From mikeadouglass@gmail.com  Thu Aug 29 13:40:19 2013
Return-Path: <mikeadouglass@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C31421F9A38 for <xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 13:40:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fCRh9iiaxjpg for <xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 13:40:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yh0-x234.google.com (mail-yh0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::234]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BFBC21F99F3 for <xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 13:40:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yh0-f52.google.com with SMTP id z6so22718yhz.11 for <xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 13:40:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/6NTVeckVQh8B7QytNfKJeyhpCwk0LeAb0rois5IDvM=; b=tjjHmNEz/Xd+E0hRZi+eoyYQnS8zhGO1JmUR7XVtDDh+1C694yLtI9QeL6B/fhlIVk htPJPvtZS8vFBe64XlOIqyYAelZzM2vgBB5dEfMmrb3c21pD283Y3K0rrVKvFdgQlGdt Uhh+4xvAh3PKT6fKk5iPPVV55VME1XQaDDVNKrSMllrSpTUvtoOwcSkzIQnx/ZdDf+hX y2MMC4aYzW8XCwJKY52ZvJvDlgmhf0W1SkpkklQxfmWHIlJ2Z2DvonGs7xhczvz60PaW Asw78DbSx6yzrXbfg/ct0eb1b4zdrL4yl/6TN5OMwmzT4PkKoMax++qLVwYNb3T65Jqh p++Q==
X-Received: by 10.236.35.145 with SMTP id u17mr4577119yha.12.1377808817930; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 13:40:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2620:0:2820:2:e56a:724a:9e36:63fb? ([2620:0:2820:2:e56a:724a:9e36:63fb]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id a10sm21287185yhm.20.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 29 Aug 2013 13:40:17 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <521FB1AF.6010705@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 16:40:15 -0400
From: Mike Douglass <mikeadouglass@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130803 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [xml2rfc-dev] Bug processing non-breaking space?
X-BeenThere: xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion about particulars of xml2rfc development and code." <xml2rfc-dev.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml2rfc-dev>, <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xml2rfc-dev>
List-Post: <mailto:xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc-dev>, <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 20:40:19 -0000

I recently submitted a draft

http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-york-vpoll-00.txt

I guess I used the older xml2rfc or perhaps an earlier version of the 
new one.

If you reprocess the XML for that draft with the lates version of 
xml2rfc you'll find that all the table entries for the itpi tables have 
lost their indenting.

For example:

In section  6.3.1.1 we have

    | VPOLL              | 1+       |                                   |
    |   DTSTAMP          | 1        |                                   |
    |   DTSTART          | 1        |                                   |


with the newer xml2rfc we have

    | VPOLL              | 1+        |                                  |
    | DTSTAMP            | 1         |                                  |
    | DTSTART            | 1         |                                  |

no indenting.

The xml for dtstamp is

               <c>
                 &nbsp;&nbsp;DTSTAMP
               </c>

If you want to try the old/new with this the full xml is at

http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-york-vpoll-00.xml


Thanks. Mike Douglass


From tony@att.com  Thu Aug 29 13:49:46 2013
Return-Path: <tony@att.com>
X-Original-To: xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1206F11E8167 for <xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 13:49:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.239
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.239 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.360, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TlxZOJgreqMI for <xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 13:49:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com (nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com [209.65.160.94]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0616111E8134 for <xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 13:49:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unknown [144.160.229.23] (EHLO alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com) by nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-6.15.0-1) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id 8d3bf125.0.3862703.00-166.10631453.nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com (envelope-from <tony@att.com>);  Thu, 29 Aug 2013 20:49:32 +0000 (UTC)
X-MXL-Hash: 521fb3dc2fce10c1-d6a74523618157d8145b8c9b667f202cc28216e5
Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r7TKnS66025413 for <xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 16:49:28 -0400
Received: from alpi131.aldc.att.com (alpi131.aldc.att.com [130.8.218.69]) by alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r7TKnID3025337 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 16:49:21 -0400
Received: from alpi153.aldc.att.com (alpi153.aldc.att.com [130.8.42.31]) by alpi131.aldc.att.com (RSA Interceptor) for <xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 20:49:09 GMT
Received: from aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi153.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r7TKn92B025220 for <xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 16:49:09 -0400
Received: from mailgw1.maillennium.att.com (maillennium.att.com [135.25.114.99]) by alpi153.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r7TKn56r025080 for <xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 16:49:05 -0400
Received: from [135.91.110.247] (ds135-91-110-247.dhcps.ugn.att.com[135.91.110.247]) by maillennium.att.com (mailgw1) with ESMTP id <20130829204905gw1004nha4e> (Authid: tony); Thu, 29 Aug 2013 20:49:05 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [135.91.110.247]
Message-ID: <521FB3C0.3010306@att.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 16:49:04 -0400
From: Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mike Douglass <mikeadouglass@gmail.com>
References: <521FB1AF.6010705@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <521FB1AF.6010705@gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-RSA-Inspected: yes
X-RSA-Classifications: public
X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; CM=0.500; S=0.200(2010122901)]
X-MAIL-FROM: <tony@att.com>
X-SOURCE-IP: [144.160.229.23]
X-AnalysisOut: [v=2.0 cv=E6l6U9hl c=1 sm=0 a=VXHOiMMwGAwA+y4G3/O+aw==:17 a]
X-AnalysisOut: [=VAG9_9YYm2gA:10 a=sCfsyOEanakA:10 a=BFgiNbt7KbwA:10 a=ofM]
X-AnalysisOut: [gfj31e3cA:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=zQP7CpK]
X-AnalysisOut: [OAAAA:8 a=r9KbhQP-ZvsA:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=ApeQx0q_Ps4ya]
X-AnalysisOut: [-84c0oA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=lZB815dzVvQA:10]
Cc: xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [xml2rfc-dev] Bug processing non-breaking space?
X-BeenThere: xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion about particulars of xml2rfc development and code." <xml2rfc-dev.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml2rfc-dev>, <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xml2rfc-dev>
List-Post: <mailto:xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc-dev>, <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 20:49:46 -0000

Please file a trac ticket at http://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/trac/

Be sure to include your XML file as an attachment.

Thanks!

    Tony Hansen

On 8/29/2013 4:40 PM, Mike Douglass wrote:
> I recently submitted a draft
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-york-vpoll-00.txt
>
> I guess I used the older xml2rfc or perhaps an earlier version of the
> new one.
>
> If you reprocess the XML for that draft with the lates version of
> xml2rfc you'll find that all the table entries for the itpi tables
> have lost their indenting.
>
> For example:
>
> In section  6.3.1.1 we have
>
>    | VPOLL              | 1+       |                                   |
>    |   DTSTAMP          | 1        |                                   |
>    |   DTSTART          | 1        |                                   |
>
>
> with the newer xml2rfc we have
>
>    | VPOLL              | 1+        |                                  |
>    | DTSTAMP            | 1         |                                  |
>    | DTSTART            | 1         |                                  |
>
> no indenting.
>
> The xml for dtstamp is
>
>               <c>
>                 &nbsp;&nbsp;DTSTAMP
>               </c>
>
> If you want to try the old/new with this the full xml is at
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-york-vpoll-00.xml
>
>
> Thanks. Mike Douglass
>
> _______________________________________________
> xml2rfc-dev mailing list
> xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc-dev