Subject: [Bug 20] lock token example

From: [email-masked]
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 04:11:36 -0700

http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20

[email-masked] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Version|-06                         |-07

------- Additional Comments From [email-masked]  2005-10-03 04:11 -------
Section 9.5.1 uses the right scheme, but an syntactically invalid token. Section
9.5.2 still uses an undefined scheme.

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.