Subject: [Bug 217] GULP integration

From: [email-masked]
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 11:50:53 -0800

http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217

------- Additional Comments From [email-masked]  2006-02-08 11:50 -------
Discussed during the Feb. 8 2006 teleconference:

Julian raised an issue with the following paragraph:

 Section 6.4., para. 2:
OLD:

    If an anonymous user requests a lock, the server MAY refuse the
    request.

There was agreement to state this as something like,

There is no server requirement that they must allow anonymous users to take out
lock requests.

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.