Subject: RE: DAV:can-overwrite

From: "Clemm, Geoff" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 00:13:55 -0400

That works for me.

Jason: Can you add this to the 2518 issues list?

Cheers,
Geoff

-----Original Message-----
From: Julian Reschke [mailto:[email-masked]]

So my vote would be to leave the BIND spec as it is, and to add an entry to
the RFC2518 issues list saying that 4xx/5xx response bodies MAY use the
DAV:error format defined in RFC3253. We could then start a separate activity
to specify precondition names for common RFC2518 error conditions (such as
parent collection must exist).