Subject: [Bug 91] New: chapter name for lock token uri schemes

From: [email-masked]
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 23:20:28 -0700

http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91

           Summary: chapter name for lock token uri schemes
           Product: WebDAV-RFC2518-bis
           Version: -07
          Platform: Other
               URL: http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-webdav-
                    rfc2518bis-07.html#rfc.section.6.4
        OS/Version: other
            Status: NEW
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P2
         Component: 06.  Locking
        AssignedTo: [email-masked]
        ReportedBy: [email-masked]
         QAContact: [email-masked]

I think the rewrite of 6.4 may be read as if only "urn:uuid" or
"opaquelocktoken" URIs are allowed. In fact, any legal URI is allowed, as long
as the server makes sure that the tokens it is generating are unique.

Maybe renaming the section to something like "Examples of applicable URI schemes
for lock tokens" will do.

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.