From waehlisch@ieee.org Fri Aug 3 10:47:24 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sam@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: sam@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 611FC21F8DEC for ; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 10:47:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -104.862 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.862 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.588, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oZ1V+LKH5mNt for ; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 10:47:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.rz.htw-berlin.de (mail2.rz.htw-berlin.de [141.45.10.102]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E6DA21F8D60 for ; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 10:47:23 -0700 (PDT) Envelope-to: sam@irtf.org Received: from dhcp-922d.meeting.ietf.org ([130.129.10.45] helo=mw-PC.meeting.ietf.org) by mail2.rz.htw-berlin.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1SxLy5-000AbH-IU for sam@irtf.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2012 19:47:22 +0200 Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2012 10:47:53 -0700 (Pacific Sommerzeit) From: Matthias Waehlisch To: sam@irtf.org Message-ID: X-X-Sender: mw@mail2.rz.fhtw-berlin.de MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-HTW-SPAMINFO: this message was scanned by eXpurgate (http://www.eleven.de) X-HTW-DELIVERED-TO: sam@irtf.org Subject: [SAM] New Version Notification for draft-irtf-samrg-common-api-06.txt (fwd) X-BeenThere: sam@irtf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "For use by members of the Scalable Adaptive Multicast \(SAM\) RG" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 17:47:24 -0000 Hi all, the following changes have been made from draft-irtf-samrg-common-api-05 1. Added preparations for IRSG review 2. Fixed error codes 3. Editorial improvements 4. Updated references The boiler plate will changed later by the RFC editor. The document is ready for IRSG review. Cheers matthias -- Matthias Waehlisch . Freie Universitaet Berlin, Inst. fuer Informatik, AG CST . Takustr. 9, D-14195 Berlin, Germany .. mailto:waehlisch@ieee.org .. http://www.inf.fu-berlin.de/~waehl :. Also: http://inet.cpt.haw-hamburg.de .. http://www.link-lab.net ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 10:44:48 -0700 From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: mw@link-lab.net Cc: schmidt@informatik.haw-hamburg.de, stig@cisco.com Subject: New Version Notification for draft-irtf-samrg-common-api-06.txt A new version of I-D, draft-irtf-samrg-common-api-06.txt has been successfully submitted by Matthias Waehlisch and posted to the IETF repository. Filename: draft-irtf-samrg-common-api Revision: 06 Title: A Common API for Transparent Hybrid Multicast Creation date: 2012-08-03 WG ID: Individual Submission Number of pages: 41 URL: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-irtf-samrg-common-api-06.txt Status: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-samrg-common-api Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-irtf-samrg-common-api-06 Diff: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-irtf-samrg-common-api-06 Abstract: Group communication services exist in a large variety of flavors, and technical implementations at different protocol layers. Multicast data distribution is most efficiently performed on the lowest available layer, but a heterogeneous deployment status of multicast technologies throughout the Internet requires an adaptive service binding at runtime. Today, it is difficult to write an application that runs everywhere and at the same time makes use of the most efficient multicast service available in the network. Facing robustness requirements, developers are frequently forced to use a stable, upper layer protocol provided by the application itself. This document describes a common multicast API that is suitable for transparent communication in underlay and overlay, and grants access to the different multicast flavors. It proposes an abstract naming by multicast URIs and discusses mapping mechanisms between different namespaces and distribution technologies. Additionally, it describes the application of this API for building gateways that interconnect current multicast domains throughout the Internet, and reports on an implementation of the programming interface including a service middleware. This document is a product of the Scalable Adaptive Multicast Research Group (SAM) Research Group. The IETF Secretariat From prvs=55523d848=schmidt@informatik.haw-hamburg.de Fri Aug 3 11:21:26 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sam@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: sam@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A206721F8DE7 for ; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 11:21:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.988 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.988 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.261, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oziRHwyJyMnA for ; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 11:21:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx3.haw-public.haw-hamburg.de (mx3.haw-public.haw-hamburg.de [141.22.6.2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAD4721F8D80 for ; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 11:21:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailgate.informatik.haw-hamburg.de ([141.22.30.74]) by mail3.is.haw-hamburg.de with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 03 Aug 2012 20:21:24 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailgate.informatik.haw-hamburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FBB0105A98B; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 20:21:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mailgate.informatik.haw-hamburg.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailgate.informatik.haw-hamburg.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 29239-03; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 20:21:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [130.129.83.194] (dhcp-53c2.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.83.194]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailgate.informatik.haw-hamburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 029E5105A968; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 20:21:22 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <501C16A6.6020209@informatik.haw-hamburg.de> Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 11:21:26 -0700 From: "Thomas C. Schmidt" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: sam Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at informatik.haw-hamburg.de Subject: [SAM] RG Status Update X-BeenThere: sam@irtf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "For use by members of the Scalable Adaptive Multicast \(SAM\) RG" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 18:21:26 -0000 Folks, the SAMRG currently has two work items, 1. the baseline protocol: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-samrg-sam-baseline-protocol 2. the common API: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-irtf-samrg-common-api While the first needs additional review cycles, the second has completed WG (+ external) reviews and should be ready to move to the IRSG. Apart from this, little activity has been visible over the past months. It appears that interest from the community has fallen below a critical mass, and we are looking at closing the group. Those who do want to bring up research items, documents or related tasks, please speak up on the list asap. In addition, please take a minute or three to review and give feedback on draft-samrg-sam-baseline-protocol. Thanks & best wishes, John & Thomas -- Prof. Dr. Thomas C. Schmidt ° Hamburg University of Applied Sciences Berliner Tor 7 ° ° Dept. Informatik, Internet Technologies Group 20099 Hamburg, Germany ° ° http://www.haw-hamburg.de/inet Fon: +49-40-42875-8452 ° ° http://www.informatik.haw-hamburg.de/~schmidt Fax: +49-40-42875-8409 ° From petithug@acm.org Mon Aug 6 09:44:54 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sam@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: sam@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C664C21E805E for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 09:44:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.177 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.177 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.376, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0gWCSUbH67Nu for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 09:44:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from implementers.org (implementers.org [IPv6:2604:3400:dc1:41:216:3eff:fe5b:8240]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20D9C21E804C for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 09:44:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:1f05:616:213:d4ff:fe04:3e08] (shalmaneser.org [IPv6:2001:470:1f05:616:213:d4ff:fe04:3e08]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Marc Petit-Huguenin", Issuer "implementers.org" (verified OK)) by implementers.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D2A02044A for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 16:44:51 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <501FF481.5080602@acm.org> Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 09:44:49 -0700 From: Marc Petit-Huguenin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.6esrpre) Gecko/20120805 Icedove/10.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: sam X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [SAM] draft-[irtf-]samrg-sam-baseline-protocol X-BeenThere: sam@irtf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "For use by members of the Scalable Adaptive Multicast \(SAM\) RG" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 16:44:54 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 I am confused. Which one of these draft should I read and eventually comment on: draft-samrg-sam-baseline-protocol-01 draft-irtf-samrg-sam-baseline-protocol-00 Thanks. - -- Marc Petit-Huguenin Email: marc@petit-huguenin.org Blog: http://blog.marc.petit-huguenin.org Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/petithug -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQH/R/AAoJECnERZXWan7EJY8P/2OoQ5btXQApZsnQfJFBhPbq /QxrWAB5nJgKMSqlFjnrdm5PdQoJXZTUZbl+aedYnS211jX3/6Sqhl/HjGUdbQ/W n9GMd0uEx8KvNjWGwqDWxEb30oBcatP7OuICLIwOWYmF99DrBbgt9sg/nV12RA8T wSrdS1ERk0t77cqsy+IbfknFOycvCyvXIsCpN1a4TEBASyDKUCB+61GsRkMr4BE0 L6veaDteWrnQ4MoYd0HTFBDx625wCO8Y7MkTrSQUbFjSzBs8vwOD+Vo0z0xisWl+ l8PNPUlVfbnSfrzLSIsfbWnC5UviHSl+3gNwb4EYjA2djCvhA56d3TmgL5xlIBby duipMPFicMHBMbDtN/B4X1wTAfPiygYm7A9kL2UnSQpRWHOvy4zT8bocSKkqqmFh ePRIJ12+HYU1jysGJKqxeXq1EmD8rrrfZGW3n8nDGhFuX8TkqTaqa4xSM9/Qj9be j2fp6DxPTp7JDYyYI5qalQTRRVQf06Vjf9bDZ7/b7+9eLUEgYl03XeWUbexoy7ui FpBDjQlNYikOXFpqdZQ9V24qtNC3fxN2nP/1PlJbhlobJ5N58jF6AmqEUcjawCeQ TO7vgIIN+7BFKLdQg7jwDbyDA4iYfsl/PrM6idV7kWjy6+P5QqT02PxOUJRkBDYo gmz6zXhPoTuQZ5v1U8SB =G4z7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From mko@cs.stir.ac.uk Mon Aug 6 09:49:53 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sam@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: sam@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC52421E804C for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 09:49:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.8 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iU6E+dE2iCPf for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 09:49:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bannock.stir.ac.uk (bannock.stir.ac.uk [139.153.12.54]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3764621E8044 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 09:49:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.stir.ac.uk ([139.153.13.214]) by bannock.stir.ac.uk with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SyQV0-0002FA-6Y; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 17:49:46 +0100 Received: from host86-169-99-176.range86-169.btcentralplus.com ([86.169.99.176] helo=[192.168.1.65]) by smtp.stir.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SyQUz-0003YP-Pg; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 17:49:45 +0100 References: <501FF481.5080602@acm.org> In-Reply-To: <501FF481.5080602@acm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: <390FD997-2FD2-48E2-9C44-2D29299B43E1@cs.stir.ac.uk> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (9B206) From: Mario Kolberg Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 17:49:45 +0100 To: Marc Petit-Huguenin X-stir.ac.uk-MailScanner-ID: 1SyQV0-0002FA-6Y X-stir.ac.uk-MailScanner: Found to be clean Cc: sam Subject: Re: [SAM] draft-[irtf-]samrg-sam-baseline-protocol X-BeenThere: sam@irtf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "For use by members of the Scalable Adaptive Multicast \(SAM\) RG" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 16:49:54 -0000 Hi Marc, Sorry about the confusion! It should be draft-irtf-samrg-sam-baseline-proto= col-00 The previous upload (without IRTF in the name) was a mistake. Mario On 6 Aug 2012, at 17:44, Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 >=20 > I am confused. Which one of these draft should I read and eventually com= ment on: >=20 > draft-samrg-sam-baseline-protocol-01 > draft-irtf-samrg-sam-baseline-protocol-00 >=20 > Thanks. >=20 > - --=20 > Marc Petit-Huguenin > Email: marc@petit-huguenin.org > Blog: http://blog.marc.petit-huguenin.org > Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/petithug > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) >=20 > iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQH/R/AAoJECnERZXWan7EJY8P/2OoQ5btXQApZsnQfJFBhPbq > /QxrWAB5nJgKMSqlFjnrdm5PdQoJXZTUZbl+aedYnS211jX3/6Sqhl/HjGUdbQ/W > n9GMd0uEx8KvNjWGwqDWxEb30oBcatP7OuICLIwOWYmF99DrBbgt9sg/nV12RA8T > wSrdS1ERk0t77cqsy+IbfknFOycvCyvXIsCpN1a4TEBASyDKUCB+61GsRkMr4BE0 > L6veaDteWrnQ4MoYd0HTFBDx625wCO8Y7MkTrSQUbFjSzBs8vwOD+Vo0z0xisWl+ > l8PNPUlVfbnSfrzLSIsfbWnC5UviHSl+3gNwb4EYjA2djCvhA56d3TmgL5xlIBby > duipMPFicMHBMbDtN/B4X1wTAfPiygYm7A9kL2UnSQpRWHOvy4zT8bocSKkqqmFh > ePRIJ12+HYU1jysGJKqxeXq1EmD8rrrfZGW3n8nDGhFuX8TkqTaqa4xSM9/Qj9be > j2fp6DxPTp7JDYyYI5qalQTRRVQf06Vjf9bDZ7/b7+9eLUEgYl03XeWUbexoy7ui > FpBDjQlNYikOXFpqdZQ9V24qtNC3fxN2nP/1PlJbhlobJ5N58jF6AmqEUcjawCeQ > TO7vgIIN+7BFKLdQg7jwDbyDA4iYfsl/PrM6idV7kWjy6+P5QqT02PxOUJRkBDYo > gmz6zXhPoTuQZ5v1U8SB > =3DG4z7 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > SAM mailing list > SAM@irtf.org > http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/sam --=20 The University of Stirling is ranked in the top 50 in the world in The Time= s Higher Education 100 Under 50 table, which ranks the world's best 100 uni= versities under 50 years old. The University of Stirling is a charity registered in Scotland,=20 number SC 011159. From buford@samrg.org Sun Aug 19 10:53:00 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sam@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: sam@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EFF721F84F9 for ; Sun, 19 Aug 2012 10:53:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -100.778 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.778 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.688, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SiiZfQx9r8k4 for ; Sun, 19 Aug 2012 10:53:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from oproxy6-pub.bluehost.com (oproxy6-pub.bluehost.com [67.222.54.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id F0DFF21F849B for ; Sun, 19 Aug 2012 10:52:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 27780 invoked by uid 0); 19 Aug 2012 17:52:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO host181.hostmonster.com) (74.220.207.181) by cpoproxy3.bluehost.com with SMTP; 19 Aug 2012 17:52:35 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=samrg.org; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Cc:To:From; bh=uAfvPXlsbfdd0wVvNZe1J0JCVreHdWw17XtFo/2w1Zw=; b=N4acOMG3d9UctwHLrxbh8xSBZkR2Xzy1XYQ7yhoN4E8TtcNaEAI9IzEu639/XIoKOMmLC17VYap15SrAYxUUhquutrhsRgbwIIRBTI7aK/691fR4q7wFn5sYjGJT7lO/; Received: from [68.37.208.245] (port=1796 helo=AGILON) by host181.hostmonster.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1T39fu-00083O-PG; Sun, 19 Aug 2012 11:52:34 -0600 From: "John Buford" To: "'Internet Research Steering Group'" References: <50134BFD.4060103@alcatel-lucent.com> In-Reply-To: <50134BFD.4060103@alcatel-lucent.com> Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 13:52:48 -0400 Message-ID: <07f701cd7e33$7296cdd0$57c46970$@org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Ac1sZ1GYZ2LTDjz2TwCpC0Qf5Gc3twRy6FXA Content-Language: en-us X-Identified-User: {2055:host181.hostmonster.com:samrgorg:samrg.org} {sentby:smtp auth 68.37.208.245 authed with buford@samrg.org} Cc: sam@irtf.org Subject: [SAM] IRSG review for draft-irtf-samrg-common-api-06 X-BeenThere: sam@irtf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "For use by members of the Scalable Adaptive Multicast \(SAM\) RG" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 17:53:00 -0000 All, SAMRG RG requests an IRSG review for draft-irtf-samrg-common-api-06.txt http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-irtf-samrg-common-api-06.txt http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/irtf/trac/ticket/50 Please let me know if you can review this draft. Thanks, John From mko@cs.stir.ac.uk Thu Aug 30 02:10:55 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sam@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: sam@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17C6021F8627 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 02:10:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.8 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4orW+atSUd90 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 02:10:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bannock.stir.ac.uk (bannock.stir.ac.uk [139.153.12.54]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5515E21F8623 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 02:10:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.stir.ac.uk ([139.153.13.214]) by bannock.stir.ac.uk with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T70lu-0006wU-Q2 for sam@irtf.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 10:10:42 +0100 Received: from d253090.cs.stir.ac.uk ([139.153.253.90]) by smtp.stir.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T70lu-0002OS-HO for sam@irtf.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 10:10:42 +0100 Message-ID: <503F2E11.5050808@cs.stir.ac.uk> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 10:10:41 +0100 From: Dr Mario Kolberg User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: sam References: <20120806084935.16313.20951.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20120806084935.16313.20951.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <20120806084935.16313.20951.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-stir.ac.uk-MailScanner-ID: 1T70lu-0006wU-Q2 X-stir.ac.uk-MailScanner: Found to be clean Subject: [SAM] Feedback on draft-irtf-samrg-sam-baseline-protocol-00.txt X-BeenThere: sam@irtf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "For use by members of the Scalable Adaptive Multicast \(SAM\) RG" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 09:10:55 -0000 We have uploaded a new version of the baseline draft and would appreciate any comments. Access details below. Many thanks, Mario -- Filename: draft-irtf-samrg-sam-baseline-protocol Title: Application Layer Multicast Extensions to RELOAD URL: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-irtf-samrg-sam-baseline-protocol-00.txt Status: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-samrg-sam-baseline-protocol Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-irtf-samrg-sam-baseline-protocol-00 Abstract: We define a RELOAD Usage for Application Layer Multicast as well as extensions to RELOAD message layer to support ALM. The ALM Usage is intended to support a variety of ALM control algorithms in an overlay-independent way. Scribe is defined as an example algorithm. -- The University of Stirling is ranked in the top 50 in the world in The Times Higher Education 100 Under 50 table, which ranks the world's best 100 universities under 50 years old. The University of Stirling is a charity registered in Scotland, number SC 011159.