From nobody Fri Nov 3 07:18:43 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9A1C13FBD2 for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 07:18:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.879 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.879 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HheHxjvjI-vo for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 07:18:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC7C913FBAF for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 07:18:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Orochi.local (99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id vA3EId0i018165 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 09:18:40 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com) X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228] claimed to be Orochi.local To: Tools Team Discussion From: Adam Roach Message-ID: <6237fa60-9b21-e5b4-d91a-95bfd4d09642@nostrum.com> Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 09:18:34 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Archived-At: Subject: [Tools-discuss] New meeting materials management page X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2017 14:18:42 -0000 I notice that the old meeting materials management page now leads to a new destination . Under the previous tool, Area Directors were able to update meeting materials for any of the working groups they managed (and it may have been broader than that -- it might have been any WG in their area or any WG at all). Under the new tool, this ability appears to have been removed: I can't perform any actions for any of my groups. Was this removal intentional or an oversight? /a From nobody Fri Nov 3 07:23:06 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC6AF13FCD4 for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 07:23:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.879 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.879 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9YwXQwa_rBoI for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 07:23:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D0E613FC10 for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 07:23:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.1.82] (cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id vA3EN19Z018665 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 3 Nov 2017 09:23:02 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com) X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22] claimed to be [10.0.1.82] From: Ben Campbell Message-Id: Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_1C31C244-37A1-4CB5-908B-4148F648AB5E"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.1 \(3445.4.7\)) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 09:23:00 -0500 In-Reply-To: <6237fa60-9b21-e5b4-d91a-95bfd4d09642@nostrum.com> Cc: Tools Team Discussion To: Adam Roach References: <6237fa60-9b21-e5b4-d91a-95bfd4d09642@nostrum.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.4.7) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] New meeting materials management page X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2017 14:23:05 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_1C31C244-37A1-4CB5-908B-4148F648AB5E Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii I noticed this, too. Can we still get to the old version? > On Nov 3, 2017, at 9:18 AM, Adam Roach wrote: >=20 > I notice that the old meeting materials management page = now leads to a new = destination . Under = the previous tool, Area Directors were able to update meeting materials = for any of the working groups they managed (and it may have been broader = than that -- it might have been any WG in their area or any WG at all). = Under the new tool, this ability appears to have been removed: I can't = perform any actions for any of my groups. >=20 > Was this removal intentional or an oversight? >=20 > /a >=20 > -- > Tools-discuss mailing list > Tools-discuss@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss >=20 > Please report datatracker.ietf.org bugs at = http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb > or send email to datatracker-project@ietf.org >=20 > Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at = http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues or > send email to webmaster@tools.ietf.org --Apple-Mail=_1C31C244-37A1-4CB5-908B-4148F648AB5E Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEExW9rpd7ez4DexOFOgFZKbJXz1A0FAln8e8QACgkQgFZKbJXz 1A3GphAAsvoff6dRVYS5hktDbDwixvVnnXTY+Ar61zrScW94/m4LdmuS7bMfIpmT pSE+njf/Vvx1FXSEdnkeVsfbbS4lOV2JLbrw0UeF7FS3qzQqkMwBKXzQ4DPZk1UR 72P4DGtk/MSCKVhK/ygAHQUxvVzkrMUS3KI2/7FzWqKdmQMCE4vERRStwi1uVLFv Eab2WN2jp0Jm/0pCQ+/sdvxamN788xs4F1s7BXNuZuN98XgZzSTMsQhFvNmmRYYN nbIjcj14Kx2U7bKYu7Io6d1b3yAwA6K5EdCg+3iy7x49J/+sn4pJ3h+/Z/RnnL6B P3x35l2hdOsDDpTHbeVkF5iNN+YMt9m1TsHsgV1RyLsroTMK9fFx1MWp0l8CL248 k9Tpysc6pdvOrjWsJQCQUaGbm0WVyzfjCr9xH3QfjLiya+hZD4s18nqoZVa7bQvM B7Eeq7BhVYSetqJ1bkDiKE5/aBKPR+QD5d+y6u2C4n51CHRLrdsIyAPxI+CFaPCo WM9TCKdDOjTZlGY/xyhsJxy/DI24d0A22wudAJIwUm2mlw6pQLDYewxV1/EcRZZc di36sysX9x+60VBk2LIB0ClL5CKig7yWX4IZiNkHOPs0poww+31gC5hHkOXQo9R4 WUlQ3BkovxaNgkseGqHkOZADicZchefQqIH05cD3S7einw/WyIA= =0Jtt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_1C31C244-37A1-4CB5-908B-4148F648AB5E-- From nobody Fri Nov 3 07:36:31 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9415213FBC5 for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 07:36:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.899 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZLyLueBP1Ixv for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 07:36:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:126c::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DEBC13FAEB for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 07:36:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from h-99-61.a357.priv.bahnhof.se ([82.196.99.61]:56908 helo=[192.168.1.120]) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1eAd59-0004rq-Vt; Fri, 03 Nov 2017 07:36:28 -0700 To: Adam Roach , Tools Team Discussion References: <6237fa60-9b21-e5b4-d91a-95bfd4d09642@nostrum.com> From: Henrik Levkowetz Message-ID: <30a20349-6520-e16a-cb3f-c38abe343de1@levkowetz.com> Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 15:36:19 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <6237fa60-9b21-e5b4-d91a-95bfd4d09642@nostrum.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gAxv231JUrCMb8Q9GRV2ljePch7BvkxLV" X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 82.196.99.61 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: tools-discuss@ietf.org, adam@nostrum.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] New meeting materials management page X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2017 14:36:29 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --gAxv231JUrCMb8Q9GRV2ljePch7BvkxLV Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="OixgtpT6P4nkx5qQJTdaT2TDdsda2pucK"; protected-headers="v1" From: Henrik Levkowetz To: Adam Roach , Tools Team Discussion Message-ID: <30a20349-6520-e16a-cb3f-c38abe343de1@levkowetz.com> Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] New meeting materials management page References: <6237fa60-9b21-e5b4-d91a-95bfd4d09642@nostrum.com> In-Reply-To: <6237fa60-9b21-e5b4-d91a-95bfd4d09642@nostrum.com> --OixgtpT6P4nkx5qQJTdaT2TDdsda2pucK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Adam, On 2017-11-03 15:18, Adam Roach wrote: > I notice that the old meeting materials management page=20 > now leads to a new=20 > destination . Under=20 > the previous tool, Area Directors were able to update meeting materials= =20 > for any of the working groups they managed (and it may have been broade= r=20 > than that -- it might have been any WG in their area or any WG at all).= =20 > Under the new tool, this ability appears to have been removed: I can't = > perform any actions for any of my groups. >=20 > Was this removal intentional or an oversight? I think this is an oversight. And irrespective of that, if we think it's right that ADs should have this ability, then putting it back is easy enough. I'll do a patch. If a reason to not permit this comes up, it's easy enough to back out again. Henrik --OixgtpT6P4nkx5qQJTdaT2TDdsda2pucK-- --gAxv231JUrCMb8Q9GRV2ljePch7BvkxLV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJZ/H7jAAoJEE6bV0uPuxcaZfoP/1ZwIW2WB556GsvszBCg/du/ HlYyO2zsOPXorTcpzA/77PcLso/kbfUwjLsYMoCAwxDLL3TTr4GZ/ut7sR/I0Lfe mQO4ZDaL+2S2pgDqx8ftp4eMbGSZGAOSbHhIxk24pohjsZ296CabP2752IPRgKoV suwibE4gllGl7fQx3ZkXUChvImkG5YKq5xvzvUTSS8MHQUBUoLDMM+66XoKdtL2d nobsbfUlDoKCSQHzq25BCvp2B+ILIcYgHA66aV4L6woyDULo6H0Du23xMyAbGei4 hwGXKvJofM8hx09v8sQmRZSloKkkL0HeyhHmeQlCrBg5tAwPckxzIxFgvKL8r0s4 y7eXLbR7SZYnrcPLCxa4ePi7/aSLqxKf4oVwtvGGnR7OTGFxlF0XWhLzwtCenWFw Q2kPtarBaNuRdJxBI4saTOBjhjuMqs46n7Brn2+G9CTmMQff/g1rkKlYosTim8As psDNqaiPv9KC3gXUNPrun9n4EqCnK5pIc1owAVnFV4NrRpV3gH+VG8TAtDQT84x0 1HMqNOWKQ4YhqTjsanjPOESFsRC7yaBpvw9Xhxn/Db24MHmiv/Mk9kZHayW/yeKa +CmjTFj6kxh0x76NZAfchXai6z4Ea4X/qd8Sc1IBqWgJeA2GlRrtNHwwNizkAmnK EyoWEWEz+plzK6DzO+ex =1vcb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gAxv231JUrCMb8Q9GRV2ljePch7BvkxLV-- From nobody Fri Nov 3 07:47:09 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD77213FB6B for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 07:47:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.899 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iG-KfeY66ZHq for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 07:47:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:126c::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6536313FD6D for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 07:47:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from h-99-61.a357.priv.bahnhof.se ([82.196.99.61]:57406 helo=[192.168.1.120]) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1eAdFS-0006n9-O9; Fri, 03 Nov 2017 07:47:07 -0700 To: Adam Roach , Tools Team Discussion References: <6237fa60-9b21-e5b4-d91a-95bfd4d09642@nostrum.com> <30a20349-6520-e16a-cb3f-c38abe343de1@levkowetz.com> From: Henrik Levkowetz Message-ID: <7e5c73c9-2b9c-c605-b8e7-e0812a552afe@levkowetz.com> Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 15:46:58 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <30a20349-6520-e16a-cb3f-c38abe343de1@levkowetz.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VfWDunUPAthhWalUiIW06TMPv3ukFhj2u" X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 82.196.99.61 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: tools-discuss@ietf.org, adam@nostrum.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] New meeting materials management page X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2017 14:47:09 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --VfWDunUPAthhWalUiIW06TMPv3ukFhj2u Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="0SPgfaIKFD7MT364nHEJ2sLvMjOtSRonD"; protected-headers="v1" From: Henrik Levkowetz To: Adam Roach , Tools Team Discussion Message-ID: <7e5c73c9-2b9c-c605-b8e7-e0812a552afe@levkowetz.com> Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] New meeting materials management page References: <6237fa60-9b21-e5b4-d91a-95bfd4d09642@nostrum.com> <30a20349-6520-e16a-cb3f-c38abe343de1@levkowetz.com> In-Reply-To: <30a20349-6520-e16a-cb3f-c38abe343de1@levkowetz.com> --0SPgfaIKFD7MT364nHEJ2sLvMjOtSRonD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Adam, I've applied a patch; please check how this works for you now. Please note that I've done a new release earlier today, which has not yet been deployed. When that happens, I'll have to re-apply this patch. Best regards, Henrik On 2017-11-03 15:36, Henrik Levkowetz wrote: > Hi Adam, >=20 > On 2017-11-03 15:18, Adam Roach wrote: >> I notice that the old meeting materials management page=20 >> now leads to a new=20 >> destination . Under = >> the previous tool, Area Directors were able to update meeting material= s=20 >> for any of the working groups they managed (and it may have been broad= er=20 >> than that -- it might have been any WG in their area or any WG at all)= =2E=20 >> Under the new tool, this ability appears to have been removed: I can't= =20 >> perform any actions for any of my groups. >>=20 >> Was this removal intentional or an oversight? >=20 > I think this is an oversight. >=20 > And irrespective of that, if we think it's right that ADs should have > this ability, then putting it back is easy enough. I'll do a patch. >=20 > If a reason to not permit this comes up, it's easy enough to back out > again. >=20 > Henrik >=20 >=20 >=20 --0SPgfaIKFD7MT364nHEJ2sLvMjOtSRonD-- --VfWDunUPAthhWalUiIW06TMPv3ukFhj2u Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJZ/IFiAAoJEE6bV0uPuxcas44P/ja3UNwrFBIKb7h6vErxRJvH u6DvlrHFDB2YdnF5/wye8qdEn5ekW+av51rkLx7vjfgagqKIeYU/a6lmgrAwTSBU zSNemWkoIZjTBJL0oYJdggR0+sWuUDwfYS5S2hLbZl2p+EE7x2s+GeJ1BvXQ+X3o 6CmnmNXNqUp8nxCQZNi00y7PS23ZP4GXM9tdCXkXHnb4y/w7AEmZdOVXBuQp5lyP OBHEgOOIUKxmBlziVSya/wr1YwKk8IsgGzXItSVEoOagEtV8xB/DGg/B/J7VPtha izluff8Wt1VFr5cvPTBHe4drHrJHe+//NfWagXleQoa/PD6E28XAHMGnFMLhJGwB zJxExiLloK2G+XbagnsNhrPPnjFLNr0GyVmo8eoUH18rSEZcZpQAzywwSTnkBRsi mRgiOguWyTM2dkNVIogOUblLDOxQEpMTcxNYL0wcG6ZRq82D43PUEInMDui3TD4b GxYyUCkSPcKBsdRrZpZt3C8V3gn+I9wa20hBGJneoA5vgEC43vzZ2H36tOGoKpUL XuGZpKZCYnYQhSFzZsW4D0o9fNHb88pW40KHFZoE6VR1vJZjgpCZkomDaC16m0NK d0ms47IvuGC3Gzr8CU/19/o5Q9cKKrSg/+e4vcG5vhyghcYJiy1tKktZD0424gZx oE5+f51iKFCTYaiHvjQG =SWFs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VfWDunUPAthhWalUiIW06TMPv3ukFhj2u-- From nobody Fri Nov 3 07:48:52 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D8BB13FD91 for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 07:48:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.879 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.879 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zRKtpnx1XQqd for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 07:48:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC3BA13FD8E for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 07:48:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Orochi.local (99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id vA3EmjFj021468 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 3 Nov 2017 09:48:46 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com) X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228] claimed to be Orochi.local To: Henrik Levkowetz , Tools Team Discussion References: <6237fa60-9b21-e5b4-d91a-95bfd4d09642@nostrum.com> <30a20349-6520-e16a-cb3f-c38abe343de1@levkowetz.com> <7e5c73c9-2b9c-c605-b8e7-e0812a552afe@levkowetz.com> From: Adam Roach Message-ID: <3a09fd55-b8db-fcd7-23df-8d9407a1e9bd@nostrum.com> Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 09:48:40 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <7e5c73c9-2b9c-c605-b8e7-e0812a552afe@levkowetz.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] New meeting materials management page X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2017 14:48:50 -0000 Perfect. Thanks! /a On 11/3/17 09:46, Henrik Levkowetz wrote: > Hi Adam, > > I've applied a patch; please check how this works for you now. > > Please note that I've done a new release earlier today, which has not > yet been deployed. When that happens, I'll have to re-apply this > patch. > > Best regards, > > Henrik > > On 2017-11-03 15:36, Henrik Levkowetz wrote: >> Hi Adam, >> >> On 2017-11-03 15:18, Adam Roach wrote: >>> I notice that the old meeting materials management page >>> now leads to a new >>> destination . Under >>> the previous tool, Area Directors were able to update meeting materials >>> for any of the working groups they managed (and it may have been broader >>> than that -- it might have been any WG in their area or any WG at all). >>> Under the new tool, this ability appears to have been removed: I can't >>> perform any actions for any of my groups. >>> >>> Was this removal intentional or an oversight? >> I think this is an oversight. >> >> And irrespective of that, if we think it's right that ADs should have >> this ability, then putting it back is easy enough. I'll do a patch. >> >> If a reason to not permit this comes up, it's easy enough to back out >> again. >> >> Henrik >> >> >> From nobody Fri Nov 3 07:55:05 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B475413FE68 for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 07:55:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.879 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.879 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sliqp_l9pGXP for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 07:55:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23C2E13FE65 for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 07:55:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.1.82] (cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id vA3EsxxX022112 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 3 Nov 2017 09:55:00 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com) X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22] claimed to be [10.0.1.82] From: Ben Campbell Message-Id: <96053508-9408-411D-A341-D5D2E7336D9C@nostrum.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_DCBA28B0-93E9-4995-A68A-72FBC7A0BD89"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.1 \(3445.4.7\)) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 09:54:58 -0500 In-Reply-To: <3a09fd55-b8db-fcd7-23df-8d9407a1e9bd@nostrum.com> Cc: Henrik Levkowetz , Tools Team Discussion To: Adam Roach References: <6237fa60-9b21-e5b4-d91a-95bfd4d09642@nostrum.com> <30a20349-6520-e16a-cb3f-c38abe343de1@levkowetz.com> <7e5c73c9-2b9c-c605-b8e7-e0812a552afe@levkowetz.com> <3a09fd55-b8db-fcd7-23df-8d9407a1e9bd@nostrum.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.4.7) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] New meeting materials management page X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2017 14:55:04 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_DCBA28B0-93E9-4995-A68A-72FBC7A0BD89 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii +1 > On Nov 3, 2017, at 9:48 AM, Adam Roach wrote: >=20 > Perfect. Thanks! >=20 > /a >=20 > On 11/3/17 09:46, Henrik Levkowetz wrote: >> Hi Adam, >>=20 >> I've applied a patch; please check how this works for you now. >>=20 >> Please note that I've done a new release earlier today, which has not >> yet been deployed. When that happens, I'll have to re-apply this >> patch. >>=20 >> Best regards, >>=20 >> Henrik >>=20 >> On 2017-11-03 15:36, Henrik Levkowetz wrote: >>> Hi Adam, >>>=20 >>> On 2017-11-03 15:18, Adam Roach wrote: >>>> I notice that the old meeting materials management page >>>> now leads to a new >>>> destination . = Under >>>> the previous tool, Area Directors were able to update meeting = materials >>>> for any of the working groups they managed (and it may have been = broader >>>> than that -- it might have been any WG in their area or any WG at = all). >>>> Under the new tool, this ability appears to have been removed: I = can't >>>> perform any actions for any of my groups. >>>>=20 >>>> Was this removal intentional or an oversight? >>> I think this is an oversight. >>>=20 >>> And irrespective of that, if we think it's right that ADs should = have >>> this ability, then putting it back is easy enough. I'll do a patch. >>>=20 >>> If a reason to not permit this comes up, it's easy enough to back = out >>> again. >>>=20 >>> Henrik >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >=20 > -- > Tools-discuss mailing list > Tools-discuss@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss >=20 > Please report datatracker.ietf.org bugs at = http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb > or send email to datatracker-project@ietf.org >=20 > Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at = http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues or > send email to webmaster@tools.ietf.org --Apple-Mail=_DCBA28B0-93E9-4995-A68A-72FBC7A0BD89 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEExW9rpd7ez4DexOFOgFZKbJXz1A0FAln8g0IACgkQgFZKbJXz 1A3NZg/6Av9ucRk9tXpQhYQTTFmRI3HiZLrQT5I/ZtVrqicKPRXSRo1/y7BcpA5V AeR5YK9EUfOYAFxv/fa77HeIKnMLK4+4Zx+XhenHHq+mQjRdNQoLdUc1LYcRHodN 0zlMV8ZvdcH8mEqZty5IwPYFbKjm8fhO7usKIB/d1xvuC1mnKRIBBU+U2yyH4bA1 ahMGq8bblGgaFllb8KqSfBpd7cig1nxkeG5ocA4MmSaZfhDyS/tiW5myynajFC6g VG+hDHgQGdsebk5fgTmkpKdJmEj5psVSDT9kvJSaLB52J8Ysci3oxsJ9IZvsqA5e RqKfDPA2fHeMGP2GyNQu6xVEI4tRnpHvkXMMoWWLkBZMTm6q97j+Qw4/u08ACc8G ZJ7gG6OHOWEGuzA1lLNF3swX1WMcaIYEeczIU6BUJYbXdCswAtOJ7yrz3Yn7Wz9y LB0iry1gdVt0oo2URuehF/8B6H3X+CBLFkzauMPgtwBAsTLHn5kNveZ/wNexZ1Mq 2olgOMSy9fkcPXyZxx4Hi5hl8ZvrXGTpqroeqC1PtWqTpxyksa2f1rHU0ieeU9Ut a5tlCq42x7MssZ/IMx9/aIE/0z91RMiuouThqRUCHJC4Jmq3+2AOCFekTfEYj90V MyOscIqwqF2f7iYkQdtYP9kHpnoI8u+1sc8x87J1Kqb4fc7kUYU= =1VJl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_DCBA28B0-93E9-4995-A68A-72FBC7A0BD89-- From nobody Fri Nov 3 09:53:36 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5298C13FEF9 for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 09:53:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.699 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d7LQL8toPJ35 for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 09:53:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wm0-x22a.google.com (mail-wm0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 111F513FEF4 for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 09:53:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id p75so2765491wmg.3 for ; Fri, 03 Nov 2017 09:53:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=qOhigfZwkIWOCoMcsKFIPtplWKbB/iJFlxWxB/56XK4=; b=lUNcBqJ1tAG2gc5IwTnEmZvPM82RF6YXoamCVbawJEOszJOnk9hysUBwdoacVU394s NPBU5ilehTJ/e4HtcHX4+BMrAS35zjxoY5Oe9stnsiK7lPkiMhYB6NeBG6gYacBM6MG7 HsvDn9Y486RCqWCbPom4rG6rS++rQRPgYuMeUKmahELHwVcvdgp+mIiqOyJpyEX1EoY7 EKVpvKmKBiabfnFCHP19uIH9Tf0OKfnepbUplTSI93yDMkV2Ou+olN5nDfqVr7kId64I v9Vv37FHqJC7YOpsMMzGW3WVsCMSBy+x2s8CqQRUqwGaBfT6u+eqFQ1WnUN4P3F0Uklz KT0Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=qOhigfZwkIWOCoMcsKFIPtplWKbB/iJFlxWxB/56XK4=; b=JHxTpWq0JsfrOikToOJzcYbzK+pFxSM0IWnIIjOFmBzm73Ai7Pi/fXBCi2pz4uGTaV 5x0kdeHHGGyAMvV3YRbUFO2QuxCgKM8/XFTDijhjEaDKn33AXZHqdrTll7dljBHg6+gw KGRmZ0XTWVMJkTGcutdMzWlklOwS1ImO8tVm1/f3I/PyNB1aoh0Vkz3AJC+O9cTt3M6g O0lCe/gNkc7bpy1MjO3HWIGz242KU6y0do4dTrh9Riombj8YuTu/ym1w44AKmy//ML5B ldhY783AUkx14qDnClaJqHVbgsglZ+qGA8lPVQr9TLLfOXONpiUCfMYKMUUas2NbI/J5 3o8Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaVkdHv5XXUMb3KPXF74jgz/47EDgjugBVyt2aC83F1ULa6OffiJ yGY95zP9h606T73NuI1AbyA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+QWkk8pru4USJRyT/jQISJxnSy+SpEo2OWpNgK3mAwUM2D8o/jhmZLoCNZlhdPQa/EYUoYk3A== X-Received: by 10.80.186.194 with SMTP id x60mr9689478ede.77.1509728010613; Fri, 03 Nov 2017 09:53:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:4d01:db10:a94b:ddac:6f5e:306a? ([2601:647:4d01:db10:a94b:ddac:6f5e:306a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e25sm5416239edj.28.2017.11.03.09.53.28 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 03 Nov 2017 09:53:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Bob Hinden Message-Id: <6372598C-47E9-45CA-B8BA-51F938B9BE0D@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_9E3AB6AB-58FB-4611-AE6A-A1765A43CF90"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 09:53:26 -0700 In-Reply-To: <30a20349-6520-e16a-cb3f-c38abe343de1@levkowetz.com> Cc: Bob Hinden , Adam Roach , Tools Team Discussion To: Henrik Levkowetz References: <6237fa60-9b21-e5b4-d91a-95bfd4d09642@nostrum.com> <30a20349-6520-e16a-cb3f-c38abe343de1@levkowetz.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] New meeting materials management page X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2017 16:53:34 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_9E3AB6AB-58FB-4611-AE6A-A1765A43CF90 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Henrik, > On Nov 3, 2017, at 7:36 AM, Henrik Levkowetz = wrote: >=20 > Hi Adam, >=20 > On 2017-11-03 15:18, Adam Roach wrote: >> I notice that the old meeting materials management page >> now leads to a new >> destination . Under >> the previous tool, Area Directors were able to update meeting = materials >> for any of the working groups they managed (and it may have been = broader >> than that -- it might have been any WG in their area or any WG at = all). >> Under the new tool, this ability appears to have been removed: I = can't >> perform any actions for any of my groups. >>=20 >> Was this removal intentional or an oversight? >=20 > I think this is an oversight. >=20 > And irrespective of that, if we think it's right that ADs should have > this ability, then putting it back is easy enough. I'll do a patch. I am not sure why ADs should be able to do this. Seem to me that if ADs = are having to do this, then there is a bigger problem with their working = group. It clearly blurs the AD and WG Chair relationship. Bob >=20 > If a reason to not permit this comes up, it's easy enough to back out > again. >=20 > Henrik >=20 > -- > Tools-discuss mailing list > Tools-discuss@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss >=20 > Please report datatracker.ietf.org bugs at = http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb > or send email to datatracker-project@ietf.org >=20 > Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at = http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues or > send email to webmaster@tools.ietf.org --Apple-Mail=_9E3AB6AB-58FB-4611-AE6A-A1765A43CF90 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEm0rfRsOCoyamPexGrut0EXfnu6gFAln8nwYACgkQrut0EXfn u6jKuAf/dJjYKqJ2Syp+pLwjZGsQdkJhDC9IMOVTlnMgBXWD1ifZYiva54s73x64 vwacStS1rN/zECl9kRXRH5yDWmj1iNR7F8rTdymBAYZB5wlaQN3964Xd+3JcjK7Z EsycvrWsGCS+PWI7WrJNhocYrkLcQ37XHGhJFxQk8AAz1tk001zq09gsT/1wsyu1 I8s02YHgqr07ZDjvLLWzJUYnR0i6Hc7XZZdvepFI+UMzDaLL/T162UHsjwufiQqe t4VAIS5J3JAWMa3TVTaRwh5JtkDva4ClSlvq7f/BzAfcwG+swAkRuJVoglzFR29E 3wKJgPtlvj4Qrk58SQfhqmE8W1+ptQ== =EDhe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_9E3AB6AB-58FB-4611-AE6A-A1765A43CF90-- From nobody Fri Nov 3 09:56:37 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C2E613FECC for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 09:56:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O5jsX-cT_f7Y for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 09:56:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2395E13FDEF for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 09:56:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de Received: from submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::b]) by mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id vA3GuTqU024967; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 17:56:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from pptp-218-1.informatik.uni-bremen.de (pptp-218-1.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.218.240]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3yT7QN6JmXzDXZn; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 17:56:28 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) From: Carsten Bormann In-Reply-To: <6372598C-47E9-45CA-B8BA-51F938B9BE0D@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 17:56:27 +0100 Cc: Henrik Levkowetz , Tools Team Discussion X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 531420987.496226-64472a19839c4cfa921d50f6eb52835e Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <40B19CB4-23BC-4106-A2B6-BC69752F5C97@tzi.org> References: <6237fa60-9b21-e5b4-d91a-95bfd4d09642@nostrum.com> <30a20349-6520-e16a-cb3f-c38abe343de1@levkowetz.com> <6372598C-47E9-45CA-B8BA-51F938B9BE0D@gmail.com> To: Bob Hinden X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] New meeting materials management page X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2017 16:56:35 -0000 On Nov 3, 2017, at 17:53, Bob Hinden wrote: >=20 > I am not sure why ADs should be able to do this. ADs sometimes stand in for a chair that may be unavailable for a = meeting. (Yes, that also blurs the roles somewhat, but when I have seen this the = damage has been limited.) Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe, Carsten From nobody Fri Nov 3 12:04:31 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95C4313FF4D for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 12:04:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pb1xRpFTiELV for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 12:04:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pf0-x232.google.com (mail-pf0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCAE213FF4A for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 12:04:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf0-x232.google.com with SMTP id a8so2858482pfc.0 for ; Fri, 03 Nov 2017 12:04:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:organization:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gmsyyFdvSnHaETUvNau8zfyGNxSiThVjJCcqKNntf9w=; b=Z70eGLYD0an0fk6iUpjnh5/Q88UjuwRWVaDFPyqFI7MF9KImxOMWw5z8S5OkqycqpY EDwADjvzfPIa2Jnh6KCotxOQgNFGigEXITz1Hp6USAxFPCAFgDse9U2j4+MMk+DxizCw 4iEcFyREpwshLvraI1T+pBRhncf1bGmxmktLf7HWLalK4UCTOADKWlYgVZjPL9Zi8pe5 lPk+T7ofBS1uSd/9s4tDPnQKT5KDNU8ES1u/pKHTSbLG/w6wDGO/ok+TBmYhbvwRoA57 V5OTJOtqptkwhUdvyygbqXG7uZHGN/QZj9gW/d14EJZST1qmIUSmVaxBd4zpOrtA2KyU qfGA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gmsyyFdvSnHaETUvNau8zfyGNxSiThVjJCcqKNntf9w=; b=HBWyfVRPV1c3qEOZ/Cs3PYGRUHtqIEuUqR4iW4MmF4OeC7OVxIzcsea+m+Tk6NQQbm 4sUwIOuxSm4eVQsl5VqpWuYc/BLSmntuw18eY2uML/ozUyFPj5u12GIjkcfqoNZwWSyA e227ZQ2kA6RDLZbpw81CpGAlTHtjmlnZcvnDKPhR0Ev3uISUnY3dm7lxH/5Oq+drPXlH oqJUXbrLC+1zShTrPAHFxXNX6Pf7frUn+1cBXmhC7h+X0trHWYBgIsDFt6lxVvnOboUg QUY7fdEorQNKq/eFS4ZO/WKa/rV8kJgsH/3ZMNVNX7RXiwkgMT5lQdLhdfzOZgUolmnN vGqA== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaX//iR0df8BvW4yvIeym7c9222WmHWisKqwoy7axJbVfILBpe3u N3QAmPKiaURud+KHXjmXh3Ax0w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+Q6y5EgVI8YxQDCEHlOL54ZdpMRD2miqSptb3bvEnHulBIft6mjLptdQZb1jCBNa9vuisfEFA== X-Received: by 10.98.242.78 with SMTP id y14mr8745900pfl.189.1509735867954; Fri, 03 Nov 2017 12:04:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e001:3d21:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781? ([2406:e001:3d21:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d2sm11036584pgu.86.2017.11.03.12.04.25 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 03 Nov 2017 12:04:26 -0700 (PDT) To: tools-discuss@ietf.org References: <6237fa60-9b21-e5b4-d91a-95bfd4d09642@nostrum.com> <30a20349-6520-e16a-cb3f-c38abe343de1@levkowetz.com> <6372598C-47E9-45CA-B8BA-51F938B9BE0D@gmail.com> <40B19CB4-23BC-4106-A2B6-BC69752F5C97@tzi.org> From: Brian E Carpenter Organization: University of Auckland Message-ID: Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2017 08:04:33 +1300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <40B19CB4-23BC-4106-A2B6-BC69752F5C97@tzi.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] New meeting materials management page X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2017 19:04:30 -0000 On 04/11/2017 05:56, Carsten Bormann wrote: > On Nov 3, 2017, at 17:53, Bob Hinden wrote: >> >> I am not sure why ADs should be able to do this. > > ADs sometimes stand in for a chair that may be unavailable for a meeting. Or whose laptop has just broken or whatever. I can imagine numerous unplanned events making this feature necessary. > (Yes, that also blurs the roles somewhat, but when I have seen this the damage has been limited.) If an AD uses this feature to do something egregious, we have much bigger problems anyway. Brian From nobody Fri Nov 10 21:04:55 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0F0A12895E for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 21:04:54 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.879 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.879 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i6HiJ2shMCsa for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 21:04:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31AA51200C1 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 21:04:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from dhcp-9e6d.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-9e6d.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.158.109]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id vAB54lws004155 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 10 Nov 2017 23:04:50 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com) To: Bob Hinden , Henrik Levkowetz Cc: Tools Team Discussion References: <6237fa60-9b21-e5b4-d91a-95bfd4d09642@nostrum.com> <30a20349-6520-e16a-cb3f-c38abe343de1@levkowetz.com> <6372598C-47E9-45CA-B8BA-51F938B9BE0D@gmail.com> From: Adam Roach Message-ID: <99a42878-02b0-b8e9-f7f0-04ecc8325d3e@nostrum.com> Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2017 13:04:47 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <6372598C-47E9-45CA-B8BA-51F938B9BE0D@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] New meeting materials management page X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2017 05:04:55 -0000 On 11/4/17 00:53, Bob Hinden wrote: > Henrik, > >> On Nov 3, 2017, at 7:36 AM, Henrik Levkowetz wrote: >> >> Hi Adam, >> >> On 2017-11-03 15:18, Adam Roach wrote: >>> I notice that the old meeting materials management page >>> now leads to a new >>> destination . Under >>> the previous tool, Area Directors were able to update meeting materials >>> for any of the working groups they managed (and it may have been broader >>> than that -- it might have been any WG in their area or any WG at all). >>> Under the new tool, this ability appears to have been removed: I can't >>> perform any actions for any of my groups. >>> >>> Was this removal intentional or an oversight? >> I think this is an oversight. >> >> And irrespective of that, if we think it's right that ADs should have >> this ability, then putting it back is easy enough. I'll do a patch. > I am not sure why ADs should be able to do this. Seem to me that if ADs are having to do this, then there is a bigger problem with their working group. It clearly blurs the AD and WG Chair relationship. The reason this is important for me this time around is that I have both chairs for a WG unable to attend the meeting this week. Rather than adding the people running the session to the WG as chairs -- which seems a bit odd -- I'm uploading materials on their behalf. This seems a perfectly reasonable use case. /a From nobody Sun Nov 12 03:11:02 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEEB5129410 for ; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 03:11:00 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.699 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xW7hXBDj-5hc for ; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 03:10:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wm0-x235.google.com (mail-wm0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19AF9128D44 for ; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 03:10:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm0-x235.google.com with SMTP id v186so1366784wma.2 for ; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 03:10:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=E4y0fs8gXO3VahqDB20W+uvlJo3UbldNIVkVEoBd8O0=; b=Rlx6kTPhF/+ZgfnBOP2Bg3v6rf9rnMmxXAZJYsWgFzQyXHhYaG0ztJjTqhFy9GbvoI Iy+3HrHheYFqfbpgjEjW6eaPNzgFtdwjjZ6xac/BDwjP6tv/dIH7U9inqgTTwtDnyBGj 8F/nBnl/7wlA4bNKxStyVtPlpeOftMEepk8Wq11QIZQ8FcluNs1stHaD74J0Zpe5DeSS rQQcNuCUXXd7c9b71SPEbbF1ZOk8QyR7JxxefmT5Xb3g2BZzVlEmB9owTCPveiSf1L3I 4oT1Kj7l0ujNme/jjlcJcVNFVjOrFqON62NwyS2I8P9cMeRSZGb76gMCfVNfKvwJQbRe mBDQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=E4y0fs8gXO3VahqDB20W+uvlJo3UbldNIVkVEoBd8O0=; b=Un/KMMKJsh8twYBve6dY2C2gpn2dUSBdM4Ta4GObuFoqZtq/CtB0cvNZBzT+YJ9e/x y9GNMam8lLvBolHTQlgNk2NuCz/xiYJ0C7BOmHR5MqKFm/dliAtDkniql/tJJSBOY0nh aYhIn53gjzypCD+99A/vF14Q3bQRoINE98nTecITK4zK0NXdZYeqlpOj1y2bkSUHbabr tMuYfrPvUgaTxO8haMlXXQmKvooEhCbnIQ0/noy+s/7PDIAq4XfJD/aW9+CUc28Vys+i /rAbFfwbtV5NgEX+l07jW/Z0pLasMuwga5gsP2W6wgFr9638XoAvaY15nPJDWEiBixY+ maqQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX5HBH/4JkypTHxerOw/sngWm8C6snXPoUkPKp+IvBXI6rgbORAn yFQW20vmXgL1uQXgOO87736QPwb9/dIh849z0KSNEA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMZTlBLNuC5wo/VzN4VwIWUkKSGHBcVKjBTlW1lJQnxW2Ds8Mo//jTb69UMk+WkSR0QiwZwXp2UQbZpN6crVaEQ= X-Received: by 10.28.30.151 with SMTP id e145mr3718304wme.8.1510485056541; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 03:10:56 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.196.169 with HTTP; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 03:10:56 -0800 (PST) From: tjw ietf Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2017 19:10:56 +0800 Message-ID: To: Tools Team Discussion Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114b2efc3bdf3f055dc7352d" Archived-At: Subject: [Tools-discuss] Materials issue with multiple session per meeting X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2017 11:11:01 -0000 --001a114b2efc3bdf3f055dc7352d Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi We ran into an interesting issue with our IETF99 proceedings. We had two sessions for DNSOP and the second set of minutes don't always appear. If you look in the session area, both sets of minutes exist: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/99/session/dnsop But if you look here, only the minutes from the first session appear: https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/dnsop/meetings/ tim --001a114b2efc3bdf3f055dc7352d Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi

We ran into an interesting = issue with our IETF99 proceedings.=C2=A0 We had two sessions for DNSOP and = the second set of minutes don't always appear.=C2=A0
If you look in the session area, both sets of minutes exist:


But if you look here, only the minutes from the = first session appear:
=C2=A0


tim
=
--001a114b2efc3bdf3f055dc7352d-- From nobody Sun Nov 12 16:14:15 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ED5E126D3F for ; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 16:14:10 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pyS1zYMXX6gC for ; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 16:14:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-pf0-x22b.google.com (mail-pf0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E23B1200C5 for ; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 16:14:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pf0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id a84so5715863pfl.0 for ; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 16:14:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=to:from:subject:organization:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6+wa72D0Ie/XU0Tiwlw0WutcyZN2X+aEaOczFpLwynQ=; b=drMK1YV37HLbVW7vvT207YUt07Mp4FQhj4zhIrXfYuVCEdXklnbhLC6GT6CGNUVNvn mVjtkH01h1ZArLLPv2E/WowD/PUo7EPgHa/RalQebfIOxLfcyqsilt/Zqh/5v3zT8zcC /NkDWmJJoZOZilUWF9MJYCXby5Xc8f7mAIdmWbFbot8Zrprr5MYsejL6FtYTr0U31xNb suUTEjHpKxfhJDn3aVFXhtwV6do8+6++WVTd9eYEuDBhn+RZPdIFl1SFLEkG4NNiLlNc oDS7VVYJem/aVCPijErOytXU7GRXo7jE9pfUcHN3ay1jlaFHJKeg73quEMCs8VIOWPb7 VO5g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6+wa72D0Ie/XU0Tiwlw0WutcyZN2X+aEaOczFpLwynQ=; b=KGMI1IrDQQpVqfIRgUrD6JP1Kk266r0R7P0YqXwCb2BUdJiDPy10M384R3Yr0FtEgb FWIQNju0yWLyBgdkbQshVG1H7d7aIVBV50DpcuUE+Ewa7wbOIPkKdTuh/N6oiJuPLxSB wbVEfBuF1HJLuJJVnsyEmRtO6wgDUEAyoxQxAIQjGSysJhfj3Z6hbWo6R+AsEtzqORyP Vtn/c60YoewM8H6frslDF9gX8HZ13g2YhwmKYKvtlqIartKaZviWGZ5D6+lH77AykQ3n 46Jd51R2fV6JmgGMWlY282fuFCkBXqtkueP0zkW5AnpArMdhEF2WXDfzgabDOhFAnG5C VS5Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX4AR66fR2GygRRtk78Wl8a/qy9b2TyZz4IFg5YrF7aDXCZwbSCF j7Ei5E7i1ibboTKIPMR8Frn80QX0 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMZ327cTMjF1uKaSvICK4YJhGfuEjnjXAAnPv82CsWcsKWX1phJetbTf/Fql0cV/4yowU7oFXw== X-Received: by 10.159.244.4 with SMTP id x4mr7163664plr.31.1510532048398; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 16:14:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.16.132.82] ([101.100.166.3]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o65sm22874717pga.71.2017.11.12.16.14.06 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 12 Nov 2017 16:14:07 -0800 (PST) To: Tools Team Discussion From: Brian E Carpenter Organization: University of Auckland Message-ID: <46d52dca-a08a-34f2-0cfb-5d65e65520f2@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 13:14:04 +1300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Subject: [Tools-discuss] Archaeology: draft-ietf-iab-case-for-ipv6 X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 00:14:10 -0000 Does anybody know why draft-ietf-iab-case-for-ipv6 is unknown to the data tracker? It went at least to version 06 (December 1999). Brian From nobody Sun Nov 12 19:03:11 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D99112700F for ; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 19:03:10 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.88 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.88 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qhgrrCwkEZpt for ; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 19:03:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0245A1241F5 for ; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 19:03:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from dhcp-9935.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-9935.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.153.53]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id vAD336fc008023 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 21:03:08 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com) From: Ben Campbell Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_6630941C-D84F-4784-806F-B540717AC10B"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.1 \(3445.4.7\)) Message-Id: <131F1CBE-1F49-4141-B628-F9948F4D0493@nostrum.com> Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 11:03:04 +0800 To: Tools Team Discussion X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.4.7) Archived-At: Subject: [Tools-discuss] 500 responses from mail archive X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 03:03:10 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_6630941C-D84F-4784-806F-B540717AC10B Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Hi, I=E2=80=99m seeing 500 responses when trying to search from the first = page of the mail archive. Are other=E2=80=99s seeing it? Thanks! Ben. --Apple-Mail=_6630941C-D84F-4784-806F-B540717AC10B Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEExW9rpd7ez4DexOFOgFZKbJXz1A0FAloJC2gACgkQgFZKbJXz 1A0sGRAAuqJgiic/W38Fj7VnHLdll7atL3DyN0NF7ALQuB29QALBaAcUQXPpIUp9 HatZz87xbiS6dTJg8do6fQxg4PnKs8T+0fZARwCDKvihhirVKmkSJHnIj9hJpPMY aiC0yGeXl7dMKl4vlOuKl1hE1/dl5rKxh7CoLxZKPqM+mi0lRTSeZhxT0L5eQYIh KZrtdMODpG47Wv9Mae5Mq7HRUzsqjx86T4JiE3w/r7l/mhuIE2NLF5CQCnTDjbOA qsYDk0XmT9yb5nq7Z3eI0ZjS++vyqANMvG8w0t0+mHTeqnmIGP867OdsiAna3Sq4 4RNQaWw3Aa1EI6LTId+15XnE3Ofura6t6H4EfIP7qqkp1xpDrYcJUisvFdec9eIb ZaucZI8oGHF2aTLIKR8B+tB9bLf82ZhMw1vXnbfIKchic8yqf/u6hImqYEaA+c8C CNc5SKq77wPPXNnqkaZqVr5mkkjbriTtBOntUDmr+11GPDNE4QdsEyTMxf2KE9fp x2eaQfi2TBitTeaHxuTeg0ZdeRUysYQhx2ExF2LFtzbYapauQL+USG/b1LIrYhzz wi4CNTWb9qwe/S/84syDNq7mA+cGQwY5o4VRJFqmMgLC7SuniaNapxsrxQPqGHft j3be1lOGXcWMpQl+KhCTjpo3yRiU56MakAbxnpFSGC5o+BNdgUM= =o3NO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_6630941C-D84F-4784-806F-B540717AC10B-- From nobody Sun Nov 12 19:10:09 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E498512700F for ; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 19:10:07 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.699 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ysKj98noZgVV for ; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 19:10:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35327127A90 for ; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 19:10:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 371211C3F55 for ; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 19:09:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-it0-f47.google.com (mail-it0-f47.google.com [209.85.214.47]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 13C7F1C3F60 for ; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 19:09:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-it0-f47.google.com with SMTP id m191so7714736itg.2 for ; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 19:10:06 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX4ggyDl1dIYFPrZfIO0askNrk+Y940YqatwUDk6J6gGxYbqqrOu pxHb5YLv93F58vR0NflYGsWtBe28HD8wghhRzX4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMY4NgfB8UGqH+jyAhnYotA9S1jpMNBjsz0SvcHei/YPFjjx+pqxnlP3Z7TFz0KvIyiLc1NjSU8KGBlR2D5o9HA= X-Received: by 10.36.217.15 with SMTP id p15mr8916923itg.14.1510542605427; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 19:10:05 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.2.73.88 with HTTP; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 19:09:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <131F1CBE-1F49-4141-B628-F9948F4D0493@nostrum.com> References: <131F1CBE-1F49-4141-B628-F9948F4D0493@nostrum.com> From: Glen Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2017 19:09:44 -0800 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: To: Ben Campbell Cc: Tools Team Discussion Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11375f1e6a29d5055dd49b4b" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] 500 responses from mail archive X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 03:10:08 -0000 --001a11375f1e6a29d5055dd49b4b Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ben - If you're talking about https://mailarchive.ietf.org/, it is working for me= . If something else, please point me to the URL and I'll check it out. Glen -- Glen Barney IT Director AMS (IETF Secretariat) On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 7:03 PM, Ben Campbell wrote: > Hi, > > I=E2=80=99m seeing 500 responses when trying to search from the first pag= e of the > mail archive. Are other=E2=80=99s seeing it? > > Thanks! > > Ben. > > > > -- > Tools-discuss mailing list > Tools-discuss@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss > > Please report datatracker.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ > ietfdb > or send email to datatracker-project@ietf.org > > Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues o= r > send email to webmaster@tools.ietf.org > > --001a11375f1e6a29d5055dd49b4b Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Ben -

If you= 9;re talking about https://mailar= chive.ietf.org/, it is working for me.

If something else, = please point me to the URL and I'll check it out.

Glen
= --
Glen Barney
IT Director
AMS (IETF Secretariat= )


On= Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 7:03 PM, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> wrote:
Hi,

I=E2=80=99m seeing 500 responses when trying to search from the first page = of the mail archive. Are other=E2=80=99s seeing it?

Thanks!

Ben.



--
Tools-discuss mailing list
Tools-discuss@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-= discuss

Please report datatracker.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf= .org/tools/ietfdb
or send email to datatracke= r-project@ietf.org

Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools= /issues or
send email to webmaster@tools.i= etf.org


--001a11375f1e6a29d5055dd49b4b-- From nobody Sun Nov 12 19:18:21 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8833B127876 for ; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 19:18:20 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UUCL2ySWIchK for ; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 19:18:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E2641274D0 for ; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 19:18:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CFFB1C416E; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 19:17:45 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SaiWn_rqYNCV; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 19:17:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from [IPv6:2001:67c:370:128:89d:1688:9c2b:976d] (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:370:128:89d:1688:9c2b:976d]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6C8871C3F60; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 19:17:44 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) From: Ryan Cross In-Reply-To: <131F1CBE-1F49-4141-B628-F9948F4D0493@nostrum.com> Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 11:18:15 +0800 Cc: Tools Team Discussion Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <131F1CBE-1F49-4141-B628-F9948F4D0493@nostrum.com> To: Ben Campbell X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] 500 responses from mail archive X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 03:18:20 -0000 Hi Ben, I=E2=80=99ve seen a number of these errors today. They are the result = of the search index changing during a query. With the higher email = volumes during the meeting this has exposed what might be a limitation = in the search backend. I am looking for ways to mitigate this in the = short term, and a long term solution as well. Thank You, Ryan > On Nov 13, 2017, at 11:03 AM, Ben Campbell wrote: >=20 > Hi, >=20 > I=E2=80=99m seeing 500 responses when trying to search from the first = page of the mail archive. Are other=E2=80=99s seeing it? >=20 > Thanks! >=20 > Ben. >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Tools-discuss mailing list > Tools-discuss@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss >=20 > Please report datatracker.ietf.org bugs at = http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb > or send email to datatracker-project@ietf.org >=20 > Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at = http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues or > send email to webmaster@tools.ietf.org From nobody Sun Nov 12 19:20:08 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCE131274D0 for ; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 19:20:06 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.879 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.879 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25Qw99EWyPvl for ; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 19:20:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C992A128AFE for ; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 19:20:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from dhcp-9935.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-9935.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.153.53]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id vAD3K1kk009860 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 21:20:04 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com) From: Ben Campbell Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_91390FCF-1E24-4DC0-87BC-080623875603"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.1 \(3445.4.7\)) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 11:20:00 +0800 References: <131F1CBE-1F49-4141-B628-F9948F4D0493@nostrum.com> To: Tools Team Discussion In-Reply-To: <131F1CBE-1F49-4141-B628-F9948F4D0493@nostrum.com> Message-Id: <1D75E795-7CDC-4D8B-8801-291DCE4300DB@nostrum.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.4.7) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] 500 responses from mail archive X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 03:20:07 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_91390FCF-1E24-4DC0-87BC-080623875603 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 It seems to be working now. Ben. > On Nov 13, 2017, at 11:03 AM, Ben Campbell wrote: >=20 > Hi, >=20 > I=E2=80=99m seeing 500 responses when trying to search from the first = page of the mail archive. Are other=E2=80=99s seeing it? >=20 > Thanks! >=20 > Ben. >=20 >=20 --Apple-Mail=_91390FCF-1E24-4DC0-87BC-080623875603 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEExW9rpd7ez4DexOFOgFZKbJXz1A0FAloJD2AACgkQgFZKbJXz 1A1S1hAAkHk4MKQF8m1Im3L1ihcRhf/ZsRso9YT1Eqx/tmz9BiP7Rl/Dg/Gcxg3V lDOppd5zGh/5T9b7z/hRdWxT3hxllOfvQSdmlqThnGQD2digVuYTdZZUbtZZ9kHt oGpIs8gNd8+JWvaS0Hic0FBeDeoYm2QKcmDExVRzeBtRjhvCzmaApMYBSIRRu169 YzcJ0v544CYTIvCwPmQ8xJrhD1GFnCR/9BJoeLBdqGckUrrfFK6QOLg/+FYIUWIC lSWTvMcVn23SfVqiBPE+g+OBMb2au0lk+CfLUbocO2MkhbflKNHU368TGykQ45V8 hJ96Nxqlj8YXebxu2Qas3QDf/jW+vHf8e5ricBR+9JumT4jc4/itnVevYei98ZwF KNDXtg8QLWlm081qoslvqS+zrTd1Bu/0hUuSQJVZRg6WAkYrCCW+Q0pxdTOr7VVc CoOoEuk1y57j0VG+m3f78iMQPNgmpRjPezJ4W02EIsKeSTU84B9YsI0cC1E/NOb/ 0pP1dBHX2KpWRqyysz3XRVUGLCSwrETd1L6eGN9vVLtbWdqFX8IyM1yJWCwp+xSv 00OiZswtgGFFF4z0HPhXX+/g0qsxKFgFZSUVDIW2q3LZkXGycnFiZeOuY7vIgYM0 SFxejpxTHjewEaSLVaxcbdZbnQfAoZixKzriStLxPscRn5/uC1o= =4QrC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_91390FCF-1E24-4DC0-87BC-080623875603-- From nobody Sun Nov 12 19:22:33 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8489D128AFE for ; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 19:22:32 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pfu2niHz_k0x for ; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 19:22:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:126c::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D619F1293E0 for ; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 19:22:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from [2001:67c:1232:144:f875:bc4:410b:94e5] (port=61537) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1eE5KN-0007bq-3H; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 19:22:27 -0800 To: Brian E Carpenter , Tools Team Discussion References: <46d52dca-a08a-34f2-0cfb-5d65e65520f2@gmail.com> From: Henrik Levkowetz Message-ID: Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 04:22:24 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <46d52dca-a08a-34f2-0cfb-5d65e65520f2@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="45hakPJ5rtQEhf78Fd9gq2dBo8kNV8oVi" X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:67c:1232:144:f875:bc4:410b:94e5 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: tools-discuss@ietf.org, brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Archaeology: draft-ietf-iab-case-for-ipv6 X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 03:22:32 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --45hakPJ5rtQEhf78Fd9gq2dBo8kNV8oVi Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="wIfNWq04KPwPqkSKwKAKrkCsa6jXEcs9L"; protected-headers="v1" From: Henrik Levkowetz To: Brian E Carpenter , Tools Team Discussion Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Archaeology: draft-ietf-iab-case-for-ipv6 References: <46d52dca-a08a-34f2-0cfb-5d65e65520f2@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <46d52dca-a08a-34f2-0cfb-5d65e65520f2@gmail.com> --wIfNWq04KPwPqkSKwKAKrkCsa6jXEcs9L Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Brian, On 2017-11-13 01:14, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > Does anybody know why draft-ietf-iab-case-for-ipv6 > is unknown to the data tracker? >=20 > It went at least to version 06 (December 1999). One possible way this may have happened is that the list of old drafts known to the datatracker was constructed based on the secretariat-held archives, where the draft exists only in compressed form (.txt.Z files). I believe the -06 version was a tombstone version; but -00 to -05 exist in the tools-held archives. I'll see if I can dig out an old script to add the -case-for-ipv6 metadat= a to the datatracker. Best regards, Henrik --wIfNWq04KPwPqkSKwKAKrkCsa6jXEcs9L-- --45hakPJ5rtQEhf78Fd9gq2dBo8kNV8oVi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJaCQ/xAAoJEE6bV0uPuxcazscP/i2BIhT0la0tcR3K1DXbOOJM Vv9CB4RAz+dNhMaaJpVHMy6ix6InHEs7JhXXRFX8lShQ2otAfp9pSR0UWY7YHyhZ 4E/57kvVtxV0zJmSj/mLTRI5eCvPfQjIsy5ird5VGUKI++k4vyFgk2ekbFdOTgZ9 KxL9lO8U/LzG71GqAtHyK4W30yI8gGgiN+lnKrSSXTvhHLKpmm3PGThZHKFcAf/l Slge6afhRISdKFQfOEUxRgKjkKFG5/jShgyrqM/yJqgEO9JGi4FnSRMVyAzAQcQP rpIGq36y+JcpTHUp8HxgmMWEq4CbTxTGQPslQA8LM9YGRugkl6rm+HRJdkcvKWwn lU5fZylBSX/gF2WYFTOiGgHPrbhkWY+8GAHXWUdH4FVg8lWvJ/xSMrlxkBmaK0eg 8+BPEp0BSU/2Z8W4cGOo1lTXk8e1dNdD43DrKipDsx6hU5mmT3ULYsQa0/rgmrTi pdAbWdy2mH/6JLsEWrMLNZTXMgCiM/BuEt0QmCEon/cpWYMjcGB+qim4L8RIxjGp lvI1i752fmkuikwP7LazX0vXLAY3SSxygjaY/bgTYUzw3YnwjzVcLt+rFzUsUAuH yQViVLB2b3Ybv8ByNhZb8Ck281a14fh/cqxNh/Sl2ilCVnbT4ZyruOd1qTzbwBYn YG8h4lm0N1i4gYNL394w =ExIo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --45hakPJ5rtQEhf78Fd9gq2dBo8kNV8oVi-- From nobody Tue Nov 14 18:00:23 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F54B127275 for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 18:00:20 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MmCZR7fawovr for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 18:00:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA2361200CF for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 18:00:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from [IPv6:2001:67c:370:1998:9430:ded7:d340:5f1e] ([31.130.238.235]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101 [212.227.17.174]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0ME33j-1eQ43s2qIZ-00HLy1 for ; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 03:00:16 +0100 From: Ian Farrer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Message-Id: <0A97AEAA-A4A1-4DC6-9D20-E9277D224E34@gmx.com> Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 10:00:15 +0800 To: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:NfTFMfnupUrNta5Q/eg20DR9xPzmhyBKnLVooWJMwDOdQjqA+d+ SZU9lFDnvHp4wTjJdyBuzivYU605xYXfxIVh0X2AeyaY/hEmkP0/wKzvnTAnQekRoPoEKm3 yUcDwa20VlEyiSnme+O2ic0nk9suHCyfSjrXkQTqDto4USeIrUMN1AuG30nyZNNFea4+0G6 5b0YH+k/Ksh4diLKNHDBA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:8jwnwWWT1K4=:03QEQlzGlcRLaWmMf8Zwtp IyxBYGdIh5f9EEp10Ut+1fX+Ri3zeuCHvoYFgixi+SPNbSzAz25KvhSIRTydoTS43CgneEUWP jkBzc4S8fHkp+noTTwD0e0kB54eUiEJRgMDdnEc0IWEQvtNvjPlC5iIC468WtaBJKekCqTDP6 ZC1VAWvTptGoKi9y10n+dzEWM+t6gdmPG9PCYB1yr9aZMqF95BJnq9U2VZp+gQ/krHQkWD5ko 1QQpZ2WO2Z/FbIJKeCAT48P9EaewFsp6K1n0JcPpGRufZYzJVJo808dASBmc8ei5twu3Z1RGG wmriKMUwFBE9je0ZWlE1m7DydPZ94fEl58WyilVSVgIll6N/rKpXE0s22y7D80iR9JXZAcasn /wKbsxBHWsOzg3pYURbauutkJIUfkpqh9TmMNJkc2VUpuPC6RrU4phnKtteQKjaTDzydql9V6 6F9hRLHMzjYZ1jBfr0OlrRVUQbCk0n6sihz216ZZx8uOa/FoJ0YC5rUcnUMFvFpI4iaIzTSDN L+vkLI/k4oewnWbWWT0ILNhj2bSqT/bl1Lm0/QWeeY3d78cH2X7esA8kKHFdz6XXHBO+WYb6/ 1HBVIdoloduvuEFCvCyVTsNqrnr8womVFxzw0/IoIrkS0GD3YTXIgTkphNiSKQNSerMuf4iRY x1kbRy5SW58ByDLJZNO5p8Gy30VNl1cXB9sqTFpCRsUOe9dQoAGmjoFMXPPbY/xhgvb8GCjAz dBmRirYoGYz1+Xj4Ee/O7fJgkhY6MriIhiKGdVtfDwqyGOSKoBG0owotbs+OkFT2b8cjnbhPt d4bacAvl94xhqMEj/OMvZzrkpdT9aEx7qDPHBr+/W1DlAu28WE= Archived-At: Subject: [Tools-discuss] Idnits-2.15.00 feedback - Spurious Warnings Generated by YANG Tree Modules X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 02:00:20 -0000 Hi, I=E2=80=99ve got a draft which I ran through IDNits. The draft specifies = YANG modules and contains tree diagrams for the YANG modules, which are = in the document source as CDATA within a figure. I generated the tree diagrams using Pyang and they compile without = problems.=20 IDNits gives the following: Miscellaneous warnings = --------------------------------------------------------------------------= -- =3D=3D Line 240 has weird spacing: '...-prefix ine...' =3D=3D Line 241 has weird spacing: '...-prefix ine...' =3D=3D Line 286 has weird spacing: '...-change ine...' =3D=3D Line 448 has weird spacing: '...-prefix ine...' =3D=3D Line 449 has weird spacing: '...-prefix ine=E2=80=A6' =46rom what I can make out (the line numbers in the output don=E2=80=99t = match the contents of the document), these are the offending lines in = the .txt: Line 240 (actually line 285) +--rw rule-ipv6-prefix inet:ipv6-prefix Line 241 (actually line 286) +--rw rule-ipv4-prefix inet:ipv4-prefix Line 286 (actually line 331) +--ro ce-binding-ipv6-addr-change inet:ipv6-address Line 448 (actually line 525) | +--rw rule-ipv6-prefix inet:ipv6-prefix Line 449 (actually line 526) | +--rw rule-ipv4-prefix inet:ipv4-prefix So, this seems to be every instance of a reference to type defined in an = external document (via an include statement), which are mandatory (i.e. = do not have a ?). E.g. no error is thrown up by the following line: | | +--rw br-ipv6-addr? inet:ipv6-address=20 Here are the links to the draft that generated the warnings: https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-softwire-yang-03.txt https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-softwire-yang-03.xml Thanks, Ian From nobody Tue Nov 14 19:33:12 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B082E1275AB for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 19:33:11 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.899 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dJ1mAlPXC9zu for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 19:33:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:126c::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74BE4126CE8 for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 19:33:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from [2001:67c:1232:144:f865:65cf:f8e3:3454] (port=52818) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1eEoRo-0008T8-Km; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 19:33:09 -0800 To: Ian Farrer , tools-discuss@ietf.org References: <0A97AEAA-A4A1-4DC6-9D20-E9277D224E34@gmx.com> From: Henrik Levkowetz Message-ID: <06a5cc56-d4f5-7760-66d4-887559047980@levkowetz.com> Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 04:32:56 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <0A97AEAA-A4A1-4DC6-9D20-E9277D224E34@gmx.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="faX9OAGlvAdGsuAvfK1CUKksM33kUm591" X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:67c:1232:144:f865:65cf:f8e3:3454 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: tools-discuss@ietf.org, ianfarrer@gmx.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Idnits-2.15.00 feedback - Spurious Warnings Generated by YANG Tree Modules X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 03:33:11 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --faX9OAGlvAdGsuAvfK1CUKksM33kUm591 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="kxagceHqNNorwHwCeWMscCMUlKeviRUEP"; protected-headers="v1" From: Henrik Levkowetz To: Ian Farrer , tools-discuss@ietf.org Message-ID: <06a5cc56-d4f5-7760-66d4-887559047980@levkowetz.com> Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Idnits-2.15.00 feedback - Spurious Warnings Generated by YANG Tree Modules References: <0A97AEAA-A4A1-4DC6-9D20-E9277D224E34@gmx.com> In-Reply-To: <0A97AEAA-A4A1-4DC6-9D20-E9277D224E34@gmx.com> --kxagceHqNNorwHwCeWMscCMUlKeviRUEP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Ian, On 2017-11-15 03:00, Ian Farrer wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I=E2=80=99ve got a draft which I ran through IDNits. The draft specifie= s YANG modules and contains tree diagrams for the YANG modules, which are= in the document source as CDATA within a figure. >=20 > I generated the tree diagrams using Pyang and they compile without prob= lems.=20 >=20 > IDNits gives the following: >=20 > Miscellaneous warnings > -----------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- >=20 > =3D=3D Line 240 has weird spacing: '...-prefix ine...' =2E.. Right. Idnits tries to warn about spurious double spaces inside running text, and this is clearly a case where its heuristics failed. I'll have a look to see if I can improve things the next time I revisit the code. For now, after having checked the warnings and concluded that they don't apply to this case, please disregard them. See also https://tools.ietf.org/tools/idnits/about Best regards, Henrik --kxagceHqNNorwHwCeWMscCMUlKeviRUEP-- --faX9OAGlvAdGsuAvfK1CUKksM33kUm591 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJaC7VwAAoJEE6bV0uPuxcafScQALatte+VoQSm4NhEFnl3JbGH oaDGMeSxuGBfJhdP2MLggBIcgcxXojRhMNjAnOp652MI/hTE4p7oUNeErAM3l2Eo 31HJ35AnO06ot0S1c+Q+lnIdHns8ALwCLqqlnyL7lsTvkLQJJOvNNmCfbU1OXnfj ZYbdk9jOmKoKDmGyS4bd3mDKaM4/MaKc+bX0zpk6guJoQjCuWUpzJaWZbd6uuWDW 1x7PMGj0yiphvwhzNy8mBIXhNuM8N1ADEhlicTQg5JaCdYvutAqvOmw1nBBXDdGO rZLz7sxq3yM7Np04hJItS2+NkT6nGQfVnK4NU1jv/CzUPc0ETTBpee7+YpYEJDwW dQE5bkgZxR85ukWSqfzPEDn47bNWgqNFxtJwbb7oXnGhaeRcyesQBsRa5sD79fp0 oV+DkMzocI54XI7KLYFrdNBMWViq2K0yyF1fBBo7UxtzBfegDcsUx8lrfaO0QqF8 nJwaiDlC82V8rjguNUwdI8fXnOjfqiyeL8V82ISMyPRErQfIlC9qzhsVuTnKjw32 E30geC5jyZeLQ1kvTGpym2v2P5f1gWcXF9um6IfkobekHcAElKKLRKxeZUsfmImn 0Ux0dviUCX13qedBzsJ5dbeZZPeXsTaPTZ8ni7uKgOTg/ETvp1IczcxbKL3DmE1v ImZpziQYd4GLSUxZSz4x =3x1k -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --faX9OAGlvAdGsuAvfK1CUKksM33kUm591--