From bclaise@cisco.com Sun Jan 5 13:58:32 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7F3F1AD190; Sun, 5 Jan 2014 13:58:32 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.039 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.039 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AET2tWwVjVR9; Sun, 5 Jan 2014 13:58:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0336D1AD10A; Sun, 5 Jan 2014 13:58:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4552; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1388959103; x=1390168703; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2l9QXsN6mB2F7DxcrnR+b2tDGlrvurAA2N4ccaWKKi4=; b=EfndWk/Q2zOgQ/LYF376G99cU4wtIvLEfAhc8zWD6eH238eMKmfadeni zdmfegSfeyeyE0vtx370thGME2yitJBh/rach3idBGFMsHFM3d/O14sGR yyRCxfZmBIKR+OVYW/bJ7WUkq/vceRHfhIQmd+yaVVoA6acXDrppyRjEC Y=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhkFAIvUyVKQ/khN/2dsb2JhbABYgws4g1O2MoENFnSCJgEBBCMVQBEdCAIFFgsCAgkDAgECATcECgYBDAYCAQEWh2oNqh6ZHxeBKY1tgm+BSASUNAWDXoEwhRWLUIMuO4EuJA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,609,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="3212054" Received: from ams-core-4.cisco.com ([144.254.72.77]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Jan 2014 21:58:21 +0000 Received: from [10.60.67.85] (ams-bclaise-8914.cisco.com [10.60.67.85]) by ams-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s05LwKB0030927; Sun, 5 Jan 2014 21:58:20 GMT Message-ID: <52C9D57C.6020505@cisco.com> Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2014 22:58:20 +0100 From: Benoit Claise User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "aaa-doctors@ietf.org" , "MIB Doctors (E-mail)" , YANG Doctors , "ops-dir@ietf.org" , "pm-dir@ietf.org" , IETF DNS Directorate References: <20140103001959.10097.81832.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20140103001959.10097.81832.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <20140103001959.10097.81832.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [pm-dir] Fwd: PRELIMINARY Agenda and Package for the January 9, 2014 IESG Teleconference X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2014 21:58:32 -0000 Dear all, Please find below the agenda of the Jan 9th IESG telechat. Please send your questions, comments and concerns before Jan 8th COB. Thanks and Regards, Benoit. INTERNET ENGINEERING STEERING GROUP (IESG) Summarized Agenda for the 2014-01-09 IESG Teleconference This agenda was generated at 2014-01-02 16:18:37 PST Up-to-date web version of this agenda can be found at: http://datatracker.ietf.org/iesg/agenda/ 2. Protocol Actions 2.1 WG Submissions 2.1.1 New Items o draft-ietf-savi-send-10 - IETF stream SEND-based Source-Address Validation Implementation (Proposed Standard) Note: The Document Shepherd is Jean-Michel Combes (jeanmichel.combes at gmail.com). Token: Ted Lemon IANA Review: IANA OK - No Actions Needed Consensus: Yes o draft-ietf-netmod-iana-if-type-09 - IETF stream IANA Interface Type YANG Module (Proposed Standard) Note: David Kessens (david.kessens@nsn.com) is the document shepherd. Token: Benoit Claise IANA Review: IANA - Not OK Consensus: Yes o draft-ietf-idr-extcomm-iana-02 - IETF stream IANA Registries for BGP Extended Communities (Proposed Standard) Token: Stewart Bryant IANA Review: IANA OK - Actions Needed Consensus: Yes o draft-ietf-pwe3-dynamic-ms-pw-20 - IETF stream Dynamic Placement of Multi-Segment Pseudowires (Proposed Standard) Token: Stewart Bryant IANA Review: IANA - Not OK Consensus: Yes o draft-ietf-trill-rfc6327bis-02 - IETF stream TRILL: Adjacency (Proposed Standard) Token: Ted Lemon IANA Review: IANA OK - No Actions Needed Consensus: Yes o draft-ietf-avtcore-leap-second-07 - IETF stream RTP and Leap Seconds (Proposed Standard) Token: Richard Barnes IANA Review: IANA OK - No Actions Needed Consensus: Unknown o draft-ietf-trill-o-pw-04 - IETF stream Transport of TRILL Using Pseudowires (Proposed Standard) Token: Ted Lemon IANA Review: Version Changed - Review Needed Consensus: Unknown 2.1.2 Returning Items o draft-ietf-pim-explicit-tracking-09 - IETF stream IGMP/MLD-Based Explicit Membership Tracking Function for Multicast Routers (Proposed Standard) Token: Adrian Farrel IANA Review: IANA OK - No Actions Needed Consensus: Yes 2.2 Individual Submissions 2.2.1 New Items NONE 2.2.2 Returning Items o draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis-05 - IETF stream IETF Guidelines for Conduct (Best Current Practice) Token: Jari Arkko IANA Review: IANA OK - No Actions Needed Consensus: Unknown Was deferred by Pete Resnick on 2013-12-19 2.3 Status Changes 2.3.1 New Items NONE 2.3.2 Returning Items NONE 3. Document Actions 3.1 WG Submissions 3.1.1 New Items o draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic-00 - IETF stream Reclassification of RFC 1142 to Historic (Informational) Token: Adrian Farrel IANA Review: IANA OK - No Actions Needed Consensus: Yes o draft-ietf-clue-telepresence-use-cases-08 - IETF stream Use Cases for Telepresence Multi-streams (Informational) Token: Gonzalo Camarillo IANA Review: IANA OK - No Actions Needed Consensus: Yes o draft-ietf-siprec-architecture-11 - IETF stream An Architecture for Media Recording using the Session Initiation Protocol (Informational) Token: Gonzalo Camarillo IANA Review: Version Changed - Review Needed Consensus: Yes o draft-ietf-ospf-manet-single-hop-or-04 - IETF stream Use of the OSPF-MANET Interface in Single-Hop Broadcast Networks (Experimental) Token: Stewart Bryant IANA Review: IANA OK - No Actions Needed Consensus: Unknown 3.1.2 Returning Items NONE 3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD 3.2.1 New Items NONE 3.2.2 Returning Items NONE 3.3 Status Changes 3.3.1 New Items NONE 3.3.2 Returning Items NONE 3.4 IRTF and Independent Submission Stream Documents 3.4.1 New Items NONE 3.4.2 Returning Items NONE 4. Working Group Actions 4.1 WG Creation 4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review NONE 4.1.2 Proposed for Approval NONE 4.2 WG Rechartering 4.2.1 Under Evaluation for IETF Review NONE 4.2.2 Proposed for Approval NONE 5. IAB News We Can Use 6. Management Issues 7. Working Group News From bclaise@cisco.com Sun Jan 5 14:07:33 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E17391AD83F for ; Sun, 5 Jan 2014 14:07:33 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -7.439 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.439 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qvJaV69BF6lq for ; Sun, 5 Jan 2014 14:07:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from av-tac-bru.cisco.com (weird-brew.cisco.com [144.254.15.118]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 697801AD7C1 for ; Sun, 5 Jan 2014 14:07:31 -0800 (PST) X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-bru.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s05M7MTB003158 for ; Sun, 5 Jan 2014 23:07:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from sweet-brew-5.cisco.com (sweet-brew-5.cisco.com [144.254.10.206]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s05M75r1009019 for ; Sun, 5 Jan 2014 23:07:15 +0100 (CET) Received: (from bclaise@localhost) by sweet-brew-5.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.6/Submit) id s05M75x3013995 for pm-dir@ietf.org; Sun, 5 Jan 2014 23:07:05 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2014 23:07:05 +0100 From: Benoit Claise To: pm-dir@ietf.org Message-ID: <20140105220705.GA13993@sweet-brew-5.cisco.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2014 22:07:34 -0000 Dear all, This is an automatically generated email. It lists the IETF internet-drafts that reference the PMOL RFC 6390, as a normative or informative reference. It also lists all the IETF internet-drafts that contain "performance metric". Regards, Benoit =========================================================== Normative References -------------------- draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04 Active draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-01Active Informative References ---------------------- draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04 Active draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-01Active draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-08 Active draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-12 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-07 Active drafts containing performance metric ------------------------------------ draft-ietf-alto-deployments-08 Active draft-ietf-cdni-footprint-capabilities-semantics-01Active draft-ietf-ippm-2330-update-01 Active draft-ietf-ippm-lmap-path-01 Active draft-ietf-ippm-model-based-metrics-01 Active draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem-05 Active draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04 Active draft-ietf-manet-smf-mib-08 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-04 Active draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-10 Active draft-ietf-ppsp-base-tracker-protocol-02 Active draft-ietf-ppsp-peer-protocol-08 Active draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-10 Active draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-00 Active draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-01Active draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-08 Active draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-12 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-07 Active draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xt-discard-metrics-00 Active From bclaise@cisco.com Sun Jan 12 14:07:38 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 354961A1F4A for ; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 14:07:38 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -7.439 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.439 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7Ej9fDMXQLwU for ; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 14:07:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from av-tac-bru.cisco.com (weird-brew.cisco.com [144.254.15.118]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 541701A1F1B for ; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 14:07:36 -0800 (PST) X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-bru.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s0CM7PkY002950 for ; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 23:07:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from sweet-brew-5.cisco.com (sweet-brew-5.cisco.com [144.254.10.206]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s0CM761Q020094 for ; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 23:07:16 +0100 (CET) Received: (from bclaise@localhost) by sweet-brew-5.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.6/Submit) id s0CM73Q8024503 for pm-dir@ietf.org; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 23:07:03 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 23:07:03 +0100 From: Benoit Claise To: pm-dir@ietf.org Message-ID: <20140112220703.GA24501@sweet-brew-5.cisco.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 22:07:38 -0000 Dear all, This is an automatically generated email. It lists the IETF internet-drafts that reference the PMOL RFC 6390, as a normative or informative reference. It also lists all the IETF internet-drafts that contain "performance metric". Regards, Benoit =========================================================== Normative References -------------------- draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04 Active draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-01Active Informative References ---------------------- draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04 Active draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-01Active draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-09 Active draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-post-repair-loss-count-00Active draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-decodability-00 Active draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-13 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-07 Active drafts containing performance metric ------------------------------------ draft-ietf-alto-deployments-08 Active draft-ietf-cdni-footprint-capabilities-semantics-01Active draft-ietf-ippm-2330-update-01 Active draft-ietf-ippm-lmap-path-01 Active draft-ietf-ippm-model-based-metrics-01 Active draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem-05 Active draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04 Active draft-ietf-manet-smf-mib-08 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-00 Active draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-04 Active draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-12 Active draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-02 Active draft-ietf-ppsp-base-tracker-protocol-03 Active draft-ietf-ppsp-peer-protocol-08 Active draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-11 Active draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-00 Active draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-01Active draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-09 Active draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-post-repair-loss-count-00Active draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-decodability-00 Active draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-13 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-07 Active draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xt-discard-metrics-00 Active From bclaise@cisco.com Fri Jan 17 00:01:17 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB5861ADFB5; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 00:01:17 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.039 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.039 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ave9nGB-BSsn; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 00:01:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D77EF1ADDDA; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 00:01:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5327; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1389945663; x=1391155263; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HkNOnSrKshcyZgyC1QqFaG1vRHO+lLYRO3/AWaq7eqk=; b=RhXuVLqMzrvGbEPniQgGMZqBjMcR6ZDVawA1TWz2SsKJnxFd7f5CuSkH VR9r/Lla9H74ucH+1qfg3RDM5qkh+5eHSqdvIhebqFtVeuqNEGURn6jND 57D6/wlknFnOOQBYodUSIbXNlKC1z6S+m6O8CyfZ5b0cfkbRoNyOGImo3 U=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ai8FAJFf2FKQ/khR/2dsb2JhbABZgws4u2eBDxZ0giYBAQQ4QBEsFg8JAwIBAgE7CgYBDAgBAYgADcU0F48GhDgEmCGBMYUVi1GBb4E/Ow X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,670,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="3087765" Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com ([144.254.72.81]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 17 Jan 2014 08:01:01 +0000 Received: from [10.60.67.85] (ams-bclaise-8914.cisco.com [10.60.67.85]) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s0H81101016188; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 08:01:01 GMT Message-ID: <52D8E33D.5070102@cisco.com> Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 09:01:01 +0100 From: Benoit Claise User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "aaa-doctors@ietf.org" , "MIB Doctors (E-mail)" , YANG Doctors , "ops-dir@ietf.org" , "pm-dir@ietf.org" , IETF DNS Directorate References: <20140117000150.30143.12438.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20140117000150.30143.12438.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <20140117000150.30143.12438.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [pm-dir] Fwd: [IESG-AGENDA-DIST] Summarized Agenda for the 2014-01-23 IESG Teleconference X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 08:01:18 -0000 Dear all, Please find below the agenda of the Jan 23rd IESG telechat. Please send your questions, comments and concerns before Jan 22nd COB. Thanks and Regards, Benoit. INTERNET ENGINEERING STEERING GROUP (IESG) Summarized Agenda for the 2014-01-23 IESG Teleconference This agenda was generated at 2014-01-16 16:00:35 PST Up-to-date web version of this agenda can be found at: http://datatracker.ietf.org/iesg/agenda/ 2. Protocol Actions 2.1 WG Submissions 2.1.1 New Items o draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-16 - IETF stream A Method for Generating Semantically Opaque Interface Identifiers with IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration (SLAAC) (Proposed Standard) Token: Brian Haberman IANA Review: IANA OK - No Actions Needed Consensus: Yes o draft-ietf-netmod-interfaces-cfg-15 - IETF stream A YANG Data Model for Interface Management (Proposed Standard) Token: Benoit Claise IANA Review: IANA OK - Actions Needed Consensus: Yes o draft-ietf-isis-rfc6326bis-01 - IETF stream Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links (TRILL) Use of IS-IS (Proposed Standard) Token: Adrian Farrel IANA Review: IANA - Review Needed Consensus: No Last call expires: 2014-01-22 o draft-ietf-ccamp-oam-configuration-fwk-12 - IETF stream GMPLS RSVP-TE extensions for OAM Configuration (Proposed Standard) Token: Adrian Farrel IANA Review: Version Changed - Review Needed Consensus: Yes o draft-ietf-netmod-system-mgmt-10 - IETF stream A YANG Data Model for System Management (Proposed Standard) Token: Benoit Claise IANA Review: IANA OK - Actions Needed Consensus: Yes Last call expires: 2014-01-22 o draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-tp-cv-adv-04 - IETF stream VCCV MPLS-TP Connectivity Verification (CV) Capability Advertisement (Proposed Standard) Token: Stewart Bryant IANA Review: IANA - Not OK Consensus: Yes o draft-ietf-mpls-moving-iana-registries-03 - IETF stream Moving Generic Associated Channel (G-ACh) IANA Registries to a New Registry (Proposed Standard) Token: Adrian Farrel IANA Review: IANA OK - Actions Needed Consensus: Unknown Last call expires: 2014-01-17 2.1.2 Returning Items NONE 2.2 Individual Submissions 2.2.1 New Items o draft-shore-icmp-aup-09 - IETF stream An Acceptable Use Policy for New ICMP Types and Codes (Best Current Practice) Token: Benoit Claise IANA Review: IANA OK - No Actions Needed Consensus: Unknown 2.2.2 Returning Items o draft-farrell-perpass-attack-03 - IETF stream Pervasive Monitoring is an Attack (Best Current Practice) Token: Jari Arkko IANA Review: Version Changed - Review Needed Consensus: Unknown 2.3 Status Changes 2.3.1 New Items NONE 2.3.2 Returning Items NONE 3. Document Actions 3.1 WG Submissions 3.1.1 New Items o draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-req-06 - IETF stream Requirements for Ethernet VPN (EVPN) (Informational) Token: Stewart Bryant IANA Review: IANA OK - No Actions Needed Consensus: Yes o draft-ietf-opsawg-lsn-deployment-04 - IETF stream CGN Deployment with BGP/MPLS IP VPNs (Informational) Token: Benoit Claise IANA Review: IANA OK - No Actions Needed Consensus: Yes o draft-ietf-mpls-multipath-use-03 - IETF stream Use of Multipath with MPLS and MPLS-TP (Informational) Token: Adrian Farrel IANA Review: IANA OK - No Actions Needed Consensus: Unknown Last call expires: 2014-01-17 o draft-ietf-mpls-tp-p2mp-framework-05 - IETF stream A Framework for Point-to-Multipoint MPLS in Transport Networks (Informational) Token: Adrian Farrel IANA Review: IANA OK - No Actions Needed Consensus: Yes 3.1.2 Returning Items NONE 3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD 3.2.1 New Items o draft-moriarty-pkcs12v1-1-03 - IETF stream PKCS #12: Personal Information Exchange Syntax v1.1 (Informational) Token: Sean Turner IANA Review: IANA OK - No Actions Needed Consensus: Yes o draft-housley-number-registries-02 - IETF stream Internet Numbers Registries (Informational) Token: Jari Arkko IANA Review: IANA OK - Actions Needed Consensus: Unknown Last call expires: 2014-01-22 3.2.2 Returning Items NONE 3.3 Status Changes 3.3.1 New Items NONE 3.3.2 Returning Items NONE 3.4 IRTF and Independent Submission Stream Documents 3.4.1 New Items NONE 3.4.2 Returning Items NONE 3.4.3 For Action o conflict-review-goix-appsawg-enum-acct-uri-00 IETF conflict review for draft-goix-appsawg-enum-acct-uri draft-goix-appsawg-enum-acct-uri-06 ENUM Service Registration for acct URI (ISE: Experimental) Token: Jari Arkko 4. Working Group Actions 4.1 WG Creation 4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review o Transparency (trans) 4.1.2 Proposed for Approval NONE 4.2 WG Rechartering 4.2.1 Under Evaluation for IETF Review NONE 4.2.2 Proposed for Approval NONE From bclaise@cisco.com Sun Jan 19 14:07:35 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11A1F1ADFA4 for ; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 14:07:35 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -7.439 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.439 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 823JvZtRgQhQ for ; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 14:07:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from av-tac-bru.cisco.com (weird-brew.cisco.com [144.254.15.118]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41CEF1ADFA1 for ; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 14:07:33 -0800 (PST) X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-bru.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s0JM7JJK021142 for ; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 23:07:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from sweet-brew-5.cisco.com (sweet-brew-5.cisco.com [144.254.10.206]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s0JM724x015892 for ; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 23:07:12 +0100 (CET) Received: (from bclaise@localhost) by sweet-brew-5.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.6/Submit) id s0JM70q9008959 for pm-dir@ietf.org; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 23:07:00 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 23:06:59 +0100 From: Benoit Claise To: pm-dir@ietf.org Message-ID: <20140119220659.GA8957@sweet-brew-5.cisco.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 22:07:35 -0000 Dear all, This is an automatically generated email. It lists the IETF internet-drafts that reference the PMOL RFC 6390, as a normative or informative reference. It also lists all the IETF internet-drafts that contain "performance metric". Regards, Benoit =========================================================== Normative References -------------------- draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04 Active draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-01Active Informative References ---------------------- draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04 Active draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-01Active draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-09 Active draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-post-repair-loss-count-00Active draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-decodability-00 Active draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-13 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-07 Active drafts containing performance metric ------------------------------------ draft-ietf-alto-deployments-08 Active draft-ietf-cdni-footprint-capabilities-semantics-01Active draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp-00 Active draft-ietf-ippm-2330-update-01 Active draft-ietf-ippm-lmap-path-01 Active draft-ietf-ippm-model-based-metrics-01 Active draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem-05 Active draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04 Active draft-ietf-manet-smf-mib-08 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-00 Active draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-04 Active draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-12 Active draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-02 Active draft-ietf-ppsp-base-tracker-protocol-03 Active draft-ietf-ppsp-peer-protocol-08 Active draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-11 Active draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-00 Active draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-01Active draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-09 Active draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-post-repair-loss-count-00Active draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-decodability-00 Active draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-13 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-07 Active draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xt-discard-metrics-00 Active From acmorton@att.com Sun Jan 19 18:40:53 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ADF51A001F for ; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 18:40:53 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.535 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.535 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ae0YWJuViYan for ; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 18:40:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-pink.research.att.com (mail-pink.research.att.com [204.178.8.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 457E51A001B for ; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 18:40:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-azure.research.att.com (unknown [135.207.255.18]) by mail-pink.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A73012021D; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 21:43:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com (unknown [135.207.255.243]) by mail-azure.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56251E0377; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 21:40:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from NJFPSRVEXG8.research.att.com ([fe80::cdea:b3f6:3efa:1841]) by njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com ([fe80::cdea:b3f6:3efa:1841%13]) with mapi; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 21:40:51 -0500 From: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" To: "Shida Schubert (shida@ntt-at.com)" Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 21:40:49 -0500 Thread-Topic: [pm-dir] Review of xrblock rtcp xr synchronization Version 5 Thread-Index: Ac5ZkephVGFFV9Y/QLGF6onWr0THmy79SCkQ Message-ID: <2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C8B0A9764C@njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_005_2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C8B0A9764Cnjfpsrvexg8rese_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Benoit Claise , "Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)" , "pm-dir@ietf.org" Subject: [pm-dir] FW: Review of xrblock rtcp xr synchronization Version 5 X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 02:40:53 -0000 --_005_2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C8B0A9764Cnjfpsrvexg8rese_ Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C8B0A9764Cnjfpsrvexg8rese_" --_000_2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C8B0A9764Cnjfpsrvexg8rese_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Shida, Vinayak already reviewed version 5 of the draft on which you requested a review (last May, see below). AFAICT, there was no response from the authors. Al pm-dir admin From: pm-dir-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pm-dir-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of= Vinayak Hegde Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2013 5:50 PM To: pm-dir@ietf.org; asaeda@nict.go.jp; Rachel@huawei.com; sunseawq@huawei.= com Subject: Re: [pm-dir] Review of xrblock rtcp xr synchronization Version 5 Hi, Used the wrong alias in the initial mail. Please reply to this mail as I ha= ve fixedc the mail address. -- Vinayak On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 3:15 AM, Vinayak Hegde > wrote: Hi, I reveiewd the xrblock rtcp xr synchronization Version 5 draft at The draft does specify and fulfill all the requirements of RFC 6390 Comments are below: Section 3.2 Initial Synchronization Delay: 32 bits The selection of units in 1/65536 seconds seems arbitrary (inspite of the f= act that it could make bit arithmetic easier). I would suggest to use may b= e denote each bit as 1/10000 or 1/100000 (too granualr ?) units. This could= be much more useful for interaction with humans such as in reading debug o= utput (which is likely since this is a synchronization delay). Section 4.2 For the offset constant it is not clear what the 8-bit is. Either yo= u can note it here or reference it. -- Vinayak --_000_2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C8B0A9764Cnjfpsrvexg8rese_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Shida,

<= p class=3DMsoNormal> 

Vinayak already reviewed version 5 of = the draft

on which you requested a review (last M= ay, see below).

 

= AFAICT, there was no response from the authors.

<= o:p> 

Al

pm-dir admin

 

<= p class=3DMsoNormal>From: pm-dir-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pm-dir-bounces@ietf= .org] On Behalf Of Vinayak Hegde
Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2= 013 5:50 PM
To: pm-dir@ietf.org; asaeda@nict.go.jp; Rachel@huawei= .com; sunseawq@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [pm-dir] Review of xrblock= rtcp xr synchronization Version 5

 

Hi,

Used the wrong alias in the initial mail. Please rep= ly to this mail as I have fixedc the mail address.

-- Vinayak

On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 3:15 AM, Vinayak = Hegde <vinayakh@= gmail.com> wrote:

Hi,

I re= veiewd the  xrblock rtcp xr synchronization Version 5 draft at
The draft does specify and fulfill all the requirements of RFC 6390
Comments are below:

Section 3.2
Initial Synchronization Delay: 3= 2 bits

The selection of units in 1/65536 seconds seems arbitrary (in= spite of the fact that it could make bit arithmetic easier). I would sugges= t to use may be denote each bit as 1/10000 or 1/100000 (too granualr ?) uni= ts. This could be much more useful for interaction with humans such as in r= eading debug output (which is likely since this is a synchronization delay)= .

Section 4.2
For the offset constant <RFSO> it is not cle= ar what the 8-bit is. Either you can note it here or reference it.

-- Vinayak<= o:p>

 

<= /body>= --_000_2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C8B0A9764Cnjfpsrvexg8rese_-- --_005_2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C8B0A9764Cnjfpsrvexg8rese_ Content-Type: text/plain; name="ATT00001.txt" Content-Description: ATT00001.txt Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="ATT00001.txt"; size=133; creation-date="Sat, 25 May 2013 21:50:47 GMT"; modification-date="Sat, 25 May 2013 21:50:47 GMT" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18NCnBtLWRpciBt YWlsaW5nIGxpc3QNCnBtLWRpckBpZXRmLm9yZw0KaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1h bi9saXN0aW5mby9wbS1kaXINCg== --_005_2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C8B0A9764Cnjfpsrvexg8rese_ Content-Type: message/rfc822 Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D62111ADF78 for ; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 13:13:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7-NFPcY-XE6e for ; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 13:13:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from gator4135.hostgator.com (gator4135.hostgator.com [192.185.4.147]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A3D81AC82A for ; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 13:13:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from [50.184.77.69] (port=59866 helo=[192.168.1.23]) by gator4135.hostgator.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W4zgT-0001Bu-FJ; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 15:13:33 -0600 From: Shida Schubert To: "pm-dir@ietf.org" CC: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 16:13:30 -0500 Subject: Request for an RFC6390 review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-07 Thread-Topic: Request for an RFC6390 review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-07 Thread-Index: Ac8VW1qLRYs5fCjITsyZ/oNFoag5HQ== Message-ID: <389E9CFD-EE87-4DD0-81DB-D67DB3BF7CC4@ntt-at.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-spam-flag: NO x-spam-level: x-spam-status: No, score=-0.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham delivered-to: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com x-source-ip: 50.184.77.69 x-virus-scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com x-original-to: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com x-antiabuse: Sender Address Domain - ntt-at.com x-source: x-source-args: x-source-dir: x-source-sender: ([192.168.1.23]) [50.184.77.69]:59866 x-spam-score: -0.002 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Dear PMDIR, As a co-chair of XRBLOCK WG, I would like to request an RFC6390 review of http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronizat= ion-07.txt This document has already completed the WGLC a while ago, and I forgot to send the review request until I sat down to write up the proto-writeup. Many Thanks & Regards Shida Schubert --_005_2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C8B0A9764Cnjfpsrvexg8rese_-- From shida@ntt-at.com Sun Jan 19 19:02:22 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D9E31A001F for ; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 19:02:22 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mRfu59RHmS66 for ; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 19:02:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from gator4135.hostgator.com (gator4135.hostgator.com [192.185.4.147]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C05E21A001B for ; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 19:02:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from [50.184.77.69] (port=58282 helo=[192.168.1.23]) by gator4135.hostgator.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W557z-000412-Eh; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 21:02:19 -0600 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0AF54920-16C4-4E13-82A1-2E9B8C58E2A4" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\)) From: Shida Schubert In-Reply-To: <2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C8B0A9764C@njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com> Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 19:02:14 -0800 Message-Id: <60498545-7261-48EB-8FBF-83DDC7FE4C1D@ntt-at.com> References: <2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C8B0A9764C@njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com> To: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gator4135.hostgator.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ntt-at.com X-BWhitelist: no X-Source-IP: 50.184.77.69 X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: ([192.168.1.23]) [50.184.77.69]:58282 X-Source-Auth: shida.schubert+tingle.jp X-Email-Count: 3 X-Source-Cap: c3NoaWRhO3NzaGlkYTtnYXRvcjQxMzUuaG9zdGdhdG9yLmNvbQ== Cc: Benoit Claise , "Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)" , "pm-dir@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [pm-dir] Review of xrblock rtcp xr synchronization Version 5 X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 03:02:22 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_0AF54920-16C4-4E13-82A1-2E9B8C58E2A4 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Al; Happy New Year and I apologize for redundant e-mail.=20 I found the e-mail.. I couldn't find my initial e-mail of me sending = out the request.=20 Anyway, Qin did reply and the reply is below in [Qin], his suggested = changes are=20 reflected in 07. Unless there are any other issues, I will go ahead and = send the=20 proto-writeup.=20 Many Thanks!!=20 Shida Comments are below: Section 3.2 Initial Synchronization Delay: 32 bits The selection of units in 1/65536 seconds seems arbitrary (inspite of = the fact that it could make bit arithmetic easier). I would suggest to = use may be denote each bit as 1/10000 or 1/100000 (too granualr ?) = units. This could be much more useful for interaction with humans such = as in reading debug output (which is likely since this is a = synchronization delay). [Qin]: The choice of 1/65536 of a second is not arbitrary, it's based on = the properties of the NTP format time stamp, and to match the rest of = the RTP protocol. This is the reason why the draft was switched to use = 1/65536 of a second. Using the other units is appropriate for this = report block. Section 4.2=20 For the offset constant it is not clear what the 8-bit is. Either = you can note it here or reference it. =20 [Qin]: Okay, we can add a sentence to say: =93 [Note to RFC Editor: please replace RFSO with the IANA provided RTCP XR block type for this block.] =94 -- Vinayak On Jan 19, 2014, at 6:40 PM, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) = wrote: > Hi Shida, > =20 > Vinayak already reviewed version 5 of the draft > on which you requested a review (last May, see below). > =20 > AFAICT, there was no response from the authors. > =20 > Al > pm-dir admin > =20 > From: pm-dir-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pm-dir-bounces@ietf.org] On = Behalf Of Vinayak Hegde > Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2013 5:50 PM > To: pm-dir@ietf.org; asaeda@nict.go.jp; Rachel@huawei.com; = sunseawq@huawei.com > Subject: Re: [pm-dir] Review of xrblock rtcp xr synchronization = Version 5 > =20 > Hi, >=20 > Used the wrong alias in the initial mail. Please reply to this mail as = I have fixedc the mail address. >=20 > -- Vinayak >=20 > On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 3:15 AM, Vinayak Hegde = wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I reveiewd the xrblock rtcp xr synchronization Version 5 draft at=20 >=20 > The draft does specify and fulfill all the requirements of RFC 6390 >=20 > Comments are below: >=20 > Section 3.2 > Initial Synchronization Delay: 32 bits >=20 > The selection of units in 1/65536 seconds seems arbitrary (inspite of = the fact that it could make bit arithmetic easier). I would suggest to = use may be denote each bit as 1/10000 or 1/100000 (too granualr ?) = units. This could be much more useful for interaction with humans such = as in reading debug output (which is likely since this is a = synchronization delay). >=20 > Section 4.2=20 > For the offset constant it is not clear what the 8-bit is. = Either you can note it here or reference it. >=20 > -- Vinayak > =20 > _______________________________________________ > pm-dir mailing list > pm-dir@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir >=20 > From: Shida Schubert > Subject: Request for an RFC6390 review of = draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-07 > Date: January 19, 2014 at 1:13:30 PM PST > To: "pm-dir@ietf.org" > Cc: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" >=20 >=20 > Dear PMDIR, >=20 > As a co-chair of XRBLOCK WG, I would like to request an RFC6390 > review of = http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-07.txt= >=20 > This document has already completed the WGLC a while ago, and I forgot > to send the review request until I sat down to write up the = proto-writeup. >=20 > Many Thanks & Regards > Shida Schubert --Apple-Mail=_0AF54920-16C4-4E13-82A1-2E9B8C58E2A4 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252

Al;

 = ;Happy New Year and I apologize for redundant = e-mail. 

 I found the e-mail.. I = couldn't find my initial e-mail of me sending out the = request. 

 Anyway, Qin did reply and = the reply is below in [Qin], his suggested changes = are 
reflected in 07. Unless there are any other issues, = I will go ahead and send = the 
proto-writeup. 

 Ma= ny Thanks!! 
  Shida

Comments are = below:

Section 3.2
Initial Synchronization Delay: 32 = bits

The selection of units in 1/65536 seconds seems arbitrary = (inspite of the fact that it could make bit arithmetic easier). I would = suggest to use may be denote each bit as 1/10000 or 1/100000 (too = granualr ?) units. This could be much more useful for interaction with = humans such as in reading debug output (which is likely since this is a = synchronization delay).

[Qin]: The choice of 1/65536 of a second = is not arbitrary, it's based on the properties of the NTP format time = stamp, and to match the rest of the RTP protocol. This is the reason why = the draft was switched to use 1/65536 of a second. Using the other units = is appropriate for this report block.

Section = 4.2 
For the offset constant <RFSO> it is not clear what = the 8-bit is. Either you can note it here or reference it.
 
[Qin]: Okay, we can add a = sentence to say:
=93
      [Note to RFC = Editor: please replace RFSO with the IANA = provided
      RTCP XR = block type for this block.]
=94

-- = Vinayak



On Jan 19, 2014, at 6:40 PM, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) <acmorton@att.com> = wrote:

Hi = Shida,
 
Vinayak already = reviewed version 5 of the draft
on which you requested a review (last May, see = below).
 
AFAICT, there was = no response from the authors.
 
Al
pm-dir = admin
 
From: pm-dir-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pm-dir-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Vinayak = Hegde
Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2013 5:50 = PM
To: pm-dir@ietf.org; asaeda@nict.go.jp; Rachel@huawei.com; sunseawq@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [pm-dir] Review of = xrblock rtcp xr synchronization Version = 5
 

Hi,

Used the wrong alias in the initial mail. Please = reply to this mail as I have fixedc the mail address.

-- = Vinayak

On Sun, May 26, = 2013 at 3:15 AM, Vinayak Hegde <vinayakh@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,

I reveiewd the  xrblock rtcp xr = synchronization Version 5 draft at 

The draft does = specify and fulfill all the requirements of RFC 6390

Comments are = below:

Section 3.2
Initial Synchronization Delay: 32 = bits

The selection of units in 1/65536 seconds seems arbitrary = (inspite of the fact that it could make bit arithmetic easier). I would = suggest to use may be denote each bit as 1/10000 or 1/100000 (too = granualr ?) units. This could be much more useful for interaction with = humans such as in reading debug output (which is likely since this is a = synchronization delay).

Section 4.2 
For the offset constant = <RFSO> it is not clear what the 8-bit is. Either you can note it = here or reference it.

-- = Vinayak
 
_______________________________= ________________
pm-dir mailing list
pm-dir@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir

From: Shida Schubert <shida@ntt-at.com>
Subject: Request for an RFC6390 review of = draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-07
Date: January 19, 2014 at 1:13:30 PM = PST
Cc: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>


Dear = PMDIR,

As a co-chair of XRBLOCK WG, I would like to request an = RFC6390
review of  http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchroniz= ation-07.txt

This document has already completed the WGLC a = while ago, and I forgot
to send the review request until I sat down = to write up the proto-writeup.

Many Thanks & Regards
Shida = Schubert

= --Apple-Mail=_0AF54920-16C4-4E13-82A1-2E9B8C58E2A4-- From acmorton@att.com Mon Jan 20 09:26:27 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CA0E1A01B2 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 09:26:27 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.435 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.435 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MuhYSJJ-5b0L for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 09:26:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-pink.research.att.com (mail-pink.research.att.com [204.178.8.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81D3D1A01A2 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 09:26:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-azure.research.att.com (unknown [135.207.255.18]) by mail-pink.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 883A5120326 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 12:28:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com (unknown [135.207.255.243]) by mail-azure.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8A6BE0376 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 12:26:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from NJFPSRVEXG8.research.att.com ([fe80::cdea:b3f6:3efa:1841]) by njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com ([fe80::cdea:b3f6:3efa:1841%13]) with mapi; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 12:26:25 -0500 From: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" To: "pm-dir@ietf.org" Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 12:26:24 -0500 Thread-Topic: pm-dir diffs - Reminders and New Drafts for Review Thread-Index: Ac8WBL5AtQP3RMLHS9q5WBKDhNWQkQ== Message-ID: <2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C8B0A97728@njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_004_2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C8B0A97728njfpsrvexg8rese_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [pm-dir] FW: pm-dir diffs - Reminders and New Drafts for Review X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 17:26:27 -0000 --_004_2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C8B0A97728njfpsrvexg8rese_ Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C8B0A97728njfpsrvexg8rese_" --_000_2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C8B0A97728njfpsrvexg8rese_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable pm-dir, After running the diff on Internet Drafts submitted since Oct 25 last year, and collecting the currently assigned drafts into a single spread sheet on google docs: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=3D0AmKrqWIOBsprdGZqMnB6dmx5bFJv= VUhta3VLSjl3SkE&usp=3Dsharing we have 5 drafts needing volunteer reviewers and 5 assigned needing review: draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes draft-ietf-nvo3-framework- Dan R. draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware draft-ietf-ppsp-base-tracker-protocol- Alan C. draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage Vinayak H or Dan R draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-framework Dan R. draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric Vinayak H draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-post-repair-loss-count draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-decodability Please volunteer and post your review to pm-dir and the alias .all@tools.ietf.org A membership review/revision will follow soon. regards, and happy 2014, Al pm-dir admin > -----Original Message----- > From: Al Morton [mailto:acmacm@usa.net] > Sent: Monday, January 20, 2014 9:52 AM > To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) > Subject: pm-dir diffs > --_000_2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C8B0A97728njfpsrvexg8rese_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

pm-dir,<= /o:p>

 

After running the diff on Internet Drafts submitted since Oct 25 last ye= ar,

and collecting the currently assi= gned drafts into a single spread sheet on

google docs:

https://docs.googl= e.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=3D0AmKrqWIOBsprdGZqMnB6dmx5bFJvVUhta3VLSjl3SkE&am= p;usp=3Dsharing

 

=

we have 5 drafts needing volunteer reviewers and 5 = assigned needing review:

 <= /o:p>

=

 

Plea= se volunteer and post your review to pm-dir and the alias

<draft-name-no-number>.all@tools.ietf.org

 

A membership review/revision will follow soon.

 

regards, and happy= 2014,

Al

pm-dir admin

 

 

 

> -----Original Message--= ---

> From: Al Morton [mailto:acmacm@usa.net]=

> Sent: Monday, January 20, 2014 9:52 AM

=

> To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)

> Subject: pm-dir diffs

>

 

= --_000_2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C8B0A97728njfpsrvexg8rese_-- --_004_2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C8B0A97728njfpsrvexg8rese_ Content-Type: text/plain; name="diff.txt" Content-Description: diff.txt Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="diff.txt"; size=1859; creation-date="Mon, 20 Jan 2014 14:52:05 GMT"; modification-date="Mon, 20 Jan 2014 14:52:05 GMT" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 RGlmZnMgZnJvbSBMYXN0IFRpbWUgLT1vbGQsICs9bmV3Ci0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tCi0t LSBwbW9sLW9sZC1jb250ZW50LnR4dAkyMDEzLTEwLTI1IDEzOjI4OjI5LjAyMjM1NzM3MCAtMDQw MAorKysgcG1vbC11bmlxLWNvbnRlbnQudHh0CTIwMTQtMDEtMjAgMDk6NDg6MDcuNTcwMTk2MTQy IC0wNTAwCkBAIC0yLDAgKzMgQEAKK2RyYWZ0LWlldGYtaWRyLXRlLXBtLWJncC0wMCAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgQWN0aXZlCQpAQCAtNiArNyBAQAotZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1pcHBtLXJhdGUt cHJvYmxlbS0wNCAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBBY3RpdmUJCitkcmFmdC1pZXRmLWlwcG0tcmF0 ZS1wcm9ibGVtLTA1ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIEFjdGl2ZQkKQEAgLTgsMiArOCwwIEBACi1k cmFmdC1pZXRmLWxtYXAtZnJhbWV3b3JrLTAxICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIEFjdGl2ZQkK LWRyYWZ0LWlldGYtbG1hcC11c2UtY2FzZXMtMDAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgQWN0aXZl CQpAQCAtMTEsMyArMTAsNSBAQAotZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1udm8zLWZyYW1ld29yay0wMyAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICBBY3RpdmUJCi1kcmFmdC1pZXRmLW9wc2F3Zy1vYW0tb3ZlcnZpZXctMTAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIEFjdGl2ZQkKLWRyYWZ0LWlldGYtcHBzcC1iYXNlLXRyYWNrZXItcHJv dG9jb2wtMDIgICAgICAgICAgQWN0aXZlCQorZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1tbXVzaWMtc2RwLW11eC1hdHRy aWJ1dGVzLTAwICAgICAgICAgICBBY3RpdmUJCitkcmFmdC1pZXRmLW52bzMtZnJhbWV3b3JrLTA0 ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIEFjdGl2ZQkKK2RyYWZ0LWlldGYtb3BzYXdnLW9hbS1vdmVy dmlldy0xMiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgQWN0aXZlCQorZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1wY2UtcGNlcC1zZXJ2 aWNlLWF3YXJlLTAyICAgICAgICAgICAgICBBY3RpdmUJCitkcmFmdC1pZXRmLXBwc3AtYmFzZS10 cmFja2VyLXByb3RvY29sLTAzICAgICAgICAgIEFjdGl2ZQkKQEAgLTE1ICsxNiBAQAotZHJhZnQt aWV0Zi1ydGN3ZWItcnRwLXVzYWdlLTEwICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBBY3RpdmUJCitkcmFm dC1pZXRmLXJ0Y3dlYi1ydHAtdXNhZ2UtMTEgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIEFjdGl2ZQkKQEAg LTE3LDQgKzE4LDYgQEAKLWRyYWZ0LWlldGYteHJibG9jay1ydGNwLXhyLWJ5dGVzLWRpc2NhcmRl ZC1tZXRyaWMtMDBBY3RpdmUJCi1kcmFmdC1pZXRmLXhyYmxvY2stcnRjcC14ci1sb3NzLWNvbmNl YWwtMDggICAgICAgIEFjdGl2ZQkKLWRyYWZ0LWlldGYteHJibG9jay1ydGNwLXhyLXFvZS0xMiAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgSW4gSUVTRyBwcm9jZXNzaW5nIC0gSUQgVHJhY2tlciBzdGF0ZSA8UHVi bGljYXRpb24gUmVxdWVzdGVkPgkKLWRyYWZ0LWlldGYteHJibG9jay1ydGNwLXhyLXN5bmNocm9u aXphdGlvbi0wNiAgICAgQWN0aXZlCQorZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi14cmJsb2NrLXJ0Y3AteHItYnl0ZXMt ZGlzY2FyZGVkLW1ldHJpYy0wMUFjdGl2ZQkKK2RyYWZ0LWlldGYteHJibG9jay1ydGNwLXhyLWxv c3MtY29uY2VhbC0wOSAgICAgICAgQWN0aXZlCQorZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi14cmJsb2NrLXJ0Y3AteHIt cG9zdC1yZXBhaXItbG9zcy1jb3VudC0wMEFjdGl2ZQkKK2RyYWZ0LWlldGYteHJibG9jay1ydGNw LXhyLXBzaS1kZWNvZGFiaWxpdHktMDAgICAgQWN0aXZlCQorZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi14cmJsb2NrLXJ0 Y3AteHItcW9lLTEzICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBJbiBJRVNHIHByb2Nlc3NpbmcgLSBJRCBUcmFj a2VyIHN0YXRlIDxXYWl0aW5nIGZvciBXcml0ZXVwPgkKK2RyYWZ0LWlldGYteHJibG9jay1ydGNw LXhyLXN5bmNocm9uaXphdGlvbi0wNyAgICAgQWN0aXZlCQo= --_004_2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C8B0A97728njfpsrvexg8rese_-- From vinayakh@gmail.com Mon Jan 20 10:58:22 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90B541A024D for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 10:58:22 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ppmncTj7Pt3M for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 10:58:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-pa0-x22f.google.com (mail-pa0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DFBE1A022F for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 10:58:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id kp14so7355656pab.34 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 10:58:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=3QwqdabIe+1Ijl+/EsUADGkLzW7K+/noayh5l0pYdEE=; b=hDxnDXHHPB2m8s07rKUVx3VEQZHfukz9qx/0litORrRQd25W+RVSuvYYDestgmuKrc RKuQDsE+pn5632lG965pi8MP3xC6rVKMapcvAalAR2FlETc1WBKp6BeewYhgIdwkakEG 7bVgzSGD36GS1u0Yq6pDNUrKOoiIlnnM12tUzW6C4sVTneHOW1R01VyxwX2fZgqWxusD O44jGZhCVwANH3KXDyDvhSakHpnssc/KgdRzcTJT7cVr9GEXuuDkFhsVMcUcBf9D8yz9 pCQixUn7UaCTPgLIQexxyTVIkS5+75JiVpHuDJSi4QGwtcmQbzTAFwHM9QYJQbkOJ0Ax jWrw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.232.40 with SMTP id tl8mr4860849pac.137.1390244300756; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 10:58:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.126.2 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 10:58:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C8B0A97728@njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com> References: <2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C8B0A97728@njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 00:28:20 +0530 Message-ID: From: Vinayak Hegde To: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b111b39b29cb904f06b796b Cc: "pm-dir@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [pm-dir] FW: pm-dir diffs - Reminders and New Drafts for Review X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 18:58:22 -0000 --047d7b111b39b29cb904f06b796b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I shall send my 2 reviews in a couple of days. Was planning to do it over the weekend but did not find time. -- Vinayak On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 10:56 PM, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) wrote: > pm-dir, > > > > After running the diff on Internet Drafts submitted since Oct 25 last year, > > and collecting the currently assigned drafts into a single spread sheet on > > google docs: > > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmKrqWIOBsprdGZqMnB6dmx5bFJvVUhta3VLSjl3SkE&usp=sharing > > > > we have 5 drafts needing volunteer reviewers and 5 assigned needing review: > > > > draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp > > draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes > > draft-ietf-nvo3-framework- > > Dan R. > > draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware > > draft-ietf-ppsp-base-tracker-protocol- > > Alan C. > > draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage > > Vinayak H or Dan R > > draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-framework > > Dan R. > > draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric > > Vinayak H > > draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-post-repair-loss-count > > draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-decodability > > > > Please volunteer and post your review to pm-dir and the alias > > .all@tools.ietf.org > > > > A membership review/revision will follow soon. > > > > regards, and happy 2014, > > Al > > pm-dir admin > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Al Morton [mailto:acmacm@usa.net] > > > Sent: Monday, January 20, 2014 9:52 AM > > > To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) > > > Subject: pm-dir diffs > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > pm-dir mailing list > pm-dir@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir > > --047d7b111b39b29cb904f06b796b Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I shall send my 2 reviews in a couple of days. Was pl= anning to do it over the weekend but did not find time.

-- Vin= ayak


On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 10:56 PM, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) = <acmorton@att.com<= /a>> wrote:
=

draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp

draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes

draft-ietf-nvo3-framework= -

Dan R.

=

draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware

draft-ietf-ppsp-base-tra= cker-protocol-

Alan C.

draft-= ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage         =        

Vinayak H or Dan R

<= span style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Courier New";color:black'>draft= -ietf-rtgwg-cl-framework

Dan R.<= /o:p>

Vinayak H

draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-post-repair-loss-count

draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-decodability

draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp

draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes<= /p>

draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-

Dan R.=

draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware

draft-ietf-ppsp-base-tracker-protocol-

Alan C.

draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0= =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0

Vinayak H or Dan R

draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-framework

Dan R.

draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric

Vinayak H

draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-post-repair-loss-count

draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-d= ecodability

=A0

Please volunteer and post your review to pm-dir = and the alias

<draft-name-no-number>.all@tools.ietf.org

=A0

A membership review/revision will follow soon.

=A0

regards, and happy 2014,<= u>

Al

pm-dir admin

=A0

=A0

=A0

> -----Original Messa= ge-----

> From: Al Morton [mailto:acmacm@usa.net]

> Sent: Monday, January 20= , 2014 9:52 AM

> To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)

> Subject: pm-dir diffs

&g= t;

=A0


____________________________= ___________________
pm-dir mailing list
pm-dir@ietf.org
= https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir


--047d7b111b39b29cb904f06b796b-- From acmorton@att.com Tue Jan 21 14:25:03 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5F271A01F6 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 14:25:03 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.435 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.435 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rV_N4pGdOcYm for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 14:24:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-red.research.att.com (mail-red.research.att.com [204.178.8.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A34381A024C for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 14:24:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-azure.research.att.com (unknown [135.207.255.18]) by mail-red.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54DA1554371; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 17:27:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com (unknown [135.207.255.243]) by mail-azure.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46160E039A; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 17:24:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from NJFPSRVEXG8.research.att.com ([fe80::cdea:b3f6:3efa:1841]) by njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com ([fe80::cdea:b3f6:3efa:1841%13]) with mapi; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 17:24:49 -0500 From: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" To: Vinayak Hegde Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 17:24:42 -0500 Thread-Topic: [pm-dir] FW: pm-dir diffs - Reminders and New Drafts for Review Thread-Index: Ac8WEZ3+Hvk6mLg6QTeBRFHGhT0KDAA5atOQ Message-ID: <2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C8B0A979F8@njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com> References: <2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C8B0A97728@njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C8B0A979F8njfpsrvexg8rese_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "pm-dir@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [pm-dir] FW: pm-dir diffs - Reminders and New Drafts for Review X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 22:25:03 -0000 --_000_2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C8B0A979F8njfpsrvexg8rese_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Vin, I just noticed that http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-= metric/ is in IETF Last Call, ending Feb 4, so comments before the LC deadline will= be helpful. regards, Al From: Vinayak Hegde [mailto:vinayakh@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, January 20, 2014 1:58 PM To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) Cc: pm-dir@ietf.org Subject: Re: [pm-dir] FW: pm-dir diffs - Reminders and New Drafts for Revie= w I shall send my 2 reviews in a couple of days. Was planning to do it over t= he weekend but did not find time. -- Vinayak On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 10:56 PM, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) > wrote: pm-dir, After running the diff on Internet Drafts submitted since Oct 25 last year, and collecting the currently assigned drafts into a single spread sheet on google docs: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=3D0AmKrqWIOBsprdGZqMnB6dmx5bFJv= VUhta3VLSjl3SkE&usp=3Dsharing we have 5 drafts needing volunteer reviewers and 5 assigned needing review: draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes draft-ietf-nvo3-framework- Dan R. draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware draft-ietf-ppsp-base-tracker-protocol- Alan C. draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage Vinayak H or Dan R draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-framework Dan R. draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric Vinayak H draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-post-repair-loss-count draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-decodability Please volunteer and post your review to pm-dir and the alias .all@tools.ietf.org A membership review/revision will follow soon. regards, and happy 2014, Al pm-dir admin > -----Original Message----- > From: Al Morton [mailto:acmacm@usa.net] > Sent: Monday, January 20, 2014 9:52 AM > To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) > Subject: pm-dir diffs > _______________________________________________ pm-dir mailing list pm-dir@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir --_000_2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C8B0A979F8njfpsrvexg8rese_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Vin,

 

helpful.

&n= bsp;

regards,

Al<= /span>

 

From: Vinayak Hegde [mailto:vinayakh@gmail.com]
Sent: Mo= nday, January 20, 2014 1:58 PM
To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
Cc= : pm-dir@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [pm-dir] FW: pm-dir diffs - Re= minders and New Drafts for Review

 

I shall send my 2 reviews in a couple of days. Was pla= nning to do it over the weekend but did not find time.

=

-- Vinayak

 

On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 10:56 PM, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) <acmorton@att.com> wro= te:

pm-dir,

 

After running the diff on Internet Drafts submitted since Oct 25 last = year,

and collecting the currently assigned drafts into a = single spread sheet on

google docs:

https://docs.go= ogle.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=3D0AmKrqWIOBsprdGZqMnB6dmx5bFJvVUhta3VLSjl3SkE= &usp=3Dsharing

 

we have 5 d= rafts needing volunteer reviewers and 5 assigned needing review:=

 

draft-ietf-ppsp-base-tracker-protocol-

<= /td><= td valign=3Dbottom style=3D'border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:= solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;border-right:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 2.25pt 0in= 2.25pt;height:12.75pt'>

Vinayak H or Dan R

draft-ietf-idr-te-p= m-bgp

draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes

draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-

Dan R.

draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware<= /p>

Alan C.

d= raft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage        &= nbsp;       

draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-framework

Dan R.

=

draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric<= o:p>

Vinayak H

draf= t-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-post-repair-loss-count

draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-decodab= ility

<= /td>

 

Please volunteer and post your = review to pm-dir and the alias

<draft-name-no-number>= ;.all@tools.ietf.or= g

 

A membership review/revision= will follow soon.

 

regards, and ha= ppy 2014,

Al

pm-dir admin

<= p> 

 

 

&= gt; -----Original Message-----

> From: Al Morton [mailt= o:acmacm@usa.net]

> Sent: Monday, January 20, 2014 9:52 AM

<= p>> To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)

> Subject: pm-dir diff= s

>

 

=


___________________= ____________________________
pm-dir mailing list
pm-dir@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo= /pm-dir

 

<= /div>
= --_000_2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C8B0A979F8njfpsrvexg8rese_-- From bclaise@cisco.com Sun Jan 26 14:07:24 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A72021A0092 for ; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 14:07:24 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -7.436 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.436 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HxxZd8Yb4pXu for ; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 14:07:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from av-tac-bru.cisco.com (weird-brew.cisco.com [144.254.15.118]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1CB21A0090 for ; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 14:07:22 -0800 (PST) X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-bru.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s0QM7KA6023769 for ; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 23:07:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from sweet-brew-5.cisco.com (sweet-brew-5.cisco.com [144.254.10.206]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s0QM73tc011423 for ; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 23:07:13 +0100 (CET) Received: (from bclaise@localhost) by sweet-brew-5.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.6/Submit) id s0QM703n028912 for pm-dir@ietf.org; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 23:07:00 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 23:06:59 +0100 From: Benoit Claise To: pm-dir@ietf.org Message-ID: <20140126220659.GA28910@sweet-brew-5.cisco.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 22:07:24 -0000 Dear all, This is an automatically generated email. It lists the IETF internet-drafts that reference the PMOL RFC 6390, as a normative or informative reference. It also lists all the IETF internet-drafts that contain "performance metric". Regards, Benoit =========================================================== Normative References -------------------- draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-01In IESG processing - ID Tracker state Informative References ---------------------- draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-01In IESG processing - ID Tracker state draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-09 Active draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-post-repair-loss-count-00Active draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-decodability-00 Active draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-13 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-07 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state drafts containing performance metric ------------------------------------ draft-ietf-alto-deployments-08 Active draft-ietf-cdni-footprint-capabilities-semantics-01Active draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp-00 Active draft-ietf-ippm-2330-update-01 Active draft-ietf-ippm-lmap-path-01 Active draft-ietf-ippm-model-based-metrics-01 Active draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem-05 Active draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state draft-ietf-lmap-use-cases-02 Active draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-00 Active draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-05 Active draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-12 Active draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-02 Active draft-ietf-ppsp-base-tracker-protocol-03 Active draft-ietf-ppsp-peer-protocol-08 Active draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-11 Active draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-00 Active draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-01In IESG processing - ID Tracker state draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-09 Active draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-post-repair-loss-count-00Active draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-decodability-00 Active draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-13 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-07 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xt-discard-metrics-00 Active From janovak@cisco.com Wed Jan 29 04:21:09 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C5471A04CC for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 04:21:09 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.035 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.035 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uNStKJM2zCm2 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 04:21:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83FFF1A047E for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 04:21:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=6084; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1390998064; x=1392207664; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=yFpQfeh4RCMA74uC0chDUnuYfZKxluRAoQRTOHUbDm8=; b=fCT0R+w/JGBQyJJWCWr+N8BlkGpd6ShIAQ94mrx7aoRM4AeN7zzEmg27 961xq9wiGlIg7DG1J5VaOlf96ktWXUQSgqRgKy4vsZqhBqVtahWlGQCPT x5huiFqvoRnW/dbbYvObRscDpa+jdXc+1e0LyEUJVrvKFsWylAPeXMcWG M=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhYFAIjx6FKtJXHB/2dsb2JhbABZgkhEOFa8foEFFnSCJwEELUwSASpWJgEEDg2HfclpF45OMYMrgRQEqkeDLYIq X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,741,1384300800"; d="scan'208,217";a="16374128" Received: from rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com ([173.37.113.193]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 29 Jan 2014 12:21:03 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com [173.36.12.82]) by rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s0TCL3IC019250 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 29 Jan 2014 12:21:03 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x03.cisco.com ([169.254.6.14]) by xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com ([173.36.12.82]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 06:21:03 -0600 From: "Jan Novak (janovak)" To: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" Thread-Topic: PM DIR review of draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp Thread-Index: Ac8c7JIyD+3lka5yRjKza3Z9DNP54w== Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 12:21:02 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.147.1.24] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F45DBC0B6261374F8F8D3AF620413DFE3FB4A0F7xmbalnx03ciscoc_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "pm-dir@ietf.org" Subject: [pm-dir] PM DIR review of draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 12:21:09 -0000 --_000_F45DBC0B6261374F8F8D3AF620413DFE3FB4A0F7xmbalnx03ciscoc_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Al, The draft is quite short and defines just BGP TLVs to transmit various link performance attributes (hence the match for the PM-DIR review) using BGP speakers. It does not define any performance metrics and RFC6390 is therefore not applicable. Jan The climate of Edinburgh is such that the weak succumb young, and the stron= g envy them .... Dr. Johnson --_000_F45DBC0B6261374F8F8D3AF620413DFE3FB4A0F7xmbalnx03ciscoc_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Al,

 <= /p>

The draft is quite short = and defines just BGP TLVs to transmit various

link performance attribut= es (hence the match for the PM-DIR review)

using BGP speakers.<= /o:p>

It does not define any pe= rformance metrics and RFC6390 is therefore

not applicable.

 <= /p>

Jan

 <= /p>

 <= /p>

--_000_F45DBC0B6261374F8F8D3AF620413DFE3FB4A0F7xmbalnx03ciscoc_-- From acmorton@att.com Wed Jan 29 05:14:04 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AF3E1A028A for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 05:14:04 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.435 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.435 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EL-HgyqeBqYy for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 05:14:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-pink.research.att.com (mail-pink.research.att.com [204.178.8.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 275691A0246 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 05:14:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-azure.research.att.com (unknown [135.207.255.18]) by mail-pink.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEE8212013E; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 08:16:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com (unknown [135.207.255.243]) by mail-azure.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5584BE02DE; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 08:13:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from NJFPSRVEXG8.research.att.com ([fe80::cdea:b3f6:3efa:1841]) by njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com ([fe80::cdea:b3f6:3efa:1841%13]) with mapi; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 08:13:58 -0500 From: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" To: "Jan Novak (janovak)" Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 08:13:56 -0500 Thread-Topic: STATUS [was RE: PM DIR review of draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp] Thread-Index: Ac8c8/ZmXrthb682RS2cQQL4KwUJfA== Message-ID: <2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C8B0C0009B@njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C8B0C0009Bnjfpsrvexg8rese_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "pm-dir@ietf.org" Subject: [pm-dir] STATUS [was RE: PM DIR review of draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp] X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 13:14:04 -0000 --_000_2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C8B0C0009Bnjfpsrvexg8rese_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks Jan! I ask for a check of all the drafts that pop out of the search machine, and since you've contributed so many reviews it's time you had an easy one! I'll update the status page, where there are four more drafts needing *volunteer reviewers*, the practice which ensures both choice of assignments and continued membership in the directorate: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=3D0AmKrqWIOBsprdGZqMnB6dmx5bFJv= VUhta3VLSjl3SkE&usp=3Dsharing Al pm-dir admin From: Jan Novak (janovak) [mailto:janovak@cisco.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 7:21 AM To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) Cc: pm-dir@ietf.org Subject: PM DIR review of draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp Al, The draft is quite short and defines just BGP TLVs to transmit various link performance attributes (hence the match for the PM-DIR review) using BGP speakers. It does not define any performance metrics and RFC6390 is therefore not applicable. Jan The climate of Edinburgh is such that the weak succumb young, and the stron= g envy them .... Dr. Johnson --_000_2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C8B0C0009Bnjfpsrvexg8rese_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thanks Jan!

 

I ask for a check of all the drafts = that

pop out of the search machine, and since yo= u've

contributed so many reviews it's time you ha= d

an easy one!

&nb= sp;

I'll update the status page, where there are<= /o:p>

four more drafts needing *volunteer reviewers*,=

the practice which ensures both choice of assign= ments

and continued membership in the directorate= :

 

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key= =3D0AmKrqWIOBsprdGZqMnB6dmx5bFJvVUhta3VLSjl3SkE&usp=3Dsharing<= /o:p>

 

 

Al

pm-dir admin

=

 

= From:= Jan Novak (janovak) [mailto:janovak@cisco.com]
Sent: Wednesd= ay, January 29, 2014 7:21 AM
To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
Cc:<= /b> pm-dir@ietf.org
Subject: PM DIR review of draft-ietf-idr-te-p= m-bgp

 

Al,

 

The draft is quite short and defines just = BGP TLVs to transmit various

link performance attributes (hence the match for the PM-DIR= review)

usin= g BGP speakers.

It does not define any performance metrics and RFC6390 is therefore=

not applicable.

 

Jan

 

<= div>

The climate of Edinburgh is su= ch that the weak succumb young, and the strong envy them ….

   &nbs= p;            &= nbsp;           &nbs= p;    Dr. Johnson

 

= --_000_2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C8B0C0009Bnjfpsrvexg8rese_--