Subject: [Bug 13] new ETag requirements

From: [email-masked]
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 06:34:28 -0800

http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13

------- Additional Comments From [email-masked]  2006-01-29 06:34 -------
> OK, I firmly believe that the right thing to do for RFC2518bis is NOT to
> introduce any new requirements for ETag behaviour upon PUT, and let another
> document define this.

I agree.

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.