Subject: [Bug 210] incorrect statement on PROPPATCH and property recurrence

From: [email-masked]
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 10:20:30 -0800

http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210

[email-masked] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         [email-masked]    [email-masked]

------- Additional Comments From [email-masked]  2005-12-30 10:20 -------
It's true that RFC2518 made no restriction on whether a PROPPATCH could set the
same property more than once.  This might be a good restriction to add, however.
If we do add it, it should be a requirement in the PROPPATCH section instead of
just a note elsewhere.  Let's discuss in some con call.

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.