NORDNS PIPELINING From: Alexey Melnikov Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 15:04:53 +0100 Message-Id: <05BD657E-BC7A-4271-AAD7-D1059C463BDF@isode.com> To: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailer: iPad Mail (13G35) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Subject: [appsdir] HTTP review requested: draft-ietf-httpauth-extension-08 X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Apps Area Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 13:53:10 -0000 Can somebody review this one as well? Thank you, Alexey