From ahagens@amsl.com  Wed May 18 08:13:17 2011
Return-Path: <ahagens@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45E86E071F for <xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 May 2011 08:13:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mCEI4F0Nvov9 for <xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 May 2011 08:13:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.amsl.com (mail.amsl.com [64.170.98.20]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C474E06FB for <xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 May 2011 08:13:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c1a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CD78E08C1; Wed, 18 May 2011 08:13:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c1a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c1a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mp-m0s8wwY9e; Wed, 18 May 2011 08:13:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc2.home (pool-72-66-107-92.washdc.fios.verizon.net [72.66.107.92]) by c1a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 04CC3E0885; Wed, 18 May 2011 08:13:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: Alice Hagens <ahagens@amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 11:13:14 -0400
Message-Id: <90472D9B-553A-42CC-B906-33AED7CBA96C@amsl.com>
To: XML Developer List <xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: [xml2rfc-dev] citation libraries - rsync1 issue
X-BeenThere: xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion about particulars of xml2rfc development and code." <xml2rfc-dev.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml2rfc-dev>, <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xml2rfc-dev>
List-Post: <mailto:xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc-dev>, <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 15:13:17 -0000

For maintaining a local copy of the citation libraries, xml.resource.org =
states:
> rsync access is available at two independent servers =
(rsync1.xml.resource.org::xml2rfc.bibxml, and =
rsync3.xml.resource.org::xml2rfc.bibxml) =97 after you pick one, you =
shouldn't switch.=20


Has anyone been having a problem w/ rsync1?  For bibxml and bibxml3, the =
most recent files we have are from 21 April and 25 April, respectively. =
More recent files (e.g., =
http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.6144.xml of =
28-Apr-2011) are available via URL, but not in our rsync'd repository.

Having looked into it from our side, we're wondering if it's on the =
rsync1 side.

Thanks,
Alice
for the RFC Production Center=