Subject: [Bug 131] DISPLAYNAME

From: [email-masked]
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:13:51 -0800

http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=131

[email-masked] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|FIXED                       |

------- Additional Comments From [email-masked]  2005-12-27 13:13 -------
I think the proposed wording is problematic:

- it makes the case where a resource has multiple bindings special (the first
SHOULD only applies to this case, and I wonder why)

- the second statement is redundant, if the property SHOULD have the same value
independant of Request-URI, then the rest follows anyway (so if people feel this
needs special mention, then just make it non-normative comment)

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.