Subject: [Bug 210] incorrect statement on PROPPATCH and property recurrence

From: [email-masked]
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 01:12:24 -0800

http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210

[email-masked] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|FIXED                       |
            Version|-09                         |-11

------- Additional Comments From [email-masked]  2006-01-28 01:12 -------
While backing out the change, you also took out the statement about PROPFIND
(which was correct and a good thing to have there).

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.