Subject: RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER

From: "Clemm, Geoff" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 12:01:03 -0500

No, we don't currently have standard locking privileges,
but the proposal I support is to add them.

Cheers,
Geoff

-----Original Message-----
From: Julian Reschke [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 10:51 AM
To: Clemm, Geoff; [email-masked]
Subject: RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER

> From: [email-masked]
> [mailto:[email-masked]]On Behalf Of Clemm, Geoff
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 4:44 PM
> To: [email-masked]
> Subject: RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
> 
> 
>    From: Julian Reschke [mailto:[email-masked]]
> 
>    Well, if the set of principals with the ability to unlock the
>    resource is bigger than one, why not report all of them (or a
>    subset whicht the server thinks makes sense)?
> 
> That's exactly what the DAV:acl property would do (i.e.
> the ACEs for DAV:can-unlock).

Yes,

but we don't have a standard privilege for this, right?