Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GmVSR-0005S0-VQ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 08:14:39 -0500 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GmHTY-000293-6Q for apps-review@ietf.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:18:52 -0500 Received: from outbound.cantata.com ([208.236.123.102]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GmHTW-0004RC-0F for apps-review@ietf.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:18:52 -0500 Received: from ma02exchtmp01.Cantata.com ([10.128.18.41]) by outbound.Cantata.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:18:49 -0500 Received: from 10.129.49.156 ([10.129.49.156]) by ma02exchtmp01.Cantata.com ([10.128.18.41]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 22:18:48 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.5.060620 Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:18:41 -0500 From: Eric Burger To: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: Expertise Areas Thread-Index: AccM8dViE/rvUHjlEduiYwAWy5cvmw== Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Nov 2006 22:18:49.0837 (UTC) FILETIME=[DAA6E1D0:01C70CF1] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: de4f315c9369b71d7dd5909b42224370 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 08:14:38 -0500 Subject: [APPS-REVIEW] Expertise Areas X-BeenThere: apps-review@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Applications Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: apps-review-bounces@ietf.org OK, so I know all the messaging folks :) Can you each e-mail me back areas of which you consider yourself to be a grey beard / grey hair / just grey (for those of US without hair...): [ ] XML [ ] Messaging [ ] Calendaring [ ] Collaboration [ ] Directories [ ] Internationalization [ ] Publishing [ ] Other _________________ Thanks. _______________________________________________ APPS-REVIEW mailing list APPS-REVIEW@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GhUY1-00050l-T0; Tue, 07 Nov 2006 12:15:41 -0500 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GhUY0-00050g-RL for APPS-REVIEW@ietf.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2006 12:15:40 -0500 Received: from laweleka.osafoundation.org ([204.152.186.98]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GhUXx-0005k9-Hg for APPS-REVIEW@ietf.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2006 12:15:40 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by laweleka.osafoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB98F1422F6; Tue, 7 Nov 2006 09:15:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from laweleka.osafoundation.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (laweleka.osafoundation.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 27621-09; Tue, 7 Nov 2006 09:15:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from [130.129.70.115] (dhcp70-115.ietf67.org [130.129.70.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by laweleka.osafoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F43F1422F5; Tue, 7 Nov 2006 09:15:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4550497F.1020607@gmx.de> References: <49CFC6C2-3FD3-4F15-8D16-2EA3EEE72DAD@osafoundation.org> <4550497F.1020607@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Message-Id: From: Lisa Dusseault Subject: Re: [APPS-REVIEW] Reviewing RFC4234 for advancement to Internet Standard Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 09:15:27 -0800 To: Julian Reschke X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new and clamav at osafoundation.org X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 2409bba43e9c8d580670fda8b695204a Cc: Eric Burger , APPS-REVIEW@ietf.org X-BeenThere: apps-review@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Applications Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1178551146==" Errors-To: apps-review-bounces@ietf.org --===============1178551146== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-2--71066043 --Apple-Mail-2--71066043 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed It was over a year ago :) thx for the suggestion to ping the tools list. lisa On Nov 7, 2006, at 12:53 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: > When? I don't see anything ABNF related over there, at least not > for the recent weeks... --Apple-Mail-2--71066043 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII
It was over a year ago :)

thx for the suggestion to ping the tools list.

lisa

On Nov 7, 2006, at 12:53 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:

When? I don't see anything ABNF related over there, at least not for the recent weeks...


--Apple-Mail-2--71066043-- --===============1178551146== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ APPS-REVIEW mailing list APPS-REVIEW@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review --===============1178551146==-- Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GhMhz-0006wM-4L; Tue, 07 Nov 2006 03:53:27 -0500 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GhMhy-0006wF-8G for APPS-REVIEW@ietf.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2006 03:53:26 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GhMhs-0002Db-PX for APPS-REVIEW@ietf.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2006 03:53:26 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 07 Nov 2006 08:53:19 -0000 Received: from mail.greenbytes.de (EHLO [192.168.1.61]) [217.91.35.233] by mail.gmx.net (mp027) with SMTP; 07 Nov 2006 09:53:19 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1915285 Message-ID: <4550497F.1020607@gmx.de> Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 09:53:19 +0100 From: Julian Reschke User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.8.0.4) Gecko/20060516 Thunderbird/1.5.0.4 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lisa Dusseault Subject: Re: [APPS-REVIEW] Reviewing RFC4234 for advancement to Internet Standard References: <49CFC6C2-3FD3-4F15-8D16-2EA3EEE72DAD@osafoundation.org> In-Reply-To: <49CFC6C2-3FD3-4F15-8D16-2EA3EEE72DAD@osafoundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 8abaac9e10c826e8252866cbe6766464 Cc: Eric Burger , APPS-REVIEW@ietf.org X-BeenThere: apps-review@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Applications Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: apps-review-bounces@ietf.org Lisa Dusseault schrieb: > > This is a little different. It's been proposed to me that we can > advance RFC4234 to Internet Standard without any changes, thus the exact That's probably a good thing. I even assumed that it already was a full standard. > text at would become the Internet > Standard. Some discussion has happened on the ietf-822 mailing list: It will probably need minor adjustments to last part of the introduction (Section 1), potentially adding RFC4234 as informative reference. > , and that's all I'm aware of. When? I don't see anything ABNF related over there, at least not for the recent weeks... > Any opinions on the desirability of this or how to demonstrate > interoperability (I've got some ideas) are welcome. I'd ping some mailing lists, for instance tools-ietf (which may be read by parser implementors). > Is this a document somebody on this list could usefully review even > though its already an RFC? I think we the obvious minor tweaks, it can be published as draft, and immediately last-called... Best regards, Julian _______________________________________________ APPS-REVIEW mailing list APPS-REVIEW@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GhD9K-00019a-8w; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 17:41:02 -0500 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GhD9J-00018r-C8 for APPS-REVIEW@ietf.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 17:41:01 -0500 Received: from laweleka.osafoundation.org ([204.152.186.98]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GhD9E-0007vQ-1B for APPS-REVIEW@ietf.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 17:41:01 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by laweleka.osafoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 464A61422BC; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 14:40:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from laweleka.osafoundation.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (laweleka.osafoundation.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01458-04; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 14:40:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from [130.129.70.115] (dhcp70-115.ietf67.org [130.129.70.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by laweleka.osafoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1C7B14229A; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 14:40:49 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <49CFC6C2-3FD3-4F15-8D16-2EA3EEE72DAD@osafoundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: Eric Burger , APPS-REVIEW@ietf.org From: Lisa Dusseault Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 14:40:47 -0800 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new and clamav at osafoundation.org X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: cf4fa59384e76e63313391b70cd0dd25 Cc: Subject: [APPS-REVIEW] Reviewing RFC4234 for advancement to Internet Standard X-BeenThere: apps-review@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Applications Review List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: apps-review-bounces@ietf.org This is a little different. It's been proposed to me that we can advance RFC4234 to Internet Standard without any changes, thus the exact text at would become the Internet Standard. Some discussion has happened on the ietf-822 mailing list: , and that's all I'm aware of. Any opinions on the desirability of this or how to demonstrate interoperability (I've got some ideas) are welcome. Is this a document somebody on this list could usefully review even though its already an RFC? Thanks! Lisa _______________________________________________ APPS-REVIEW mailing list APPS-REVIEW@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review