Subject: [Bug 72] Review references section

From: [email-masked]
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 13:45:39 -0800

http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72

------- Additional Comments From [email-masked]  2005-12-10 13:45 -------
Another todo for when we're getting to this:

make the reference style for W3C specs consistent, that is either

1) XML, XML-NS and XML-INFOSET, or
2) REC-XML, REC-XML-NS and REC-XML-INFOSET, or
3) REC-xml-20040204, REC-xml-names-19990114 and REC-xml-infoset-20040204, or
4) W3C.REC-xml-20040204, W3C.REC-xml-names-19990114 and
W3C.REC-xml-infoset-20040204.

For readability, I would choose either 1) or 2).

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.