From nobody Fri Jun 1 10:32:48 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: codec@ietf.org Delivered-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FEDA12D9FF; Fri, 1 Jun 2018 10:32:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Tim Terriberry To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.81.1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Cc: tterriberry@mozilla.com, iesg-secretary@ietf.org, codec-chairs@ietf.org, Tim Terriberry , codec@ietf.org Message-ID: <152787436512.14883.4381177818560485747.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2018 10:32:45 -0700 Archived-At: Subject: [codec] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-codec-ambisonics-06 X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 List-Id: Codec WG List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2018 17:32:45 -0000 Tim Terriberry has requested publication of draft-ietf-codec-ambisonics-06 as Proposed Standard on behalf of the CODEC working group. Please verify the document's state at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-codec-ambisonics/ From nobody Thu Jun 14 13:20:19 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFE4A130E70; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 13:20:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.88 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.88 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3sJvUE77vAfG; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 13:20:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06AA0130E98; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 13:20:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.1.95] (cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w5EKKBIa048896 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 14 Jun 2018 15:20:12 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com) X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22] claimed to be [10.0.1.95] From: Ben Campbell Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D2EA6E27-A67B-4786-BE7B-AE317665B68B"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.4 \(3445.8.2\)) Message-Id: <05380CB5-0261-47DC-B578-9BE7C21CAB16@nostrum.com> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 15:20:10 -0500 To: draft-ietf-codec-ambisonics.all@ietf.org, codec@ietf.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.8.2) Archived-At: Subject: [codec] AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-codec-ambisonics-06 X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: Codec WG List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 20:20:18 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_D2EA6E27-A67B-4786-BE7B-AE317665B68B Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Hi, This is my AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-codec-ambisonics-06. Overall the = draft is in good shape. I just have a couple of minor = comments/questions, and a few editorial comments. Thanks! Ben. =E2=80=94=E2=80=94=E2=80=94=E2=80=94=E2=80=94=E2=80=94=E2=80=94=E2=80=94=E2= =80=94=E2=80=94=E2=80=94=E2=80=94=E2=80=94=E2=80=94=E2=80=94=E2=80=94 *** Substantive ***: =C2=A73.2, last sentence: " Also note that the total output channel number, C, MUST be set in the = 3rd field of the identification header.=E2=80=9D Is that MUST intended as a new normative requirement? The wording makes = it seem more like a statement of fact. (The prefix of =E2=80=9CAlso note = that=E2=80=A6=E2=80=9D tends to suggest the sentence is an FYI rather = than a normative requirement. =C2=A74: I am a little confused by the MAYs in this section. Are there = other alternatives? Is this an example approach? A sentence or two of = context would be helpful. *** Editorial ***: =C2=A72: Please use the boilerplate from RFC 8174 unless there is a = reason to do otherwise. (I note at least one lower case normative = keyword (=E2=80=9Cshould=E2=80=9D); there may be more. =C2=A73.1, - first paragraph: First sentence is a fragment. Should there be a = conjunction between the last two values in the list of allowed numbers = of channels? (The pattern repeats in =C2=A73.2) - figure 1: It would be helpful to define =E2=80=9Corder=E2=80=9D and = =E2=80=9Cdegree=E2=80=9D (defined in figure 2) prior to using them. =C2=A75.2, first sentence: Missing article before =E2=80=9CTreatment=E2=80= =9D. =C2=A77: s/ =E2=80=9Cneed take=E2=80=9D / =E2=80=9Cneed to take" --Apple-Mail=_D2EA6E27-A67B-4786-BE7B-AE317665B68B Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEExW9rpd7ez4DexOFOgFZKbJXz1A0FAlsizfoACgkQgFZKbJXz 1A05GxAAlSYH2dPTGMpY8LjaPD+/ID1KbTnbWcCAl8cDgDdOxona9MRnAsuvE/NH alk5OOm0k4ltCLQJHsFXg85sY+awz3DSYiXRZYSRfzuZtco3nkq6cjEJVmdgsgut xwgb6vSugsAAyHhCIhKo4F9BQ7kYhyLdC/5X4ciV8eiqf5X+xKTDHD/sTLwKpJHy W+kyVge10qDO0fL0Vxe/v05shmioYWBWsfCjRzvnVGxoTVzQxqlrT3H0i6XBBauw Dd/rAqpUjpNtgD3KNiVKbgwLb/Y3rfadoTmc/YF6RrITPK5HKljeZLaJx4eR3vRQ 1A7kE1ABaSEZQbWU22YT80gO0nlZG/ulp27ALq1Pwv+X7leRRrSQMcwLnFQwAiIk CLUupxbfIW9C7A9el9c8VOt359DO7PJxE4ehnwa4nyd/S4qrxuhjBNdcDRwNDswN mYyBJ25wne6A+OknjJB82SwpcvgNYzRMv6OaizeXjK57pfyKtR7eM6vVhRBDdcG2 wdNmbq+gpdRkWjEPJLrbVLd4OLJ2YznQuo862r9l2QNc5Co2Zw57uqb3t4xNYirm oUcQGjGcM2tEjHR1z72wheNQTWzRyn0uQLcB1sEyRomF1qrT/jF2KTnpM+msT3Rr iwba8cz/zxqEsPWJ226dCFhWAMI+2U9E90MyN2x0dPNFR65MrF4= =9aMz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_D2EA6E27-A67B-4786-BE7B-AE317665B68B-- From nobody Thu Jun 14 13:26:21 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BE42130E70; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 13:26:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.879 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.879 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lmBl89YlIebx; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 13:26:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99EBE130E6E; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 13:26:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.1.95] (cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w5EKQG2a049914 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 14 Jun 2018 15:26:17 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com) X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22] claimed to be [10.0.1.95] From: Ben Campbell Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_AFE0B8E2-2B1C-4981-B473-43E143722CF2"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.4 \(3445.8.2\)) Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 15:26:15 -0500 References: <05380CB5-0261-47DC-B578-9BE7C21CAB16@nostrum.com> To: draft-ietf-codec-ambisonics.all@ietf.org, codec@ietf.org In-Reply-To: <05380CB5-0261-47DC-B578-9BE7C21CAB16@nostrum.com> Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.8.2) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [codec] AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-codec-ambisonics-06 X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: Codec WG List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 20:26:19 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_AFE0B8E2-2B1C-4981-B473-43E143722CF2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 The address for bounced. I see the shepherd = mentioned that he was unable to contact Michael. That will be = inconvenient once we reach the Auth48 state; I encourage the chairs and = co-author to please keep trying. Thanks! Ben. > On Jun 14, 2018, at 3:20 PM, Ben Campbell wrote: >=20 > Hi, >=20 > This is my AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-codec-ambisonics-06. Overall = the draft is in good shape. I just have a couple of minor = comments/questions, and a few editorial comments. >=20 > Thanks! >=20 > Ben. >=20 > =E2=80=94=E2=80=94=E2=80=94=E2=80=94=E2=80=94=E2=80=94=E2=80=94=E2=80=94= =E2=80=94=E2=80=94=E2=80=94=E2=80=94=E2=80=94=E2=80=94=E2=80=94=E2=80=94 >=20 > *** Substantive ***: >=20 > =C2=A73.2, last sentence: " > Also note that the total output channel number, C, MUST be set in the = 3rd field of the identification header.=E2=80=9D >=20 > Is that MUST intended as a new normative requirement? The wording = makes it seem more like a statement of fact. (The prefix of =E2=80=9CAlso = note that=E2=80=A6=E2=80=9D tends to suggest the sentence is an FYI = rather than a normative requirement. >=20 > =C2=A74: I am a little confused by the MAYs in this section. Are there = other alternatives? Is this an example approach? A sentence or two of = context would be helpful. >=20 > *** Editorial ***: >=20 > =C2=A72: Please use the boilerplate from RFC 8174 unless there is a = reason to do otherwise. (I note at least one lower case normative = keyword (=E2=80=9Cshould=E2=80=9D); there may be more. >=20 > =C2=A73.1, >=20 > - first paragraph: First sentence is a fragment. Should there be a = conjunction between the last two values in the list of allowed numbers = of channels? (The pattern repeats in =C2=A73.2) >=20 > - figure 1: It would be helpful to define =E2=80=9Corder=E2=80=9D and = =E2=80=9Cdegree=E2=80=9D (defined in figure 2) prior to using them. >=20 > =C2=A75.2, first sentence: Missing article before =E2=80=9CTreatment=E2=80= =9D. >=20 > =C2=A77: s/ =E2=80=9Cneed take=E2=80=9D / =E2=80=9Cneed to take" >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 --Apple-Mail=_AFE0B8E2-2B1C-4981-B473-43E143722CF2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEExW9rpd7ez4DexOFOgFZKbJXz1A0FAlsiz2cACgkQgFZKbJXz 1A1FohAAzoySgfCLZoMdenpgVF13Xm9Q3I3Q3TCExCJG013Cr6iWRx4/NTnzIGan i1BRLsFkQMrfYJ/1MbXCvtcFjn5DnQ9Hxydx0oYOhAJVsYMKGY4VDU32mJX27K2Y 2xFS3NVDeFjGIsPp9JXgaJ96NRr7E+aJE2wiiG/fLP/DUTu1LEIy7zh4mnfkt4x9 PjEAjc3c4bflWuLd6kq/qtAxrtJUvbBO+BEKq177PiOjkmO0m01OSv/jWgpwqhWQ 7nyZrxgQVmzbmt1B/rgD03zY2ShGUugIEndbrNl7zbEM5b60lU46FAu2YV5cCfYU YPiONmUpEkUFiP4RA+Xrd9p32jTlrSQtlx/SjeaJj3y/dk+xyrr6BRsUNpdEPQng aHqnAhCxcn+otqNerK8txMJdBZSuy07ViFiz9UXtoeShKayZWIboM0lmOQLdqJRf olBbvWF+LoTiMCm1jrhPZXiNryBrzLK+dIquG9SM50HDp/q2mdq97fSzDe/liptF WEcWZJRn1oWE8by1nPNnhr5LpP5XS0iqxEcDJFdqEcGupg46e3XO4bsWNN5LGZ0t IK+i1MUOdQ5K2BeFwBaO7T2sFf8KRlMI23gnlwUa2RIF6v32G4wWEqQEGfd/uqXb uY3HAkKTKNK1IqgbBoJaH5jHu47tBRymEeOFlj3bJl1FRvqS0lA= =HvoW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_AFE0B8E2-2B1C-4981-B473-43E143722CF2-- From nobody Fri Jun 15 16:21:39 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 977E8130E77; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 16:21:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.901 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LJu_BJBdNxo5; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 16:21:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.mozilla.org (mx2.scl3.mozilla.com [63.245.214.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7166B130E61; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 16:21:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost6.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.mail.scl3.mozilla.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39B80C0A2D; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 23:21:34 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mozilla.org Received: from smtp.mozilla.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx2.mail.scl3.mozilla.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4NmjJnK9ZDPF; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 23:21:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.20.17.143] (unknown [207.242.53.83]) (Authenticated sender: tterriberry@mozilla.com) by mx2.mail.scl3.mozilla.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E002EC0949; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 23:21:33 +0000 (UTC) To: Ben Campbell , draft-ietf-codec-ambisonics.all@ietf.org, codec@ietf.org References: <05380CB5-0261-47DC-B578-9BE7C21CAB16@nostrum.com> From: "Timothy B. Terriberry" Message-ID: <3b98c57e-d8f8-cd47-6f6e-e514e5bce3d1@xiph.org> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 16:21:33 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.49.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Subject: Re: [codec] AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-codec-ambisonics-06 X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: Codec WG List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 23:21:38 -0000 Ben Campbell wrote: > The address for bounced. I see the shepherd mentioned that he was unable to contact Michael. That will be inconvenient once we reach the Auth48 state; I encourage the chairs and co-author to please keep trying. Jan Skoglund reported contacting him successfully at shortly after I submitted the shepherd write-up. I assume the authors will fix the address the next time the draft is submitted. From nobody Tue Jun 19 10:33:41 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: codec@ietf.org Delivered-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FFD013118F; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 10:33:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: Cc: codec@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.81.2 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <152942961921.32314.14187185254114658610@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 10:33:39 -0700 Archived-At: Subject: [codec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-codec-ambisonics-07.txt X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 List-Id: Codec WG List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 17:33:40 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Internet Wideband Audio Codec WG of the IETF. Title : Ambisonics in an Ogg Opus Container Authors : Jan Skoglund Michael Graczyk Filename : draft-ietf-codec-ambisonics-07.txt Pages : 10 Date : 2018-06-19 Abstract: This document defines an extension to the Opus audio codec to encapsulate coded ambisonics using the Ogg format. It also contains updates to RFC 7845 to reflect necessary changes in the description of channel mapping families. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-codec-ambisonics/ There are also htmlized versions available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-codec-ambisonics-07 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-codec-ambisonics-07 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-codec-ambisonics-07 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Tue Jun 26 14:16:40 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66B1C130E2E; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 14:16:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.878 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.878 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WpQN2fRlE8wV; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 14:16:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F21AC130E2C; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 14:16:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.1.95] (cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w5QLGZ1W008876 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 26 Jun 2018 16:16:36 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com) X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22] claimed to be [10.0.1.95] From: Ben Campbell Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_CD1D0C88-6647-43CB-AB00-EF90F674250C" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.4 \(3445.8.2\)) Message-Id: References: <152942961936.32314.15917277945157190269.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> To: draft-ietf-codec-ambisonics.all@ietf.org, codec@ietf.org Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 16:16:34 -0500 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.8.2) Archived-At: Subject: [codec] Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-ietf-codec-ambisonics-07.txt X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: Codec WG List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 21:16:39 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_CD1D0C88-6647-43CB-AB00-EF90F674250C Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi, I think version 7 is ready for IETF Last Call, which I will request = shortly. Thanks! Ben. > Begin forwarded message: >=20 > From: internet-drafts@ietf.org > Subject: New Version Notification - draft-ietf-codec-ambisonics-07.txt > Date: June 19, 2018 at 12:33:39 PM CDT > To: , "Tim Terriberry" >=20 >=20 > A new version (-07) has been submitted for = draft-ietf-codec-ambisonics: > = https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-codec-ambisonics-07.txt >=20 > Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed >=20 >=20 > The IETF datatracker page for this Internet-Draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-codec-ambisonics/ >=20 > Diff from previous version: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-codec-ambisonics-07 >=20 > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of = submission > until the diff is available at tools.ietf.org. >=20 > IETF Secretariat. >=20 --Apple-Mail=_CD1D0C88-6647-43CB-AB00-EF90F674250C Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Hi,

I = think version 7 is ready for IETF Last Call, which I will request = shortly.

Thanks!

Ben.

Begin forwarded = message:

From: = internet-drafts@ietf.org
Subject: = New Version = Notification - draft-ietf-codec-ambisonics-07.txt
Date: = June 19, 2018 at 12:33:39 PM = CDT
To: = <ben@nostrum.com>, "Tim = Terriberry" <tterriberry@mozilla.com>


A new version = (-07) has been submitted for draft-ietf-codec-ambisonics:
https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-codec-ambisonic= s-07.txt

Sub state has been changed to = AD Followup from Revised ID Needed


The IETF datatracker page for this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-codec-ambisonics/
Diff from previous version:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-codec-ambisonics= -07

Please note that it may take a couple = of minutes from the time of submission
until the diff is = available at tools.ietf.org.

IETF = Secretariat.


= --Apple-Mail=_CD1D0C88-6647-43CB-AB00-EF90F674250C-- From nobody Tue Jun 26 14:37:28 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: codec@ietf.org Delivered-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04D44130EF3; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 14:37:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: The IESG To: "IETF-Announce" X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.81.3 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk CC: ben@nostrum.com, draft-ietf-codec-ambisonics@ietf.org, codec@ietf.org, tterriberry@mozilla.com, Tim Terriberry , codec-chairs@ietf.org Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org Sender: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <153004903393.18886.540465268203949254.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 14:37:13 -0700 Archived-At: Subject: [codec] Last Call: (Ambisonics in an Ogg Opus Container) to Proposed Standard X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 List-Id: Codec WG List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 21:37:16 -0000 The IESG has received a request from the Internet Wideband Audio Codec WG (codec) to consider the following document: - 'Ambisonics in an Ogg Opus Container' as Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2018-07-10. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract This document defines an extension to the Opus audio codec to encapsulate coded ambisonics using the Ogg format. It also contains updates to RFC 7845 to reflect necessary changes in the description of channel mapping families. The file can be obtained via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-codec-ambisonics/ IESG discussion can be tracked via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-codec-ambisonics/ballot/ The following IPR Declarations may be related to this I-D: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3200/