From rttm@angelfire.com Sun Apr 2 12:58:25 2000 Received: from sj-mailhub-3.cisco.com (sj-mailhub-3.cisco.com [171.68.224.215]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA25283 for ; Sun, 2 Apr 2000 12:58:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from proxy1.cisco.com (proxy1.cisco.com [192.31.7.88]) by sj-mailhub-3.cisco.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id JAA00948 for ; Sun, 2 Apr 2000 09:33:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200004021633.JAA00948@sj-mailhub-3.cisco.com> Received: from first.bicom.slupsk.pl ( [213.25.142.3]) by proxy1.cisco.com with SMTP (MailShield v1.5); Sun, 02 Apr 2000 09:32:44 -0700 Received: from kllklk ([38.26.242.97]) by first.bicom.slupsk.pl (post.office MTA v2.0 0813 ID# 0-34083U135) with ESMTP id AAA272; Sun, 2 Apr 2000 17:50:39 +0200 From: "John" Subject: The Best To: in87h@cisco.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.70 [en] (Win95; I) Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2000 11:52:51 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-SPAM: Yes X-SPAM-REASON: DNS did not return a vaild name for Relay X-SPAM-REASON: Suspicious TO Address X-SPAM-INFO: http://wwwin.cisco.com/CustAdv/InfoSys/spam X-SMTP-HELO: first.bicom.slupsk.pl X-SMTP-MAIL-FROM: rttm@angelfire.com X-SMAP-Received-From: outside X-SMTP-PEER-INFO: [213.25.142.3] Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ietf.org id MAA25283 WE MAKE IT EASY & AFFORDABLE TO ACCEPT CREDIT CARDS FOR YOUR BUSINESS ! INTERNET (Auction Vendors & Online Mall Stores Too!) STOREFRONT OR MAIL ORDER MERCHANTS WE SPECIALIZE IN APPROVING YOU! APPLY TODAY AND START FOR JUST $9.95! FREE APPLICATION!! FREE PROGRAMMING!! DON'T LOSE ANOTHER SALE! APPLY TO ACCEPT CREDIT CARDS AND CALL (888) 264-9272 DON'T FORGET TO ASK ABOUT OUR WEB DESIGN AND HOSTING PACKAGE !!! ********************************************************************* ** If you receive this message and have never joined one of our email lists you can be removed by replying to: mailto:bnm99t@usa.net?subject=remove ********************************************************************* ** From peter.lewis@upperside.fr Mon Apr 10 09:38:47 2000 Received: from sj-mailhub-3.cisco.com (sj-mailhub-3.cisco.com [171.68.224.215]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA11130 for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 09:38:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from proxy3.cisco.com (proxy3.cisco.com [192.31.7.90]) by sj-mailhub-3.cisco.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id GAA23510 for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 06:09:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp1.cluster.oleane.net (smtp1.cluster.oleane.net [195.25.12.16]) by proxy3.cisco.com with SMTP (MailShield v1.5); Mon, 10 Apr 2000 06:07:26 -0700 Received: from oleane (dyn-1-2-129.Vin.dialup.oleane.fr [194.2.4.129]) by smtp1.cluster.oleane.net with SMTP id PAA40731; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 15:05:10 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <000f01bfa2ec$d7828520$0401a8c0@oleane.com> From: "Peter Lewis" To: Subject: IP Policing 2000 Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 15:00:13 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000C_01BFA2FD.79104C00" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 X-SPAM: Yes X-SPAM-REASON: Suspicious TO Address X-SPAM-INFO: http://wwwin.cisco.com/CustAdv/InfoSys/spam X-SMTP-HELO: smtp1.cluster.oleane.net X-SMTP-MAIL-FROM: peter.lewis@upperside.fr X-SMAP-Received-From: outside X-SMTP-PEER-INFO: smtp1.cluster.oleane.net [195.25.12.16] This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000C_01BFA2FD.79104C00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable IP Policing 2000, Paris, 12-15 September =20 The need to police IP networks has grown in importance with the rise of = a new generation of applications such as VPNs, VoIP or IPSec. Approaches under consideration include COPS, DEN/LDAP and PIB, but their = ultimate potential remains undecided. =20 See: http://www.upperside.fr/baippol.htm ------=_NextPart_000_000C_01BFA2FD.79104C00 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
IP Policing 2000, Paris, = 12-15=20 September
 
The need to police IP = networks has=20 grown in importance with the rise of a new generation of applications = such as=20 VPNs, VoIP or IPSec.
Approaches under consideration include COPS, = DEN/LDAP=20 and PIB, but their ultimate potential remains undecided.
 
See:
http://www.upperside.fr/baip= pol.htm
 
 
------=_NextPart_000_000C_01BFA2FD.79104C00--