From henrik@levkowetz.com Wed Apr 17 15:08:30 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07FA41F0D16 for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 15:08:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.6 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x0gIPfaASA2f for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 15:08:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2::30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90ACD1F0D12 for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 15:08:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36126 helo=vigonier.lan ident=henrik) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1USaWh-0005VG-Mv; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 00:08:27 +0200 Message-ID: <516F1D5B.8000908@levkowetz.com> Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 00:08:27 +0200 From: Henrik Levkowetz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Loa Andersson References: <08615E9C-C58B-4815-98F3-12D2C1F12F7A@gmail.com> <5143A3FA.2050201@pi.nu> In-Reply-To: <5143A3FA.2050201@pi.nu> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: loa@pi.nu, xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org, kireeti@juniper.net, adrian@olddog.co.uk X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on grenache.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: Kireeti Kompella , Adrian Farrel , xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org Subject: Re: [xml2rfc-dev] Problem compiling with the xml beta version - Fwd: special purpose labels X-BeenThere: xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about particulars of xml2rfc development and code." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 22:08:30 -0000 Hi Loa, On 2013-03-15 23:43 Loa Andersson said the following: > Folks, > > I've included two files > > - draft-kompella-mpls-special-purpose-labels-02.xml > - draft-kompella-mpls-special-purpose-labels-02.txt > > We are updating a number of RFCs, and uses the "updates" > element in the RFC-header. > > Compiling with the beta version gives us a long long row > that disappears way beyond the right hand side of the > the file as shown in the .txt file. This is a clear bug. Could I bother you to add a ticket to the issue tracker, here: https://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/trac/newticket ? > The long row also prevents uploading with the submit tool. This, however, has a different cause. Running idnits in submission-checking mode shows two errors, which are caused by what could be argued to be deficiencies in the source file: ** Missing expiration date. The document expiration date should appear on the first and last page. ** Expected the document's filename to be given on the first page, but didn't find any If you change your to (or a full date) a proper expiration date will be generated, and the first error will go away. If you add an attribute docName="draft-kompella-... to the element, the second error will go away. > Using the old xml2rfc version works just fine. Yes, apparently version 1 ignored the year="2012" in your source, and used today's date instead. I don't know if that's the right behaviour. Also, it seems version 1 would pick up the document name from the filename if no docName attribute was given. I don't know if that's right, either. (Probably, though, the right behaviour for both of these would be to give warnings, instead of quietly produce something which won't pass idnits...) Best regards, Henrik > /Loa > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: special purpose labels > Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 19:28:02 -0400 > From: Kireeti Kompella > To: Loa Andersson , "adrian@olddog.co.uk Farrel" > > CC: Kireeti Kompella > > (resending -- correct address for Adrian) > > Sat with Loa, hammered out the following changes: > 0) changed draft title, affiliations of Loa and me. > 1) add a section describing RFCs updated. > 2) added clarification that the extension label only affects the > immediately following label. > 3) clarified IANA: > - set aside the existing special purpose labels in the extended space > - if a new special purpose label in the old space is defined, it MUST > say if it needs to be reserved in the extended space as well > > Question: should there be verbiage that new special purpose labels > should only be allocated from the old space if they are processed in the > data plane? > > Kireeti > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > xml2rfc-dev mailing list > xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc-dev > From lars@netapp.com Mon Apr 29 02:02:43 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A7BD21F98C0 for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 02:02:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -9.11 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.11 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-1.11, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SxTlqyseTZs7 for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 02:02:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx12.netapp.com (mx12.netapp.com [216.240.18.77]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7E5C21F9487 for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 02:02:42 -0700 (PDT) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,572,1363158000"; d="scan'208";a="45940374" Received: from smtp1.corp.netapp.com ([10.57.156.124]) by mx12-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 29 Apr 2013 02:02:42 -0700 Received: from vmwexceht02-prd.hq.netapp.com (vmwexceht02-prd.hq.netapp.com [10.106.76.240]) by smtp1.corp.netapp.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/NTAP-1.6) with ESMTP id r3T92gJp000068 for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 02:02:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SACEXCMBX01-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([169.254.2.71]) by vmwexceht02-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.106.76.240]) with mapi id 14.02.0342.003; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 02:02:42 -0700 From: "Eggert, Lars" To: "xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: rsync1.xml.resource.org down Thread-Index: AQHORLhNsg0Qp3oSdkOQ04y47Wp5vA== Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 09:02:41 +0000 Message-ID: <4AF905B0-F9F7-473B-B07C-2947DDD099E7@netapp.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.106.53.51] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [xml2rfc-dev] rsync1.xml.resource.org down X-BeenThere: xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about particulars of xml2rfc development and code." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 09:02:43 -0000 Hi, rsync1.xml.resource.org has been down for a while now: rsync: failed to connect to rsync1.xml.resource.org (147.28.0.88): Operatio= n timed out (60) Lars=