From acmorton@att.com Tue Jan 8 12:34:06 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F09C21F8525 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 12:34:06 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -105.688 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.688 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.547, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.457, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 36EeBtQoV4nm for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 12:34:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from nbfkord-smmo07.seg.att.com (nbfkord-smmo07.seg.att.com [209.65.160.93]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6090521F8523 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 12:34:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from unknown [144.160.20.145] (EHLO mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com) by nbfkord-smmo07.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-6.11.0-12) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id cb28ce05.0.425704.00-386.1189326.nbfkord-smmo07.seg.att.com (envelope-from ); Tue, 08 Jan 2013 20:34:05 +0000 (UTC) X-MXL-Hash: 50ec82bd392e5f6e-197fb65aab8f0e6de0f19f966d0eca14a80b36cb Received: from enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r08KY426004799 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 15:34:04 -0500 Received: from sflint02.pst.cso.att.com (sflint02.pst.cso.att.com [144.154.234.229]) by mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r08KXxk7004706 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 15:33:59 -0500 Received: from alpd052.aldc.att.com (alpd052.aldc.att.com [130.8.42.31]) by sflint02.pst.cso.att.com (RSA Interceptor) for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 15:33:50 -0500 Received: from aldc.att.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alpd052.aldc.att.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r08KXnFm016104 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 15:33:50 -0500 Received: from dns.maillennium.att.com (maillennium.att.com [135.25.114.99]) by alpd052.aldc.att.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r08KXfm8015071 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 15:33:45 -0500 Received: from lt-hp1044652.att.com (dn135-16-251-78.dhcpn.ugn.att.com[135.16.251.78](misconfigured sender)) by maillennium.att.com (mailgw1) with SMTP id <20130108203309gw100632kie>; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 20:33:09 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [135.16.251.78] Message-Id: <7.0.1.0.0.20130108135730.07f78038@att.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 15:33:39 -0500 To: pm-dir@ietf.org From: Al Morton In-Reply-To: <201201161446.q0GEkPPo010569@alpd052.aldc.att.com> References: <201201161446.q0GEkPPo010569@alpd052.aldc.att.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" X-RSA-Inspected: yes X-RSA-Classifications: public X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; CM=0.500; S=0.200(2010122901)] X-MAIL-FROM: X-SOURCE-IP: [144.160.20.145] X-AnalysisOut: [v=2.0 cv=I/zSsqcg c=1 sm=0 a=ZRNLZ4dFUbCvG8UMqPvVAA==:17 a] X-AnalysisOut: [=DwyFDWaKD4wA:10 a=HGOELgx6o6gA:10 a=ofMgfj31e3cA:10 a=BLc] X-AnalysisOut: [eEmwcHowA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=zQP7CpKOAAAA:8 a=fY5Gov-I] X-AnalysisOut: [MKIA:10 a=vhsLuPeP-3uF4DF3268A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=_W_S_] X-AnalysisOut: [7VecoQA:10 a=yq4OKjWFWRZ5QQGO:21] Subject: Re: [pm-dir] [PMOL] Thoughts on how we operate as a Directorate X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 20:34:06 -0000 At 09:47 AM 1/16/2012, Al Morton wrote:
As this new year goes into full swing, I'd like to offer some
thoughts on how we might operate as a Directorate and
hear from others.
...

That was the message that launched a productive year, IMO.

First, I'd like to say *thanks* for your participation last year.

In Summary:

We reviewed 6 drafts:
draft-tempia-opsawg-p3m-01
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-pdv-02
draft-akhter-opsawg-perfmon-method-02
draft-sun-tsvwg-flowbased-pm-00.txt
draft-singh-rmcat-cc-eval
draft-ietf-ccamp-dpm 
<if additional reviews were performed, please let me know!>

We didn't write a reply to the Liaison from BBF to OPS and Transport,
but I our patience was rewarded. The FCC contacted IETF directly
and it seems likely that related work will proceed here, and that will be
the likely response (e.g., come work with us in IPPM, BBF).

Carlos Pignataro volunteered to be our
Liaison/Advisor to the Network Complexity Research Group

Alan Dekok and Benoit Claise will be providing a script this month
to help us find performance drafts to review.

Benoit also organized a face2face meeting for the Directorate.

The two performance-oriented working groups, BMWG and IPPM,
appear to have new and relevant work for 2013.

We have a new mailing list name:  pm-dir

When the new list was announced, several people tried to join.
We should probably have a call for new members soon,
if the current Directorate members agree.  Also, if anyone would
like to retire from the Performance Directorate (for example,
if you didn't find time to perform reviews in 2012, then
you might consider the question in that light), please let me know.

This year, I hope that increased visibility will bring a both
larger and more interesting review load. And I hope that we can
expand Advisor/Liaison Appointments.

Any thoughts/comments/suggestions from the members as 2013 begins?

regards,
Al
PM Dir Admin
From bclaise@cisco.com Wed Jan 23 01:07:36 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1B6121F85AC for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 01:07:36 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.589 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.589 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.010, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yyh61vJC6tly for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 01:07:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from av-tac-bru.cisco.com (weird-brew.cisco.com [144.254.15.118]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 355ED21F859D for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 01:07:36 -0800 (PST) X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-bru.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r0N97Z2D019231 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 10:07:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from sweet-brew-5.cisco.com (sweet-brew-5.cisco.com [144.254.10.206]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r0N97HBg005979 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 10:07:27 +0100 (CET) Received: (from bclaise@localhost) by sweet-brew-5.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.6/Submit) id r0N97EZ6003090 for pm-dir@ietf.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 10:07:14 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 10:07:14 +0100 From: Benoit Claise To: pm-dir@ietf.org Message-ID: <20130123090714.GA3076@sweet-brew-5.cisco.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 09:07:37 -0000 Dear all, This is an automatically generated email. It lists the IETF internet-drafts that reference the PMOL RFC 6390, as a normative or informative reference. Regards, Benoit =========================================================== Normative References -------------------- draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-rle-metrics-05 Active Informative References ---------------------- draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-discard-10 Active draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-loss-08 Active draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-concsec-03 Active draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-decodability-07 Active draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-11 Active draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-jb-06 Active draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-03 Active draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-03 Active From bclaise@cisco.com Mon Jan 28 03:23:36 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D613421F8D3B for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 03:23:36 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.083 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.083 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.476, BAYES_00=-2.599, DATE_IN_PAST_12_24=0.992, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qaUsRYZlyw+J for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 03:23:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from av-tac-bru.cisco.com (weird-brew.cisco.com [144.254.15.118]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18D7221F8CB7 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 03:23:35 -0800 (PST) X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-bru.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r0SBNTLr023344; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:23:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.61.86.177] (ams3-vpn-dhcp5810.cisco.com [10.61.86.177]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r0SBMxMi000347; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:23:09 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <51057B67.7090205@cisco.com> Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 20:09:27 +0100 From: Benoit Claise User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pm-dir@ietf.org References: <50F93070.7040107@ericsson.com> In-Reply-To: <50F93070.7040107@ericsson.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: xrblock-chairs@tools.ietf.org, draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-summary-stat@tools.ietf.org, Gonzalo Camarillo Subject: Re: [pm-dir] Request for an RFC 6369 review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-summary-stat-06 X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 11:23:37 -0000 Dear all, Here is an official request for the RFC 6390 review. Who would like to volunteer? Regards, Benoit > Hi Benoit, > > as suggested by Dan in his PROTO writeup, I would like to request the > performance metrics directorate to perform an RFC 6390 review of the > following draft as part of its IETF LC: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-summary-stat/ > > Could you please arrange such a review? > > Thanks, > > Gonzalo > > From bclaise@cisco.com Mon Jan 28 04:08:17 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EFF621F8432 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 04:08:17 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.567 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.567 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.032, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7TdrtF3hAgYq for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 04:08:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from av-tac-bru.cisco.com (weird-brew.cisco.com [144.254.15.118]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13AB921F842B for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 04:08:13 -0800 (PST) X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-bru.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r0SBvXum027654 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:57:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from sweet-brew-5.cisco.com (sweet-brew-5.cisco.com [144.254.10.206]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r0SBvI4d000760 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:57:28 +0100 (CET) Received: (from bclaise@localhost) by sweet-brew-5.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.6/Submit) id r0SBvCDt001401 for pm-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:57:12 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:57:12 +0100 From: Benoit Claise To: pm-dir@ietf.org Message-ID: <20130128115712.GA1399@sweet-brew-5.cisco.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:08:17 -0000 Dear all, This is an automatically generated email. It lists the IETF internet-drafts that reference the PMOL RFC 6390, as a normative or informative reference. Regards, Benoit =========================================================== Normative References -------------------- draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-rle-metrics-05 Active Informative References ---------------------- draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-discard-10 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-loss-08 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-concsec-03 Active draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-decodability-07 Active draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-11 Active draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-jb-07 Active draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-04 Active draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-03 Active