Subject: RE: [Simple] Re: Draft-campbell-simple-im-session-01: Unmatched transport protocols

From: Adam Roach <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 16:05:19 -0500

You're talking about changing *presentation* protocols,
not *transport* protocols. (We've confounded this so many
places that clarification seems necessary. For example,
changing from TCP to SCTP will probably result in few or
no complications).

Changing from TLS to non-TLS should probably be outlawed,
as I suggested in an earlier thread.

/a

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cullen Jennings [mailto:[email-masked]]
> Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2003 22:38
> To: [email-masked]; Jonathan Rosenberg; Robert Sparks; Paul Kyzivat;
> Ben Campbell
> Subject: [Simple] Re: Draft-campbell-simple-im-session-01: Unmatched
> transport protocols
> 
> 
> 
> If the relay does TLS on one side and TCP on the other, does 
> that cause any
> issues? How do you deal with a relay changing the protocol or offering
> multiple transport protocols? Probably need to be able to 
> discover this in
> the BIND and advertise it in the SDP. 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Simple mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple
> 
_______________________________________________
Simple mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple