Subject: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks

From: [email-masked]
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 14:45:23 -0800

http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23

[email-masked] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX

------- Additional Comments From [email-masked]  2005-11-30 14:45 -------
I don't see anything wrong with the spec.  Certainly servers must use any other
valid *URI*, because to use another *URI scheme* alone might make an incomplete
URI and thus an invalid lock token.  I don't recall agreeing to make these
changes in the con call, perhaps this bug was edited by mistake?

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.