From nobody Mon Jan 14 06:10:51 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: enum@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: enum@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 873E012D4E7 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 06:10:49 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nlnetlabs.nl header.b=C/iz42V/; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nlnetlabs.nl header.b=drUr6Wpk Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p46LXzeFudqb for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 06:10:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from dicht.nlnetlabs.nl (dicht.nlnetlabs.nl [IPv6:2a04:b900::1:0:0:10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8B8B129A87 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 06:10:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by dicht.nlnetlabs.nl (Postfix, from userid 58) id 4C0CA140DF; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 15:10:45 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=nlnetlabs.nl; s=default; t=1547475045; bh=eyZ9eYFMDFcnOwuoEyJmJShfi185aeQ2oVqtWUNWmQM=; h=To:Subject:From:Date; b=C/iz42V/ja4SfJBg//n0UnpAcsR10gkp1eflG0dho7bT/Wxm9Jwdo2f70RxqZVyGB lv3eSBkpxMgK2lbJf23ZtQIt1ezpXZMPmWWSIx1DCn2SZFzguy8BBJlw7Vpg+E0sIG dWjHs58QdykEVBB74jXiitgEHiBnBP9JwCHud3E0= Received: from bela.nlnetlabs.nl (bela.nlnetlabs.nl [IPv6:2a04:b900::1:0:0:15]) by dicht.nlnetlabs.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8C52140DC for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 15:10:40 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: dicht.nlnetlabs.nl; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=nlnetlabs.nl DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=nlnetlabs.nl; s=default; t=1547475040; bh=eyZ9eYFMDFcnOwuoEyJmJShfi185aeQ2oVqtWUNWmQM=; h=To:Subject:From:Date; b=drUr6WpkPoycp4Rf+yBojZC83OHe0OzYAGe7I9Y50GriiMe5xEr3F2G40C/e3tWBJ XUBW6CvPU3GIq8Fjwmpp3KBsTu3UsPZWwYxT8oOpPg7j3YpJUXITDwQaof9cXgJNjH cvaMu2pa4BerMSbJinNMWCCpSLhU6Km0XoCcTgPA= Received: from bela.nlnetlabs.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bela.nlnetlabs.nl (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x0EEAevo082529 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 15:10:40 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jaap@nlnetlabs.nl) Received: from bela.nlnetlabs.nl (jaap@localhost) by bela.nlnetlabs.nl (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id x0EEAegF082526 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 15:10:40 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jaap@nlnetlabs.nl) Message-Id: <201901141410.x0EEAegF082526@bela.nlnetlabs.nl> X-Authentication-Warning: bela.nlnetlabs.nl: jaap owned process doing -bs To: enum@ietf.org From: Jaap Akkerhuis MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <82524.1547475040.1@bela.nlnetlabs.nl> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 15:10:40 +0100 X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (bela.nlnetlabs.nl [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 14 Jan 2019 15:10:40 +0100 (CET) Archived-At: Subject: [Enum] 5 years since last message X-BeenThere: enum@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Enum Discussion List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 14:10:49 -0000 All, It is now five tears ago that there was any activity [1] on this list so maybe it is time to retire this list. I actually completely forgot about this list but some recent spam reminded me of the existence. FYI. There are currently 503 subscribers on this list (although probably quite some addresses will likely bounce this messages). Regards, jaap (list maintainer) [1] See From nobody Mon Jan 14 06:34:23 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: enum@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: enum@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EB7F130FB5 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 06:34:22 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.899 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XnzH1VjE_ixj for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 06:34:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from softronics.hoeneisen.ch (softronics.hoeneisen.ch [62.2.86.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF4561277BB for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 06:34:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by softronics.hoeneisen.ch with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gj3Jh-00052H-Ss; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 15:34:17 +0100 Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 15:34:17 +0100 (CET) From: Bernie Hoeneisen X-X-Sender: bhoeneis@softronics.hoeneisen.ch To: Jaap Akkerhuis cc: IETF ENUM list In-Reply-To: <201901141410.x0EEAegF082526@bela.nlnetlabs.nl> Message-ID: References: <201901141410.x0EEAegF082526@bela.nlnetlabs.nl> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on softronics.hoeneisen.ch); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Enum] 5 years since last message X-BeenThere: enum@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Enum Discussion List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 14:34:22 -0000 Hi Jaap Well, there is a dependency on this list in RFC 6117... On the other hand, registering new ENUM services has not been that popular either for several years... cheers Bernie (Designated Expert of the IESG and other list maintainer) -- http://ucom.ch/ Modern Telephony Solutions and Tech Consulting for Internet Technology On Mon, 14 Jan 2019, Jaap Akkerhuis wrote: > All, > > It is now five tears ago that there was any activity [1] on this > list so maybe it is time to retire this list. I actually completely > forgot about this list but some recent spam reminded me of the > existence. > > FYI. There are currently 503 subscribers on this list (although > probably quite some addresses will likely bounce this messages). > > Regards, > > jaap (list maintainer) > > [1] See > > _______________________________________________ > enum mailing list > enum@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum > From nobody Tue Jan 15 04:17:58 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: enum@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: enum@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0FFB130E3F for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 04:17:57 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -7.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nlnetlabs.nl header.b=JdVWb8oX; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nlnetlabs.nl header.b=wHsAw/YQ Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JqD5d6JsgaWE for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 04:17:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from dicht.nlnetlabs.nl (dicht.nlnetlabs.nl [IPv6:2a04:b900::1:0:0:10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD604130DE9 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 04:17:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by dicht.nlnetlabs.nl (Postfix, from userid 58) id 7DF8517F43; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 13:17:51 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=nlnetlabs.nl; s=default; t=1547554671; bh=rGSn/2fKplf2wyKdHhriGPAw7+0yS42xsOf1UgUFnyA=; h=To:cc:Subject:From:In-reply-to:References:Date; b=JdVWb8oXAQTA1M5PIW3KXjXKsmSTe/OebOO3a1ViZwolC59BFG6yiVuq3gvZW1OmR j3tacB0Sch/rpUP9tip6mUG79Tl135oz8klotMzTnre2SVXgMJ7zMXx+6uF06mbcll SrG9w/1FB+Wa/q6etPZYTD6mswTDIcM5+uYEk54I= Received: from bela.nlnetlabs.nl (bela.nlnetlabs.nl [IPv6:2a04:b900::1:0:0:15]) by dicht.nlnetlabs.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E33C517F3D; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 13:17:50 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: dicht.nlnetlabs.nl; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=NLnetLabs.nl DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=nlnetlabs.nl; s=default; t=1547554670; bh=rGSn/2fKplf2wyKdHhriGPAw7+0yS42xsOf1UgUFnyA=; h=To:cc:Subject:From:In-reply-to:References:Date; b=wHsAw/YQts/khKAo2cG9kKO2cKLpT1oeJGta5qiC0n8KiTMdTxmN9rGC/FPP2IN9u ff4qet/gUhXDKOjpklY26e7VuqbV+/NFOiPkMYQIjoqQ+2mA6OxC7sbS846khd9WFQ 0sep3LL8moVVQPOKEZJtWBhTvWfW0Jljr4775xx4= Received: from bela.nlnetlabs.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bela.nlnetlabs.nl (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x0FCHore066561 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 15 Jan 2019 13:17:50 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jaap@NLnetLabs.nl) Received: from bela.nlnetlabs.nl (jaap@localhost) by bela.nlnetlabs.nl (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id x0FCHoCj066558; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 13:17:50 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jaap@NLnetLabs.nl) Message-Id: <201901151217.x0FCHoCj066558@bela.nlnetlabs.nl> X-Authentication-Warning: bela.nlnetlabs.nl: jaap owned process doing -bs To: Bernie Hoeneisen cc: IETF ENUM list From: Jaap Akkerhuis In-reply-to: References: <201901141410.x0EEAegF082526@bela.nlnetlabs.nl> Comments: In-reply-to Bernie Hoeneisen message dated "Mon, 14 Jan 2019 15:34:17 +0100." MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <66556.1547554670.1@bela.nlnetlabs.nl> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 13:17:50 +0100 X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (bela.nlnetlabs.nl [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 15 Jan 2019 13:17:50 +0100 (CET) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Enum] 5 years since last message X-BeenThere: enum@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Enum Discussion List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 12:17:58 -0000 Bernie Hoeneisen writes: > Hi Jaap > > Well, there is a dependency on this list in RFC 6117... > > On the other hand, registering new ENUM services has not been that popular > either for several years... > > cheers > Bernie (Designated Expert of the IESG and other list maintainer) In that case, it would make sense that you take over the maintaining of this list as well. Would you? If so, let's arrange that off-list. jaap