From nobody Mon Jan 4 06:01:08 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 600293A0D4A for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 06:01:07 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.198 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sOMePK4znTWm for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 06:01:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wr1-x436.google.com (mail-wr1-x436.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::436]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1889F3A0D50 for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 06:01:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x436.google.com with SMTP id r7so32243725wrc.5 for ; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 06:01:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=uEztN038Lc4k9ybgQvIRS0se3o21E5sjO665EhPx+x4=; b=He8JxEhMUOVfS3mPGRtyWkkcgTMllh/M/ueZz2cyphBgtb862ozNnRfQdVpaahFFMF nYz8wvxGjMz4teRHCD2GOPOCrnsn0PS/M79QtU8qQxZQ+XB7uGk0PmW0YNow0NoPrq1W FN0WY8ZqfWmMkI7ELGd/14jwZc1yqGLNg2epeY2u16GSIrKXUVkpcEVWqFEz+TJ60nZ5 w9gVOINzOz6SHnHNwzKUuRzJZCTLdcw5BeL3DOGs25He5Wa4r66+lKryqoVEgB+uEBvR ga7chctrooxBjOaNaHN4Ri8YoLxm0sba0U7qMHXl00JiiDVljcuFPdCbGqeVGz2tqXFI B3ng== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=uEztN038Lc4k9ybgQvIRS0se3o21E5sjO665EhPx+x4=; b=NSXOdDJ0jPtghM8kyJmsMwT6tmtnzq0i89vUlWQxsBPdFix9Ts8nhRlcIsvkohWzKa d3iaJejop9UUbMqnGQ6rcyBGHbcpyQidRvl9b4yVrAY35POjRwFB0eH+p2xB374K3yV/ UbjZ5aHbSNr3WQFlBK3V7441tZPgfF3R398XanA6txagEaXq/1ty7ZGgajzGFNoCJgqA pyl/FX7IU9zV60ns0Q8TqkO5TyX0TLlSum65oUfakXCuzm37pd23XaPIqWLuUQHigoFn snAY3nxShu5OhFW3uQEQ+PP3+FqjLpkrtuzeLp/ucKLZnBgE7p5shXmkO9lwlXFixRTn r2wA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532pMAnzK2HBowWOb4/OyCvQebfpyPFax+ZncpzVseAGCyZMPi8v gbaCD8YULezNjJp1OZwM3Ew= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxwNJBWHd/iS17H57eATXZFM3JVGG+Zp0mCZ74iAzWArJ3wx0GXDkLtel8JZfte1m6Ph2t4Rg== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4c4e:: with SMTP id n14mr80547351wrt.209.1609768861683; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 06:01:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from zion.lan (111.219.93.209.dyn.plus.net. [209.93.219.111]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x17sm91355269wro.40.2021.01.04.06.01.00 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 04 Jan 2021 06:01:01 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <0808f8df59c0d4b38d48e766b0f1af6f9111c3e6.camel@gmail.com> From: Glyn Normington To: Stefan Hagen , "Murray S. Kucherawy" Cc: Tim Bray , jsonpath@ietf.org, Carsten Bormann Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2021 14:00:59 +0000 In-Reply-To: <48DC8041-83F9-42C7-A2B6-F7C7EC7382A6@dilettant.eu> References: <48DC8041-83F9-42C7-A2B6-F7C7EC7382A6@dilettant.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.1-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Jsonpath] JSONPath WG next steps X-BeenThere: jsonpath@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: A summary description of the list to be included in the table on this page List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2021 14:01:07 -0000 On Thu, 2020-12-24 at 18:21 +0100, Stefan Hagen wrote: > > > Am 24.12.2020 um 17:35 schrieb Murray S. Kucherawy > > : > > > > I suggest draft-ietf-jsonpath-base-00. > > > > -MSK > > > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 11:51 PM Tim Bray > > wrote: > > > Hmm, draft-ietf-jsonpath-00 certainly wouldn't offend me, but on > > > the other hand there's a lot to be said for sticking to > > > conventions.  I'm imagining someone writing a bot to plow through > > > WG drafts and relying on the convention. I've added Murray to the > > > "To" line to see if he has an opinion.  James? Anyone else? > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 11:27 PM Carsten Bormann > > > wrote: > > > > On 2020-12-24, at 08:14, Glyn Normington > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Out of interest, why the "stutter" in the name? Wouldn't > > > > draft-ietf- > > > > > jsonpath-00 be less cumbersome? I don't feel strongly, but it > > > > would be > > > > > good to know the rationale. > > > > > > > > Internet-draft naming for WG documents is > > > > > > > > draft-ietf-wgname-subject-subject-subject-nn > > > > > > > > Now if there is only one draft in the WG, we might leave the > > > > subject off entirely. > > > > I actually find a few cases where this has been done: > > > > > > > > draft-ietf-cnrp-12.txt > > > > draft-ietf-geojson-04.txt > > > > draft-ietf-gsmp-11.txt > > > > draft-ietf-itrace-04.txt > > > > draft-ietf-lisp-24.txt > > > > draft-ietf-otp-01.txt > > > > draft-ietf-sming-02.txt > > > > draft-ietf-upsmib-05.txt > > > > > > > > Most of these are older cases (1994 to 2006, with geojson at > > > > 2016 being the newest), but it sure could be done again. > > > > > > > > (Some of the WGs then did develop further drafts with non-empty > > > > subject parts, e.g., lisp.) > > > > > > > > Grüße, Carsten > > > > > I second draft-ietf-jsonpath-base-00 +1 > Grüße, Stefan > > > > > > -- > > Jsonpath mailing list > > Jsonpath@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jsonpath