From nobody Wed Nov 2 13:11:03 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6DAC1298BA for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 13:11:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -8.398 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JTkyBdlWZZ2a for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 13:11:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.mozilla.org (mx2.scl3.mozilla.com [63.245.214.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E71F61298B2 for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 13:11:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost6.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.mail.scl3.mozilla.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6BF0C209C; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 20:11:00 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mozilla.org Received: from smtp.mozilla.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx2.mail.scl3.mozilla.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zMpkKH9T2lOE; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 20:11:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.252.28.155] (corp.mtv2.mozilla.com [63.245.221.32]) (Authenticated sender: tterriberry@mozilla.com) by mx2.mail.scl3.mozilla.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A8869C128D; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 20:10:55 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <581A4844.5070200@mozilla.com> Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 13:10:44 -0700 From: "Timothy B. Terriberry" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.26 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: RFC Errata System , jmvalin@jmvalin.ca, koenvos74@gmail.com, ben@nostrum.com, alissa@cooperw.in, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, mzanaty@cisco.com References: <20161012012526.77898B8002B@rfc-editor.org> In-Reply-To: <20161012012526.77898B8002B@rfc-editor.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Cc: 0f1ac5@gmail.com, codec@ietf.org Subject: Re: [codec] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6716 (4829) X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Codec WG List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 20:11:02 -0000 RFC Errata System wrote: > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: flacs <0f1ac5@gmail.com> > > Section: GLOBAL > > Original Text > ------------- > Coeffieients > > Corrected Text > -------------- > Coefficients This seems correct. Oddly the title of the actual section is correct (it's just the ToC that is wrong). I assume this should be Held for Document Update. From nobody Wed Nov 2 13:11:17 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 964481298BB for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 13:11:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -8.398 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t1_MdbmE4Dsh for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 13:11:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.mozilla.org (mx2.scl3.mozilla.com [63.245.214.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABFE21298B2 for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 13:11:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost6.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.mail.scl3.mozilla.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 945BCC2022; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 20:11:14 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mozilla.org Received: from smtp.mozilla.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx2.mail.scl3.mozilla.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IUTlKJMrPDXT; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 20:11:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.252.28.155] (corp.mtv2.mozilla.com [63.245.221.32]) (Authenticated sender: tterriberry@mozilla.com) by mx2.mail.scl3.mozilla.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E0A62C1533; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 20:11:12 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <581A485F.3000803@mozilla.com> Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 13:11:11 -0700 From: "Timothy B. Terriberry" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.26 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: RFC Errata System , jmvalin@jmvalin.ca, koenvos74@gmail.com, ben@nostrum.com, alissa@cooperw.in, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, mzanaty@cisco.com References: <20161102190547.CBBE1B80109@rfc-editor.org> In-Reply-To: <20161102190547.CBBE1B80109@rfc-editor.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Cc: codec@ietf.org, atomnuker@gmail.com Subject: Re: [codec] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6716 (4853) X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Codec WG List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 20:11:15 -0000 RFC Errata System wrote: > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: Rostislav Pehlivanov > > Section: 5.1.1 > > Original Text > ------------- > rng > rng = rng - --- * (fh - fl) > ft > > Corrected Text > -------------- > rng > rng = rng - --- * (ft - fh) > ft > > Notes > ----- > Equation should match with the one in the range decoder (section 4.1.2), however comparing the two and the reference implementation reveals the equation in section 5.1.1 to be incorrect. I think this report is correct and should be Verified. Although the code is authoritative, this section of the text is complete enough for someone to implement this feature directly from the text, so it will cause confusion if they don't actually match. From nobody Wed Nov 2 13:14:02 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA2DA127076; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 13:14:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -105.699 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kCnK9330A1FG; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 13:13:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCF591298BB; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 13:13:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id ACE2BB80093; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 13:13:57 -0700 (PDT) To: 0f1ac5@gmail.com, jmvalin@jmvalin.ca, koenvos74@gmail.com, tterriberry@mozilla.com X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php From: RFC Errata System Message-Id: <20161102201357.ACE2BB80093@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 13:13:57 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: Cc: codec@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: [codec] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC6716 (4829) X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Codec WG List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 20:14:01 -0000 The following errata report has been held for document update for RFC6716, "Definition of the Opus Audio Codec". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6716&eid=4829 -------------------------------------- Status: Held for Document Update Type: Editorial Reported by: flacs <0f1ac5@gmail.com> Date Reported: 2016-10-12 Held by: Ben Campbell (IESG) Section: GLOBAL Original Text ------------- Coeffieients Corrected Text -------------- Coefficients Notes ----- Just a small typo in the Table of Contents. -------------------------------------- RFC6716 (draft-ietf-codec-opus-16) -------------------------------------- Title : Definition of the Opus Audio Codec Publication Date : September 2012 Author(s) : JM. Valin, K. Vos, T. Terriberry Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Internet Wideband Audio Codec RAI Area : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG From nobody Wed Nov 2 13:14:48 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40B4E1298C3; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 13:14:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -105.699 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LfgQ4f2r0l48; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 13:14:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0977412989E; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 13:14:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id F2E5EB80097; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 13:14:39 -0700 (PDT) To: atomnuker@gmail.com, jmvalin@jmvalin.ca, koenvos74@gmail.com, tterriberry@mozilla.com X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php From: RFC Errata System Message-Id: <20161102201439.F2E5EB80097@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 13:14:39 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: Cc: codec@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: [codec] [Errata Verified] RFC6716 (4853) X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Codec WG List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 20:14:41 -0000 The following errata report has been verified for RFC6716, "Definition of the Opus Audio Codec". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6716&eid=4853 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Technical Reported by: Rostislav Pehlivanov Date Reported: 2016-11-02 Verified by: Ben Campbell (IESG) Section: 5.1.1 Original Text ------------- rng rng = rng - --- * (fh - fl) ft Corrected Text -------------- rng rng = rng - --- * (ft - fh) ft Notes ----- Equation should match with the one in the range decoder (section 4.1.2), however comparing the two and the reference implementation reveals the equation in section 5.1.1 to be incorrect. -------------------------------------- RFC6716 (draft-ietf-codec-opus-16) -------------------------------------- Title : Definition of the Opus Audio Codec Publication Date : September 2012 Author(s) : JM. Valin, K. Vos, T. Terriberry Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Internet Wideband Audio Codec RAI Area : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG From nobody Wed Nov 2 13:15:07 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D29031298C3 for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 13:15:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.397 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.397 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uROmx6b3vj5x for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 13:15:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 839F01298BF for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 13:15:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.1.21] (cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id uA2KEv3H000197 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 2 Nov 2016 15:14:57 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com) X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22] claimed to be [10.0.1.21] From: "Ben Campbell" To: "Timothy B. Terriberry" Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 15:14:57 -0500 Message-ID: <834DF9F9-4FE7-4360-8832-C94CA60D595D@nostrum.com> In-Reply-To: <581A4844.5070200@mozilla.com> References: <20161012012526.77898B8002B@rfc-editor.org> <581A4844.5070200@mozilla.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.5r5263) Archived-At: Cc: aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, codec@ietf.org, alissa@cooperw.in, 0f1ac5@gmail.com, koenvos74@gmail.com, RFC Errata System Subject: Re: [codec] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6716 (4829) X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Codec WG List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 20:15:06 -0000 Agreed, and done. On 2 Nov 2016, at 15:10, Timothy B. Terriberry wrote: > RFC Errata System wrote: >> -------------------------------------- >> Type: Editorial >> Reported by: flacs <0f1ac5@gmail.com> >> >> Section: GLOBAL >> >> Original Text >> ------------- >> Coeffieients >> >> Corrected Text >> -------------- >> Coefficients > > This seems correct. Oddly the title of the actual section is correct > (it's just the ToC that is wrong). I assume this should be Held for > Document Update. > From nobody Wed Nov 2 13:38:13 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE3781298C7 for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 13:38:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.397 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.397 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N7CGOXWqBXTl for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 13:38:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F9DC1298C5 for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 13:38:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.1.21] (cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id uA2KEv3I000197 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 2 Nov 2016 15:15:20 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com) X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22] claimed to be [10.0.1.21] From: "Ben Campbell" To: "Timothy B. Terriberry" Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 15:15:20 -0500 Message-ID: <559E9380-F02F-4F8D-9C02-8D784BF2A0FD@nostrum.com> In-Reply-To: <581A485F.3000803@mozilla.com> References: <20161102190547.CBBE1B80109@rfc-editor.org> <581A485F.3000803@mozilla.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.5r5263) Archived-At: Cc: atomnuker@gmail.com, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, codec@ietf.org, alissa@cooperw.in, koenvos74@gmail.com, RFC Errata System Subject: Re: [codec] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6716 (4853) X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Codec WG List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 20:38:12 -0000 On 2 Nov 2016, at 15:11, Timothy B. Terriberry wrote: > RFC Errata System wrote: >> -------------------------------------- >> Type: Technical >> Reported by: Rostislav Pehlivanov >> >> Section: 5.1.1 >> >> Original Text >> ------------- >> rng >> rng = rng - --- * (fh - fl) >> ft >> >> Corrected Text >> -------------- >> rng >> rng = rng - --- * (ft - fh) >> ft >> >> Notes >> ----- >> Equation should match with the one in the range decoder (section >> 4.1.2), however comparing the two and the reference implementation >> reveals the equation in section 5.1.1 to be incorrect. > > I think this report is correct and should be Verified. Although the > code is authoritative, this section of the text is complete enough for > someone to implement this feature directly from the text, so it will > cause confusion if they don't actually match. Done. Thanks! Ben. From nobody Sat Nov 12 00:34:35 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D51C2129B64 for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 12:06:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -105.699 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fuJQLLQk3i15 for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 12:06:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E27B4129B63 for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 12:05:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id CBBE1B80109; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 12:05:47 -0700 (PDT) To: jmvalin@jmvalin.ca, koenvos74@gmail.com, tterriberry@mozilla.com, ben@nostrum.com, alissa@cooperw.in, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, tterriberry@mozilla.com, mzanaty@cisco.com X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php From: RFC Errata System Message-Id: <20161102190547.CBBE1B80109@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 12:05:47 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 00:34:33 -0800 Cc: codec@ietf.org, atomnuker@gmail.com, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: [codec] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6716 (4853) X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Codec WG List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 19:06:08 -0000 The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6716, "Definition of the Opus Audio Codec". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6716&eid=4853 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Rostislav Pehlivanov Section: 5.1.1 Original Text ------------- rng rng = rng - --- * (fh - fl) ft Corrected Text -------------- rng rng = rng - --- * (ft - fh) ft Notes ----- Equation should match with the one in the range decoder (section 4.1.2), however comparing the two and the reference implementation reveals the equation in section 5.1.1 to be incorrect. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC6716 (draft-ietf-codec-opus-16) -------------------------------------- Title : Definition of the Opus Audio Codec Publication Date : September 2012 Author(s) : JM. Valin, K. Vos, T. Terriberry Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Internet Wideband Audio Codec RAI Area : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG From sirdarick@gmail.com Mon Nov 7 00:04:31 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17CAB129A01 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 00:04:31 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.699 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i6N4_XQCXkq7 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 00:04:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qk0-x22c.google.com (mail-qk0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6673129566 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 00:04:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qk0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id q130so166801896qke.1 for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2016 00:04:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=u44dDrjLXpE/bffM8JUcYw1chilRNZElcXhJsjTEL9s=; b=O5OxUmn7L3bFoavp8o/FFIHWg99ia25qamsiDb6DLOVuHuREbp9gChlUpRMtYbij3t lWhr9XEvOuIQGI9BEtrdntELl8Z4oaSCHXfW8QRy+1Uxdjj9Oh8bsNs3NBLFl72TD6eh HCbEhO8/v52dOIJo0YczP3Ls1rHM0N9SGNzUTUK8mpedX7NoNbRER1eK5dyGBAopypmk ce9yvdxhLMJ5SDXolGPdkOzChEMk6yVNqjb2KOAcMhpbyh5720yTYDjXpf1zWSltdcbO wu6g/SXQE0FRjbmR9Qei4SIte32kXZgqFKQ4sezGF6C9kh8mn945DASiDlr9dNNH316q SwDA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=u44dDrjLXpE/bffM8JUcYw1chilRNZElcXhJsjTEL9s=; b=BF07zGU1gA14807ynPU3O5R2MFFQiNTB8aDieP7Y+AWrb8KfjQ37uj3bZ9xq/7Npmr +pk997RfZtBFxQdCRWkGuHDgswAMdpL58Yd3qopdcVza0g4cLMXaWNHxITeU51kSz6yn dtsIjBcN3Cr6Xv4e4Lcw1HjJfHClwsTVg0CQaBhcPJLkb463T0W95/94OUFskTKhY0b5 sx0O33+QFGZHmM7WQzGJXUTkbDaCQV92jWQA9D1qzEx/WnK9HhiUer6fWZHckd/Mk4oG lauWRJf2bfqVRI9/5D71KkIWSZBpm43UjPWDgWpWcD6pWA3Vjl/qV5+bT8xRhppXk9m4 36Fg== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvc0c3nr7yxtTqFZp2zNdlTtA4xC1xea8xCTDZPEZnH0Gk5n1s03KuCwXz8NsVYkjGLsuJ6x3ptZNKESNg== X-Received: by 10.233.220.71 with SMTP id q68mr5906005qkf.8.1478505868827; Mon, 07 Nov 2016 00:04:28 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.200.41.137 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 00:03:48 -0800 (PST) From: Darick2k Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 03:03:48 -0500 Message-ID: To: codec@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c0438e01c210f0540b179f9 Archived-At: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 00:34:33 -0800 Cc: opus@xiph.org Subject: [codec] My new introduction to Opus X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Codec WG List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 08:13:56 -0000 --94eb2c0438e01c210f0540b179f9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I=E2=80=99ve recently talked with an associate of mine and was told about h= is new line2 VoIP service with outstanding call quality. After a short research on the call codec used and it came up with the opus platform. Can you explain how to install that codec to my current Google Voice Hangouts VoIP I=E2=80=99m using? I look forward to your encouraging r= esponse and thanks in advance. Darick Clemons 810-210-7548 --94eb2c0438e01c210f0540b179f9 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I=E2=80=99ve recently talked with an associate of mi= ne and was told about his new line2 VoIP service with outstanding call quality.

=C2=A0

After a short research on the call codec used and it= came up with the opus platform. Can you explain how to install that codec to my cur= rent Google Voice Hangouts VoIP I=E2=80=99m using? I look forward to your encour= aging response and thanks in advance.

=C2=A0

Darick Clemons

810-210-7548

--94eb2c0438e01c210f0540b179f9-- From nobody Wed Nov 16 17:43:25 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6504D1294DC for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 17:43:24 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.235 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.235 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IOHeS0KKJEqb for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 17:43:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.mozilla.org (mx2.scl3.mozilla.com [63.245.214.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CB0F1295D8 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 17:43:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost6.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.mail.scl3.mozilla.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D806C1ECB for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 01:43:14 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mozilla.org Received: from smtp.mozilla.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx2.mail.scl3.mozilla.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6FnBMfHUIBql for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 01:43:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [31.133.132.157] (dhcp-849d.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.132.157]) (Authenticated sender: tterriberry@mozilla.com) by mx2.mail.scl3.mozilla.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9F0D6C056B for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 01:43:09 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <582D0B2A.4030304@xiph.org> Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 17:43:06 -0800 From: "Timothy B. Terriberry" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.26 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "codec@ietf.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Subject: [codec] WGLC of draft-ietf-codec-opus-update-04 X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Codec WG List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 01:43:24 -0000 Except for the issue of where the new test vectors should live, the chairs believe that this draft is ready to go. We would like to initiate a working group last call on draft-ietf-codec-opus-update-04 to help gather any remaining issues. The draft can be found at https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-codec-opus-update-04 Please send comments to the list by the end of the day on Dec. 1. From nobody Thu Nov 17 23:15:13 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDE6B1295FE for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 23:15:12 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.601 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y-Nbf1Ob3hVL for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 23:15:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx0b-00198e01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00198e01.pphosted.com [67.231.149.202]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0D36129537 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 23:15:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0073109.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00198e01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.17/8.16.0.17) with SMTP id uAI7F8Pf029101; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 02:15:08 -0500 Received: from mail.vidyo.com ([162.209.16.214]) by mx0a-00198e01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 26nxwev4h4-1 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 18 Nov 2016 02:15:08 -0500 Received: from 492132-EXCH1.vidyo.com ([fe80::50:56ff:fe85:4f77]) by 492133-EXCH2.vidyo.com ([fe80::50:56ff:fe85:6b62%13]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 01:15:07 -0600 From: Jonathan Lennox To: "Timothy B. Terriberry" Thread-Topic: [codec] WGLC of draft-ietf-codec-opus-update-04 Thread-Index: AQHSQHxXVG+Mzr7W8UuQWSNIZFkTm6DeupYA Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 07:15:06 +0000 Message-ID: References: <582D0B2A.4030304@xiph.org> In-Reply-To: <582D0B2A.4030304@xiph.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [58.123.138.206] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: <1EA08D4D5050DD499D8C8C95ED77A036@vidyo.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2016-11-18_06:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1609300000 definitions=main-1611180132 Archived-At: Cc: "codec@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [codec] WGLC of draft-ietf-codec-opus-update-04 X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Codec WG List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 07:15:13 -0000 DQo+IE9uIE5vdiAxNywgMjAxNiwgYXQgMTA6NDMgQU0sIFRpbW90aHkgQi4gVGVycmliZXJyeSA8 dHRlcnJpYmVAeGlwaC5vcmc+IHdyb3RlOg0KPiANCj4gRXhjZXB0IGZvciB0aGUgaXNzdWUgb2Yg d2hlcmUgdGhlIG5ldyB0ZXN0IHZlY3RvcnMgc2hvdWxkIGxpdmUsIHRoZSBjaGFpcnMgYmVsaWV2 ZSB0aGF0IHRoaXMgZHJhZnQgaXMgcmVhZHkgdG8gZ28uIFdlIHdvdWxkIGxpa2UgdG8gaW5pdGlh dGUgYSB3b3JraW5nIGdyb3VwIGxhc3QgY2FsbCBvbiBkcmFmdC1pZXRmLWNvZGVjLW9wdXMtdXBk YXRlLTA0IHRvIGhlbHAgZ2F0aGVyIGFueSByZW1haW5pbmcgaXNzdWVzLg0KPiANCj4gVGhlIGRy YWZ0IGNhbiBiZSBmb3VuZCBhdCBodHRwczovL3Rvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnL2h0bWwvZHJhZnQtaWV0 Zi1jb2RlYy1vcHVzLXVwZGF0ZS0wNA0KPiANCj4gUGxlYXNlIHNlbmQgY29tbWVudHMgdG8gdGhl IGxpc3QgYnkgdGhlIGVuZCBvZiB0aGUgZGF5IG9uIERlYy4gMS4NCg0KSSBoYXZlIHJldmlld2Vk IHRoaXMgZG9jdW1lbnQuDQoNCkkgaGF2ZW4ndCBwZXJzb25hbGx5IHZhbGlkYXRlZCBhbGwgdGhl IGNoYW5nZXMgdG8gdGhlIEMgY29kZSwgYnV0IHRoZXkgc2VlbSBwbGF1c2libGUgdG8gbWUuICBF YWNoIG9mIHRoZSBwYXRjaGVz4oCZIGV4cGxhbmF0b3J5IHRleHQgYWxzbyBzZWVtcyBnb29kLg0K DQpIb3dldmVyLCBJIHRoaW5rIHRoZSBvdmVydmlldyB0ZXh0IGNvdWxkIGJlIGNsZWFyZXIuDQoN CjEuIEkgYXNzdW1lIG5vbmUgb2YgdGhlc2UgY2hhbmdlcyByaXNlIHRvIHRoZSBsZXZlbCB0aGF0 IHRoZXkgd291bGQgbWFrZSBhbnkgY2hhbmdlIHRvIHRoZSB0ZXh0dWFsIGRlc2NyaXB0aW9uIG9m IHRoZSBPcHVzIGNvZGVjPyAgVGhpcyBzaG91bGQgcHJvYmFibHkgYmUgc3RhdGVkIGV4cGxpY2l0 bHkuDQoNCjIuIFRoZSBhYnN0cmFjdCBhbmQgaW50cm9kdWN0aW9uIHNob3VsZCBtZW50aW9uIHRo YXQgdGhpcyBkb2N1bWVudCB1cGRhdGVzIHRoZSBub3JtYXRpdmUgYmVoYXZpb3Igb2YgdGhlIGNv ZGVjLCBpbmNsdWRpbmcgdGhlIHRlc3QgdmVjdG9ycy4NCg0KMy4gVGhlIGxpbmsgdG8gdGhlIHBy b3Blcmx5LWZvcm1hdHRlZCBwYXRjaCBtYXRjaGluZyB0aGUgZG9jdW1lbnQgc2hvdWxkIGJlIG1l bnRpb25lZCBzb21ld2hlcmUgb3RoZXIgdGhhbiBpbiBTZWN0aW9uIDUg4oCUIGVzcGVjaWFsbHkg c2luY2UgaXQgYWN0dWFsbHkgaW5jbHVkZXMgcGF0Y2hlcyBmb3IgYWxsIHRoZSBzZWN0aW9ucyBv ZiB0aGUgZG9jdW1lbnQsIG5vdCBqdXN0IFNlY3Rpb24gNSBhbmQgYWJvdmUuICBUaGUgaW50cm9k dWN0aW9uIHNlZW1zIGxpa2UgYSBzZW5zaWJsZSBwbGFjZSwgcGVyaGFwcy4NCg0K From nobody Thu Nov 17 23:41:34 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 578E71293E9 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 23:41:33 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.701 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=mozilla.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5ywcbrZIPHl0 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 23:41:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qk0-x22d.google.com (mail-qk0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B855A129473 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 23:41:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qk0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id n21so253024715qka.3 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 23:41:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mozilla.com; s=google; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=1xsJgNfuoaQWxscr1t4MIVDjqLZgchpl6VnnZmFBT9k=; b=U1iatcgn87L4KWZiSazUtGq46C5daNg/In74gh/XzQbCaSpJl+6L81Rc/BvAdbKZiO d+3opZISqwi4wFQJYczLb449YdJ10S3CH9InY8BEqtm2goI2W8Bzpl9izFUThRxEkC5+ 2IseE6gi36m4DI2M41GVibENM2TnncT2+us5c= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=1xsJgNfuoaQWxscr1t4MIVDjqLZgchpl6VnnZmFBT9k=; b=FRzpYkxsyX1zJg093R3K/+9pQHroaatIUDUrFBcvGCT3uAW8TUyNKOZVXprXAbY6Xv FiitLRjisuz2uR3L9ImlK8xYvU6h15K5C+vWJrOTDsYEqA2P2ix0LS3+LKI9e0h711gT t6xCi4IO9bQ0nUuxvQ3ZXSox9XSM22UJ18rb+G+oNJ4ky2bf5RrTkBd/yl/gjOtZQSGw XV0GJOfhCj3GMUvJ5wxGEtvNionvyguNBF4hUSihiVinYcj/jo8DIflpjnbryFmsPmFn IxniNMR416/Gftoe0gcd1EgCTT61IAiELTrEHy3ZyzhSBNK+1o7LZhqjAR0pQzkM9Xz2 Oxew== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC00T0fgyapxRv82WYrIPosInHpziAfY4mZGWmmdHV2rU1pxcCU8uMytyQ0oGhhSvTro6 X-Received: by 10.55.150.131 with SMTP id y125mr8542097qkd.115.1479454889078; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 23:41:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from panoramix.jmvalin.ca ([24.225.136.155]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b16sm3429584qkg.41.2016.11.17.23.41.28 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 17 Nov 2016 23:41:28 -0800 (PST) To: Jonathan Lennox , "Timothy B. Terriberry" References: <582D0B2A.4030304@xiph.org> From: Jean-Marc Valin Message-ID: <5f7e9022-7716-302a-98b0-70f4c2223e64@mozilla.com> Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 02:41:27 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="awQ9bsjTnMsls9cxHmVbj2ISwTo00DrCT" Archived-At: Cc: "codec@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [codec] WGLC of draft-ietf-codec-opus-update-04 X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Codec WG List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 07:41:33 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --awQ9bsjTnMsls9cxHmVbj2ISwTo00DrCT Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="oN0Hg28XiDKmhsE97FomS3osMWL1qPEtU"; protected-headers="v1" From: Jean-Marc Valin To: Jonathan Lennox , "Timothy B. Terriberry" Cc: "codec@ietf.org" Message-ID: <5f7e9022-7716-302a-98b0-70f4c2223e64@mozilla.com> Subject: Re: [codec] WGLC of draft-ietf-codec-opus-update-04 References: <582D0B2A.4030304@xiph.org> In-Reply-To: --oN0Hg28XiDKmhsE97FomS3osMWL1qPEtU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Jonathan, Thanks very much for the review. On 18/11/16 02:15 AM, Jonathan Lennox wrote: > 1. I assume none of these changes rise to the level that they would > make any change to the textual description of the Opus codec? This > should probably be stated explicitly. I believe that's correct, but I'll check. > 2. The abstract and introduction should mention that this document > updates the normative behavior of the codec, including the test > vectors. Agreed. I'll make the change in the next version. > 3. The link to the properly-formatted patch matching the document > should be mentioned somewhere other than in Section 5 =E2=80=94 especia= lly > since it actually includes patches for all the sections of the > document, not just Section 5 and above. The introduction seems like > a sensible place, perhaps. Agreed, will update. There's also going to be the question of where that patch should go. Since it's a lot smaller than the test vectors, there may be more options. Cheers, Jean-Marc --oN0Hg28XiDKmhsE97FomS3osMWL1qPEtU-- --awQ9bsjTnMsls9cxHmVbj2ISwTo00DrCT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJYLrCoAAoJEF5d2aNvkYnIl14QAIQnHvatjR3fkUoFLnVF1RsC ye8AmyTrFzscz7ePdXb8f6L00PQ3t630/u2SVqsgCZZAHPWetQEHXDGYh9GNfwDB KG5QeBy6ddTUY6kkZBQfoNCLYoxSVbeVREuWwXGrNpq74LIscP5GA7alxhDHbX9T avFz4eoJY8HTugfQUxi9veV2rhEYEoo3ST+zyi8UGXK+iH3gwWypDI+LdRpk/+iT tAS9JM3d3C9KIXgpNEMNWm6rzf0tbnGblPs4YbP4YnArN6sIBIZvBHS3saql9LKK /zXTSINi9t/UPS1/SZvtKdW1lMr+teJMi3V+NkxRqo7n22+gmBPQrkAG6/G1lv/9 5In0mWg5D1v9H0O1ZInlZfLVExIdqFArnMpNNltvFGOxIVYquHsHRulJflzYk7Oo DgIhV81+ijSmK3X/ugiWbsPvZlNnfMR+KKXdWAWYmoPj6xR6mN7Y5k5gP4QJM6qi 15OFZRmkDjEULa3T5SFXNlWmvLIBNAyQJe8eOxAE+wBWgtB9Ts9lGs+et5Ue29MK IxZafoLAK2AhXI42x1MDuZ+cw2mvK5P6kDAcs3nkgSBLSsLt7P2n+cc9DPVTTLzu apglwRvC0BQbrt1UQXhuLn1V+j9MHe5/ytWE75mb8nLMoFKBNcjXQNTSSBFa5Qss GHC6JmJisEjW+7pSpVA0 =2wLh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --awQ9bsjTnMsls9cxHmVbj2ISwTo00DrCT-- From nobody Mon Nov 21 15:35:05 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: codec@ietf.org Delivered-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBD9A128874; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 15:34:59 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.38.1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <147977129992.16202.1720088436051662245.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 15:34:59 -0800 Archived-At: Cc: codec@ietf.org Subject: [codec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-codec-ambisonics-01.txt X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 List-Id: Codec WG List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 23:35:00 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Internet Wideband Audio Codec of the IETF. Title : Ambisonics in an Ogg Opus Container Authors : Michael Graczyk Jan Skoglund Filename : draft-ietf-codec-ambisonics-01.txt Pages : 10 Date : 2016-11-21 Abstract: This document defines an extension to the Ogg format to encapsulate ambisonics coded using the Opus audio codec. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-codec-ambisonics/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-codec-ambisonics-01 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-codec-ambisonics-01 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/