From skeggse@gmail.com Sat Jun 24 21:11:40 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ima@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ima@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36E5C128D69 for ; Sat, 24 Jun 2017 21:11:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.697 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.697 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_08=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u-9eIVc6eESS for ; Sat, 24 Jun 2017 21:11:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qk0-x22b.google.com (mail-qk0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80036126CE8 for ; Sat, 24 Jun 2017 21:11:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qk0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id d78so25809331qkb.1 for ; Sat, 24 Jun 2017 21:11:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:message-id:date:delivered-to:mime-version; bh=w2Zm6WFYTGsC0b4SCfkWSKaVNHT+2KLxK6IGHA66/vs=; b=OShXONXWpO+4csauTWbktqKhQB1TSnehfKvrT+f1qq4nXnjHJFdX7CwCz/lhqWvRHa +/dzrpdPyYBU4gKkKU34t17YFHKGLViDAGgWAg1gE862mJBgwoZnWKYuyGZZPH+ly68O 4pT1vhLg3FnFhPd7AjCDR+28TYBkkg9id8P88ZhfhAfLb5q6fMyb1BBgtpuF3kiqg9lN 1npySJ7wjd5mmtTC8VdCUUEMr8GugpNmzydWDChARxHSS8aj9Z278Jld+YyngvyjUbpL JZdcu4u914FadcKtSBb4o3r5Qneq9DFp/VfAxFTQQUIYxuw1aCH4sU9UvKXlIWcY4SZn r/Cw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:message-id:date:delivered-to :mime-version; bh=w2Zm6WFYTGsC0b4SCfkWSKaVNHT+2KLxK6IGHA66/vs=; b=XzNRmWRA7/ZXgTUhsICnTTD7OushZV+irGwBO+OTFG61Ye3Azcln1O9w0suX5nyLQi 6rqbHJ1aqq57VtMS+UyxnRTQXNCvO1vLyIY4DVG9ltlOlFEy+JIU6ZdcMWE54XQnc8Xq FsTLlkK59P2KoTZNBFsJQNQoAIEeCoPa5HpchSwy9Z7mrdeG0iCmAmv50Yxxjzr1U9C4 IF1Wk5iawxThx0lnfbS2LIGtVohuIBR+frXz1qd5Yfe+RQZ+fCVhzygmnGTs3991oiVq uaUZGqIVCjxRXeEmge/n3DpIazRxF2F0KkU2sytXRItW4U7QlfFKBBu62PG9YftBTvWB PZMQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOz9IrWILsi6ZFBWTIsNdZ0hlRIR1f7VLISJT67LkERosF8pvfK0 JKsFXnJj7/wbh162CFE= X-Received: by 10.55.214.221 with SMTP id p90mr16792243qkl.228.1498363897476; Sat, 24 Jun 2017 21:11:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (send-23.prod.mixmax-mailer.com. [52.206.110.60]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i29sm6852138qkh.4.2017.06.24.21.11.37 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 24 Jun 2017 21:11:37 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----sinikael-?=_1-14983638970620.28659488900927643" From: Eli Skeggs To: ima@ietf.org Message-Id: Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2017 04:11:34 +0000 X-Mixmax-Message-Id: NLBkZboRzbcNPhNFc Delivered-To: rsm@mixmax.com X-Mailer: Mixmax (mixmax.com) MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 25 Jun 2017 18:23:34 -0700 Subject: [EAI] Question regarding RFC 6531 X-BeenThere: ima@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "EAI \(Email Address Internationalization\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2017 04:14:12 -0000 ------sinikael-?=_1-14983638970620.28659488900927643 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Minor correction to the copy available at https://tools.ietf.= org/html/rfc6531#section-3.3: Page 7 includes a link to "RFC 5890, Section = 2.3.2.1." The 2.3.2.1 portion incorrectly links to the nonexistent section = 2.3.2.1 of RFC 6531 (to itself), where the prior portion of the link is = correct. The link immediately precedes the =C2=A0import definition= . Thanks,Eli ------sinikael-?=_1-14983638970620.28659488900927643 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 96 =
=
Minor correction to the copy available at https://tools.ietf.= org/html/rfc6531#section-3.3:

Page 7 includes a = link to "RFC 5890, Section 2.3.2.1." The 2.3.2.1 portion = incorrectly links to the nonexistent section 2.3.2.1 of RFC 6531 (to = itself), where the prior portion of the link is correct. The link = immediately precedes the <U-label>=C2=A0import definition.=

Thanks,
Eli
3D""
= =20 ------sinikael-?=_1-14983638970620.28659488900927643-- From nobody Sun Jun 25 19:18:06 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ima@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ima@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFC66128B93 for ; Sun, 25 Jun 2017 19:18:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.903 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kUKk3CkXC-He for ; Sun, 25 Jun 2017 19:18:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cnnic.cn (smtp13.cnnic.cn [218.241.118.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 244E6127873 for ; Sun, 25 Jun 2017 19:18:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from healthyao-PC (unknown [218.241.103.224]) by ocmail02.zx.nicx.cn (Coremail) with SMTP id AQAAf0BZYJzWblBZQCleKw--.4461S2; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 10:17:58 +0800 (CST) Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 10:17:47 +0800 From: "Jiankang Yao" To: "Eli Skeggs" , ima Reply-To: yaojk References: X-Priority: 3 X-Has-Attach: no X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.0.1.92[cn] Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <20170626101645848077200@cnnic.cn> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-CM-TRANSID: AQAAf0BZYJzWblBZQCleKw--.4461S2 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoW7tFWDZF4fXF4rWF4rZFy7Jrb_yoW8GFWfpa 1jvr9rK34DXr1rXF4kAryjkay8XrZ7tFWrCryxJr1Utay5ZFyktFnayFs0vrZrWr4vya1j va1I9w45Ga4DA37anT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUU9qb7Iv0xC_tr1lb4IE77IF4wAFF20E14v26r1j6r4UM7CY07I2 0VC2zVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M28lY4IEw2IIxxk0rw A2F7IY1VAKz4vEj48ve4kI8wA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Xr0_Ar1l84ACjcxK6xII jxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Cr0_Gr1UM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVAFwI0_Gr1j6F4UJwA2z4x0Y4 vEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_Cr1j6rxdM2AIxVAIcxkEcVAq07x20xvEncxIr21l5I8CrVAC Y4xI64kE6c02F40Ex7xfMcIj6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r18McIj6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJV W8JwAm72CE4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lF7xvr2IYc2Ij64vIr41lFcxC0VAYjxAxZF0Ew4CE w7xC0wCY02Avz4vE14v_Gr1l42xK82IYc2Ij64vIr41l4I8I3I0E4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr 1lx2IqxVAqx4xG67AKxVWUJVWUGwC20s026x8GjcxK67AKxVWUGVWUWwC2zVAF1VAY17CE 14v26r1Y6r17MIIYrxkI7VAKI48JMIIF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_JF4lIxAIcVC0I7 IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26r1j6r4UMIIF0xvE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0rVWrZr1j6s0DMIIF0xvE x4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1l6VACY4xI67k042 43AbIYCTnIWIevJa73UjIFyTuYvjxUcmL9UUUUU X-CM-SenderInfo: x1dryyw6fq0xffof0/ Archived-At: Subject: Re: [EAI] Question regarding RFC 6531 X-BeenThere: ima@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "EAI \(Email Address Internationalization\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 02:18:06 -0000 DQpGcm9tOiBFbGkgU2tlZ2dzDQpEYXRlOiAyMDE3LTA2LTI1IDEyOjExDQpUbzogaW1hDQpTdWJq ZWN0OiBbRUFJXSBRdWVzdGlvbiByZWdhcmRpbmcgUkZDIDY1MzENCj5NaW5vciBjb3JyZWN0aW9u IHRvIHRoZSBjb3B5IGF2YWlsYWJsZSBhdCBodHRwczovL3Rvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnL2h0bWwvcmZj NjUzMSNzZWN0aW9uLTMuMzoNCj4NCj4NCj5QYWdlIDcgaW5jbHVkZXMgYSBsaW5rIHRvICJSRkMg NTg5MCwgU2VjdGlvbiAyLjMuMi4xLiIgDQo+DQoNCkRlYXIgRWxpLA0KDQpUaGFua3MgZm9yIHlv dXIgcXVlc3Rpb24uDQpJIHRoaW5rIHRoYXQgeW91IG1lYW4gUGFnZSA4LCBub3QgUGFnZSA3Lg0K SW4gcGFnZSA4LCB0aGVyZSBpcyBhIHNlbnRlbmNlIlRoZSBmb2xsb3dpbmcgQUJORiBydWxlIHdp bGwgYmUgaW1wb3J0ZWQgZnJvbSBSRkMgNTg5MCwgU2VjdGlvbg0KICAgMi4zLjIuMSINCg0KPlRo ZSAyLjMuMi4xIHBvcnRpb24gaW5jb3JyZWN0bHkgbGlua3MgdG8gdGhlIG5vbmV4aXN0ZW50IHNl Y3Rpb24gMi4zLjIuMSBvZiBSRkMgNjUzMSAodG8gaXRzZWxmKSwgDQo+d2hlcmUgdGhlIHByaW9y IHBvcnRpb24gb2YgdGhlIGxpbmsgaXMgY29ycmVjdC4gVGhlIGxpbmsgaW1tZWRpYXRlbHkgPnBy ZWNlZGVzIHRoZSA8VS1sYWJlbD4gaW1wb3J0IGRlZmluaXRpb24uDQo+DQoNClRoaXMgcHJvYmxl bSBpcyBkdWUgdG8gdGhlIGh0bWwgdmVyc2lvbidzIGxpbmsgcHJvYmxlbS4gICJSRkMgNTg5MCwg U2VjdGlvbiAyLjMuMi4xIiBzaG91bGQgbGluayB0byBvbmx5IG9uZSBsaW5rIDoiaHR0cHM6Ly90 b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy9odG1sL3JmYzU4OTAjc2VjdGlvbi0yLjMuMi4xIiwNCmJ1dCB0aGlzIHBh Z2Ugc2VwYXJhdGVzICJSRkMgNTg5MCwgU2VjdGlvbiAyLjMuMi4xIiB0byAyIGxpbmtzLCBhbmQg b25lIG1ha2VzIHRleHQgIlJGQyA1ODkwLFNlY3Rpb24iIGxpbmsgdG8gUkZDIDU4OTAsIGFub3Ro ZXIgbWFrZXMgdGV4dCAiIDIuMy4yLjEiIGxpbmsgdG8gUkZDIDY1MzEuDQoNCkFsbCBvdGhlciBz aW1pbGFyIHNlbnRlbmNlcyBhbGwgZ290IHRoZSByaWdodCBsaW5rLiBmb3IgZXhhbXBsZXM6DQoN CiAxKSBUaGUgZm9sbG93aW5nIEFCTkYgcnVsZSB3aWxsIGJlIGltcG9ydGVkIGZyb20gUkZDIDUy MzQsIEFwcGVuZGl4IEIuMQ0KIDIpIGV4dGVuZCB0aGUgZGVmaW5pdGlvbiBvZiBzdWItZG9tYWlu IGluIFJGQyA1MzIxLCBTZWN0aW9uIDQuMS4yDQoNCg0KVGhlIHRleHQgaGFzIG5vIHByb2JsZW0u DQpXZSBtYXkgYXNrIGZvciB0aGUgaGVscCBmcm9tIFJGQyBlZGl0b3JzIGFuZCBsZXQgdGhlbSBl ZGl0IHRoZSBsaW5rIG9mIHRleHQgIlJGQyA1ODkwLCBTZWN0aW9uIDIuMy4yLjEiIG9mIHRoZSBo dG1sIHZlcnNpb24gb2YgdGhpcyBSRkMgdG8gbWFrZSBpdCBnZXQgdGhlIHJpZ2h0IGxpbmsuDQoN ClRoYW5rcy4NCg0KDQpKaWFua2FuZyBZYW8NCg0KPg0KPlRoYW5rcywNCj5FbGkNCiA= From nobody Mon Jun 26 07:47:03 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ima@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ima@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD70612EAB4 for ; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 07:47:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isode.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NSHg3RO9EaDo for ; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 07:47:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from waldorf.isode.com (waldorf.isode.com [62.232.206.188]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D78A5124217 for ; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 07:46:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1498488419; d=isode.com; s=june2016; i=@isode.com; bh=OzgPZIx7RMmFX0TR9+uXdvzf1m3QLpQZh7YtFitPz6k=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=PKiEh6HCNKhNOh/mg+TFT6D3/wd8njEcHctU5zl6NbVlfQJW6pC59aHD5kPpbkDntyRP4+ AIYYAOceUt+3jbtAYLhzQGDWYrjPd0BCNWgy4iwMtURizjqcl16kD34Q81jAIEtDEqDlhk C6ZLuJHFz1s7Z6Dcrm4fZ6ZlzILqh0Q=; Received: from [172.20.1.215] (dhcp-215.isode.net [172.20.1.215]) by waldorf.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id ; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 15:46:58 +0100 From: Alexey Melnikov To: yaojk , Eli Skeggs , ima References: <20170626101645848077200@cnnic.cn> Message-ID: Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 15:46:51 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 In-Reply-To: <20170626101645848077200@cnnic.cn> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------AE7D2F183F66547026777D4B" Content-Language: en-US Archived-At: Subject: Re: [EAI] Question regarding RFC 6531 X-BeenThere: ima@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "EAI \(Email Address Internationalization\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 14:47:02 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------AE7D2F183F66547026777D4B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, On 26/06/2017 03:17, Jiankang Yao wrote: > From: Eli Skeggs > Date: 2017-06-25 12:11 > To: ima > Subject: [EAI] Question regarding RFC 6531 >> Minor correction to the copy available athttps://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6531#section-3.3: >> >> >> Page 7 includes a link to "RFC 5890, Section 2.3.2.1." >> > Dear Eli, > > Thanks for your question. > I think that you mean Page 8, not Page 7. > In page 8, there is a sentence"The following ABNF rule will be imported from RFC 5890, Section > 2.3.2.1" Yes, it is on page 8. >> The 2.3.2.1 portion incorrectly links to the nonexistent section 2.3.2.1 of RFC 6531 (to itself), >> where the prior portion of the link is correct. The link immediately >precedes the import definition. >> > This problem is due to the html version's link problem. "RFC 5890, Section 2.3.2.1" should link to only one link :"https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5890#section-2.3.2.1", > but this page separates "RFC 5890, Section 2.3.2.1" to 2 links, and one makes text "RFC 5890,Section" link to RFC 5890, another makes text " 2.3.2.1" link to RFC 6531. > > All other similar sentences all got the right link. for examples: > > 1) The following ABNF rule will be imported from RFC 5234, Appendix B.1 > 2) extend the definition of sub-domain in RFC 5321, Section 4.1.2 > > > The text has no problem. > We may ask for the help from RFC editors and let them edit the link of text "RFC 5890, Section 2.3.2.1" of the html version of this RFC to make it get the right link. RFC Editor doesn't control tools.ietf.org HTML version. I think you should email Henrik Levkowetz directly. Best Regards, Alexey --------------AE7D2F183F66547026777D4B Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi,

On 26/06/2017 03:17, Jiankang Yao wrote:

From: Eli Skeggs
Date: 2017-06-25 12:11
To: ima
Subject: [EAI] Question regarding RFC 6531

Minor correction to the copy available at https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6531#section-3.3:


Page 7 includes a link to "RFC 5890, Section 2.3.2.1." 


Dear Eli,

Thanks for your question.
I think that you mean Page 8, not Page 7.
In page 8, there is a sentence"The following ABNF rule will be imported from RFC 5890, Section
   2.3.2.1"
Yes, it is on page 8. 
The 2.3.2.1 portion incorrectly links to the nonexistent section 2.3.2.1 of RFC 6531 (to itself), 
where the prior portion of the link is correct. The link immediately >precedes the <U-label> import definition.


This problem is due to the html version's link problem.  "RFC 5890, Section 2.3.2.1" should link to only one link :"https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5890#section-2.3.2.1",
but this page separates "RFC 5890, Section 2.3.2.1" to 2 links, and one makes text "RFC 5890,Section" link to RFC 5890, another makes text " 2.3.2.1" link to RFC 6531.

All other similar sentences all got the right link. for examples:

 1) The following ABNF rule will be imported from RFC 5234, Appendix B.1
 2) extend the definition of sub-domain in RFC 5321, Section 4.1.2


The text has no problem.
We may ask for the help from RFC editors and let them edit the link of text "RFC 5890, Section 2.3.2.1" of the html version of this RFC to make it get the right link.
RFC Editor doesn't control tools.ietf.org HTML version. I think you should email Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com> directly.

Best Regards,
Alexey

--------------AE7D2F183F66547026777D4B--