From nobody Thu Aug 8 06:46:52 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55669120044 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 06:46:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.699 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=vpMkjuyz; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=Llptc9t1 Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rzUVxyAX1R9O for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 06:46:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 754681200B6 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 06:46:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E129D242; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 09:46:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 08 Aug 2019 09:46:48 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h= from:content-type:mime-version:subject:date:references:cc:to :message-id; s=fm3; bh=3k60ppsgPly/Q93nsO1/2F1Wa3cdCVOrFQJhsKDrf DI=; b=vpMkjuyzz9Ut4xRziEYZjNZu08eVH7Udl5ezgf7hH5UODcbmu1H4eg/v0 2W0YfAun7kuEFGDujj4bayOVIduX2qMwiYcWXf3+pjZvnq1Yr0+JhHukCskU4O6A +k0CIxWMEP/1T3gKT8fnPeBz0OhXBElGv4h+5slZM8J1DaaG8kONdeoM1aClsO1f fGKReIbAUdnCaCrrSCd9bWgy9ifBW3N7I7KjNj3inKS1wC1+nAXsOZg45Vi5SI3n yJhaZQesta/3aJr+y+evG4GF91EhwbKcdVGgpx0Una4FmANdRS7aO1WTSBCgy7Qq aq+5seEplfbD03xz9A+HEWv0DhIsA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=3k60ppsgPly/Q93ns O1/2F1Wa3cdCVOrFQJhsKDrfDI=; b=Llptc9t14Zwdj3DEtmLZ8NNKBoNfKsw6q M4jkNhYLS/dlsveAGoQddOx/EaVc4ePUxCZoM3w/EdkkeCyGXJK6+x5ZN+CtLd9W oSnFRUQooChL7hHQ3u+0f7CoaztdyxcbHZR5lzT3+2X4UNUSZ3+2gvtWATxSq2kw Zc06swc6t2RaFIh0im02303aq8Y6RCOBssRKrNeNhHNm4vyGUgAqa+xzzSuZOTH+ uaflBbwsJm7OaH4pHSWNQVZVj6B08D9Us6WPET8LBAKATEhePoy27BHfHbI9EjIx 8sTHQabkyNQ+gg46k66Wq0BPwq9vA7vqFmNfA9KZLEXQb4jIcX6LQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddrudduhedgieekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephfgtggfuffhfvffkofesrgdtmherhhdtvdenucfhrhhomheptehlihhsshgr ucevohhophgvrhcuoegrlhhishhsrgestghoohhpvghrfidrihhnqeenucffohhmrghinh eprhhftgdqvgguihhtohhrrdhorhhgpdhivghtfhdrohhrghenucfkphepudejfedrfeek rdduudejrdejfeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheprghlihhsshgrsegtohhoph gvrhifrdhinhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from rtp-alcoop-nitro2.cisco.com (unknown [173.38.117.73]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D8CE680066; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 09:46:45 -0400 (EDT) From: Alissa Cooper Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C484BD24-950F-4257-97A8-0EA212D29834" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\)) Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2019 09:46:44 -0400 References: <8164720c-383b-8e3b-5b71-bb120fea0e77@nostrum.com> To: IETF Tools Development , Heather Flanagan Message-Id: <9C1F0619-2CD5-4532-B6B0-BEF8D98709EA@cooperw.in> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1) Archived-At: Subject: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Fwd: Errata Processing Stats/Queue? X-BeenThere: tools-development@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Tools Development list server List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2019 13:46:50 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_C484BD24-950F-4257-97A8-0EA212D29834 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Robert, Heather, all, (+ Adam since he did the PoC) Is there a reason not to deploy the in-line errata display on = datatracker.ietf.org and tools.ietf.org RFC versions in addition to = rfc-editor.org RFCs? =46rom the start when we were discussing this = project and working out the budget for it I thought the plan was to = deploy in all three places. Thanks, Alissa > Begin forwarded message: >=20 > From: Robert Sparks > Subject: Re: Errata Processing Stats/Queue? > Date: August 7, 2019 at 11:30:21 AM EDT > To: ietf@ietf.org >=20 >=20 > On 8/7/19 9:52 AM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 06:13:08AM -0700, Eric Rescorla wrote: >>> Dear IESG: can you report on the status of that project and when the >>> tools/datatracker sites will show inline errata? >> My understanding is that the code is done and waiting to be deployed. >>=20 >> Alissa's note at >> = https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/QDuj5ItTcY5nbVQVp7FMRjZiSZY = may >> be the most authoritative thing I can point to right now. >=20 > This is currently in the rfc-editor's hands (as their plan is to = deploy it on the rfc-editor website). >=20 > RjS >=20 >>=20 >> -Ben >>=20 >=20 --Apple-Mail=_C484BD24-950F-4257-97A8-0EA212D29834 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Robert, Heather, all,

(+ Adam since he did the PoC)

Is there a reason not to = deploy the in-line errata display on datatracker.ietf.org = and tools.ietf.org RFC = versions in addition to rfc-editor.org RFCs? =46rom the start when we were = discussing this project and working out the budget for it I thought the = plan was to deploy in all three places.

Thanks,
Alissa


Begin = forwarded message:

From: = Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Subject: = Re: Errata = Processing Stats/Queue?
Date: = August 7, 2019 at 11:30:21 AM = EDT
To: = ietf@ietf.org


On 8/7/19 9:52 = AM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 06:13:08AM -0700, Eric Rescorla = wrote:
Dear IESG: can = you report on the status of that project and when the
tools/datatracker sites will show inline errata?
My understanding is that the code is done and = waiting to be deployed.

Alissa's note at
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/QDuj5ItTcY5nbVQVp7FM= RjZiSZY may
be the most authoritative thing I can = point to right now.

This is = currently in the rfc-editor's hands (as their plan is to deploy it on = the rfc-editor website).

RjS


-Ben



= --Apple-Mail=_C484BD24-950F-4257-97A8-0EA212D29834-- From nobody Thu Aug 8 06:52:29 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F8FF1200B6 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 06:52:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.978 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nhFFi3SjEFmv for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 06:52:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 604EA120044 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 06:52:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unescapeable.local ([47.186.30.41]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x78DqLBb078131 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 08:52:21 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1565272342; bh=YwOjAb5asaXBneOPnINEanjg9qDMoCbPVZNPE7sv4oI=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=bwzdhMapLNen1cOq1ocw1fRXAuR4gjQqaIRWiEWVVrGAzx9T9nejK2x2z9Oc4jChv qu2HobqPn4bgoFUuB5YF8CZNsx/LLCqQ4GOcUMJErBp3jLAksaVYJPQtqQmBrfHj/+ aAM7XoLs1oCw07MwlKsF/eqnDn5dLdWXdElNwdso= X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.30.41] claimed to be unescapeable.local To: tools-development@ietf.org References: <8164720c-383b-8e3b-5b71-bb120fea0e77@nostrum.com> <9C1F0619-2CD5-4532-B6B0-BEF8D98709EA@cooperw.in> From: Robert Sparks Message-ID: <4954fac2-085d-69ea-c38e-9ea36e01ea7b@nostrum.com> Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2019 08:52:20 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9C1F0619-2CD5-4532-B6B0-BEF8D98709EA@cooperw.in> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------C80CF2D281CEDCBA108AD704" Content-Language: en-US Archived-At: Subject: Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Fwd: Errata Processing Stats/Queue? X-BeenThere: tools-development@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Tools Development list server List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2019 13:52:27 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------C80CF2D281CEDCBA108AD704 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I am currently expecting that datatracker and tools would link to the rfc-editor pages once deployed. (From what I've heard from Heather, that deployment should be very soon). RjS On 8/8/19 8:46 AM, Alissa Cooper wrote: > Robert, Heather, all, > > (+ Adam since he did the PoC) > > Is there a reason not to deploy the in-line errata display on > datatracker.ietf.org and tools.ietf.org > RFC versions in addition to rfc-editor.org > RFCs? From the start when we were discussing > this project and working out the budget for it I thought the plan was > to deploy in all three places. > > Thanks, > Alissa > > >> Begin forwarded message: >> >> *From: *Robert Sparks > > >> *Subject: **Re: Errata Processing Stats/Queue?* >> *Date: *August 7, 2019 at 11:30:21 AM EDT >> *To: *ietf@ietf.org >> >> >> On 8/7/19 9:52 AM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: >>> On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 06:13:08AM -0700, Eric Rescorla wrote: >>>> Dear IESG: can you report on the status of that project and when the >>>> tools/datatracker sites will show inline errata? >>> My understanding is that the code is done and waiting to be deployed. >>> >>> Alissa's note at >>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/QDuj5ItTcY5nbVQVp7FMRjZiSZY >>> may >>> be the most authoritative thing I can point to right now. >> >> This is currently in the rfc-editor's hands (as their plan is to >> deploy it on the rfc-editor website). >> >> RjS >> >>> >>> -Ben >>> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT mailing list > TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-development --------------C80CF2D281CEDCBA108AD704 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I am currently expecting that datatracker and tools would link to the rfc-editor pages once deployed. (From what I've heard from Heather, that deployment should be very soon).

RjS

On 8/8/19 8:46 AM, Alissa Cooper wrote:
Robert, Heather, all,

(+ Adam since he did the PoC)

Is there a reason not to deploy the in-line errata display on datatracker.ietf.org and tools.ietf.org RFC versions in addition to rfc-editor.org RFCs? From the start when we were discussing this project and working out the budget for it I thought the plan was to deploy in all three places.

Thanks,
Alissa


Begin forwarded message:

From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Subject: Re: Errata Processing Stats/Queue?
Date: August 7, 2019 at 11:30:21 AM EDT


On 8/7/19 9:52 AM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 06:13:08AM -0700, Eric Rescorla wrote:
Dear IESG: can you report on the status of that project and when the
tools/datatracker sites will show inline errata?
My understanding is that the code is done and waiting to be deployed.

Alissa's note at
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/QDuj5ItTcY5nbVQVp7FMRjZiSZY may
be the most authoritative thing I can point to right now.

This is currently in the rfc-editor's hands (as their plan is to deploy it on the rfc-editor website).

RjS


-Ben




_______________________________________________
TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT mailing list
TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-development
--------------C80CF2D281CEDCBA108AD704-- From nobody Thu Aug 8 11:31:39 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEC6112022A for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 11:31:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.699 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=C3xxZhET; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=rutnXQd5 Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fn4LLgxsrWcL for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 11:31:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55CB812023B for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 11:31:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8A9141F; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 14:31:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 08 Aug 2019 14:31:18 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h= from:message-id:content-type:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; s=fm3; bh=9gWAZlglma0wxzRF2BgFdKz Kllg8CpKwXvXplQGJOYg=; b=C3xxZhETpB274A0ScGPZOU/7CBPMSYsrWODpeWN /bcAEf3JVmmmhn1ShrhGxX05lXzGKx/kLgidGjHqD1YdigSAp2Qs5HKOWHA5RBez a6rXIvIwr6p6T+PDcKNCJTsB3cTIxL+7hSVcI1u8H4fEezUTFGjobLjocF/q8Yxy 9AuwzI2+6ivSQ0gaIqHCbMSrmdjOEFzjEurC8UfE8NO9JbAGlLMhWOH4Jo4kEgax P8z3jt4ZtcTzZ7b45TUKW02IOY1JLonwJFyCbMXOezyZpKgkdwWNUB9xgdPJH0zL KTTQqOwyunYAKdU1u+GvMZnRpNZJ3wwdZXPd7XctD/Ic/6Q== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=9gWAZl glma0wxzRF2BgFdKzKllg8CpKwXvXplQGJOYg=; b=rutnXQd5Q/3YOTsvD0tD3M CSUPCYI2I0yvMx22jbovooxWeZp1xRsUlAvfSXOSmqudBPQ2c9QabeFx0+hYVL5w 04wBlczZI5xSEFSqZkHt09xlI8+N9at1RblmtIbFcrbml+kvMLFkb5++NemzgR1M ziybpUds75BQrsXsPDse8U8KB2oi/+1phJuPKZh1Sc/dIHMdbaQEMji78ihVDmTZ ZKOng/Vhyz8yt5phGDKbOy1qH42tL8gVswHDjwxJuNuciM44UKYMEEYWKKV63KqV n2ea1OkQeAoY/968ncG5E5X+qmfDYxmoPvqHFZr5u9kARwfA0Kx45aTuCtW1dmfA == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddrudduhedguddvhecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefhkfgtggfuffgjvfhfofesrgdtmherhhdtheenucfhrhhomheptehlihhs shgrucevohhophgvrhcuoegrlhhishhsrgestghoohhpvghrfidrihhnqeenucffohhmrg hinheprhhftgdqvgguihhtohhrrdhorhhgpdhivghtfhdrohhrghenucfkphepudejfedr feekrdduudejrdejfeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheprghlihhsshgrsegtoh hophgvrhifrdhinhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from rtp-alcoop-nitro2.cisco.com (unknown [173.38.117.73]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 920EE8005B; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 14:31:17 -0400 (EDT) From: Alissa Cooper Message-Id: <42351F4B-6A41-40F2-A67E-9E64680A44D6@cooperw.in> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_6AEFA762-8038-40FA-BD8D-9CC40A29CE02" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\)) Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2019 14:31:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4954fac2-085d-69ea-c38e-9ea36e01ea7b@nostrum.com> Cc: tools-development@ietf.org To: Robert Sparks References: <8164720c-383b-8e3b-5b71-bb120fea0e77@nostrum.com> <9C1F0619-2CD5-4532-B6B0-BEF8D98709EA@cooperw.in> <4954fac2-085d-69ea-c38e-9ea36e01ea7b@nostrum.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Errata Processing Stats/Queue? X-BeenThere: tools-development@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Tools Development list server List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2019 18:31:38 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_6AEFA762-8038-40FA-BD8D-9CC40A29CE02 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Excellent, thanks. Alissa > On Aug 8, 2019, at 9:52 AM, Robert Sparks = wrote: >=20 > I am currently expecting that datatracker and tools would link to the = rfc-editor pages once deployed. (=46rom what I've heard from Heather, = that deployment should be very soon). >=20 > RjS > On 8/8/19 8:46 AM, Alissa Cooper wrote: >> Robert, Heather, all, >>=20 >> (+ Adam since he did the PoC) >>=20 >> Is there a reason not to deploy the in-line errata display on = datatracker.ietf.org and tools.ietf.org = RFC versions in addition to rfc-editor.org = RFCs? =46rom the start when we were discussing = this project and working out the budget for it I thought the plan was to = deploy in all three places. >>=20 >> Thanks, >> Alissa >>=20 >>=20 >>> Begin forwarded message: >>>=20 >>> From: Robert Sparks > >>> Subject: Re: Errata Processing Stats/Queue? >>> Date: August 7, 2019 at 11:30:21 AM EDT >>> To: ietf@ietf.org >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> On 8/7/19 9:52 AM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: >>>> On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 06:13:08AM -0700, Eric Rescorla wrote: >>>>> Dear IESG: can you report on the status of that project and when = the >>>>> tools/datatracker sites will show inline errata? >>>> My understanding is that the code is done and waiting to be = deployed. >>>>=20 >>>> Alissa's note at >>>> = https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/QDuj5ItTcY5nbVQVp7FMRjZiSZY = = may >>>> be the most authoritative thing I can point to right now. >>>=20 >>> This is currently in the rfc-editor's hands (as their plan is to = deploy it on the rfc-editor website). >>>=20 >>> RjS >>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> -Ben >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> _______________________________________________ >> TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT mailing list >> TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-development = > _______________________________________________ > TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT mailing list > TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-development --Apple-Mail=_6AEFA762-8038-40FA-BD8D-9CC40A29CE02 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Excellent, thanks.
Alissa

On Aug 8, 2019, at 9:52 AM, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> wrote:

I am currently expecting that datatracker and tools would link to the rfc-editor pages once deployed. (From what I've heard from Heather, that deployment should be very soon).

RjS

On 8/8/19 8:46 AM, Alissa Cooper wrote:
Robert, Heather, all,

(+ Adam since he did the PoC)

Is there a reason not to deploy the in-line errata display on datatracker.ietf.org and tools.ietf.org RFC versions in addition to rfc-editor.org RFCs? From the start when we were discussing this project and working out the budget for it I thought the plan was to deploy in all three places.

Thanks,
Alissa


Begin forwarded message:

From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Subject: Re: Errata Processing Stats/Queue?
Date: August 7, 2019 at 11:30:21 AM EDT


On 8/7/19 9:52 AM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 06:13:08AM -0700, Eric Rescorla wrote:
Dear IESG: can you report on the status of that project and when the
tools/datatracker sites will show inline errata?
My understanding is that the code is done and waiting to be deployed.

Alissa's note at
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/QDuj5ItTcY5nbVQVp7FMRjZiSZY may
be the most authoritative thing I can point to right now.

This is currently in the rfc-editor's hands (as their plan is to deploy it on the rfc-editor website).

RjS


-Ben




_______________________________________________
TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT mailing list
TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-development
_______________________________________________
TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT mailing list
TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-development

--Apple-Mail=_6AEFA762-8038-40FA-BD8D-9CC40A29CE02-- From nobody Fri Aug 16 12:08:56 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DB6B1200C3 for ; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 12:08:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.979 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.979 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D7fINPdH3lAf for ; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 12:08:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BFF1120090 for ; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 12:08:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unescapeable.local ([47.186.30.41]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x7GJ8qEO013545 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 16 Aug 2019 14:08:53 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1565982533; bh=VErRwrlJEp3rQ7+gvteKVBl0w0+Ch5dL5R5fWVDSZcw=; h=To:Cc:From:Subject:Date; b=nThgDQ+q98N9+fKWTdxQg5GyuA69XrvzuCeaLHwuBsS5SIVjeReSBR0iXE7yNIhnF 8EmXvcZsNf7Yk/bolyQZnf9Z0Dx7u2l/TakpoYErb3Kfy7QSrSQqpBn42k6Q2KBjlK II3a6yOLjKG4krJVg0awPaspSuBEo2P4nr26uTG0= X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.30.41] claimed to be unescapeable.local To: tools-development@ietf.org From: Robert Sparks Message-ID: <5d3b6f63-fec8-7394-f33b-c015736e4428@nostrum.com> Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 14:08:51 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Archived-At: Subject: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Next (hopefully close to final) iteration of the automatic schedule generator SoW X-BeenThere: tools-development@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Tools Development list server List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 19:08:55 -0000 I've incorporated Henrik's suggestion to talk in terms of schedules rather than agendas. I've also borrowed text from Greg to address Alissa's request for an introductory section that would make the SoW more accessible to potential bidders who are not already familiar with the IETF. Please review RjS From nobody Sun Aug 18 10:02:51 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD5E9120059 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2019 10:02:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.897 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CzQU7l9r__N9 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2019 10:02:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0698412002E for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2019 10:02:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9CF7300A48 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2019 12:43:29 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id ivRlbICaqkZF for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2019 12:43:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (unknown [138.88.156.37]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 78062300A30; Sun, 18 Aug 2019 12:43:28 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\)) From: Russ Housley In-Reply-To: <5d3b6f63-fec8-7394-f33b-c015736e4428@nostrum.com> Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2019 13:02:45 -0400 Cc: IETF Tools Development Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <7BDC13AE-AFC0-422F-B459-405D6C420863@vigilsec.com> References: <5d3b6f63-fec8-7394-f33b-c015736e4428@nostrum.com> To: Robert Sparks X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Next (hopefully close to final) iteration of the automatic schedule generator SoW X-BeenThere: tools-development@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Tools Development list server List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2019 17:02:50 -0000 Robert: I made five or six minor editorial changes. The changes were for = consistency and clarity. I think the document is ready to go out for = bids. Russ > On Aug 16, 2019, at 3:08 PM, Robert Sparks = wrote: >=20 > I've incorporated Henrik's suggestion to talk in terms of schedules = rather than agendas. >=20 > I've also borrowed text from Greg to address Alissa's request for an = introductory section that would make the SoW more accessible to = potential bidders who are not already familiar with the IETF. >=20 > Please review = >=20 > RjS