From nobody Wed Mar 30 13:15:20 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tcpprague@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tcpprague@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB3D612D93F; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:13:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.699 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xEEIaG1Yq3Zz; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:13:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-yw0-x22e.google.com (mail-yw0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D028612D54F; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:13:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yw0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id g127so72380623ywf.2; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:13:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=FO9vnKbA3LXtnZ4BS7vK+MSMLCDMEFPr/zF5QJa4bvk=; b=Nm4G05nU56H3n0IlYKW/lQE2O6bfyUPHm0wRJckUuvABl9MQDgy4w2K205yPWOxY0e CCyHUDZaxP11t37Si6z1lPnlsfF8h0iqPaMBJBjiQ5zXUH4TIJ5Vd3BzT6Az4Ejhnp0J XNG/YR1gG9oY4pKWmMaUx/Qkk0WYSiNohO9hoqZU8ov5DTvD7V/uFAy156s873/PsSm+ i6SLAEhLRcLhD1TDrYl6DTNRhIGjdVX6Joy9n1zZTZkRQK/hu3Lo2ye7RKf+YpaDWUd7 4hkJO26tgsZpD++B8CEHfNswG0fbgLG7+6X6x+ejZZuzhqct3wwWJOqQ2xGRyKEq2qjW 2jLQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=FO9vnKbA3LXtnZ4BS7vK+MSMLCDMEFPr/zF5QJa4bvk=; b=mBhnGnYriuAJqrVDKGgdKGMwC7yGQt3guB0MyccIX0iWJMJR2xnslxOcEUPjuOj8zw kWfMZ0pNddmAxmhKrj7235lVoX3lqriLLtigyeyGHaXPFv2yOp6d2oQ7kyRMNlF4NC1c C/iIksdypmXPa2I55rVHJF4lZsf6romCHWKWu3oPpUzJI6RSaVHYTaaEXl9jD7F0RHx7 wvLH2pTlWLW4eWxeYkjiZoCE7BOY0qcfdBOxCzQ3hquO719FHRfzP1GuAJcRxdXW7v0q qj5911nCwSmYyDVb9PHMFpY6RuP1fvjxfLTLpmBY6YsRI8IdpHWQnSv2m32/Sdd1LsDb r+XQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJ3hCtjfIppvcKWeZB7QSHzTjRFNPaLcTx668fVpEYgKN5SWb+3ijltnbghggEj7v7KiFKWgSjgEttauQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.129.99.197 with SMTP id x188mr5113243ywb.61.1459368809062; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:13:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.37.70.198 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:13:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <56C71869.9080503@bobbriscoe.net> <20160219182359.GA74531@verdi> <56CACCB1.2080502@bobbriscoe.net> Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 16:13:28 -0400 Message-ID: From: Aaron Falk To: Spencer Dawkins at IETF Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1135a06875ecc8052f49c75e Archived-At: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:15:18 -0700 Cc: tcpm IETF list , tsvwg IETF list , Bob Briscoe , TCP Prague List , "tsv-ads@ietf.org" , AQM IETF list , "De Schepper, Koen \(Koen\)" Subject: Re: [tcpPrague] [tcpm] [tsvwg] (Bar) BoF @IETF-95 'Ultra-Low Queuing Delay for All' (L4S, DualQ Coupled AQM, TCP Prague)? X-BeenThere: tcpprague@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "To coordinate implementation and standardisation of TCP Prague across platforms. TCP Prague will be an evolution of DCTCP designed to live alongside other TCP variants and derivatives." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 20:13:35 -0000 --001a1135a06875ecc8052f49c75e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Did this get scheduled? --aaron On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Spencer Dawkins at IETF < spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: > Just to try to be helpful ... > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 2:54 AM, Bob Briscoe wrote: > >> John, >> >> On 19/02/16 18:23, John Leslie wrote: >> >>> Bob Briscoe wrote: >>> >>>> I'm cross-posting 'cos this impacts 3 IETF WGs and interested >>>> implementers. >>>> >>>> We would like to propose a Bar BoF at the Buenos Aires IETF, about L4S, >>>> DualQ and solutions to the TCP Prague Requirements. >>>> >>> This feels like it belongs as a non-WG-forming formal BoF. >>> >>> It describes work spanning at least three WGs; and could benefit from >>> formal scheduling to avoid conflicts with those WGs and others. >>> >>> OTOH, it really isn't to the point where a WG charter can reasonably >>> be drafted. First we must decide whether the work _can_ be split among >>> existing WGs. >>> >>> However this may turn out, I wish to participate remotely. >>> >> OK, we'll see if the secretariat can help us with that. >> > > I believe that happens at http://www.ietf.org/meeting/amreq.html. If you > put "TSV" in as "type of meeting", your happy TSV ADs would see the request. > > Thanks, > > Spencer > > >> Unfortunately we ran out of time for the formal BoF deadline on Friday. >> >> >> Bob >> >> >>> -- >>> John Leslie >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> tcpPrague mailing list >>> tcpPrague@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpprague >>> >> >> -- >> ________________________________________________________________ >> Bob Briscoe http://bobbriscoe.net/ >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > tcpm mailing list > tcpm@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm > > --001a1135a06875ecc8052f49c75e Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Did this get scheduled?

--aaron

On Mon, Feb 22, 201= 6 at 12:21 PM, Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gm= ail.com> wrote:
Just to try to be helpful ...

On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 2:54 AM, Bob Bri= scoe <ietf@bobbriscoe.net> wrote:
John= ,

On 19/02/16 18:23, John Leslie wrote:
Bob Briscoe <ie= tf@bobbriscoe.net> wrote:
I'm cross-posting 'cos this impacts 3 IETF WGs and interested imple= menters.

We would like to propose a Bar BoF at the Buenos Aires IETF, about L4S,
DualQ and solutions to the TCP Prague Requirements.
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 This feels like it belongs as a non-WG-forming formal BoF.
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 It describes work spanning at least three WGs; and could bene= fit from
formal scheduling to avoid conflicts with those WGs and others.

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 OTOH, it really isn't to the point where a WG charter can= reasonably
be drafted. First we must decide whether the work _can_ be split among
existing WGs.

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 However this may turn out, I wish to participate remotely.
OK, we'll see if the secretariat can help us with that.

I believe that happens at=C2=A0http://www.ietf.org/me= eting/amreq.html. If you put "TSV" in as "type of meetin= g", your happy TSV ADs would see the request.

Thanks,

Spencer
=C2=A0=
Unfortunately we ran out of time for the formal BoF deadline on Friday.


Bob


--
John Leslie <john@jlc.= net>

_______________________________________________
tcpPrague mailing list
tcpPrague@ietf.org<= /a>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpprague

--
________________________________________________________________
Bob Briscoe=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0http://bobbriscoe.net/



_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm


--001a1135a06875ecc8052f49c75e--