Subject: [Bug 94] New: COPY and the Overwrite Header vs

From: [email-masked]
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 23:24:56 -0700

http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94

           Summary: COPY and the Overwrite Header vs
           Product: WebDAV-RFC2518-bis
           Version: -07
          Platform: Other
               URL: http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-webdav-
                    rfc2518bis-07.html#rfc.section.8.9.4
        OS/Version: other
            Status: NEW
          Severity: major
          Priority: P2
         Component: 08.  HTTP Methods for Distributed Authoring
        AssignedTo: [email-masked]
        ReportedBy: [email-masked]
         QAContact: [email-masked]

"(Extensions to WebDAV might not follow this rule to the letter but	
			must consider backwards compatibility with clients that expect COPY	
			to work this way.)"
      
Fact is RFC3253 does not follow this rule, and with good reasons. Seems to me
that RFC2518bis needs to reflect reality, instead of insisting it's somebody
else's problem.

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.