From nobody Thu Jun 1 16:37:09 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1207129454 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 16:37:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.8 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QvV_Pq87RQtJ for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 16:37:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lf0-x232.google.com (mail-lf0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E68E412420B for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 16:37:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf0-x232.google.com with SMTP id a136so20674160lfa.0 for ; Thu, 01 Jun 2017 16:37:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=o5BSHwULTFzQympZ6SOp1jVh493RYtl9zSFK6gadf6Y=; b=dSA7tawaoWtsx/3k0I01xHCnKKdDngAVubsgjDx8/PXWPpD9GO0Oy90sqt+PoA9pWA QAHwsebSxRCTtVEVElKWyFt7mI1hrzXtSDOrg5gKAWc0Mdry9VsRVV3ZG6PEz95sOLXG H6f4Fk36FLAZxmeCHDht0HBJt1GrMF5dG+2aQxLvNYSXeK8O1rQjL9O+aPLtVGR8d4B0 vNewE0a3jmWlWpKIUi9E8QEbnWzs8L8FhpWyUrntMr6Hirzm+aXGWEHsMlermt/nSTuA iZHtQA/Jo6hzjLBHAy2cdApPnPfQvvjoEwbmnQElONWumVQuVnOwsimRfDx/vcaPg6Te i9bg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=o5BSHwULTFzQympZ6SOp1jVh493RYtl9zSFK6gadf6Y=; b=lgfKYHQVTf+O/PYF2v7vExb8qMyZlg0bJLQ/HQ7VP3mTfDZ7IW22f7wh3FvSXOISik tjN/5mCZktd42m89AC1UG4aefsTBeE1i4lfH8AlUtta887u3FSwVoFu3U0/dFBROYN0t FVZPtyCkfCkyzt/Ns9uWJoCsSFWLpXl+y9gZ5/vQXHyAKPllFfyF3Yax7Kd4/2MMk95y IcT43MCMTFnujjIx1jqQMPdSHeDkY+pxoNk2zZZf2C5wluf3wK/MZjaKd+aTqV9e+qc6 LkPmaRzLRzUgnTaLN/w3Ox9B++yqnrv9CG6FRuo2/BW0lrHUQiN3gWKjasGI7fDrs7Kg gIyQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcDhxTN36gGav6oad8JoAA8xFjlN1bCufSKw8769O6W3+T7zjPoD kF7RT1u5aOmzuvBFV7RiVBbfNCFMgmPirFc= X-Received: by 10.25.29.82 with SMTP id d79mr1425661lfd.130.1496360224929; Thu, 01 Jun 2017 16:37:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.46.8.66 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 16:37:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Martin Thomson Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 09:37:04 +1000 Message-ID: To: "tools-discuss@ietf.org Discussion" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Archived-At: Subject: [Tools-discuss] Missing DOI resources X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 23:37:09 -0000 See https://circleci.com/gh/quicwg/base-drafts/2076 The resource in question, , used to be available. The DOI appears to be correct, see . Has there been a change in the tools infrastructure, or is the back end flaking somehow? From nobody Thu Jun 1 18:15:48 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D005F129B7A for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 18:15:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.766 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.766 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tjKsJXf1tVMO for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 18:15:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from resqmta-ch2-03v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-03v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7FD1129B7E for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 18:15:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from resomta-ch2-18v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.114]) by resqmta-ch2-03v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id GbBZdw6oAfuM3GbBldziF5; Fri, 02 Jun 2017 01:15:41 +0000 Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com ([24.60.114.4]) by resomta-ch2-18v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id GbBjdcRs4StKdGbBkdiMdV; Fri, 02 Jun 2017 01:15:41 +0000 Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com (hobgoblin.ariadne.com [127.0.0.1]) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id v521FdGA009301 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 21:15:39 -0400 Received: (from worley@localhost) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id v521FdoD009298; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 21:15:39 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: hobgoblin.ariadne.com: worley set sender to worley@alum.mit.edu using -f From: worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) To: tools-discuss@ietf.org Sender: worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 21:15:38 -0400 Message-ID: <87h8zzrxz9.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com> X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfETcM/yJLdhy30ZkBpbmxi3dNagmdCBkpTtQk6fCJ/kquMer3Pq5UYu+1nTqeL367mw446P8C4iM6sMnrIFKV257PlMKdWGleVwOmjZtp1Khdr73ah6F y7HA5xFARJI2m76YavLeBe7lE/j6nPOOMEr4vxsbZ7U/4ETMndn6rYI/N9Hg59R7Knif7GQrMmAqcw== Archived-At: Subject: [Tools-discuss] Gen-Art e-mails still getting line-wrapped X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 01:15:47 -0000 The reviews I e-mail to Gen-Art are still getting line-wrapped. I find this very irritating. An example is: https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/current/msg14810.html with part of the body being: > My knowledge of BGP is quite limited, so I cannot review the > desirability of this solution. I assume that the routing and > operations community has fully considered that question. > > 1. Introduction > > BGP routing security issues need to be addressed in order to make > the > Internet more stable. Route leaks [RFC7908] are part of the > problem, I see this in both the copy that is cc'ed to me as well as the copy recorded in mail-archive. I upload these as text files through the datatracker pages like https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject/reviewrequest/8805/ Dale From nobody Thu Jun 1 22:35:33 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62533127137 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 22:35:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AOUYGzuKstuU for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 22:35:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5832E12773A for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 22:35:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de Received: from submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::b]) by mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v525ZGpL004281; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 07:35:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.217.124] (p5DC7F3A7.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.199.243.167]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3wfCbS4Wc7zDH8k; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 07:35:16 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) From: Carsten Bormann In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 07:35:16 +0200 Cc: "tools-discuss@ietf.org Discussion" , Martin Thomson X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 518074515.892326-dcdf29949c5b7b13b642be848dcc5273 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <3B39EE57-ED38-4523-B87A-817F883ED64C@tzi.org> References: To: "HANSEN, TONY L" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Missing DOI resources X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 05:35:31 -0000 On Jun 2, 2017, at 01:37, Martin Thomson = wrote: >=20 > = , Right: $ doilit 10.1145/1282427.1282421 a: seriesinfo: ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review: Vol. 37, pp. 361 DOI: 10.1145/1282427.1282421 title: Structured streams author: - name: Bryan Ford ins: B. Ford date: '2007-10-01=E2=80=99 (Including this in the YAML would be the workaround for now.) Wild guess as to the underlying problem: Since the resolution of this = doi now involves a redirect from HTTP to HTTPS, which was not supported = (incorrectly considered insecure) in older versions of Ruby: Has the = server infrastructure behind bibxml7 possibly regressed to a historic = version of Ruby? Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe, Carsten From nobody Fri Jun 2 02:14:54 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55137129B6F for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 02:14:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BgQOO_-E-7_z for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 02:14:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from durif.tools.ietf.org (durif.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::3d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4FE012D0C3 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 02:14:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from h-43-30.a357.priv.bahnhof.se ([79.136.43.30]:55333 helo=[192.168.1.120]) by durif.tools.ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1dGifO-0005RB-3E; Fri, 02 Jun 2017 02:14:47 -0700 To: Carsten Bormann , "HANSEN, TONY L" References: <3B39EE57-ED38-4523-B87A-817F883ED64C@tzi.org> Cc: "tools-discuss@ietf.org Discussion" From: Henrik Levkowetz Message-ID: <59312C72.3010605@levkowetz.com> Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 11:14:26 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3B39EE57-ED38-4523-B87A-817F883ED64C@tzi.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fEv3P0FcndFhw2Ef12JiXaNeRkIfVU4CK" X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 79.136.43.30 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: tools-discuss@ietf.org, tony@att.com, cabo@tzi.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on durif.tools.ietf.org) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Missing DOI resources X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 09:14:50 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --fEv3P0FcndFhw2Ef12JiXaNeRkIfVU4CK Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="3aRcisBVTBlmSDku6jj59vSu4RC6lt8Bn"; protected-headers="v1" From: Henrik Levkowetz To: Carsten Bormann , "HANSEN, TONY L" Cc: "tools-discuss@ietf.org Discussion" Message-ID: <59312C72.3010605@levkowetz.com> Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Missing DOI resources References: <3B39EE57-ED38-4523-B87A-817F883ED64C@tzi.org> In-Reply-To: <3B39EE57-ED38-4523-B87A-817F883ED64C@tzi.org> --3aRcisBVTBlmSDku6jj59vSu4RC6lt8Bn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Carsten, On 2017-06-02 07:35, Carsten Bormann wrote: > Wild guess as to the underlying problem: Since the resolution of > this doi now involves a redirect from HTTP to HTTPS, which was not > supported (incorrectly considered insecure) in older versions of > Ruby: Has the server infrastructure behind bibxml7 possibly > regressed to a historic version of Ruby? No, this server has never had a higher version of ruby then 1.9.3. I hacked the installed kramdown-rfc2629-1.2.2/bin/doilit to say https://dx.doi.org/, which got the service up and running again. Thanks, Carsten. Good wild guess :-) Henrik --3aRcisBVTBlmSDku6jj59vSu4RC6lt8Bn-- --fEv3P0FcndFhw2Ef12JiXaNeRkIfVU4CK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJZMSx9AAoJEE6bV0uPuxcaHn4QAIVI3Hwp3VbkJR5n+Ff6c+cZ Mq8f5mzRugbru9LRkAtTNbk/3nYN5bqMkwq38NEx+D/QJyAb+Unt/Ct/5bndlt7T JwLMTIJALVV6IWeBGYdhVP1ECHZT9z+qzQKNQy0ilzRtx+btTsDfQvcg9gxgUe3X xaXmhKfMWcP4vdAZdJItu8uT22e30MjMdA3IYWW4Nl1LAqTIdUXKN0hdHW3uwsn+ xXnNO9A1mtjgb1nI+LKBcageUtt6Mv5P7vR3oCbuNFXWdwVlLBdVnZ3c4apG4xvS G/lPmLpjRqulGPH/8f6pWvONKt9eqq5hLWAcm301zk2fMi8UQkP+Wigh1KrRopg9 x3OW27MaTYBRzYSgUwxrqjhdsEYFom93TKVYVgvg+5UfP9qCQy6y8d6xKQhiRh2C HtgWT+Buexi2bZKLbpiLEnKxA/mG2f+y5wxKRXzu/AQPyYp2LMRLiNYnoNgWIXxV +ckoLGL7Y3kAzyduWJkaKMbmxVkV6vyoHKRS6cldx4ptW2QvErHgGoP6ZFdHzBeC nY8iHKkpiRiCf6+xeI+qZFTmLfAzKULSxw3UBwo8kAYMwCfkhD7b5nqevXpndO4d vxFht4yFk76tivvHaM+lOC87WgXrJOWxxxjfFXIminAifpQWtFcmJv9I0HShzREQ Cg5A56VywVRGI2uM7dhJ =yHE3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fEv3P0FcndFhw2Ef12JiXaNeRkIfVU4CK-- From nobody Fri Jun 2 05:52:31 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 525BB12EB5E for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 05:52:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aQrWrtX32omG for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 05:52:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6127D12EB62 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 05:52:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de Received: from submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::b]) by mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v52CqJNr002907; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 14:52:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.217.113] (p5DC7F3A7.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.199.243.167]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3wfPHl1l8czDJR5; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 14:52:19 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) From: Carsten Bormann In-Reply-To: <59312C72.3010605@levkowetz.com> Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 14:52:18 +0200 Cc: "HANSEN, TONY L" , "tools-discuss@ietf.org Discussion" X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 518100738.461197-f665c5cb5068030184ce20234e8cf619 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <3B39EE57-ED38-4523-B87A-817F883ED64C@tzi.org> <59312C72.3010605@levkowetz.com> To: Henrik Levkowetz X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Missing DOI resources X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 12:52:30 -0000 On Jun 2, 2017, at 11:14, Henrik Levkowetz wrote: >=20 > Hi Carsten, >=20 > On 2017-06-02 07:35, Carsten Bormann wrote: >> Wild guess as to the underlying problem: Since the resolution of >> this doi now involves a redirect from HTTP to HTTPS, which was not >> supported (incorrectly considered insecure) in older versions of >> Ruby: Has the server infrastructure behind bibxml7 possibly >> regressed to a historic version of Ruby? >=20 > No, this server has never had a higher version of ruby then 1.9.3. Oh, right. That was October 30, 2011. (That was the day "The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 1=E2=80=9D = premiered,=20 Greek prime minister Papandreou announced a referendum on the EU = Bailout, and Ivanka Trump turned 30. Just for context :-) So it seems dx.doi.org now started redirecting to https sources. That is certainly a good thing. > I hacked the installed kramdown-rfc2629-1.2.2/bin/doilit to say > https://dx.doi.org/, which got the service up and running again. I pushed an updated kramdown-rfc2629 gem with this change as 1.2.3. Thanks for fixing this so quickly. Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe, Carsten From nobody Fri Jun 2 06:22:11 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F61612EA6A for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 06:22:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.901 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iola-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wqeHIcwiGSU7 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 06:22:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qt0-x230.google.com (mail-qt0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E0B312EAA4 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 06:22:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qt0-x230.google.com with SMTP id w1so31740164qtg.2 for ; Fri, 02 Jun 2017 06:22:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iola-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=pf/dt/7bbDKdsoDxrwumP+AVyEq8TyzBJ5aQl2F7FMI=; b=gEPoDnrXjFD6E0pvUX0vxqbE7V9FHEgzlIvCQUkvy1aXhgczSqkjrZYMLFdhB28Obb grC282pXC4zPfx0irjrA80BwbRnpIx23goY32m4XEq1eeoh2AQckSlRNBePJz+1pFX6x kqv4NZP8GIVOGffunOaqRNFGIZqACPHsKdEik/cTJ8AYt0ts49mVrB+Xw6/ZhBUimv7v O6IPvvpKrBVaVceLk3jb5kfyCGZeRTRamGbI7x0KbFbCJtLVD+SJIN5euOAZbiOkAIzd fbBezOl5S3js+YN9idJdDCz2ytQIx624mHID/t05OxVC4RuRdgMUYJIDRp8uQlekk8PE XEMw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=pf/dt/7bbDKdsoDxrwumP+AVyEq8TyzBJ5aQl2F7FMI=; b=gWqMjvGf1AuT52TUSKGWhjCVys3R1+YeA5xsiw2U/CpELu0fyZgj1Z4p0ld+sbKcOr RVX9Eb4ocLHFGBYGqzS6Io/VVOsGUi2nhQQ8W2lYAbzwdSwmu1McRzHivWWLxCedZvaT xFjziqLCbapZy92NBohEMBNfAMM9HMxeEGBpeEdA7e5UgIAVh41FCc/wLrztfoa/ierr tOFDJpqanLIEQdDAYYt21QFB6kwS/dlRRfT8davSBnj1Ji8wrUh7Aoc6yfut4UwUegSM otD28y+kf8AQKPDAGecP/jTyBQXdOA6+Be5d36tWvIty19mllAmcT8xfbCUT/L2bXMWG rMLQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcCz8kJTFmLt0AdihTIrlNFxdmzis/Gd9HRjaS1S+G5ryBlDfVaQ za7vBRF+iYGOslHcPZFLWG0L8YeK4ob2 X-Received: by 10.200.51.66 with SMTP id u2mr8761325qta.12.1496409726592; Fri, 02 Jun 2017 06:22:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.200.56.2 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 06:21:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87h8zzrxz9.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com> References: <87h8zzrxz9.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com> From: Ole Laursen Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 15:21:46 +0200 Message-ID: To: "Dale R. Worley" Cc: Tools Team Discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Gen-Art e-mails still getting line-wrapped X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 13:22:10 -0000 Hi again! I just committed a patch that fixes this. Once it's merged by Henrik and released, you shouldn't see this problem again. Sorry! Ole 2017-06-02 3:15 GMT+02:00 Dale R. Worley : > The reviews I e-mail to Gen-Art are still getting line-wrapped. I find > this very irritating. > > An example is: > https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/current/msg14810.html > with part of the body being: > >> My knowledge of BGP is quite limited, so I cannot review the >> desirability of this solution. I assume that the routing and >> operations community has fully considered that question. >> >> 1. Introduction >> >> BGP routing security issues need to be addressed in order to make >> the >> Internet more stable. Route leaks [RFC7908] are part of the >> problem, > > I see this in both the copy that is cc'ed to me as well as the copy > recorded in mail-archive. > > I upload these as text files through the datatracker pages like > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject/reviewrequest/8805/ > > Dale > > -- > Tools-discuss mailing list > Tools-discuss@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss > > Please report datatracker.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb > or send email to datatracker-project@ietf.org > > Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues or > send email to webmaster@tools.ietf.org From nobody Fri Jun 2 08:38:32 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39F34129B45 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 08:38:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.401 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9C2aABfYOPcG for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 08:38:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com [67.231.149.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF48A12714F for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 08:38:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0049297.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0049297.ppops.net-00191d01. (8.16.0.17/8.16.0.17) with SMTP id v52FZVFR026065; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 11:38:25 -0400 Received: from alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (sbcsmtp7.sbc.com [144.160.229.24]) by m0049297.ppops.net-00191d01. with ESMTP id 2au3u02096-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 02 Jun 2017 11:38:25 -0400 Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v52FcM3E019726; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 11:38:23 -0400 Received: from mlpi408.sfdc.sbc.com (mlpi408.sfdc.sbc.com [130.9.128.240]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v52FcHln019553 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 2 Jun 2017 11:38:19 -0400 Received: from MISOUT7MSGHUBAF.ITServices.sbc.com (MISOUT7MSGHUBAF.itservices.sbc.com [130.9.129.150]) by mlpi408.sfdc.sbc.com (RSA Interceptor); Fri, 2 Jun 2017 15:38:06 GMT Received: from MISOUT7MSGUSRCG.ITServices.sbc.com ([169.254.7.110]) by MISOUT7MSGHUBAF.ITServices.sbc.com ([130.9.129.150]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 11:38:06 -0400 From: "HANSEN, TONY L" To: Carsten Bormann , Henrik Levkowetz CC: "tools-discuss@ietf.org Discussion" Thread-Topic: [Tools-discuss] Missing DOI resources Thread-Index: AQHS2zAA7rGTv/a0cEi05arD38R5S6IRULUAgAA9PACAADzfAP//6z+A Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 15:38:05 +0000 Message-ID: <7EEAF1AE-AEC1-4B37-BA4F-15F5061D4193@att.com> References: <3B39EE57-ED38-4523-B87A-817F883ED64C@tzi.org> <59312C72.3010605@levkowetz.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [135.210.14.220] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-RSA-Inspected: yes X-RSA-Classifications: public X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-06-02_08:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1703280000 definitions=main-1706020278 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Missing DOI resources X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 15:38:30 -0000 T24gNi8yLzE3LCA4OjUyIEFNLCAiQ2Fyc3RlbiBCb3JtYW5uIiA8Y2Fib0B0emkub3JnPiB3cm90 ZToNCg0KICAgIE9uIEp1biAyLCAyMDE3LCBhdCAxMToxNCwgSGVucmlrIExldmtvd2V0eiA8aGVu cmlrQGxldmtvd2V0ei5jb20+IHdyb3RlOg0KICAgID4gDQogICAgPiBIaSBDYXJzdGVuLA0KICAg ID4gDQogICAgPiBPbiAyMDE3LTA2LTAyIDA3OjM1LCBDYXJzdGVuIEJvcm1hbm4gd3JvdGU6DQog ICAgPj4gV2lsZCBndWVzcyBhcyB0byB0aGUgdW5kZXJseWluZyBwcm9ibGVtOiAgU2luY2UgdGhl IHJlc29sdXRpb24gb2YNCiAgICA+PiB0aGlzIGRvaSBub3cgaW52b2x2ZXMgYSByZWRpcmVjdCBm cm9tIEhUVFAgdG8gSFRUUFMsIHdoaWNoIHdhcyBub3QNCiAgICA+PiBzdXBwb3J0ZWQgKGluY29y cmVjdGx5IGNvbnNpZGVyZWQgaW5zZWN1cmUpIGluIG9sZGVyIHZlcnNpb25zIG9mDQogICAgPj4g UnVieTogIEhhcyB0aGUgc2VydmVyIGluZnJhc3RydWN0dXJlIGJlaGluZCBiaWJ4bWw3IHBvc3Np Ymx5DQogICAgPj4gcmVncmVzc2VkIHRvIGEgaGlzdG9yaWMgdmVyc2lvbiBvZiBSdWJ5Pw0KICAg ID4gDQogICAgPiBObywgdGhpcyBzZXJ2ZXIgaGFzIG5ldmVyIGhhZCBhIGhpZ2hlciB2ZXJzaW9u IG9mIHJ1YnkgdGhlbiAxLjkuMy4NCiAgICANCiAgICBPaCwgcmlnaHQuICBUaGF0IHdhcyBPY3Rv YmVyIDMwLCAyMDExLg0KICAgIChUaGF0IHdhcyB0aGUgZGF5ICJUaGUgVHdpbGlnaHQgU2FnYTog QnJlYWtpbmcgRGF3biAtIFBhcnQgMeKAnSBwcmVtaWVyZWQsIA0KICAgIEdyZWVrIHByaW1lIG1p bmlzdGVyIFBhcGFuZHJlb3UgYW5ub3VuY2VkIGEgcmVmZXJlbmR1bSBvbiB0aGUgRVUgQmFpbG91 dCwNCiAgICBhbmQgSXZhbmthIFRydW1wIHR1cm5lZCAzMC4gIEp1c3QgZm9yIGNvbnRleHQgOi0p DQogICAgDQogICAgU28gaXQgc2VlbXMgZHguZG9pLm9yZyBub3cgc3RhcnRlZCByZWRpcmVjdGlu ZyB0byBodHRwcyBzb3VyY2VzLg0KICAgIFRoYXQgaXMgY2VydGFpbmx5IGEgZ29vZCB0aGluZy4N CiAgICANCiAgICA+IEkgaGFja2VkIHRoZSBpbnN0YWxsZWQga3JhbWRvd24tcmZjMjYyOS0xLjIu Mi9iaW4vZG9pbGl0IHRvIHNheQ0KICAgID4gaHR0cHM6Ly9keC5kb2kub3JnICwgd2hpY2ggZ290 IHRoZSBzZXJ2aWNlIHVwIGFuZCBydW5uaW5nIGFnYWluLg0KICAgIA0KICAgIEkgcHVzaGVkIGFu IHVwZGF0ZWQga3JhbWRvd24tcmZjMjYyOSBnZW0gd2l0aCB0aGlzIGNoYW5nZSBhcyAxLjIuMy4N CiAgICANCiAgICBUaGFua3MgZm9yIGZpeGluZyB0aGlzIHNvIHF1aWNrbHkuDQoNCkkgdXBkYXRl ZCBrcmFtZG93biBvbiB0b29scy5pZWYub3JnIHRvIHBpY2sgdXAgdGhlIGNoYW5nZSDigJxvZmZp Y2lhbGx54oCdLiBBIHF1aWNrIHRlc3Qgc2hvd3MgYmlieG1sNyBzdGlsbCB3b3Jrcy4NCg0KCVRv bnkNCg0KICAgIA0KDQo= From nobody Fri Jun 2 17:40:46 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFE77127B57 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 17:40:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.034 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.034 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OGqt-B2-st_Z for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 17:40:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from resqmta-ch2-11v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-11v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B31912420B for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 17:40:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from resomta-ch2-13v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.109]) by resqmta-ch2-11v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id Gx78dmd1zT4XXGx7SdI9b3; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 00:40:42 +0000 Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com ([24.60.114.4]) by resomta-ch2-13v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id Gx7QdlkmjAtR2Gx7RdqNLO; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 00:40:42 +0000 Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com (hobgoblin.ariadne.com [127.0.0.1]) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id v530eecG029275; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 20:40:40 -0400 Received: (from worley@localhost) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id v530ed4E029272; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 20:40:39 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: hobgoblin.ariadne.com: worley set sender to worley@alum.mit.edu using -f From: worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) To: Ole Laursen Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org In-Reply-To: (olau@iola.dk) Sender: worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 20:40:39 -0400 Message-ID: <87lgp9rji0.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com> X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfPkDLseoaR7y9fZ99qniTVMO80gumPRTJuCT1FBYjpWvAd9yw9m/s4Y1WBUXz/naiHTcT9VqbzyS33v3HqqXFtlybwxnfU2tQwVPy6DPWw5yn2XimoKO wQtwaMZD+1xSmAFL6aYdjXJEVC+ifyQV+JKGEOvlF5c49y8ujlLvkzmwjmXwtcVnEuWlb/24pnfPDGYONQzNjy+s1JgNYbyoZj4= Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Gen-Art e-mails still getting line-wrapped X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2017 00:40:44 -0000 Ole Laursen writes: > I just committed a patch that fixes this. Once it's merged by Henrik > and released, you shouldn't see this problem again. Sorry! Ah, thank you! Dale From nobody Sat Jun 3 17:40:55 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 112F012969E for ; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 17:40:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6pC4gzgomnxm for ; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 17:40:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lf0-x230.google.com (mail-lf0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A32E91294C4 for ; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 17:40:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf0-x230.google.com with SMTP id c184so52735764lfe.2 for ; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 17:40:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=wh0W1JPOa0FaCIBThvCQFv0ZqQIm+AP9Jys/7aVOkvs=; b=rUwxm0gTUdSZfE7cqZKVX+qHmAibN51sgODi2N6369xWPvEbZEPF4sqENyr3iNaTfe FsolJILhaNV60t8S/b3EKyJe6UOnBTpPi7Ef9DrhTcJWHqx6ckg7lSQtrIaNTIPi9S5X +4mfRBBWo7Eaw/1mPAberPL9S9jrTg/o5OO3qXe6Ks+rASyXavEkP4IZJkEIBqe2rg7X 9XkLXZqyJaOducURYH03y5is6efDMZPnIl3X14abK9V7gPTRZUsfgs08jBVxDPx4HQAh uaz6hGuq35BakTOJVG0DqAu1W53eWs8cyu37ixjckjlEa78llH3OzhDqMxFwhAVPDA7D 9Keg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=wh0W1JPOa0FaCIBThvCQFv0ZqQIm+AP9Jys/7aVOkvs=; b=CMTZQUZE+whzfAodx2PT4uiZNTHIWs4HDNjUYMUJahGkBTRafBGZyDaprFMV2yEwmE x887bJ++yZ8oTNtvdwZ+vsxHKaGUi7MIEonfOY8ZX49DaLL7SMzz/Vyk/Gi1KrjKm4+e DOaI9168BhTBJqhZIAYbmG+0DgSxzUEPAsYpyasS7VwYs9FY4h4e4ihsONKh+CnOm3R7 RSY93SXJ+YqkEnHI0B8l+XL6yP4ZuKIiUrmfPzQbYQuF4aicHtd+JF+mue8pqNXPEyT3 ZBk8sn7ETLtrGx5p5nNHHvTNOLK/5xQgWZIxPP3W3PKWz4bIpuQYhj5vvSHUj6j2Srbg VeZQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcDHwyB7g9NHKyWTaPGS+h6NujBJddX8taCQlbFCVTM0Qr9tkzfW 32fwSAdiJVZ13HLhnerhvbdxI4UbrQ== X-Received: by 10.46.76.1 with SMTP id z1mr4147965lja.128.1496536848834; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 17:40:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.46.8.66 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 17:40:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <3B39EE57-ED38-4523-B87A-817F883ED64C@tzi.org> <59312C72.3010605@levkowetz.com> From: Martin Thomson Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2017 10:40:47 +1000 Message-ID: To: Carsten Bormann Cc: Henrik Levkowetz , "HANSEN, TONY L" , "tools-discuss@ietf.org Discussion" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Missing DOI resources X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2017 00:40:54 -0000 On 2 June 2017 at 22:52, Carsten Bormann wrote: > Thanks for fixing this so quickly. And from me :) From nobody Thu Jun 8 07:11:02 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4E2A124BFA; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 07:11:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.902 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v7mbxP_tYMV6; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 07:10:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAD721200E5; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 07:10:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E145E25A; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 10:11:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id D73BD636BB; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 10:10:58 -0400 (EDT) From: Michael Richardson To: Glen via cc: tools-discuss X-Attribution: mcr X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1 X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m Archived-At: Subject: [Tools-discuss] etherpad X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2017 14:11:02 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain https://etherpad.tools.ietf.org/p/ seems to be down. I'm not sure if this is an ietf-action report or not. -- Michael Richardson , Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =- --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEbsyLEzg/qUTA43uogItw+93Q3WUFAlk5WvIACgkQgItw+93Q 3WVHIwf9HOQZTxzTWTOYOeIFtgDty/nRtYmBSk7k3a+Q3gaQ9utDAwROb5FZe1y6 C76OMUCV8wXdmPzGf9tCt7J7/30z03Tdbu/OvA9yIvXshtNvQH8ZOv5AMkkR+XtD Ks+5BHNFDV1KJNdFDOmt05OV+m9lYaQdf1aiUg3kGJFCPpdhN35kZ1U2S3995EaZ QWYZYNu+9p+E0/KWtZAFAN+TC5AF2S+nROzyIFyg7ZqlM9OjsraQfN14UXx2y1Xy iEOAnAxNBd2FHOQhbE5D7WsLPzFnu5DOZvmSqPzRxP4bYpbQQfeMlo+pbZhKGtp1 JSdijW0VV4MZ1GCm1HUR9HqOxyg8ZQ== =piln -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From nobody Thu Jun 8 08:03:28 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8B06124D85 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 08:03:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.88 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.88 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I9yC7POUcw4J for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 08:03:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 026A612E057 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 08:03:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unescapeable.local ([148.87.66.199]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v58F3KV0007421 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 10:03:21 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com) X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [148.87.66.199] claimed to be unescapeable.local To: tools-discuss@ietf.org References: <9044.1496931058@obiwan.sandelman.ca> From: Robert Sparks Message-ID: <691ea934-ba21-8e29-a5ce-848a82611f98@nostrum.com> Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 11:03:20 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9044.1496931058@obiwan.sandelman.ca> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------BE3144CC0B2A89740BB7B0BD" Content-Language: en-US Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] etherpad X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2017 15:03:27 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------BE3144CC0B2A89740BB7B0BD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit It's at tools.ietf.org, so its a note to Henrik (who has already fixed it). RjS On 6/8/17 10:10 AM, Michael Richardson wrote: > https://etherpad.tools.ietf.org/p/ > > seems to be down. I'm not sure if this is an ietf-action report or not. > > > -- > Michael Richardson , Sandelman Software Works > -= IPv6 IoT consulting =- > > > > > --------------BE3144CC0B2A89740BB7B0BD Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

It's at tools.ietf.org, so its a note to Henrik (who has already fixed it).

RjS


On 6/8/17 10:10 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:
https://etherpad.tools.ietf.org/p/

seems to be down. I'm not sure if this is an ietf-action report or not.


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-



--------------BE3144CC0B2A89740BB7B0BD-- From nobody Sat Jun 17 11:26:20 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1FD1129B61 for ; Sat, 17 Jun 2017 11:26:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gGodfao-dFPk for ; Sat, 17 Jun 2017 11:26:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-yw0-x235.google.com (mail-yw0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5426E129B5E for ; Sat, 17 Jun 2017 11:26:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yw0-x235.google.com with SMTP id e142so29594896ywa.1 for ; Sat, 17 Jun 2017 11:26:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=vSOiE9KtwRgZi4cpWNIjA7JsJkL2NxtF8TBbwzgz9pU=; b=n5yZqKIFAWe3d6WMPCec0spXSsS60l9gQ3iakU84sXU11hJtBT7e07qDrin5cZWAdh yuSa+I0zvljsX7xxwIycw0anPk13pVP2HCL7OHyemNvd79ieulbqd+E/dQgPbdiGSATK iVHvXvG3Fk1XzcSl4B7miKxXItRlxEo+UPXH25M23RWmSWNd7D11mY5HK+444P+7hlvI o7e364fUu7IQCWi67mATsr6YwvgTGt11WOrMJbAoeaY8gRzkPe8P0uPYQwYzqu49Dse1 0GH6C7zyIg1oGxgyZ1cYK/9WxH+4CHBmikaOJIudjg/PC+uZy813FDQ1krXOxUF2IZ3+ el/A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=vSOiE9KtwRgZi4cpWNIjA7JsJkL2NxtF8TBbwzgz9pU=; b=Eywq+ukVYB1uB0N7T366HAT/CMFnRmkrYbucNujo1sTbWZuw9duppkgDgXRVwGv7g0 7iB+dLxRAvoUGT4oVYLS5jjlfBrWcni3LlPp6y4oYAFUIwHoscVlsSHpWHwQGUWWC7ro LZ5CH+6TEMziqgwNxMAS3oZF8AfiShFXp4uKWMMyzkm6N7MXvwI0kRPcETJmU2oKfWg1 b5JxcOYAMqP4ZrEcGPWGkzh8GfJr+3j3xh2TlNwgGqx/Qqc4eJR2DAcTqQHKbD/5ORlt DvHqOs3EVkDWRfpptsj47UnN9zyRTgQJ19w3+/Vx/x/1C1YonNQV+gIB542sm2/pXmdq oQvA== X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOyFyPLE15UzXwQdStYWRZwmfMGoslM/qTCJdtOups9a857sfF/V kZszQIvSQGYWyu1SZ5WH113Jp0Yk6WBX8wtREg== X-Received: by 10.129.109.4 with SMTP id i4mr13799779ywc.3.1497723976459; Sat, 17 Jun 2017 11:26:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.13.215.144 with HTTP; Sat, 17 Jun 2017 11:25:36 -0700 (PDT) From: Eric Rescorla Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2017 11:25:36 -0700 Message-ID: To: tools-discuss Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114dd18496c24905522c0911" Archived-At: Subject: [Tools-discuss] Spurious YANG warnings X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2017 18:26:19 -0000 --001a114dd18496c24905522c0911 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" The YANG checker seems to be overreacting to documents which have code examples but no YANG. See, for instance: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-kitten-rfc5653bis/ -Ekr --001a114dd18496c24905522c0911 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
The YANG checker seems to be overreacting to documents whi= ch
have code examples but no YANG.

See, for in= stance:

-Ekr

--001a114dd18496c24905522c0911-- From nobody Sat Jun 17 13:41:32 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF953129BCF for ; Sat, 17 Jun 2017 13:41:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.899 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m6YBXJ0ey4Sg for ; Sat, 17 Jun 2017 13:41:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from durif.tools.ietf.org (durif.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::3d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEBAA1293D8 for ; Sat, 17 Jun 2017 13:41:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from h-43-30.a357.priv.bahnhof.se ([79.136.43.30]:65052 helo=[192.168.1.120]) by durif.tools.ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1dMKX9-0001MO-Ok; Sat, 17 Jun 2017 13:41:28 -0700 To: Eric Rescorla , tools-discuss References: From: Henrik Levkowetz Message-ID: <896c0d39-7d51-935d-f4df-a78508acaf96@levkowetz.com> Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2017 22:41:19 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="evLLrajOH6oud4cpdtJ8rLNMJ5LAWcrRm" X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 79.136.43.30 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: tools-discuss@ietf.org, ekr@rtfm.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on durif.tools.ietf.org) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Spurious YANG warnings X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2017 20:41:31 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --evLLrajOH6oud4cpdtJ8rLNMJ5LAWcrRm Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="ClvKvkDTKDXfpK1QDaX4Jwopf4RUkIB61"; protected-headers="v1" From: Henrik Levkowetz To: Eric Rescorla , tools-discuss Message-ID: <896c0d39-7d51-935d-f4df-a78508acaf96@levkowetz.com> Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Spurious YANG warnings References: In-Reply-To: --ClvKvkDTKDXfpK1QDaX4Jwopf4RUkIB61 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Ekr, On 2017-06-17 20:25, Eric Rescorla wrote: > The YANG checker seems to be overreacting to documents which > have code examples but no YANG. >=20 > See, for instance: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-kitten-rfc5653bis/ Good point. Working on a fix. Thanks :-) , and regards, Henrik --ClvKvkDTKDXfpK1QDaX4Jwopf4RUkIB61-- --evLLrajOH6oud4cpdtJ8rLNMJ5LAWcrRm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJZRZPvAAoJEE6bV0uPuxca0S8P/2EIvzOzLc6wAwJhTKGBRi9p U8nJrLurK81WmXk+wXfPqAKNnaS/g5s4GAxL2T13BQfl7qc8EQ1623PhkiL1HtJq mLcrw6nqkufkSrvt1HcXYUjSBxT2TyYcd0ksw39CAfGa+dOlim1XhFgjjYXSboAl re0sQnrI8LxSzbFTUFBp31zbDORYJcxfqC83CnOMngRNuzVCCKoZ0bazmdpnEBH2 KDaFtRobkQ2VdwDI/PTMWKlTvSxsrCNrL6nFLB+EwsOHjJursaNv+5AtVTt73QKh 16vxGnwHVMREXg20dy4XYp5XnEpb8yKd7NWmND7ikm5e1RbhffC+6tpkY+MnwnXm QdnFhFq0Jj+0u8CWAE3yXBjbxgHezN4dwfnQJJUsbo94RcodTL3w98DxBHflj+Xw X1IoBWG7AQ6P0vOxpQybojN2lDX0u6nFykcWyOZkvdcQue2BFIvJ9nON57c0uDS7 wfA9PtrrXMdjNcj7tempvl/oLt//d9gW88r13QUShjmwvxnvBtg4ej8PUyyhdmvp 4HD9NSFKuls+dqgUFeXNy68XiGbMk8QExX7FMDwIIbeivLNsfT75zCp3LM5n8yUb cJEzB7ofPjbd3JE//hn706HuSBbUgysOzKpYlw+Q/HmsM2EnYvyWozxit7wWK45M 6zRujLduGmE3M+ftMgtI =K788 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --evLLrajOH6oud4cpdtJ8rLNMJ5LAWcrRm-- From nobody Sun Jun 18 23:27:47 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C012128DF6 for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2017 23:27:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=netapp.onmicrosoft.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h-kAxesgqd2B for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2017 23:27:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx144.netapp.com (mx144.netapp.com [216.240.21.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92259127601 for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2017 23:27:44 -0700 (PDT) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.39,359,1493708400"; d="scan'208,217";a="200313732" Received: from hioexcmbx01-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.122.105.34]) by mx144-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 18 Jun 2017 23:02:44 -0700 Received: from VMWEXCCAS07-PRD.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.25) by hioexcmbx01-prd.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Sun, 18 Jun 2017 23:22:41 -0700 Received: from NAM03-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (10.120.60.153) by VMWEXCCAS07-PRD.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 18 Jun 2017 23:22:41 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netapp.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-netapp-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=oOWE5rV4fqNJZyxtVHm4qev+g8niWRWVvyZdQJr8gMI=; b=diYwN7Rn9GGGW0uu03MrbvtFhlkl3o/wKsUzt+x4gWeifxyeabsGn9RbHvOV2SB+dMqa8a2j7G8Uk0gaqBqw0/37aVRvxvqQWzybEdP7hqmtu+g1ExRi2zd+aaJxn1Wc1CjpqRzNbaqa5uSHra0ZvruNB7D6VPITVeBCPDSXsJc= Received: from BLUPR06MB1764.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.162.224.150) by BLUPR06MB1764.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.162.224.150) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1178.14; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 06:22:42 +0000 Received: from BLUPR06MB1764.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.224.150]) by BLUPR06MB1764.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.224.150]) with mapi id 15.01.1178.018; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 06:22:42 +0000 From: "Eggert, Lars" To: Eric Rescorla CC: tools-discuss Thread-Topic: [Tools-discuss] Spurious YANG warnings Thread-Index: AQHS55c5OqbNQPCYN0ibSzvgfTk4AqIrubuY Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 06:22:42 +0000 Message-ID: <9710DFBA-CB6E-44C1-9AAC-386A056C9D68@netapp.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: rtfm.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;rtfm.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=netapp.com; x-originating-ip: [109.43.1.194] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BLUPR06MB1764; 7: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 x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 1acd5e26-8bae-4a87-b29e-08d4b6db9790 x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(2017030254075)(201703131423075)(201703031133081)(201702281549075); SRVR:BLUPR06MB1764; x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BLUPR06MB1764: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(120809045254105); x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000700101)(100105000095)(100000701101)(100105300095)(100000702101)(100105100095)(6040450)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(10201501046)(3002001)(100000703101)(100105400095)(93006095)(93001095)(6055026)(6041248)(20161123564025)(20161123555025)(20161123560025)(20161123562025)(20161123558100)(201703131423075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(6072148)(100000704101)(100105200095)(100000705101)(100105500095); SRVR:BLUPR06MB1764; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000800101)(100110000095)(100000801101)(100110300095)(100000802101)(100110100095)(100000803101)(100110400095)(100000804101)(100110200095)(100000805101)(100110500095); SRVR:BLUPR06MB1764; x-forefront-prvs: 0343AC1D30 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(39450400003)(39840400002)(39400400002)(39410400002)(39850400002)(24454002)(81166006)(54356999)(2900100001)(82746002)(606005)(8936002)(966005)(6512007)(77096006)(6486002)(53936002)(478600001)(76176999)(83716003)(50986999)(7736002)(6506006)(36756003)(189998001)(8676002)(6436002)(38730400002)(3846002)(53386004)(110136004)(99286003)(5660300001)(25786009)(1680700002)(66066001)(2906002)(33656002)(102836003)(122556002)(86362001)(54896002)(3660700001)(3280700002)(6116002)(19273905006)(6306002)(7906003)(229853002)(4326008)(2950100002)(6916009)(563064011); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR06MB1764; H:BLUPR06MB1764.namprd06.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en; spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9710DFBACB6E44C19AAC386A056C9D68netappcom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 19 Jun 2017 06:22:42.0746 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 4b0911a0-929b-4715-944b-c03745165b3a X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BLUPR06MB1764 X-OriginatorOrg: netapp.com Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Spurious YANG warnings X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 06:27:47 -0000 --_000_9710DFBACB6E44C19AAC386A056C9D68netappcom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 RG9uJ3QgYWxsIElEcyBoYXZlIHRvIGhhdmUgWUFORyB0aGVzZSBkYXlzPyA7LSkNCg0KLS0NClNl bnQgZnJvbSBhIG1vYmlsZSBkZXZpY2U7IHBsZWFzZSBleGN1c2UgdHlwb3MuDQorNDkgMTUxIDEy MCA1NTc5MQ0KDQpPbiBKdW4gMTcsIDIwMTcsIGF0IDIwOjI2LCBFcmljIFJlc2NvcmxhIDxla3JA cnRmbS5jb208bWFpbHRvOmVrckBydGZtLmNvbT4+IHdyb3RlOg0KDQpUaGUgWUFORyBjaGVja2Vy IHNlZW1zIHRvIGJlIG92ZXJyZWFjdGluZyB0byBkb2N1bWVudHMgd2hpY2gNCmhhdmUgY29kZSBl eGFtcGxlcyBidXQgbm8gWUFORy4NCg0KU2VlLCBmb3IgaW5zdGFuY2U6DQpodHRwczovL2RhdGF0 cmFja2VyLmlldGYub3JnL2RvYy9kcmFmdC1pZXRmLWtpdHRlbi1yZmM1NjUzYmlzLw0KDQotRWty DQoNCi0tDQpUb29scy1kaXNjdXNzIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdA0KVG9vbHMtZGlzY3Vzc0BpZXRmLm9y ZzxtYWlsdG86VG9vbHMtZGlzY3Vzc0BpZXRmLm9yZz4NCmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3JnL21h aWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vdG9vbHMtZGlzY3Vzcw0KDQpQbGVhc2UgcmVwb3J0IGRhdGF0cmFja2Vy LmlldGYub3JnPGh0dHA6Ly9kYXRhdHJhY2tlci5pZXRmLm9yZz4gYnVncyBhdCBodHRwOi8vdG9v bHMuaWV0Zi5vcmcvdG9vbHMvaWV0ZmRiDQpvciBzZW5kIGVtYWlsIHRvIGRhdGF0cmFja2VyLXBy b2plY3RAaWV0Zi5vcmc8bWFpbHRvOmRhdGF0cmFja2VyLXByb2plY3RAaWV0Zi5vcmc+DQoNClBs ZWFzZSByZXBvcnQgdG9vbHMuaWV0Zi5vcmc8aHR0cDovL3Rvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnPiBidWdzIGF0 IGh0dHA6Ly90b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy90b29scy9pc3N1ZXMgb3INCnNlbmQgZW1haWwgdG8gd2Vi bWFzdGVyQHRvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnPG1haWx0bzp3ZWJtYXN0ZXJAdG9vbHMuaWV0Zi5vcmc+DQo= --_000_9710DFBACB6E44C19AAC386A056C9D68netappcom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PGh0bWw+DQo8aGVhZD4NCjxtZXRhIGh0dHAtZXF1aXY9IkNvbnRlbnQtVHlwZSIgY29udGVudD0i dGV4dC9odG1sOyBjaGFyc2V0PXV0Zi04Ij4NCjwvaGVhZD4NCjxib2R5IGRpcj0iYXV0byI+DQo8 ZGl2PkRvbid0IGFsbCBJRHMgaGF2ZSB0byBoYXZlIFlBTkcgdGhlc2UgZGF5cz8gOy0pPGJyPg0K PGJyPg0KLS0mbmJzcDsNCjxkaXY+U2VudCBmcm9tIGEgbW9iaWxlIGRldmljZTsgcGxlYXNlIGV4 Y3VzZSB0eXBvcy48L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXY+JiM0Mzs0OSAxNTEgMTIwIDU1NzkxPC9kaXY+DQo8L2Rp dj4NCjxkaXY+PGJyPg0KT24gSnVuIDE3LCAyMDE3LCBhdCAyMDoyNiwgRXJpYyBSZXNjb3JsYSAm bHQ7PGEgaHJlZj0ibWFpbHRvOmVrckBydGZtLmNvbSI+ZWtyQHJ0Zm0uY29tPC9hPiZndDsgd3Jv dGU6PGJyPg0KPGJyPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8YmxvY2txdW90ZSB0eXBlPSJjaXRlIj4NCjxkaXY+DQo8 ZGl2IGRpcj0ibHRyIj5UaGUgWUFORyBjaGVja2VyIHNlZW1zIHRvIGJlIG92ZXJyZWFjdGluZyB0 byBkb2N1bWVudHMgd2hpY2gNCjxkaXY+aGF2ZSBjb2RlIGV4YW1wbGVzIGJ1dCBubyBZQU5HLjwv ZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj48YnI+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXY+U2VlLCBmb3IgaW5zdGFuY2U6PC9kaXY+DQo8 ZGl2PjxhIGhyZWY9Imh0dHBzOi8vZGF0YXRyYWNrZXIuaWV0Zi5vcmcvZG9jL2RyYWZ0LWlldGYt a2l0dGVuLXJmYzU2NTNiaXMvIj5odHRwczovL2RhdGF0cmFja2VyLmlldGYub3JnL2RvYy9kcmFm dC1pZXRmLWtpdHRlbi1yZmM1NjUzYmlzLzwvYT48YnI+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXY+PGJyPg0KPC9k aXY+DQo8ZGl2Pi1Fa3I8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXY+PGJyPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0K PC9ibG9ja3F1b3RlPg0KPGJsb2NrcXVvdGUgdHlwZT0iY2l0ZSI+DQo8ZGl2PjxzcGFuPi0tIDwv c3Bhbj48YnI+DQo8c3Bhbj5Ub29scy1kaXNjdXNzIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdDwvc3Bhbj48YnI+DQo8 c3Bhbj48YSBocmVmPSJtYWlsdG86VG9vbHMtZGlzY3Vzc0BpZXRmLm9yZyI+VG9vbHMtZGlzY3Vz c0BpZXRmLm9yZzwvYT48L3NwYW4+PGJyPg0KPHNwYW4+PGEgaHJlZj0iaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0 Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby90b29scy1kaXNjdXNzIj5odHRwczovL3d3dy5pZXRmLm9y Zy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL3Rvb2xzLWRpc2N1c3M8L2E+PC9zcGFuPjxicj4NCjxzcGFuPjwv c3Bhbj48YnI+DQo8c3Bhbj5QbGVhc2UgcmVwb3J0IDxhIGhyZWY9Imh0dHA6Ly9kYXRhdHJhY2tl ci5pZXRmLm9yZyI+ZGF0YXRyYWNrZXIuaWV0Zi5vcmc8L2E+IGJ1Z3MgYXQNCjxhIGhyZWY9Imh0 dHA6Ly90b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy90b29scy9pZXRmZGIiPmh0dHA6Ly90b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy90 b29scy9pZXRmZGI8L2E+PC9zcGFuPjxicj4NCjxzcGFuPm9yIHNlbmQgZW1haWwgdG8gPGEgaHJl Zj0ibWFpbHRvOmRhdGF0cmFja2VyLXByb2plY3RAaWV0Zi5vcmciPmRhdGF0cmFja2VyLXByb2pl Y3RAaWV0Zi5vcmc8L2E+PC9zcGFuPjxicj4NCjxzcGFuPjwvc3Bhbj48YnI+DQo8c3Bhbj5QbGVh c2UgcmVwb3J0IDxhIGhyZWY9Imh0dHA6Ly90b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZyI+dG9vbHMuaWV0Zi5vcmc8 L2E+IGJ1Z3MgYXQgPGEgaHJlZj0iaHR0cDovL3Rvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnL3Rvb2xzL2lzc3VlcyI+ DQpodHRwOi8vdG9vbHMuaWV0Zi5vcmcvdG9vbHMvaXNzdWVzPC9hPiBvcjwvc3Bhbj48YnI+DQo8 c3Bhbj5zZW5kIGVtYWlsIHRvIDxhIGhyZWY9Im1haWx0bzp3ZWJtYXN0ZXJAdG9vbHMuaWV0Zi5v cmciPndlYm1hc3RlckB0b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZzwvYT48L3NwYW4+PGJyPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8L2Js b2NrcXVvdGU+DQo8L2JvZHk+DQo8L2h0bWw+DQo= --_000_9710DFBACB6E44C19AAC386A056C9D68netappcom_-- From nobody Mon Jun 19 04:17:05 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0F40129B83 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 04:17:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.898 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qwWeIZrnMJVM for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 04:17:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-yb0-x229.google.com (mail-yb0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c09::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39C24129B74 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 04:16:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yb0-x229.google.com with SMTP id f192so26929096yba.2 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 04:16:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=t2zXv+RCGJNyQZftPJf1f68Ldq11SBv5hEZjgRScuck=; b=HlexArbYl6IKqsjHpFxwTdWQB46e/fivqdS8h1VcCrvzGdaL9R14VzD6a+3Bgus4EB h+Q6FxmLr9Ped/IbXQ6aYAJpEHotHl8iqls336x3zOOwvNlsBwpw+A/Fe2mamv/ad21n pK00UYYtFDQgWFo4w3EE9E8aFtuH9va95nEQm7W1DBzgYf/nrbuG951VrIY1jFHTEgnw VNUV1CRTB1+NCcFjtQ/4n2WgM2cmSbAEw0VBw5kWEoUhKYjPB0a/oO75feJLpOOw8O4G i3oRVcuZxUYcFB44a0RjX3+AL/UJoGsGl14pO4U9WY4GbcNbn1LfkcBC5fPEWgZAdv7j u17g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=t2zXv+RCGJNyQZftPJf1f68Ldq11SBv5hEZjgRScuck=; b=Rv6PPht90W+JuBj32WoXRb8xmqA2ljAtzEaAaIMZysqaalfWN8cNSHqlciQjhxMtCZ aMTcDKIwZEWYJ24nzf6BJfSwVL7rita58xo105WuvXTwQ0+1dPiwsDPVdECVjybFTTUZ ZJAbSgfiY/hq5vvPFdGXdA1mKAMweDFdGwsOQB1h9w3iKSR90EwovnSsTJeHE81q3Vef 01rySsKCq4hdJ91awL1J5ANmpjvXi/sJLQTdMTjVv055OPD+x86IHfAybWj6F5w3effD UHvpg95msqv48PCIHM7ZwmsA5KYsZXzCLNhzr2sCIYJeO2OqP6nFInX8VZPIXz/hSuTc oSMQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOxlftx4cW1DA8qNO80ae6/8ifdPwfojKTYQ+86z/gzUdrQvdfni 09n4LJTiVjibU7tnTNTlQjzdMvTV1sHi X-Received: by 10.37.68.87 with SMTP id r84mr18795230yba.229.1497870992528; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 04:16:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.13.215.144 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 04:15:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9710DFBA-CB6E-44C1-9AAC-386A056C9D68@netapp.com> References: <9710DFBA-CB6E-44C1-9AAC-386A056C9D68@netapp.com> From: Eric Rescorla Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 04:15:52 -0700 Message-ID: To: "Eggert, Lars" Cc: tools-discuss Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113f5f3e6df9ab05524e4402" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Spurious YANG warnings X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 11:17:03 -0000 --001a113f5f3e6df9ab05524e4402 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 11:22 PM, Eggert, Lars wrote: > Don't all IDs have to have YANG these days? ;-) > Oh but in that case we need different warnings! "This document is missing a YANG section!!!" -Ekr > -- > Sent from a mobile device; please excuse typos. > +49 151 120 55791 <+49%201511%202055791> > > On Jun 17, 2017, at 20:26, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > The YANG checker seems to be overreacting to documents which > have code examples but no YANG. > > See, for instance: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-kitten-rfc5653bis/ > > -Ekr > > -- > Tools-discuss mailing list > Tools-discuss@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss > > Please report datatracker.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ > ietfdb > or send email to datatracker-project@ietf.org > > Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues or > send email to webmaster@tools.ietf.org > > --001a113f5f3e6df9ab05524e4402 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 11:22 PM, Eggert, Lars <lars@netapp.com><= /span> wrote:
Don't all IDs have to have YANG these days? ;-)

Oh but in that case we need different warning= s! "This document is missing a YANG section!!!"

-Ekr

=C2=A0
--=C2=A0
Sent from a mobile device; please excuse typos.

On Jun 17, 2017, at 20:26, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:

The YANG checker seems to be overreacting to documents whi= ch
have code examples but no YANG.

See, for instance:

-Ekr


--001a113f5f3e6df9ab05524e4402--