Subject: [Simple] RE: draft-lonnfors-simple-binpidf-00.txt

From: Adam Roach <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 13:04:14 -0500

I have one minor comment on the current binpidf draft.

It's not clear what the motivation for having both
direct and indirect links to external content are.
The rationale for having multiple ways to do it
should probably be discussed in the document. In
particular, it would probably be worthwhile to
explicitly provide an analysis of why the flexibility
is worth the additional code that implementors
will need to write to support both modes of operation.

/a
_______________________________________________
Simple mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple