Subject: Re: [Simple] Consensus on INVITE-established IM

From: [email-masked]
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 15:24:21 -0500

go with INVITE-established IM sessions - as long as there is a way to
associate a one-time MESSAGE
with a later session of MESSAGEs.

Gur Kimchi
VocalTec Communications

                    "Peterson, Jon"                                                                                   
                    <[email-masked]>        To:     "[email-masked]'"                      
                    Sent by:                          <[email-masked]>                                
                    [email-masked]        cc:                                                             
                    icsoft.com                        Subject:     [Simple] Consensus on INVITE-established IM        

                    10/01/2001 02:05 PM                                                                               

It sounds like pretty much no one out there is vehemently opposed to the
concept of INVITE-established IM sessions (independent of what, exactly,
the
transport for these IM will be), and that a rough consensus supports this
protocol concept. If there is in fact any new argument to be made for
excluding this concept, this would be a good time for someone to raise it.

Jon Peterson
NeuStar, Inc
SIMPLE co-chair
_______________________________________________
simple mailing list
[email-masked]
http://mailman.dynamicsoft.com/mailman/listinfo/simple