From: [email-masked]
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 04:02:19 -0800

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

w3.org
Subject: [Bug 230] New: tagged lists and repeating URIs
X-Archived-At: http://www.w3.org/mid/[email-masked]
Resent-From: [email-masked]
X-Mailing-List: <[email-masked]> archive/latest/12048
X-Loop: [email-masked]
Sender: [email-masked]
Resent-Sender: [email-masked]
Precedence: list
List-Id: <w3c-dist-auth.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email-masked]?subject=unsubscribe>
Resent-Message-Id: <[email-masked]>
Resent-Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 12:02:32 +0000

http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230

           Summary: tagged lists and repeating URIs
           Product: WebDAV-RFC2518-bis
           Version: -12
          Platform: Other
               URL: http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-webdav-
                    rfc2518bis-12.html#rfc.section.10.4.2
        OS/Version: other
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: 09.  HTTP Headers for Distributed Authoring
        AssignedTo: [email-masked]
        ReportedBy: [email-masked]
         QAContact: [email-masked]

Draft 12, 10.4.2 says:

"The same URI MUST NOT appear more than once in a resource production in an If
header."

(btw, this is language from RFC2518).

I don't think this restriction makes any sense, so I didn't include it in my
rewrite (see issue 161) of the If header. Note that if stayed in, we would need
to explain exactly when two URIs are considered to be the "same" here (string
equality?).

(opening a new ticket for easier tracking)

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.